Grex Coop Conference

Item 346: Nominations for the 2014 Grex Board of Directors (Second Special Election)

Entered by kentn on Thu Mar 20 13:15:16 2014:

 
  Nominations are now open for the Cyberspace Communications, Inc.
  Second Special Election for the Board of Directors, in accordance with
  Article 4, Sections a and b of the Bylaws. Nominations will close on
  March 31, 2014 and an online election will be held April 15 through
  April 29, 2014.

  Terms of office will still begin on January 1, 2014, and are two years
  in length. One seat is up for election.

  Grex membership is a requirement for serving on the Board. Any current
  member of Grex who has paid at least 3 months' membership dues and
  meets state of Michigan eligibility requirements may run for and serve
  on the Board. Candidates who are not members will be disqualified.

  This special election is for one seat left open by a candidate who was
  not a member, and was disqualified in the regular Board election in
  December 2013.

  To appear on the ballot, a person must be nominated in this item by
  March 31, 2014 and affirmatively accept the nomination in this item
  before the start of voting on April 15, 2014.

  Seconds of nominations are not required. Self-nominations are
  permitted.
102 responses total.

#1 of 102 by cross on Thu Mar 20 19:20:59 2014:

I nominate walkman.


#2 of 102 by tod on Thu Mar 20 22:11:08 2014:

I second walkman's nomination


#3 of 102 by walkman on Fri Mar 21 00:11:39 2014:

Thank you gentlemen!


#4 of 102 by walkman on Fri Mar 21 00:11:48 2014:

Oh, BTW I accept.


#5 of 102 by rcurl on Sat Mar 22 20:13:51 2014:

(Nominations do not get seconded, per RRofO.)


#6 of 102 by kentn on Sat Mar 22 21:50:26 2014:

They don't hurt.  They are just not required.  Grex doesn't
follow RRofO to the letter and don't expect it to.


#7 of 102 by tod on Sat Mar 22 21:57:10 2014:

walkman for board of directors.  Are there further nominations for
the board?


#8 of 102 by kentn on Sat Mar 22 22:08:57 2014:

Nominations end March 31, so you have time yet, if you are thinking
about it.


#9 of 102 by cross on Sun Mar 23 22:09:52 2014:

resp:5 Grex doesn't use RR.


#10 of 102 by rcurl on Mon Mar 24 20:15:48 2014:

Yeah, I know. That is why discussions go nowhere.


#11 of 102 by kentn on Mon Mar 24 21:28:29 2014:

RRofO would not help the discussions one bit.



#12 of 102 by cross on Tue Mar 25 13:27:25 2014:

resp:10 Your constant efforts to force your way of doing things on others
is tiresome.


#13 of 102 by nharmon on Tue Mar 25 17:08:24 2014:

I third walkman's nomination. :D


#14 of 102 by rcurl on Tue Mar 25 18:38:32 2014:

I'm not forcing anything. Do you feel forced? You don't seem to be 
reacting like you have been forced to do anything. I just have an 
opinion. Lots of people here have opinions. Your's is one of them. You 
are welcome to your opinion. Why not likewise welcome me to mine?


#15 of 102 by cross on Tue Mar 25 20:55:50 2014:

You are not helping.


#16 of 102 by tod on Wed Mar 26 00:15:00 2014:

Thanks for the reference about no seconds in RRoO (for nominations.)

re #13
 :)


#17 of 102 by kentn on Thu Mar 27 01:36:12 2014:

Are there any other nominations?  This nominating period will
end March 31.

Also a reminder to all candidates that they need to be members of
Grex in order to run (you have up to the start of the election to
make sure of this).



#18 of 102 by kentn on Fri Mar 28 13:41:59 2014:

Nominations end at midnight March 31.  You still have time to nominate
yourself or others for this position.


#19 of 102 by kentn on Tue Apr 1 01:25:41 2014:

Nominations end at midnight tonight.  No nominations will be accepted
for this election after then. 


#20 of 102 by cross on Tue Apr 1 14:57:14 2014:

Looks like walkman is running unopposed.  Is there a need to hold an election,
then?


#21 of 102 by kentn on Tue Apr 1 15:24:18 2014:

The bylaws say we have to run the election, but it would be a formality.
I don't see anything in the bylaws about "if candidates are running
unopposed, the election does not need to be held" or anything similar.


#22 of 102 by kentn on Fri Apr 4 13:19:52 2014:

This special election will be held online April 15 thorugh April 29,
2014.  Now is the time to get your membership in good shape so
your vote will count.


#23 of 102 by tod on Fri Apr 4 16:01:50 2014:

How does one check their status?


#24 of 102 by rcurl on Sat Apr 5 01:16:02 2014:

I'd like to have my membership in good status. Please tell me what
it is now.


#25 of 102 by kentn on Sat Apr 5 01:22:27 2014:

Your membership ran out over a year ago.


#26 of 102 by kentn on Sat Apr 5 01:24:29 2014:

One checks their status by contacting the treasurer and asking.

Or, if you want to do it yourself, recollect the last time you
donated for a membership and if it has been longer than you
donated for, then, no, you aren't a member.



#27 of 102 by cross on Sat Apr 5 01:38:18 2014:

Actually, I think Rane's membership expired a few months ago (December of
2013, as the last time he appears to have paid was for a year's membership
in December 2012).

But the point stands: the way to ascertain your membership status is not to
ask in this item.


#28 of 102 by kentn on Sat Apr 5 02:50:21 2014:

Yup, that is probably correct.  From this point on if you ask me you are
going to hear 'not a member' as that is the most conservative answer I
can give (and most likely to be correct).  Exact answers are not likely
to be found by asking on Grex, unless the treasurer happens to log in
(which is not impossible, but not likely to be a frequent occurrence).
And the best course of action if you want to ensure you are valid voting
member is to re-up your membership now for a year and you'll know for
sure.


#29 of 102 by tod on Sat Apr 5 05:14:27 2014:

Hmm..
https://www.nonprofitissues.com/public/features/point/59.html


#30 of 102 by cross on Sat Apr 5 12:22:25 2014:

resp:29 Talk to TS.  Oh, wait....


#31 of 102 by kentn on Sat Apr 5 16:29:57 2014:

We follow State of Michigan law.  If the State ever asks for a list of
members, we would be required to give it to them.  Board members also
need to give real names, addresses, and phone numbers.  This information
is filed with the State each year in order to keep our corporation
active.  That Board information is a public record.

The treasurer maintains the list of members.  I don't think it would
be a good thing to publicly give out names and addresses if it is not
a requirement.  But we do list members by userid occasionally.  Other
organizations (for example, university alumni associations) often do
list names, but not addresses or phone numbers.

Since we don't have a maintained list on Grex of current members, it's
difficult to provide information for requests in the conferences.  
Again, talk to TS.  As difficult as it may be to contact him, that is
your method of finding what you seek right now.

If you want the membership process to run better, then the Board needs
to do something.  However, anything for improving the membership list
will require the cooperation and timeliness of the treasure even if the
function of maintaining that membership roll is given to someone else
(or a group of someone elses--Grex has in the past had a membership
committee, for example).  Perhaps a membership chair could be elected or
appointed by the Board?

Ultimately, it comes down to people doing things.  This is a volunteer
organization.  If people won't or can't do things, it is difficult to
motivate them.  But we can look for people who are willing to do what
needs to be done.

Right now it's Hobson's Choice for treasurer unless someone else wants
to step up and do the job.

Every time the treasurer position has come up for Board officers, no one
wants it if they need to do the day to day work.  


#32 of 102 by rcurl on Sat Apr 5 17:56:42 2014:

It certainly dosn'thelp membership, and general appreciation for Grex, if
officers are unavailable or don't do their jobs in a helpful manner. It
all hardly encurages anyone to donate money. And then there is a grief one
gets if one talks about it. Oh well, let's see if it's possible to find out
where and how much to pay........


#33 of 102 by kentn on Sat Apr 5 17:57:40 2014:

All the griping and the lack of doing is what makes it unbearable.


#34 of 102 by denise on Sat Apr 5 19:24:04 2014:

It would be nice if we had more people willing to run for the board or
to  at least volunteer to take on some of the things that would help
Grex. It  seems like people are always willing to talk about the
'problems' but not  willing to help. If even a few people volunteered to
take on a project to  make Grex more efficient and an enjoyable place to
be, then even more  people may be encouraged to donate time and money.
And to participate in  online discussions, etc.


#35 of 102 by kentn on Sat Apr 5 20:11:11 2014:

Woulda coulda shoulda. 


#36 of 102 by cross on Sun Apr 6 00:44:01 2014:

resp:34 I agree.  That's why I feel that responses such as resp:32 are
not helpful; instead of offering to help out in some fashion, Rane simply
complains about the status quo.

Not useful.


#37 of 102 by rcurl on Mon Apr 7 17:59:43 2014:

That also doesn't encourage anyone to donate money. 


#38 of 102 by kentn on Tue Apr 8 00:18:09 2014:

So start encouraging people, Rane.


#39 of 102 by cross on Tue Apr 8 08:42:33 2014:

resp:37 What Kent said.  Also, consider the motivation of someone to donate
money when they first come to Grex, and all they see is a bunch of grousing
from the regulars.


#40 of 102 by rcurl on Tue Apr 8 20:16:24 2014:

They'll start grousing on their own, when they see how things are run.


#41 of 102 by kentn on Tue Apr 8 22:56:36 2014:

So, you are volunteering to help with the running of things?


#42 of 102 by tod on Wed Apr 9 04:12:33 2014:

a bunch of bananas
a flock grousing


#43 of 102 by cross on Wed Apr 9 11:49:00 2014:

resp:40 Yeah, ok.  So let us know when you are actually interested in
helping out.


#44 of 102 by tod on Wed Apr 9 15:52:58 2014:

We need to look at the Treasurer responsibilities and accountability with
the board.  There's an obvious disconnect.
Plus, while a PO Box is great for taking donations/memberships - what
are the present day options to make it more accessible?


#45 of 102 by rcurl on Wed Apr 9 17:51:27 2014:

I've served on the Grex board, but got static for suggesting more
business-like procedures. No sense volunteering where I'm not wanted.


#46 of 102 by kentn on Wed Apr 9 18:59:52 2014:

A PO Box is a physical location, so as far as accessibility, you need
to have it close to the person or people who are going to be checking
it.  It is also where we receive the state form we need to fill out
each year, so it needs to be checked periodically.  In the past it has
overflowed and went unpaid, etc. so we need to have someone available
who can check it reliably.  I think gelinas has a key in addition to
the treasurer.

Yes, we need to look at treasurer duties (as you might imagine, this
has been a Board topic of discussion many times over the last several
years).  I think I sent the Board the list of duties that Mark put
together in years past.  It is a good starting place, although some
items are no longer necessary.  The treasurer is supposed to be doing
monthly financial reports according to the bylaws.  That is to be done
no matter how often the Board meets.  It is difficult to see how things
are running if we don't have up to date information on income/expense
and bank balance.  I can't remember the last time we had a financial
report.


#47 of 102 by cross on Thu Apr 10 02:04:43 2014:

resp:45 You haven't served on the board in my memory.  I think you just
like to complain about things that aren't run the way you think they should be
run.


#48 of 102 by kentn on Thu Apr 10 02:16:42 2014:

I don't find any record of Rane serving on the Grex board.  When
was that exactly?


#49 of 102 by tod on Thu Apr 10 04:59:59 2014:

Is the chronology of board members online somewhere?  


#50 of 102 by cross on Thu Apr 10 13:14:58 2014:

It's available at http://grex.org/cyberspace/board.xhtml, but is out of
date. rcurl is not listed, but to my knowledge, he has not served a board term
since that list was last updated.  So I suspect he's never actually served on
Grex's board.


#51 of 102 by remmers on Thu Apr 10 18:25:01 2014:

Rane served one term on the Board sometime in the early or mid 1990s. I 
remember because I was on the Board at the same time. I'm surprised it's 
not easy to find in the record.


#52 of 102 by kentn on Thu Apr 10 18:28:52 2014:

We can update it if we have the right information.  It has been updated
through 2015, but may need a little more updating.


#53 of 102 by remmers on Thu Apr 10 18:30:55 2014:

Apparently Rane was on the Board in 1994. See this: 
http://cyberspace.org/grexdoc/archives/minutes/1994-01-11


#54 of 102 by cross on Thu Apr 10 18:49:57 2014:

I stand corrected, though it is curious that there seems to be no record of
his tenure on the board.  Regardless, his experience is a twenty years old;
it's rather sad that he bases his current statements about how Grex operates
on such outdated knowledge.


#55 of 102 by rcurl on Thu Apr 10 18:55:51 2014:

Re #47: I do like to suggest better ways of doing things. I mostly gave up.
You can see that things are not done as well as they could be by the above
discussion from others.


#56 of 102 by cross on Thu Apr 10 19:02:20 2014:

resp:55 I have yet to see a concrete, actionable, suggestion from
you.  Most of what I see are snarky exclamations that may be
summarized by saying that, if we just used, e.g., Roberts Rules,
all of our problems would disappear.  I think that's laughable.

If you want to snipe from the sidelines, be my guest.  Don't be
surprised, however, if people ignore you.


#57 of 102 by kentn on Thu Apr 10 19:17:06 2014:

I'll see if I can update our Board web page (assuming I can find start and
stop dates).
 
That page is mostly legacy info from whoever put it together previously.
I've just been adding to it.


#58 of 102 by tod on Sat Apr 12 19:43:42 2014:

I was working in Randall Labs when Rane was on the board.  I remember
this because I used to shoulder surf when kermit read Grex and she knew
the who's who of the board at the time.


#59 of 102 by rcurl on Sat Apr 12 20:48:26 2014:

I sent my dues check to the POBox given at 
http://www.cyberspace.org/member.xhtml 

It was returned as "box closed/unable to forward/return to sender". This 
updated knowledge of Grex seems much like me old outdated knowledge.


#60 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 01:21:54 2014:

You can use PayPal.


#61 of 102 by tod on Sun Apr 13 01:21:56 2014:

Has anyone seen the treasurer or is he also closed?
Perhaps the board should re-elect a treasurer with a modification of
duties?  


#62 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 01:23:15 2014:

Again, and again, and again...broken record here: call TS and
find out.


#63 of 102 by cross on Sun Apr 13 01:47:38 2014:

I think it's time to side-step TS and appoint someone new.  Any volunteers?
It makes sense, perhaps, to have someone who is a Michigan resident do it.

Rane?  Would you like to volunteer to be Grex's treasurer?


#64 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 02:12:37 2014:

We certainly need treasurer help.  Any reliable, honest volunteers that
are will to help, would be appreciated.  It doesn't take a lot of time,
but it does take consistent, regular effort to keep things up to date.

I can say though, from the previous to-do getting the treasurer signed
up with the bank, it takes a fair amount of effort to add or subtract
people from the account.

It is good if the person is local or near to Ann Arbor so they can check
the PO Box, and deposit any checks that come in there (when the box is
active).  I think the state corporation renewal form also comes to the
PO Box.  Most other things can be done remotely, I think.

The ability to effectively communicate is a necessary attribute as
is the ability to keep accurate financial and membership records
and produce monthly financial reports (these are not difficult).
Above all the person needs to be above reproach when it comes to the
corporation's bank account.  Other duties include verifying users,
sending membership renewal notices, and providing the list of valid
voters for our elections in a timely manner.

I'd say approx. an hour or two each month would go a long way toward
getting things back on track, though at first it might take more time to
get the information needed and get things set up.


#65 of 102 by rcurl on Sun Apr 13 05:08:57 2014:

Sensible words. However I doubt the job would amount to only an hour or 
two each month. There may be daily communications from users, reports to 
write, visits to the bank with checks, in addition to your list - and a 
lot more time "getting things back on track".

Also, doesn't anyone think http://www.cyberspace.org/member.xhtml should 
be corrected?

So, where do I send my dues check? Someone reading this board must     
know.

I don't have time for a new responsibility. 



#66 of 102 by cross on Sun Apr 13 12:42:00 2014:

I thought as much.


#67 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 16:12:33 2014:

Re 65: Okay, let's waste our time speculating on how much time it takes.
If we were to get 2 hours EVERY month that is way better than what we
are getting now.  Maybe the time investment is more like 5-6 hrs. a
month.  But that is just arguing details when we have much bigger issues
finding someone to do ANYTHING.

It may be that some time every other day, or every 3 days, would be
enough, in which case, the time commitment might be more like 2-3 hrs. a
month.  Some months of the year would be worse than others, of course.
Some months would have no activity at all other than produce a financial
report (the treasurer should verify this rather than ignore the job).

Bear in mind, many of the functions of the treasurer should be available
at the touch of a button (or a command at the command line).  We are
spending WAY more time right now because the treasurer believes in
pencil and paper records.  Every report, every query, every update,
is manually-generated by searching through paper records (and PayPal
statements).  This is unacceptable and a big reason why being the
treasurer takes so much time.  Someone who is organized can and should
REDUCE the amount of time spent by the treasurer.

I would rather a treasurer spend 10 min. each day than ignore our
business for months on end.  What is happening now is that those little
bits of time are not invested. Then a month or two goes by and a simple
task becomes a 10 hour mess to straighten out (and many phone calls by
me--it would be good if others would help with this).  Fire-fighting is
not the way to manage things, if it can be easily avoided (and it can be
in this case).  Some days the only task would be to check that there is
nothing to do.  I doubt that would take 10 or 15 min.

As I've already noted, initially the amount of time would be more
getting set up to do things in a better way. After that, it should be a
relatively easy task to stay up to date if the treasurer consistently
and periodically makes the necessary updates.

Whoever takes this task on should be able to count on the Board to help
them get set up.  It is not necessary that the treasurer be a Board
member, although we will have a Board officer to oversee the treasurer
function, even if that officer is not the day-to-day treasurer.  There is
a list of tasks that the treasurer has traditionally done in an old coop 
conference.  Thus it's not like there are no instructions at all and
no help.

And, as I've noted before, it might work better to split the treasurer's
jobs among 2 or 3 people to reduce the time commitment for any one
person.  Communication in that case becomes very important. We've
allowed some tasks to remain in the treasurer function because the
treasurer has or should have the information to do them.  If that is not
the case, or the treasurer is not doing the tasks, then moving something
like membership management to another person might make sense.  But
handling the money (e.g. membership donations) is still the treasurer's
responsibility, hence the need to communicate and cooperate with others,
if we were to to make such a split of duties.


#68 of 102 by cross on Sun Apr 13 17:08:28 2014:

Perhaps if we used RRoO the treasurer's job would take less time.  (Note for
Rane: that was sarcasm.)


#69 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 18:05:02 2014:

As to the PO Box, that is being looked into (one of those 10 hour
messes I mentioned above).  If we can get our previous box number
working again, fine.  If not, we'll get another number and update the
member.xhtml web page.  If things ran smoothly they would take much
less time.  


#70 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 18:58:11 2014:

In regard to how to get a payment in you have two alternatives:
1. Use PayPal.  2. Broken record time again: call the treasurer
and ask.  I don't know why people act like they can't figure
this out or that they are afraid to make a phone call.  


#71 of 102 by cross on Sun Apr 13 19:33:06 2014:

resp:69 (It's too bad a smart and capable person like Rane isn't interested
in helping out.)  (Note to Rane: that is NOT sarcasm.)


#72 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 19:35:32 2014:

I've put a note on the member.xhtml page to say that our PO Box is out
of service.  Hopefully that will help disuade people from trying to 
send checks there right now.  Note: I brought up the PO Box with the
treasurer weeks ago.  Nothing has been done about so far.


#73 of 102 by kentn on Sun Apr 13 19:37:27 2014:

Re 72:  s/disuade/dissuade/


#74 of 102 by tod on Sun Apr 13 20:16:39 2014:

I've been treasurer for many non-profits.  The first thing to change is
the bank.  Get a national bank where deposits can be done by a phone app.
The board need simply sign a piece of paper at their local branch to
get the ball rollings.  The existing monies can simply be removed by
transfer or check, yes?
As for the PO Box, what is the purpose of that really?  Can not the
treasurer at the time use a mailing address of their choice so long as
it is made available on the website?


#75 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 01:45:56 2014:

The corporation needs an address and usually it's better that it be
a P.O. Box.  
 
As far as changing banks, we'd need to make sure that we are not going
to get charged fees on our rather low account balance (relative to
most banks' levels for getting free checking).  If that isn't an
issue, then this sounds like a reasonable idea for making the banking
easier.  The fees tend to become one of the biggest expenses if we
get charged them because they occur every month.


#76 of 102 by dtk on Mon Apr 14 05:02:21 2014:

Resp:75

A common technique I have heard from some SMEs here is the corp opens a 
POBox, but has the mail forwarded by the POBox operator (Mailboxes, Etc;
 UPS; & al) forward the mail to whichever officer is responsible for 
receiving and replying to mail. The POBox is opened in the corp's name, 
with multiple individual signers, so if the responsible officer becomes 
incapablr to discharge his duties (or her, I suppose, but women tend to 
keep it together better, and give more notice before dropping out or 
flaking out), the corp board sends orders on corp letterhead to the 
POBox operator to change the forwarding address to that of the incoming 
responsible corp officer. 




#77 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 12:36:58 2014:

Thanks, dtk.  That sounds feasible.  The letterhead bit might be
problematic, though.  :)


#78 of 102 by tod on Mon Apr 14 16:53:36 2014:

re #76
USPS charges $17/wk to do that.  What's the best thing out there?
(I supposed I should check the RV bug-out community forums for mail
forwarding options.)


#79 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 17:13:58 2014:

That's a lot of money to forward mail. 

Now we see why the box hasn't moved.  The thing is, if we can have an
agent in Ann Arbor check the box, that would help a remote person.  We'd
likely spend some bucks mailing important docs from Ann Arbor to the
remote person from time to time, but not $17/month.  The main things
that come into the PO Box are donations which need to be deposited in
whatever bank we use (and relatively quickly), and the state corporate
renewal form.  If the checks can be deposited locally, then it's just
the renewal form that would need to transfer.


#80 of 102 by cross on Mon Apr 14 17:22:47 2014:

At a minimum, we clearly need to have more than one person who has access to
the relevant things (P.O. Box, bank accounts, etc).


#81 of 102 by rcurl on Mon Apr 14 18:05:56 2014:

Grex is a corporation. Corporations must have a registered agent and a
mailing address. Use that mailing address (and give the registered agent
something to do - or even appoint him/her treasurer!).

"(It's too bad a smart and capable person like Rane isn't interested
 in helping out.)"

It's too bad a smart a capable person like Cross has no manners and 
doesn't appreciate both volunteers and those that do not have time to 
volunteer (especially when they have to work with someone always as 
cross as Cross).


#82 of 102 by cross on Mon Apr 14 18:08:12 2014:

Physician, heal thyself!


#83 of 102 by rcurl on Mon Apr 14 18:17:39 2014:

Here is part of the the Michigan record for CC:
(http://is.gd/h2rjPJ)

"Entity Name: CYBERSPACE COMMUNICATIONS
Type of Entity: Domestic Nonprofit Corporation

"Resident Agent: TS TAYLOR
Registered Office Address: 5276 TEXTILE  YPSILANTI TWP   MI  48197

"Mailing Address:   P.O. Box 4432 ANN ARBOR  MI  48106

"Year of Most Recent Annual Report: 12 "

Better get that mailing address corrected - and get in that late
Annual Report for 2013.

Should I send my dues check to the Resident Agent address?


#84 of 102 by cross on Mon Apr 14 18:18:57 2014:

resp:83 Seems to me that you've already been given the answer to that
question multiple times.


#85 of 102 by rcurl on Mon Apr 14 18:33:40 2014:

I have a rerturned (for no valid address) check for dues to send somewhere.
No valid address to send it to have been provided.


#86 of 102 by cross on Mon Apr 14 19:32:55 2014:

resp:85 Seems to me that you've already been given the answer to the
question of how to find out where to send it multiple times.


#87 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 20:24:09 2014:

Rane, you have the registered agent's address and the name of our treasurer.
You can get on the phone and double check as you've been instructed multiple
times.  I really don't get why you can't figure this out and keep asking
the same question over and over.


#88 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 21:37:48 2014:

Okay, the P.O. Box is back in service at the same number.  The treasurer
should have helped Rane with his issue by now.


#89 of 102 by rcurl on Mon Apr 14 22:21:54 2014:

TS popped up at my front door, and I delivered my check to him in 
person. I'm glad, if surprised, that shaking the Grex tree got a result.

(I ask the same question over again because I don't get the answers to 
the question I ask.)


#90 of 102 by tod on Mon Apr 14 22:26:25 2014:

re #88 & 89
Good new, thanks!


#91 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 22:44:06 2014:

You do get answer to the questions you ask, Rane.  Had you called TS,
you would have gotten the issue fixed.


#92 of 102 by kentn on Mon Apr 14 22:50:51 2014:

s/answer/answers in 91.


#93 of 102 by cross on Tue Apr 15 01:07:00 2014:

resp:89

"(I ask the sam question over again becasue I don't get the answers I want
to hear to the question I ask.)"  FTFY.


#94 of 102 by gelinas on Tue Apr 15 02:56:11 2014:

I've set up the files to begin the special election at one minute after
midnight on April 15, and to end the special election at one minute before
midnight on April 19. The times are local to grex: Eastern Daylight Time.

There is one candidate: walkman. (I hope he is eligible of election.)

The home page still needs to be updated to offer a link to the voting both.


#95 of 102 by kentn on Tue Apr 15 12:25:01 2014:

The home page was updated last night to add the link.


#96 of 102 by tod on Tue Apr 15 16:27:37 2014:

Thanks Joe


#97 of 102 by gelinas on Sun Apr 27 18:36:02 2014:

BTW, I mistyped: the election closes on 29 April, not 19 April. So there is
still time to vote. :)


#98 of 102 by gelinas on Sat May 3 00:17:54 2014:

I just looked over the votes; ten people entered the voting booth. Nine people
voted for walkman. So, if walkman is a member in good standing, and any of
the people who voted for him are also voters, then he is elected a Director
of Cyberspace Communications, Inc, for two years beginning on 1 January 2014.

May be, one day, the Treasurer will deign to read his e-mail and send the
lists of voters I requested.


#99 of 102 by gelinas on Fri May 9 02:30:32 2014:

TS sent me an update of the voter list yesterday. Unfortunately, I've not had
time yesterday or today to recount the votes. I took a quick look and can say
that walkman was elected. I'll post the formal tomorrow evening.


#100 of 102 by kentn on Fri May 9 03:15:45 2014:

Thanks, gelinas.


#101 of 102 by tod on Sat May 10 01:12:20 2014:

thanks


#102 of 102 by gelinas on Sat May 10 01:34:12 2014:

I've now formally counted the votes for the Special Election held between
April 15, and April 29.

Ten people voted in this Special Election, seven members and three
nonmembers.  Of the seven members, six voted for walkman and one submitted a
blank ballot.  The three non-members also voted for walkman.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: