Grex Coop Conference

Item 361: Board Meeting - Sunday, September 20, 2015, 9:00 p.m. EDT, teleconference

Entered by kentn on Tue Sep 15 14:47:06 2015:


     Agenda for the Sunday, September 20, 2015 Grex Board Meeting, 9:00 p.m.
     EDT

         1. Call to Order/Roll Call/Determination of Quorum
         2. Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes (item 360 in coop cf)
         3. Schedule Next Meeting.  
         4. Business
             a. Treasurer Set Up 
             b. New Grex Plans/Implementation
             c. Downturn in Validations 
             d. Weekly walk notifications in bbs
         5. Status Reports (Treasurer, Staff)
             a. Treasurer report  Paypal=$1472.69, TCF Bank=???
             b. System report
         6. Walk-in Business
         7. Adjourn

     We will use Google Hangouts for this meeting.  See:
     https://support.google.com/hangouts/answer/2944865?hl=en&ref_topic=29
44848
     You will need a Google+ account and the right computer/cellphone/tablet
     setup to connect.  It is possible to call in, as well, but that needs to
     be done when the meeting starts.

20 responses total.

#1 of 20 by kentn on Tue Sep 15 14:47:43 2015:

If there are any other items for the Board to discuss, enter them here or
let me know.


#2 of 20 by kentn on Tue Sep 15 15:07:09 2015:

The Paypal balance above is from July. We hope to update that number at this
meeting.


#3 of 20 by tod on Wed Sep 16 04:55:12 2015:



#4 of 20 by tod on Wed Sep 16 04:56:09 2015:

Selection of Resident Agent (michigan resident to receive official state
mailings at their non-post office box address.)


#5 of 20 by gelinas on Thu Sep 17 23:06:40 2015:

Is Mark no longer willing or able to serve as the Resident Agent?


#6 of 20 by kentn on Fri Sep 18 01:34:07 2015:

That's why we switched to TS.  I think Mark is too busy to deal with Grex.
He might be willing to help, possibly, but I kind of doubt he has the time.


#7 of 20 by gelinas on Fri Sep 18 22:59:37 2015:

I hadn't heard that TS was the Resident Agent. I thought he was just the
Treasurer.


#8 of 20 by gelinas on Fri Sep 18 23:10:01 2015:

I thought about starting a new item, but I'll raise the matter here, in
connection with the Resident Agent selection.

Mark's is also the only name on the PO Box access list. We will need his
attendance to change to a new lead, if we want one. I'm going to try to make
the Debrief tomorrow, to talk to him about it. My question, though, is who
else should be on the list? Kent comes to mind, as does Tony. I'm available,
as well.

NB: I am NOT volunteering to be the Resident Agent.


#9 of 20 by kentn on Sat Sep 19 15:46:48 2015:

TS had access to the PO box and was the one renewing it each year ($65
if I recall correctly).  He should have a key.
 
We are very short on Michigan residents in the area to do things like
this.  Note that I live outside Ann Arbor, so checking the box requires
me to drive more than 30 min. to get there, though it wouldn't hurt
to have me on the access list, I guess, just in case no one else is
available to check it.
 
I have the change of resident agent form downloaded.  It is one page
and requires the information of the previous RA (name, address) and
the info for the new RA and a corporate officer/agent signature.
We need the RA information in order to file our yearly MI corporate
update.


#10 of 20 by gelinas on Sat Sep 19 23:47:44 2015:

When I was there yesterday, their new keys didn't work, so they are changing
the lock. So TS's key won't work.

I didn't make it to the debrief, so I'll send a message to Mark with the
details, to see what he is willing to do.

The Resident Agent and the P O Box are separate things.


#11 of 20 by cross on Mon Sep 21 01:34:52 2015:

Due to lack of quorum and technical difficulties, we're postponing this one.


#12 of 20 by kentn on Tue Sep 22 03:48:16 2015:

I'd like to add the PO Box issues we've been having to the agenda when
we do meet.  Also some discussion of the charity in Ann Arbor that wants
to donate to Grex.  Finally, it is not too early to start planning for this
year's Board elections.  4 seats will become open.  


#13 of 20 by gelinas on Mon Sep 28 22:57:25 2015:

This was in my spam folder:

} We are a Network Service Company which is the domain name registration
} center in Shanghai, China.  We received an application from Huake Ltd on
} September 21, 2015. They want to register " cyberspace " as their Internet
} Keyword and " cyberspace .cn " " cyberspace .com.cn "  " cyberspace .net.cn
} " " cyberspace .org.cn "  " cyberspace .asia " domain names etc.., they are
} in China and Asia domain names. But after checking it, we find "cyberspace"
) conflicts with your company. In order to deal with this matter better, so
) we send you email and confirm whether this company is your distributor or
) business partner in China or not?

Do we care about the domain name in China and Asia?

The message was from Jim Gong <jim.gong@webregistry.org.cn>, and signed

} Jim
} General Manager  
} Shanghai Office (Head Office) 
} 3008, Jiulong Building, No. 836 Nandan Road, 
} Xuhui District, Shanghai 200070, China 
} Tel: +86 216191 8696 
} Mobile: +86 1870199 4951 
} Fax: +86 216191 8697
} Web: www.webregistry.org.cn


#14 of 20 by kentn on Tue Sep 29 19:37:26 2015:

If we don't register other variations of cyberspace.X then they are fair
game for another company to register.  Obviously, we are not affilated
with Huake Ltd.  I don't think we have the money and time to chase this
kind of thing around all over the globe.  As long as they don't try to
take cyberspace.org or pretend they are, we should be okay. But, there
will likely be some search conflicts at some point.  We'll need to make
sure they don't try to take over cyberspace.org via some backhanded
complaint process, though.  And keeping our domain registration up
to date would be wise.  That cyberspace.org is worth a lot more than
grex.org.


#15 of 20 by kentn on Wed Sep 30 12:23:03 2015:

BTW, this is a known scam.  For example, the name of the sender or their
so-called domain registry company changes frequently. If you reply,
they'll try to sell you domains, potentially via phone calls.  So, we
should NOT reply to this e-mail.  Just ignore it (delete it).


#16 of 20 by gelinas on Wed Sep 30 22:50:08 2015:

Thank you, Kent.


#17 of 20 by tod on Mon Oct 19 15:42:42 2015:

Thanks Kent


#18 of 20 by gelinas on Sun Oct 25 00:02:44 2015:

Has a new date been set?


#19 of 20 by kentn on Sun Oct 25 12:30:34 2015:

Not yet.  I've been busy with work and yard work.  I did try once but
only got a response from Tod.  I need at least a quorum to make a
decision on when to meet.  Otherwise it's two people meeting who
can't do anything.


#20 of 20 by kentn on Wed Oct 28 19:39:15 2015:

Okay, we'll try to meet online at 9:30 p.m. Eastern time on Friday,
Oct. 30, 2015. 


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: