Grex Coop Conference

Item 326: Grex in 2012

Entered by mary on Mon Dec 12 20:01:50 2011:

Is anyone interested in running for a seat on Grex's board of directors?  
If so, please volunteer here.  If not, maybe we should plan to dissolve 
the organization in a graceful manner.  This probably means revoking our 
501c(3) status and our bylaws and simply allowing whatever volunteers are 
interested in running the hardware to do so, probably out of one of their 
homes.  Whatever money we have would need to be donated to another non-
profit entity, I believe. 

I, for one, sincerely thank our current board members for all their 
efforts.  Kent, especially.  

But without volunteers the game is over.  Anyone willing to step up to 
the plate and give it a try?  
57 responses total.

#1 of 57 by lar on Mon Dec 12 20:39:14 2011:

for once you and I agree mary. the days of this type of forum are
over.m-net has a superior shell and platform so most of the CS majors
use that as a practice box. grex could have had a part in that but
everyone ignored cross's suggestion to move over to freebsd. Openbsd
just plain sucks.the bbs here has decayed into a few users who shout out
their particular party line and all the good trolling fodder is gone so
I am the only die hard troll left. gone are the heydays of party. even
the system info conf has been laid waste by valerie mates unethical
delete script that violated the stated purpose of grex and all that
because someone suggested that nursing makes your nipples tough.grex was
an interesting place when it ran on sun hardware as that was a bit of a
novelty even those many years ago. you and remmers both have forsaken
grex and no longer entertain with your witty and creative comebacks. 

grex is dead,long live m-net!


#2 of 57 by mary on Mon Dec 12 21:10:54 2011:

I guess that means you're not interested in running for a board seat.


#3 of 57 by nharmon on Mon Dec 12 21:12:21 2011:

What kind of time commitment is involved with being on Grex's BoD?


#4 of 57 by ryan on Mon Dec 12 22:30:14 2011:

I live in Chicago, so I can't volunteer, sorry!
If I was local, I would do it.


#5 of 57 by kentn on Mon Dec 12 23:25:03 2011:

We have had board members dial-in (or Skype in, if that works), and our
by-laws allow for this.  It does make it a little interesting to find a
location were we can have a phone, but it's not impossible.

The time commitment is a couple hours every 6-8 weeks plus whatever
thinking you need to do to prepare for a meeting and answer an e-mail or
two in between meetings.

It might be less time depending on how often the board chooses to meet
and how many issues requiring board input occur between meetings (that
has not been much other than contribute to the agenda and commit to a
meeting date and time).

If you are a Board officer, your time commitment will be somewhat higher.


#6 of 57 by denise on Tue Dec 13 00:48:37 2011:

If we stick with the by-laws, I won't be able to run again as this will 
end my 2nd consecutive term. Of the 5 current board members, 4 members 
term will expire at the end of the month; if IIRC, 3 of us are
ineligible  to run again due to this 2 consecutive term limit.


#7 of 57 by keesan on Tue Dec 13 01:22:36 2011:

How about voting on whether to allow more consecutive terms if nobody else
is running?


#8 of 57 by kentn on Tue Dec 13 01:25:22 2011:

We'd need to change the by-laws for that since the by-laws are 
specific about the number of consecutive terms.


#9 of 57 by ryan on Tue Dec 13 02:06:11 2011:

Well if a "warm body" is just needed, who can participate via skype, I
suppose I could throw my hat into the ring.  However, I do not know if I'd
be qualified, as I have just recently re-joined Grex after several years 
away -- and I'm not really sure what the duties of a board member are anyway.
But still, if it is needed for Grex to continue operating, and nobody else
is willing, I'd do it just to try to keep Grex going -- because I think it
is something worth keeping.  I learned quite a bit of stuff on Grex
"back in the day" ;)


#10 of 57 by rcurl on Tue Dec 13 03:45:51 2011:

One duty of a Board member is to keep Grex going


#11 of 57 by mary on Tue Dec 13 12:26:10 2011:

Thanks, Ryan.


#12 of 57 by kentn on Tue Dec 13 13:02:21 2011:

Yes, thank you, Ryan.  


#13 of 57 by keesan on Tue Dec 13 13:50:50 2011:

Where will grex be meeting (every 2-3  months).


#14 of 57 by glitch on Tue Dec 13 15:35:00 2011:

I can throw my name in the hat as well. Being from upstate NY means it'd be
a remote thing.


#15 of 57 by kentn on Tue Dec 13 16:36:04 2011:

I'll run again, too.


#16 of 57 by mary on Tue Dec 13 16:37:11 2011:

Wow, thanks Kent & glitch.  There is hope for this sucker yet. ;-)


#17 of 57 by keesan on Tue Dec 13 17:04:24 2011:

Meeting place seems to be irrelevant at this point.


#18 of 57 by richard on Tue Dec 13 18:57:18 2011:

The organization cannot dissolve because in doing so, not only would 
the money have to be donated to charity, but the organization's assets 
as well.  Which would principally include the hardware grex runs on.  
How much money does Grex have left anyway?  The ballgame's over when 
the money runs out regardless. 


#19 of 57 by richard on Tue Dec 13 19:06:26 2011:

Actually there is little point in continuing the cyberspace 
communications organization when it does nothing, doesn't have enough 
people for its board, and has really ceased to exist for practical 
purposes. Perhaps Grex should dissolve the corporation and donate the 
box to someone who can keep it in their house and reboot it now and 
again.  A benevolent dictator who will keep running it.

Somebody call Dave Cahill  :)    Easy easy...only kidding about that.  
He'd take the Grex box and throw it into Lake Michigan.  Better find 
somebody else. 


#20 of 57 by jep on Tue Dec 13 23:23:24 2011:

Dave Cahill never did anything to make you think he had ill intentions 
toward Grex.

There are established rules for disbanding a non-profit.  Grex could 
disband, sell off assets, and donate any remaining cash to any 501(c)(3) 
selected by the Board, as long as there is a Board.  If there is not, I 
imagine the assets would be collected by the IRS and probably put into 
storage and forgotten.  I bet it happens pretty often that way to small 
non-profits that cease to have a membership.


#21 of 57 by richard on Wed Dec 14 00:13:48 2011:

re #20 "Dave Cahill never did anything to make you think he had ill 
intentions toward Grex."

Oh I dunno.  When I suggested sometime back on mnet that grex was in 
trouble and maybe arbornet could take it over, he said something 
like 'over my dead body', with a few expletives thrown in.  You got the 
impression he'd do everything in his power to prevent those guys from 
helping grex in anyway.  Well it wasn't an impression, he *said* that. 
Is that ill will?


#22 of 57 by ball on Wed Dec 14 00:39:46 2011:

I'm open to the idea.  It's about time I pulled a
shift just to give a little back to Grex.


#23 of 57 by kentn on Wed Dec 14 02:42:37 2011:

Thanks, Andy.  We've got 4 people running for 4 seats now.  Anyone
else interested in help Grex by serving on the Board?  


#24 of 57 by rcurl on Wed Dec 14 04:24:09 2011:

Don't the articles contain a statement on how assets will be disributed if
the organization folds? I thought that was required of non-profits.


#25 of 57 by kentn on Wed Dec 14 05:38:43 2011:

Are you running for the Board, Rane?  Thanks, we'll put you down for it.


#26 of 57 by bellstar on Wed Dec 14 07:04:20 2011:

On an off note, thanks to whoever did it for fixing cyberspace.org's SSL
certificate. It seems tonster took it upon himself to have a new certificate
issued to cyberspace.org under his name. Thanks to him, too.


#27 of 57 by mary on Wed Dec 14 16:05:33 2011:

Re: #24  The title should probably be "dissolution" but here is what's 
stated in our bylaws.  State law may have some say that would fine tune 
the procedure some.

ARTICLE 8:  DISSOLVEMENT
 
  In the event the membership is unable to support Cyberspace
  Communications, all property belonging to the club shall be
  sold.  The remaining cash assets, after paying final bills, shall
  be donated to a charitable organization, as determined by the
  BOD.  All elected officers shall then be released from their
  obligations and the corporation dissolved.

Thanks, Andy!  Woot!
 


#28 of 57 by richard on Wed Dec 14 17:09:04 2011:

re #27 If grex was required to sell its box, couldn't it continue 
hosted somewhere as a virtual conferencing system?  If we just want the 
conferences, and there's no further need for a corporation, why not go 
in that direction?  


#29 of 57 by tonster on Wed Dec 14 18:55:17 2011:

resp:26: You're welcome.  Unfortunately, I didn't have a choice with the
provider of the ssl certificates on whose name to put there, so that's
how it shows.  It works though, and I don't see a problem with it.


#30 of 57 by rcurl on Wed Dec 14 19:22:19 2011:

Re #25: No, I did that, and found my approach to non-profit corporate
management was incompatible with the established ethos. I'm a Roberts Rulian.


#31 of 57 by jep on Wed Dec 14 21:18:52 2011:

re resp:28: The name 'Grex' has always been presumed to be worth more than 
the hardware.  That is, after all, why the users paid for the hardware.  
The name itself is an asset, and I'd think it would have to be sold just 
like anything else.  Maybe an enterprising or public-spirited person would 
buy the name and continue to offer Grex as a private system, or maybe it 
could be donated to another non-profit if Grex were to disband.


#32 of 57 by mary on Wed Dec 14 21:23:42 2011:

Do you really mean "Grex" or our domain, cyberspace.org.  If the 
organization revoked its 501(c)3 status and wanted to continue using that 
domain, it gets muddy.  The domain is worth money.  The cleanest way to 
do it would be to sell the domain and give that money to another non-
profit.  We could make a case for keeping the domain as we had it before 
we gained non-profit status.  But I don't see "Grex", the name, as having 
any value at all.


#33 of 57 by ball on Wed Dec 14 23:44:45 2011:

It has great intangible value to some of us. :-)


#34 of 57 by ryan on Thu Dec 15 04:44:33 2011:

If there are ever sufficient people running for the board without me running,
then I would withdraw my bid for it ;)  I don't think I'm the best person
for it, but I will do it if absolutely needed, and nobody else is willing.


#35 of 57 by mary on Thu Dec 15 13:27:37 2011:

I think there are probably a number of non-local people out there who 
would consider taking a turn on the BOD if they could get to meetings, 
easily.  I'd like to suggest Google plus hangouts as a way of 
facilitating such meetings.

Just like on Facebook someone would setup a Grex page.  Folks who are on 
the board and others who would like to be part of meetings would need 
Google+ accounts.  That's the hardest part.  From there on our you'd be 
able to have board meetings without anyone being in the same room.  You 
could connect with video by smartphone or computer or by simple 
telephone dialin.  Everyone is heard by everyone else.  The person who 
is speaking gets the large video frame, others are along the bottom of 
the page.

Anyhow, just knowing this could be easily done might encourage people to 
volunteer.

Here is a link to more on the Google hangouts:
http://goo.gl/z74dv


#36 of 57 by tonster on Thu Dec 15 13:39:59 2011:

People still use Google+?


#37 of 57 by keesan on Thu Dec 15 13:54:08 2011:

Would a conference call not work, without the video?


#38 of 57 by mary on Thu Dec 15 14:49:19 2011:

Yes.

Not as well.


#39 of 57 by keesan on Thu Dec 15 14:54:54 2011:

Why do you need video to talk about grex?


#40 of 57 by mary on Thu Dec 15 15:16:41 2011:

You don't need it.  It's not about need.


#41 of 57 by glitch on Thu Dec 15 15:38:07 2011:

I'd prefer a voice solution to a video solution as well. Having done a
large number of videoconferences on high-end hardware, I'm less than
impressed. I can probably find a friend who'd host a conference call, too.

If voice isn't important, IRC makes a fine place for meetings, would be
easy to record, and if anyone wanted to sit in they could idle in the
channel.


#42 of 57 by ryan on Thu Dec 15 15:50:24 2011:

What about in 'party' on Grex ;)


#43 of 57 by richard on Thu Dec 15 15:54:58 2011:

Grex doesn't own the name Grex.  Other places use it.  There is a 
grex.com that is not us for instance.  We never trademarked the name.


#44 of 57 by walkman on Thu Dec 15 16:00:52 2011:

dumpsterdiving.com is also taken.


#45 of 57 by richard on Thu Dec 15 16:03:56 2011:

cyberspace.org is however a nice domain name that surely has some value.


#46 of 57 by jep on Thu Dec 15 19:07:35 2011:

"Cyberspace.org" was picked because it was available and it was a buzz 
word.  The name probably does, or did, have some value, but for Grex it 
was just something to use in hope confused people would stumble into the 
conferencing system.  

There's no "cyberspace.com" WWW site.  Someone owns the domain name but 
doesn't use it for the WWW.  It may reflect something about the current 
value of "cyberspace.org".

I think it's better to keep Grex going for a while longer.  I hope that 
can happen.  It looks promising for a couple more years as there are 
people willing to serve on the Board.  In a couple more years, lots 
could happen.  A new crowd might appear.  Unix, text and non-profits 
might become popular again.  (Grex is the text-message mechanism of the 
Facebook age!  We have privacy here.)  Heck, get a cell phone app and 
people will probably start blaming Grex for car accidents.


#47 of 57 by tonster on Thu Dec 15 19:12:40 2011:

I can certainly help host an audiconferencing line if it's needed.


#48 of 57 by glitch on Thu Dec 15 19:25:12 2011:

I think there's definitely a place for Grex in the world. There are a few
groups I'm part of that are looking for a BBS or forum solution that has a
lower signal-to-noise ratio than most of the public Internet -- and less
spam! 

Grex could probably generate more interest from the vintage computing
crowd, too. There aren't many fully text-based services out there anymore.


#49 of 57 by kentn on Fri Dec 16 05:41:30 2011:

Item 76 in agora has been linked to item 326 in coop.


#50 of 57 by vsrinivas on Thu Dec 22 09:38:04 2011:



#51 of 57 by kentn on Fri Dec 23 21:27:42 2011:

Is there any further interest in running for the Grex Board?


#52 of 57 by denise on Mon Dec 26 19:43:28 2011:

Last year, jadecat ran for a seat on the board. I think she'd be an
asset  so I wonder if she would consider running again?


#53 of 57 by kentn on Sat Dec 31 01:02:20 2011:

Nominations for the seats open for the Board in 2012 are now closed.


#54 of 57 by kentn on Sat Dec 31 22:18:47 2011:

BTW, the Board voted to elect all 4 candidates to the Board as it
was an uncontested election.  You'll all need to be members of Grex
if you aren't already.  We'll need your real names and addresses
for our Michigan state annual report, too.  Send those to the
treasurer.


#55 of 57 by mary on Sat Dec 31 23:04:30 2011:

Thanks, glitch, Andy, Ryan & Kent!  


#56 of 57 by glitch on Wed Jan 4 02:52:22 2012:

Information sent to treasurer@grex.org -- is that ok?


#57 of 57 by kentn on Wed Jan 4 04:35:42 2012:

Yes, I think so.  Thanks, glitch.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: