Grex Coop10 Conference

Item 123: Minutes from the July 22, 1998 Grex Board Meeting

Entered by scott on Thu Jul 23 20:44:05 1998:

Attending:
STeve Andre (steve), Valerie Mates (valerie) (board), Jan Wolter (janc) 
(President), Misti Tucker (mta) (board), Scott Helmke (scott) 
(Secretary), Dan Gryniewicz (dang) (board), Dan Romanchik (danr), Steve 
Gibbard (board), Mark Conger (Treasurer), Dave Lovelace (davel)

-10,000 Initial Gavel Pounding
Meeting was called to order by janc at 7:48 pm 

-1,700,000 Treasurer's Report (aruba):  last month had $1300 income, 
about $600 expenses, so about $500 ahead (thanks to our anonymous $600 
donor).  4 new members.  July so far is looking OK.  Auction is going on 
currently, about 50 items so far up for sale, more to enter.
Need to recalculate power usage, too.

 (see note)
-12,000,000 Publicity (mta):
mta had nothing to report.  Valerie delivered a box full of business 
card sized flyers (400 pages of 10 cards each) for people to pass out.  
Also, the Observer reporter seems to have disappeared, no idea if the 
story is going to happen.

-26,000,000 Technical Committee:
Valerie has gotten msql working reliably, and is working on putting in 
nuget data.  Valerie has also installed ytalk and the mutt mailer.  Some 
discussion of automatic mail to recent users.  The Grex console has 
become unreliable, has been replaced.  HVCN is currently down, will 
probably move Backtalk buttonons onto Grex since they are small. Mdw has 
Kerberos almost ready.  No progress on mail machine.  Marcus has added 
more antispam measures.  Recent issue with modems not answering, Scott 
has worked on this today.  Scott has found updated Iolan manuals, is 
supposed to work on PPP.

-38,000,000 501(c)(3) issues (round of applause from all present).  We 
now have 501(c)(3)!
The main issues are:
1.  Receipts to donors/members
2.  Fair value of things sold, memberships, auction items. 
3.  Donations of equipment, value to donor (not our problem, donor might 
want to claim a high value but we don't have to give receipts w/ 
values).
Aruba would like to get some help/advice about all of this.  We could 
work w/ Accounting Aid Society for a small amount of money ($25 per 
year).  Aruba moves that Grex authorize up to $50 to join the Accounting 
Aid Society.  dang seconds.
Vote is  in 7 favor, 0 against, no abstentions.  The motion is passed
From advice by Ken Ascher (ken), Grex will not have to pay taxes on 
phone lines (~$30/month).
Memberships may be tax deductible, we need to find out.
Sales tax is not an issue if we sell less than $5000/yr., but if we do 
get past that $5000 we are responsible for sales tax for all of it.  We 
would be very unlikely to get to $5000.
We don't have to pay sales tax in most cases, but payment must come 
directly from Cyberspace Communications, rather than having somebody buy 
things and get reimbursed.
We can't get any savings on electricity since we don't have our own 
meter.

-54,000,000 Cost reductions:
aruba has been compiling numbers, going back to 1993.  Hasn't had time 
to really summarize yet.  Showed a graph of donations and expenses over 
the last few years, which shows a much narrower gap than there used to 
be.  Conclusion is that we now are breaking even, and are dependent on 
fundraisers to stay afloat.  (~$620/month is expenses).
Specific things:
0.  501(c)(3) saves us about $30/mo.
1.  Move ISDN lines off of Centrex.  Monthly savings, but an 
installation fee to make the change.  W/o Centrex would save about 
$46/mo.  Need to find out what change would cost (over $100/line).  
Aruba will call Ameritech and ask.
2.  Cutting one or more phone lines.  Each line would save about 
$18/mo., and with installation charges a line would need to be cut for 
at least 3 months to save money.  We could also cut the currently unused 
IC-Net lines, but STeve would like to keep IC-Net lines for mail once we 
get mail machine running.  Much discussion over reasons to not cut lines 
right now, too much disagreement to take any action at tonight's 
meeting.
3.  Updating our electricity payment to reflect current hardware should 
save money.  Aruba will look for most recent figures, which should still 
be valid (scott will measure again if the last figures cannot be found).
4.  Increase membership?  Appoint a new membership chair?  Danr 
volunteers during this discussion.  Janc moved that danr be appointed 
membership chair, scg seconded. 7 in favor, 0 against, no abstentions.
5.  Accept credit cards?  It's now cheaper, but still expensive.  Needs 
to be a Coop item.

-65,000,000 New Business
Valerie is looking for somebody to take over the Agora "selections" 
command.

-135,000,000 Final Gavel Pounding
Janc closed the meeting at 9:38 pm 
19 responses total.

#1 of 19 by keesan on Thu Jul 23 21:21:30 1998:

Is grex paying for touchtone phone lines?  We save about $2/month having
pulse phone service, but it may not be available for business lines. 
Potential savings of another $30/month or so?


#2 of 19 by aruba on Fri Jul 24 03:38:03 1998:

We are not paying for touchtone on most of our lines.  However I am worried
that we might be on the last two we installed in early '96.  I asked Ameritech
to send me a breakdonw of our monthly charges, so I can check that.


#3 of 19 by aruba on Fri Jul 24 04:03:23 1998:

See item 124 for info about taking our ISDN lines off centrex.

I called the Accounting Aid Society today and spoke with a woman named
R. Sue Dodea.  (Apparently people call her "R. Sue".)  She was very nice and
will send us a membership packet.  The membership fee has gone up since the
last time we were a member - it'll be $50, so it's good that we authorized
that much at the board meeting.

The AAS is a non-profit organization founded by accountants to help other
non-profits deal with the various government regulations they are subject to.
Once we are a member, we can call them up and ask questions about the rules.
They also publish a book called the Michigan Nonprofit Management Manual which
has (R. Sue told me) the answer to most of the questions we will run up
against.  It costs $55 for members or $85 for non-members.  She pretty much
sold me on it as worth buying, but I will look at what she sends me before
asking for any money from the board.


#4 of 19 by scg on Fri Jul 24 05:11:24 1998:

I think we now have touchtone on all the lines, because it's a standard
feature of Centrex lines.


#5 of 19 by davel on Fri Jul 24 11:34:22 1998:

Ameritech keeps promising (threatening) that pulse-only as an option will
vanish Real Soon Now.  It's been at least a decade now since the first time,
so I'm not all *that* worried.  (Yep, we avoid that particular charge.  Used
to make attack-dialing Grex very painful, especially those 3 zeroes.)


#6 of 19 by void on Sun Aug 2 22:03:20 1998:

   oldcoop 123 <--> newcoop 14.


#7 of 19 by keesan on Mon Aug 3 03:35:38 1998:

Ameritech, some time in the past three years, managed to stop being required
to provide party lines.  I still have one, and there is no other party on it.
So there is some chance they might not be selling new pulse lines, though
keeping the old ones.  (I doubt that anyone is still selling new phones that
work only on pulse lines).  I. e., if they stop selling new pulse lines, they
would probably continue to support the ones that already exist.


#8 of 19 by scg on Mon Aug 3 05:26:33 1998:

If you're not doing Centrex, you can ask for a pulse only line.  They charge
so little for tone that I'm not sure why anybody who makes any outgoing calls
would bother.


#9 of 19 by steve on Fri Oct 2 17:17:05 1998:

   I don't believe that it costs anything for touch tone service on a Centrex
line.  Thats what I remember ken K at Ameritech telling me when we got the
Centrex order put together.  It was part of some package that we needed for
the lines, so essentially it was free.


#10 of 19 by aruba on Fri Oct 2 19:04:00 1998:

Or rather, "unavoidable".  :)  Yes, I believe STeve  is correct.  We pay $2.26
per line for "Intercom charges", which I gather allows us to transfer calls
easily and do lots of other stuff we're never going to do.  But according to
the woman  who broke down the bill for me, we can't choose not to pay for it.


#11 of 19 by rtgreen on Mon Oct 5 02:12:42 1998:

You've touched another hot button of mine.  Ameritech is still selling
pulse-only lines, and charging extra for the touch-tone 'service'.  The
truth is that DTMF tones are easier and quicker to detect, and thus place
less load on the switch's CPU resources during call setup.  It is
therefore cheaper for the phone company if we use tones rather than
pulses, but they charge us more!
  I do know some people who refuse to pay the extra charge, and have hung
on to their old rotary phones for all these years.  I've had to train them
how to get a modern phone, and switch it between pulse and tone modes, so
that they can use audio response units.


#12 of 19 by davel on Mon Oct 5 12:04:30 1998:

We refuse to pay the extra charge, but all our phones except one are
switchable.  Ameritech has several times, over the years, warned us of an
imminent mandatory change to tone dial at the higher rate, but never yet
followed through.  I find it especially repugnant in that no longer having
to support pulse dial ought to save them quite a lot of money.  (I mean, in
addition to what rtgreen said about tone's being cheaper in itself; they could
scrap the entire cost of maintaining the ability to interpret pulse.)


#13 of 19 by scg on Tue Oct 6 04:23:53 1998:

I don't think they could scrap maintaing pulse intrepretation all that easily,
given that there are still a fair number of people who have rotary phones,
and that those people often tend to be those who don't adjust to technological
changes easily.

Somebody I knew in the Chicago area a few years ago discovered that Ameritech
there was providing tone service even on lines where it wasn't being paid for.
Presumably that was easier than turning it off.


#14 of 19 by dang on Tue Oct 6 16:39:00 1998:

They don't do that here.  We had a pulse line in our last house, but the 
phone wouldn't work on tone.


#15 of 19 by davel on Wed Oct 7 11:54:39 1998:

Right.  They still don't do it here.


#16 of 19 by krj on Wed Oct 7 15:32:26 1998:

Are you guys on non-Ameritech phone systems?


#17 of 19 by rtgreen on Thu Oct 8 05:19:58 1998:

I for many years did not subscribe to tone service, and found that my
modem and tone phones worked just fine.  About five years ago the phone
company called me and told me there had been a mistake on the billing, and
I owed them for ten years of tone service, since my line had it and and
audit showed that I wasn't being billed for it.  I told them that I had
never ordered it, and it would be fine with me if they disabled it.  We
compromised, and they began billing me for it, and I didn't have to pay
the retroactive charges, and I didn't have to pay an 'installation fee'
for 'enabling' it on my line.  It grinds me to pay for something that's a
benefit to them, but I didn't want to ruin my credit with a huge bogus
retroactive bill dispute.  It's a racket!


#18 of 19 by tsty on Fri Oct 9 02:10:12 1998:

...or line noise <g>.


#19 of 19 by dang on Mon Oct 19 21:33:29 1998:

No, I was and am on Ameritech phone lines. (I don't live at that house
any more, and it has since had tone turned on.)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: