Grex Cooking Conference

Item 61: Gadgets and Gizmos

Entered by denise on Sun Dec 19 14:49:38 1993:

131 new of 205 responses total.


#75 of 205 by jmsaul on Tue Dec 3 05:05:25 2002:

Re #73:  That's pretty funny.  How many times has he blown the cutout?


#76 of 205 by slynne on Tue Dec 3 16:13:02 2002:

I think I will try to borrow my mom's bread machine. I'll bet she cant 
remember the last time she used it! :) I guess if I break it with my 
whole wheat flour, I'll buy her a new one. 


#77 of 205 by keesan on Tue Dec 3 16:34:00 2002:

Jim has, at present, three bread machines.  The one into which he is putting
rye flour has not 'broken' yet.  One of the others arrived with blown cutout,
which he replaced.  First time he made bread it blew again so he tried a
smaller batch or more water.  Then his housemate blew the cutout on the third
machine.  So the answer is three.  Some of these machines are really not well
designed for non-fluffy type bread.  Another friend with another machine also
had problems with whole wheat bread - it would start moving and then stop
every time until Jim gave him an adjusted recipe.  Until then he would always
take the unkneaded dough out and bake it (without waiting for it to rise) and
eat a hard lump.  He does not quite understand how bread is made.

Two of the three problem machines are Wellbuilt.  The one which always works
well is a Regal, so you might try a Regal for heavier breads.  We actually
paid $20 for it used (at Miller Manor thrift shop).  Kiwanis often has bread
machines for $10-25.

If Slynne's mother's bread machine stops working Jim will be happy to fix it.
Ask him for a recipe suggestion for whole wheat bread.  He did a lot of
experimenting and discovered that it helps to preheat the pan and the water
so it will rise faster.


#78 of 205 by scott on Tue Dec 3 16:35:32 2002:

My Panasonic is a tank - I've had it for 7-8 years, and had to replace the
drive belt after 7 years.  Worth the $160, certainly.


#79 of 205 by scott on Tue Dec 3 16:36:23 2002:

(er, worth the $160 to buy the machine, not to replace the belt.  The new belt
cost something like $10-15 with shipping)


#80 of 205 by slynne on Tue Dec 3 17:22:06 2002:

I definately will ask Jim (and others) for nice whole grain bread 
recipes! 


#81 of 205 by i on Wed Dec 4 12:15:54 2002:

Note that most bread recipes probably need to be tweaked (adjust yeast,
sugar, liquids, etc.) to your machine (which has slightly different times,
temps, pan shape, etc. than the recipe-writer's machine).


#82 of 205 by slynne on Wed Dec 4 18:34:59 2002:

I see. That just might end up being a challenge for me. I am not the 
best cook in the world. Oh well, it will be fun anyways. 


#83 of 205 by i on Mon Dec 23 03:14:12 2002:

I'm thinking more about a toaster oven.  Cooking for one, there are a
fair number of times when turning on the stove's oven just seems silly
(making 6 muffins or some such).  I don't make toast, so the "can also
reheat pizza" bottom-end models are out.  I want something that'll do
a loaf of banana bread, small casserole, etc. 

Measuring tape, etc. will tell me if it would fit in & not blow fuses - 
but how useful are such things?  Are good ones really a smaller version
of a "real" oven, or just glorified TV dinner heaters?  Is "convection"
a real feature or a noisy price-hike? 


#84 of 205 by slynne on Mon Dec 23 04:03:27 2002:

I made my first loaf of bread in my bread machine! It didnt rise as much as
I would have liked but it was edible!


#85 of 205 by cmcgee on Mon Dec 23 12:11:04 2002:

Toaster ovens are Great for small batches.  I even have a set of baking
pans that fit toaster ovens.  It includes a jelly roll pan (the cookie pan
with 3/8 in sides), a 9 1/4 by 6 1/2 by 2 in baking pan that is a great
lasagne size, a 7 1/2 by 3/3/4 by 2 1/4 in loaf pan, three mini pie pans,
and four mini loaf pans. Made by Mirro.  I don't remember the last time I
saw them on sale, but check the (fake) hardware store on Stadium, next to
Big George's. [We all know that Stadium Hardware is the REAL hardware
store on Stadium}. 

Over the years I've collected a couple 6-hole muffin pans, a springform
pan with both a flat bottom and center-hole insert, 7 inch pie pans, two
small round cake pans, and numerous tart pans of various shapes.  I make
biscuits, muffins, cookies, cornbread, and just about everything else in
my toaster oven.  

The Jiffy mix single layer cake mixes make the cutest little layer cakes.
For mixing small batches of cookies, my Cuisinart Little Pro Plus is a
whizz.  (It also whips egg whites, juices limes, lemons and oranges, and
doubles as a salad shooter, with a side-directed, continuous feed shredder
or slicer.)

That said, I don't bake much, compared to many people here.  If I ate
baked goods very often, I'd probably go the big oven, big freezer route.


#86 of 205 by slynne on Mon Dec 23 15:54:21 2002:

Wow. that does sound like something a single person could use.


#87 of 205 by keesan on Mon Dec 23 17:58:02 2002:

I have not used my stove oven for over a year, since we got the bread machine.
I have a small round Nesco electric oven (insulated walls) that works for
potatoes.  Congrats on mastering the bread machine. Whole wheat bread never
rises enough in those.   I wonder if the Nesco would bake bread.


#88 of 205 by jaklumen on Tue Dec 24 08:21:04 2002:

I really wish I had a toaster oven myself.  I don't eat toast as much 
as I used to, and so I really think a slot toaster alone is somewhat 
useless.  It's hard to cook everything on the stove top and I don't 
always like waiting for a large oven to heat.

resp:85 thanks for the tip, even though I must hunt among my own local 
stores.  hehe


#89 of 205 by gelinas on Tue Dec 24 16:01:23 2002:

Hmm... We probably should replace our four-slot toaster; one of the handles
won't stay down, so only two of the slots are useable.  A toaster oven would
be easier for some of the larger things, like bagels.  Hmm...


#90 of 205 by kentn on Tue Dec 24 17:27:06 2002:

We're talking about getting a two-slot toaster that can accept wider
items (like bagels).  There are several of them out there and they
all seem to have a pair of wire grids in the slot that adjust to the
thickness of the item and keep it centered between the heating elements.
Does anyone have any recommendations on this sort of toaster?  Do they
work okay for regular bread?  Do they wear out quickly?  Any particular
brand?


#91 of 205 by slynne on Tue Dec 24 17:42:42 2002:

I have one like that and it works ok. I think it is Proctor-Silex or 
soemthing. I bought mine for a dollar at a garage sale 2 years ago. 


#92 of 205 by mary on Tue Dec 24 18:48:22 2002:

A few years ago I purchased a Cuisinart toaster much like
what kentn described in #90.  Works great on both really
thin toast and thick english muffins and specialty 
breads.  

Plus, it had a line of lights to show the darkness setting.
These lights are always on.  So it's yet one more thing to
glow in the dark come nightime.  I love that.


#93 of 205 by jmsaul on Wed Dec 25 03:23:54 2002:

You can get Hello Kitty toasters at Tsai Grocery.  They even toast a picture
of Hello Kitty on the bread.


#94 of 205 by kentn on Wed Dec 25 04:17:07 2002:

Heh, but will they toast a picture of Hello Kitty on an English
muffin?


#95 of 205 by jmsaul on Thu Dec 26 03:02:40 2002:

Probably screw up the resolution, but what the hell...  ;-)


#96 of 205 by slynne on Thu Dec 26 19:03:15 2002:

Oh man. I might have to get that Hello Kitty toaster. 


#97 of 205 by jmsaul on Fri Dec 27 00:16:31 2002:

I only saw one more there.


#98 of 205 by i on Fri Dec 27 01:25:49 2002:

I've got the latest CR report & ratings on toasters & toaster ovens here
if anyone's interested...


#99 of 205 by gelinas on Fri Dec 27 02:28:59 2002:

Sure.  I'm interested.


#100 of 205 by i on Fri Dec 27 12:43:44 2002:

From Consumer Reports (usual disclaimers here, i own none of these):

(Defaults - slot-type toasters take thick stuff, everything has one-
year warranties, and toaster ovens rates at least "good" for baking &
broiling while holding at least 4 large slices of toast.) 

4-slot Toasters:
Only 2 of the 15 toasters reviewed were 4-slotters -
Proctor-Silex 2444[5] (similar were Hamilton-Beach 24505, 24507, & 24508)
Toastmaster T2050[W]
CR paid $24 for the P-S & $27 for the Tm.  They liked the P-S's overall
performance better & it has a 2-year warranty.  The Tm's shade dial is
"mostly unmarked".  On specifics, they rated the P-S better for ease of
use and the Tm better for producing a full color range.

At the top (ignoring a $100 Kitchenaid) are Philips HD2533 (Target, $30)
and GE 106641 (106691) (WalMart, $20).  Only an average ease of use kept
the P from taking the gold medal, the GE is above average everywhere &
has a 2-year warranty. 

Toaster Ovens: 
...really ain't built to be toasters (is CR's conclusion).  Only 2 of the
10 reviewed are as good at toasting as any of the "slot machines" i listed
above:
Cuisinart TOB-175 (TOB-165, TOB-160) $205
Delonghi XU120 $53
The C is as good a toaster as the $20 GE 2-slotter, but with better ease of
use.  It's also a large convection/broiler/oven with digital controls & a
3-year warranty.  The D is weak at toasting consistent (color) successive
or full batches, but is a bit easier to use than the ToastMaster.
A notch down at toasting ("very good preformance", but its weakness is 
limited color range) is the Sears Kenmore KTES8 at $70.  

The GE & Kenmore units got "CR Best Buy" (based mostly on price/performance).
They didn't look at any Cuisinart slot-type toasters. 


#101 of 205 by i on Sat Dec 28 00:55:03 2002:

FWIW, the toaster oven i'm thinking about is the paint-instead-of-cool-
polished-metal-outside Cuisinart TOB-165; i'd hope to get it for under
$160 at Big Georges (in Ann Arbor).  I don't make toast, so that stuff
mostly doesn't matter.


#102 of 205 by headdoc on Thu Jan 2 16:12:16 2003:

Electric appliances I currently use:  Microwave oven, toaster oven,drip coffee
maker, small electric chopper, and amazingly a new George Forman Grill which
is turning out to be extremely handy.  small appliances I do not use:  bread
machine, cuisinart mixer, electric knife, immersion blender. blender (for
smoothies.


#103 of 205 by keesan on Thu Jan 2 16:16:37 2003:

Do you want to sell your bread machine (I think you are implying that you have
one)?  Or trade it for a repair of something electrical or mechanical? 
(Assuming you live within a few miles or us or come this way occasionally).


#104 of 205 by slynne on Sun Jan 5 21:39:31 2003:

I have been using my bread machine a lot since I got it. My whole wheat 
bread keeps coming out funny though. I mean it looks funny but it 
tastes ok so that is what is important. I have been experimenting with 
adjusting the recipe. I have found that the 1 lb loaf suits my needs 
best. 


#105 of 205 by keesan on Sun Jan 5 22:18:33 2003:

What kind of funny?  Does it maybe rise and then fall again, making the 
top look sort of depressed?


#106 of 205 by mary on Sun Jan 5 22:37:00 2003:

I remember wheat bread as being difficult.  No matter 
what I did it was always a bit dense and gummy.  Then
I bought some gluten and started adding a teaspoon or two
for each loaf.  What a difference.  I purchased it at
Fireside, in Ann Arbor, but they're gone now.  Maybe 
the Ypsi food co-op would carry it?  


#107 of 205 by jmsaul on Sun Jan 5 23:16:03 2003:

You can get it at Hiller's, too.


#108 of 205 by slynne on Mon Jan 6 20:41:56 2003:

re#105 - Yeah, that is exactly what is happening. The bread *tastes* 
great except that it is kind of dense. But that is ok. It is very 
filling which has helped me not eat bad things before lunch since a 
couple of slices of that for breakfast really keeps me full. I might 
try adding some gluten though. I mean, it cant hurt. Is it in the 
baking goods section at Hillers?


#109 of 205 by keesan on Mon Jan 6 23:15:35 2003:

Is there some way to set your machine for a longer rise (or for one long rise
instead of two short ones)?


#110 of 205 by davel on Tue Jan 7 02:30:43 2003:

Usually not, but it may depend on the machine.  Certainly some machines come
with various cycles, some of which have longer rise times.  Usually the
details are not documented.  (In fact, due to our Zojirushi's having died
after 7 years of heavy use, we opened the Wellbilt which we bought (around
1/2 price, when Best went out of business) to have as a backup.  Its
documentation of exactly how long each stage is in each possible cycle is very
complete; if there are temp differences they don't say, though.  The chart
is impressive & likely to be useful.)


#111 of 205 by keesan on Tue Jan 7 02:41:14 2003:

When did Best go out of business?


#112 of 205 by gelinas on Tue Jan 7 03:46:19 2003:

The one on Carpenter closed in . . . '92, I think it was.  Maybe earlier.


#113 of 205 by i on Tue Jan 7 12:28:08 2003:

Gluten's also available at By The Pound (S. Main Mkt.), probably People's
Food Coop (Kerrytown), and (guess) at most big supermarkets.


#114 of 205 by keesan on Tue Jan 7 17:34:46 2003:

There is a food coop in Ypsi, where Slynne lives.
I got my first fax machine at Best. It was a come-on special (for only $300,
took special half-size rolls that you had to roll yourself, and had no paper
feed or cutter) and they tried to talk me into something else.  I did not
realize I got it so long ago.  


#115 of 205 by glenda on Tue Jan 7 18:41:28 2003:

The Ann Arbor People's Food Coop doesn't carry gluten, we also got ours at
Fireside.  Whole Foods sometimes has it in 1/2 - 1 lb packages.


#116 of 205 by slynne on Tue Jan 7 20:38:53 2003:

Yeah, the Ypsi food coop is just a few blocks from my house and I am 
even a member and everything. I'll bet *they* have gluten. 

My bread machine will not allow for a longer rise. It isnt a big deal. 
I have found that if I make the 1 lb loaf, it comes out ok but a little 
over done. The solution might be to make the 1 lb loaf and then just 
take it out early. That works better for me anyway because the 1 1/2 lb 
loaf gets stale before I finish it. 


#117 of 205 by jaklumen on Thu Jan 15 10:07:57 2004:

I bought a griddle/grill for Julie at Christmas and we seem to use it 
all the time now.  It's one of those metal things that fits over the 
burners on your stove-- a griddle surface on one side, and a grill 
surface on the other.  It's not as great as an appliance; I have 
noticed that heating is a little uneven as it comes right from the 
stove coil burners.  Hotter in some places than others, I guess?  But 
we needed to save space and it works reasonably well.


#118 of 205 by eeyore on Sun Feb 15 03:21:06 2004:

You can get gluten from Buy The Pound on Main Street in Ann Arbor.

So I'm back working part time at Williams-Sonoma.....lots of toys there.  I
want them all.


#119 of 205 by denise on Sat Nov 18 03:43:52 2006:

Are there any new cool gadgets out there these days? 

There's been a lot of talk in this item about bread machines. Are people still
using them? 


#120 of 205 by keesan on Sat Nov 18 16:19:32 2006:

Jim uses his as an oven, after mixing the bread by hand.  The machines don't
deal well with sticky rye flour.  


#121 of 205 by cmcgee on Sat Nov 18 17:38:33 2006:

My bread machine makes great rye bread, but the recipe uses about half white
flour.  It makes WONDERFUl whole wheat, with nothing but whole wheat flour.

It's an old Toastmaster.  Don't think they make them anymore.


#122 of 205 by denise on Sat Nov 18 23:02:37 2006:

And those that have one, what's the difference in rice that is cooked in a
rice cooker vs making some on the stove?


#123 of 205 by mynxcat on Sat Nov 18 23:31:14 2006:

When I used a rice cooker I noticed no difference. Except that you
didn't have to watch it so it wouldn't get burnt. Apart from that, I
didn't notice any difference. 


#124 of 205 by cmcgee on Sun Nov 19 02:35:44 2006:

I've never noticed any difference either.  The main reason I don't use one
is that it is simple to use a saucepan.  If you put in any amount of rice,
and fill the pan until the water is 1 inch above the surface of the rice, you
can make perfect rice that doesn't burn.

Bring the rice and water to a hard boil, and boil until the water is reduced
to the level of the rice, usually 5 - 7 minutes.  Do not stir during this
process.  When the water is at the top of the rice, you will see small
"volcanos" forming.  

Turn off the electric burner or turn the gas burner down to the lowest
possible flame.  Put a close fitting lid on the pan.  Let the rice steam 15
- 20 minutes or longer.  After 15 minutes you can turn off the flame, and the
rice will remain hot for another half an hour or so.


#125 of 205 by denise on Sun Nov 19 03:38:33 2006:

Hmm, ok... And thanks for the instructions.  I have a SIL [who is Japanese]
who, I think] still has a rice cooker.  They eat a lot of rice. I did like
the rice I had over there awhile back [I think it was the 'sticky' rice with
a bit of seasoning added to it.] What's added, does anyone know, to make
sticky rice? Though I'm sure I can find out from Kazuko or Mike next time I
see them.


#126 of 205 by cmcgee on Sun Nov 19 15:35:53 2006:

Actually, it is more likely to be the type of rice you buy.  Sticky rice,
brown rice, white rice, sushi rice, these are all varieties of rice that give
different dishes.
Sushi rice will also have a vinegar dressing on it.

BTW, the method above came from my childhood, when the lady from Osaka who
lived next door to us in Hawaii taught my mother to make Japanese rice.  My
mother was a southerner who traditionally put sugar and milk on rice for a
breakfast dish.


#127 of 205 by keesan on Sun Nov 19 16:03:16 2006:

Rice cookers work by being leaky and losing most of the water as steam.  When
enough water has left, the temperature rises and they shut off.  This wastes
a lot of energy as well as steaming up the kitchen.  I think you need to put
in at least two cups of water per cup of rice.  We use a pressure cooker with
1 1/3 cups of water per cup of rice, which heats up quickly to 15 lb pressure,
then you turn it off and wait 5-10 minutes for it to finish cooking as it
cools down (for brown rice, which would otherwise take 45 minutes).  We tried
a microwave pressure cooker but that was slower and quite small.  There is
short, long, and medium grain white and brown rice, and white or brown sticky
(glutinous) rice.  Sushi used to be fermented rice, now it is imitated with
vinegar (like vinegar pickles instead of salt pickles).


#128 of 205 by glenda on Sun Nov 19 23:00:05 2006:

My rice cooker does not steam up my kitchen.  We like it.  Using it means that
a burner (and pan, pans seem to be a limited resource for some reason) is not
being taken up by the rice and can be used for another dish.  It keeps the
rice warm longer than the pan method which is useful when we have varied
schedules.  It means no more burned rice.  Damon does most of the cooking
since I am either covering or taking evening classes and STeve often doesn't
get home until quite late.  Damon has a tendancy to game while cooking, hence
he often forgets to check on things.  If we use the rice cooker and he burns
the chicken or pork chops and veggies, we can at least have buttered rice or
the above mentioned with milk, sugar, cinnamon, and nutmeg. 

Our rice cooker can also do slow cooked soups and stews.


#129 of 205 by keesan on Sun Nov 19 23:01:57 2006:

How much water goes into your rice cooker per cup of rice?  You probably have
a relatively leaky house and don't mind some extra steam in it.


#130 of 205 by mary on Sun Nov 19 23:18:33 2006:

Hah, I got you all beat.  My rice only takes ONE MINUTE!  Which means I 
have more time to develop my plan for world peace and I can save precious 
energy resources at the same time.



#131 of 205 by cmcgee on Mon Nov 20 03:14:18 2006:

World Peace!  You planning on becoming a beauty contestant?


#132 of 205 by glenda on Wed Nov 22 04:43:57 2006:

I use the knuckle medthod of measuring rice and water - rice to the depth of
the first knuckle, water to the depth of the second.  Works in the rice cooker
or in a saucepan.


#133 of 205 by cmcgee on Wed Nov 22 12:27:20 2006:

Actually, mine is the knuckle method as well.  However, you can fill the pan
with any amount of rice.  The only measurement is the 1 knuckle between the
top of the rice and the top of the water.


#134 of 205 by jadecat on Wed Nov 22 13:55:08 2006:

*grins* and here I use measuring cups...


#135 of 205 by keesan on Thu Nov 23 17:37:00 2006:

A knuckly method would only work if you use the same pot and cook the same
amount of rice every time.  


#136 of 205 by glenda on Thu Nov 23 18:35:56 2006:

It has worked every time in every pot I have used it.  It is basically the
same as Colleen's - about 1 inch of water above the level of the rice.  The
second knuckle on my index finger is close enough to an inch that I use it
for measuring while stitching.  It is the easiest measuring device for this
purpose as it is always available, is easy to wash before using, and doesn't
matter if it gets wet.  I have made rice for 1 person to 8-10 people using
it.  I don't know how you came to your conclusion above, especially if you
haven't used the method.


#137 of 205 by cmcgee on Thu Nov 23 23:54:50 2006:

Yes, the knuckle method has worked for my mom and me for over 50 years.  I
have never in my life made rice by measuring either the rice or the water.


Many pots, many stoves, infinite amounts of rice.  It works the same way for
brown rice and white.  I probably err on the "more" side of the joint when
adding water for brown rice.  

I just pour rice into a pot until it looks like the right amount for the
number of people I'm feeding and how hungry they are. 

It's worked for 1-8 people, routinely, for dinner, even when 3 of the 8 people
were hungry teenaged athletes.  I too don't understand how Sindi can tell
those of us who use the method that it doesn't work.  


#138 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 24 04:26:51 2006:

I can't believe this would work, unless you put in too much water every time
and cook it without a cover and boil it until the water is gone.  If you cover
the pot, and use the same pot for 1 or 8 cups of rice, either the 1 cup will
come out much too wet or the 8 cups will burn.


#139 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 05:59:01 2006:

Do you really think that your belief that it wouldn't work is a more
compelling argument than our years of experience feeding people with this
method?


#140 of 205 by glenda on Fri Nov 24 07:52:43 2006:

Really.  I put the lid on EVERY time.  When cooking on the stove and not in
the rice cooker, it is brought to a boil and either turned off or down to the
lowest temp on the burner and left alone for 15-20 minutes for white rice,
35-45 minutes for brown.  No boiling until the water is gone.  Doesn't matter
what pot or how much rice.  The magic is in the inch of water above the level
of the rice.  That is just enough water for the rice to come out light and
fluffy every time.  It is the instructions for cooking rice that is in all
my Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Indian, Persian, and Mid-eastern cookbooks.  It
is also the instructions I got from Chinese and Indian friends.  (I asked just
to confirm how they were taught.)  Since most of them have rice for almost
every meal, and the fact that it has always worked for me, I trust them.  Try
it and see.


#141 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 15:40:42 2006:

Actually, the water isn't gone.  You only boil until the water level reaches
the rice level.  Any more than that and you get burned rice.


#142 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 24 19:54:51 2006:

Re 141, that means you are putting in more water than you need, if you boil
off some of it.   If 1" of water above 8" of rice is enough, then it is too
much above 1" of rice, unless you like added heat and humidity in your
kitchen.  We pressure cook brown rice by just bringing it to 15 lb and turning
it off.  Some time I will measure how much water is above 2 cups of rice when
we add 2.6 cups of water to it.  


#143 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 20:02:08 2006:

If I put in less water, I get burned rice.


#144 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 24 20:10:21 2006:

Your pot is probably losing a lot of water to the air.


#145 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 22:49:07 2006:

Well, it's one of those waterless stainless pots, that has a lid that floats
on the steam.  I have butter-steamed new potatoes in it without using any
water at all.  Works just fine with tiny potatoes and butter.  Without having
an seal that withstands multiple atmospheres of pressure, it's one of the best
designed lid and pan sets I've ever seen.  

It was designed in the 50s, and has a cast iron core in the bottom, sandwiched
between layers of stainless steel.  It uses very little fuel to cook with,
and because  of the cast iron core, can finish cooking a dish with the heat
turned off.  

I have a set my mother gave me when I went to college, and have collected all
the other pieces over the years.  The company went out of business in the 70s,
and the pieces are gourmet collectors items because of their fuel efficiency.

It self-seals when used correctly, and the lids are precisely weighted to
provide waterless cooking of vegetables and other foods that contain a fair
amount of natural moisture.  

It does not create a pressure vessel, but short of a pressure cooker, it does
the best job of any professional pans I've ever used.  


#146 of 205 by denise on Sat Nov 25 02:25:55 2006:

Those sound cool; I've never heard of them before. too bad they don't make
them any more...


#147 of 205 by cmcgee on Sat Nov 25 18:34:09 2006:

They are cool.  However, the rice technique works in ANY kind of pan, not just
these way cool ones.  I've cooked in a lot of kitchens, and clearly other
people have used this technique for years without my super cool pans.


#148 of 205 by denise on Sun Nov 26 11:15:41 2006:

Something I'm going to have to pick up when I can is a basic mixer... My old
one has disappeared, apparently not having survived my move back to MI.
There's been a few times recently where I've wanted to use one.


#149 of 205 by denise on Sat Dec 9 10:04:15 2006:

Back to rice: Do y'all tend to season your rice with anything to keep it from
being bland, and if so, what kinds of things do you use? I know one time, my
SIL added some kind of seasoning that included sesame seeds and salt that I
thought was good. And at a restaurant that included rice, it tasted like it
had some herbs of some sort [at a middle eastern place] and maybe some Italian
dressing or oil of some sort. And almonds which were good.  I also know of
that asian stuff [liquid form] that I can't think of the name of right now
[I'm not really crazy about that one, it tastes salty to me, and the flavor
doesn't do much for me--though I know a lot of other people that do like it].


#150 of 205 by glenda on Sat Dec 9 12:31:33 2006:

It depends on what is served with it.  I like rice plain, both white and
brown, when served with most any spiced dish.  The plain rice offsets the
spiciness of the other food.  I like both white and brown rice with butter,
salt and pepper.  I like white rice with milk, sugar, cinnamon, and nutmeg
(really rice pudding without the custard and long cooking).  I like it with
saffron.  I like it curried.  I like what Mom calls Glorified Rice - cooked
white rice with a can or two of fruit cocktail with its juice and whipped
cream mixed in, sort of a cheap ambrosia.  Rice is very versitile and able
to take almost any type of spicing that you care to throw at it.


#151 of 205 by keesan on Sat Dec 9 17:34:27 2006:

Jim eats leftover rice with chopped apples and pomegranate syrup and black
walnuts when he feels like cracking them first.


#152 of 205 by edina on Sun Dec 10 03:35:28 2006:

Re 151  That sounds insanely good.

Re 149  I tend to like plain rice, because like Glenda said, it's more 
on what goes with it.  With indian food, I'll cook basmati rice with 
whole cloves and a cinnamon stick in it, maybe a bit of saffron, but 
nothing else.  


#153 of 205 by void on Sun Dec 10 20:16:40 2006:

Sometimes I cook rice in stock instead of plain water.

Plain rice with slivered almonds, green onions, and Clancy's Fancy is
pretty good.


#154 of 205 by jadecat on Mon Dec 11 14:30:19 2006:

I'm boring, I just tend to have brown rice with a little salt and butter.


#155 of 205 by i on Thu Dec 14 03:53:55 2006:

I always mix rice into a casserole or stew sort of dish.  Cooking for one
makes it easy to avoid the issue.

Whole wheat noodles i sometimes serve plain, then add a bit of olive oil,
salt, & pepper, or maybe plain yogurt.  Depends mostly on what's on hand
and how much time i have.


#156 of 205 by mary on Sun May 11 16:43:58 2008:

I got a rice cooker.  I'm geeked, in a rice cooker kind of way. ;-)


#157 of 205 by furs on Sun May 11 19:04:08 2008:

hahaha.
I know people love those, but for me there is no purpose.  I don't cook
enough rice I guess.


#158 of 205 by tod on Sun May 11 21:32:26 2008:

re #157
They're great if rice is a side dish and you tend to forget it's cooking (thus
it doesn't burn as easily in a cooker)


#159 of 205 by keesan on Sun May 11 22:46:35 2008:

Rice cookers are designed to put a lot of steam into the air, which means they
waste a lot of energy and also make your room very humid.  We cook rice in
a tightly fitting pot and it comes to boiling much faster (and if in a
pressure cooker, you just turn it off once it reaches pressure, after a few
minutes, and it cannot burn).


#160 of 205 by mary on Sun May 11 23:15:51 2008:

All that wasted steam must be what's making my kitchen smell delish at the 
moment.

Tonight, at chez Remmers, it's orange beef stir-fry.


#161 of 205 by edina on Mon May 12 04:22:09 2008:

Steam is just one more excuse to open my pores.


#162 of 205 by keesan on Mon May 12 14:56:21 2008:

It is not good for the structure of whatever you are living in to have water
condensing in it.  Running down the windows.  Puddling on the sills.   Rotting
the wood.


#163 of 205 by mary on Mon May 12 15:03:41 2008:

I'm sure it's not.


#164 of 205 by edina on Mon May 12 16:25:08 2008:

Hi Sindi.  I live in the desert.  Trust me, I'm good.  The house is fine
too.


#165 of 205 by tod on Mon May 12 18:38:43 2008:

re #162
They've invented these crazy lil things called exhaust fans.  When I cook on
the stove, I use it.


#166 of 205 by keesan on Mon May 12 20:44:10 2008:

Do you have an objection to using less energy to cook with?  An exhaust fan
also cools the house (or heats it if it is warmer out).


#167 of 205 by edina on Mon May 12 20:56:27 2008:

I seriously could count on one hand how many times this year I've used
my   rice cooker, so it's not too much an issue.  We just don't eat that
much rice.


#168 of 205 by tod on Mon May 12 22:25:52 2008:

re #166
 Do you have an objection to using less energy to cook with? 

You mean do I object to eating only twigs and leaves like a Giraffe? Yes.


#169 of 205 by keesan on Mon May 12 23:39:30 2008:

Cooked rice does not grow on trees.


#170 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 00:07:14 2008:

Neither do spastic colons.


#171 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 00:35:00 2008:

Do nonspastic colons?
Pressure cooked rice gets very thoroughly cooked.  With brown rice we add 1.3
cups water per cup of rice.  White rice would probably be less.  If you cook
with more water, the rest of it goes into the air along with wasted heat.


#172 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 02:21:53 2008:

re #171
How long does that take?  Do you use a pressure cooker pot on a stove?


#173 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 02:38:49 2008:

Maybe 5 minutes to come to pressure, then 5 to come down?  I never timed it.
It is does before the rest of the meal.  Yes pressure cooker on stove.  We
also have one large electric pressure cooker which is more efficient but too
large (nuisance to clean).  We have at least 10 pressure cookers of various
sizes and designs, and take a small one bike camping with us.  I wonder if
we could cook oatmeal in it (dont' let the pressure come up too far).


#174 of 205 by void on Tue May 13 05:32:07 2008:

What the hell kind of rice cooker causes steam to condense on windows,
puddle on sills, and rot the house frame???


#175 of 205 by jadecat on Tue May 13 13:59:54 2008:

I dunno, but I do know that in the winter, when the air is very dry in
our apartment- a little steam only does good things. We tend to use the
'pot on the stove' method of rice making though- not a specific rice
steamer...


#176 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 15:54:29 2008:

Our house is well sealed, and adding steam to the air causes problems.
Our highest January heating bill was $60 (electric).  DO the rest of you not
believe in global warming or just not personally want to do anything about
it?  Some friends put in a geothermal heating system at great expense but
never insulated or weatherstripped and they now pay $180 in January for heat.


#177 of 205 by edina on Tue May 13 16:25:22 2008:

WTF Sindi?  The occasional use of a rice cooker is going to top the
balance?


#178 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 16:45:38 2008:

re #176
My electric bill in Jan was about $60, too.  I do my part for low carbon
footprint but I also have to do my part for low mildew in rainforest climate.
I'm betting the cooking we do at home(rice rarely) is way more efficient
time, money, energy than restaurant or frozen microwavable.


#179 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 18:56:17 2008:

I am pointing out that there are multiple reasons to cook efficiently.
Seattle does not typically go to -10F in January.  Tod, do you cook things
in tightly sealed pots?  I agree that taking a car to a restaurant wastes far
more fuel that even boiling a lot of water off rice into the air.


#180 of 205 by jadecat on Tue May 13 19:10:27 2008:

My electric bill in the winter was about $30.

Our gas bill was higher, but that's divided up between all the units in
the building.

Sindi- some of us also live in apartments that are run by corporations
that REALLY frown on tenants making their own changes to the apartments.
So we do what we can. 

And for goodness sake, we're not talking about THAT much steam! It's a
rice cooker, not a steam engine.


#181 of 205 by remmers on Tue May 13 19:26:25 2008:

Um, we got a console model rice cooker that sits on the floor, is about
4 feet high and 3 feet across, and weighs 200 pounds.  Whenever we use
it, all the windows fog up, the walls get wet, and the neighborhood
experiences brownouts from the electricity consumption.  If we run it 
with the windows open, the weather bureau issues a local dense fog
warning.

None of these wimpy table model rice cookers for us!






Oops, almost forgot:  :)


#182 of 205 by edina on Tue May 13 19:39:15 2008:

John Remmers, kicking it hard core.


#183 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 19:53:50 2008:

re #179
 Tod, do you cook things
 in tightly sealed pots?

I haven't entertained the idea of a pressure cooker in my house simply for
safety reasons.  In the 80's, a friend of mine suffered major burns when
the pressure cooker where he worked (Big Boy's on 9mile in St.Clair Shores)
exploded.  The risk doesn't seem equitable to energy savings.  Perhaps the
new stovetop pressure cookers are better these days?


#184 of 205 by slynne on Tue May 13 20:43:53 2008:

One thing I will mention even though it doesnt have much to do with
kitchen gizmos is that people should pay attention to their reactions
regarding Sindi's comments about how cooking inefficiently is
contributing to global warming. 

That is why expecting people to change any of their habits out of the
good ness of their heart is never going to work. You have to make policy
that forces them to change their habits. Rice cookers probably dont use
enough energy to really come into play here but I'll bet that if it cost
5 cents to cook rice with a pressure cooker and $5 to cook rice with a
rice cooker, a lot of people would switch to using pressure cookers. 



#185 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 20:51:41 2008:

I'm intrigued simply because my rice cooker works like crap when it cooks
brown/basmati rice.  If I can do it in the same time as white rice by using
a pressure cooker then I'm interested.  I would need assurances that a
pressure cooker isn't going to harm someone, though.


#186 of 205 by edina on Tue May 13 21:25:28 2008:

I love that....I won't make changes out of the goodness of my heart. 
Just because I use my rice cooker maybe once a month I am somehow
condemning the earth.  Nevermind my avid recyclying/reusing or other
things we have done to our home to make it more energy efficient.  Next
you'll be telling my not owning a pressure cooker is me buying into a
patriarchal conspiracy.

I don't use a pressure cooker because A) I don't own one and B) I try to
not own a ton of stuff in my kitchen.  I hate being cluttered in my
kitchen.  I have considered getting a pressure cooker simply because I
love watching them get used on Iron Chef.  But I'm not there yet.


#187 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 21:34:19 2008:

We have been pressure cooking for 30 years or so and never had an accident.
We have pressure cookers from the 50s and later.  It is the ones from the 40s
that were not working right.  They are by far the easiest (not just the
fastest) way to cook grains and beans (it helps to presoak the beans but it
not necessary).  Or even potatoes.  We use the special weights that show
pressure (5 10 15 lb) and potatoes need 5 lb, brown rice and beans 15 lb.
Brown rice takes much longer to cook than white rice.  Probably the rice
steamers assume white rice, you add the amount of water that corresponds to
the 20 min it takes to cook rice (it takes 20 min to boil off then the cooker
senses that the temperature has gone up and turns of).  YOu could try adding
twice the water for brown rice.

Pressure cookers do not burn things because they cook mainly with steam, not
just with bottom heat.  My mother used hers for potroasts.  

We tried a microwave rice cooker which took much longer than pressure cookers.


#188 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 21:55:01 2008:

Where can I find pressure cookers which use weights?  Or is it better to use
the electronic ones with auto shutoff?


#189 of 205 by slynne on Wed May 14 01:19:41 2008:

resp:186 That is my point. *everyone* thinks what they are doing is
reasonable. I know I sure think that I am doing my part. And no...using
a rice cooker is not especially harmful to the environment. And fwiw, I
use the stove top method which is probably the least efficient. Anyways,
I seriously doubt that even the highest energy taxes in the land would
deter someone using a rice cooker since they just dont use that much
energy. But think about how you feel when someone suggests to you that
you should give up the rice cooker. That is how some folks feel about
their SUVs. Guilt will not get them to stop buying them just like no
amount of guilt will stop anyone in this conversation from cooking rice
in the way that works best for them. 


#190 of 205 by tod on Wed May 14 07:57:57 2008:

We made a big pot of rice last night in the rice cooker and I was sure to
towel off the windows and sills while wearing hipwaders.  ;)


#191 of 205 by mary on Wed May 14 12:41:54 2008:

http://tinyurl.com/6gr9b3

You want my rice cooker? You're going to have to pry that baby from my 
cold dead hands.


#192 of 205 by tod on Wed May 14 19:03:55 2008:

From my cold dead chubby fingers!

Look a nice one with a dial setting (instead of weights)
http://tinyurl.com/4qsand


#193 of 205 by slynne on Wed May 14 23:23:29 2008:

Yeah, you would have to pry my rice cooker from my fingers too!

http://www.clearwaterbeachkiku.com/images/ImgLeft_About.jpg



#194 of 205 by edina on Wed May 14 23:56:03 2008:

hahahahahah!!!!


#195 of 205 by mary on Thu May 15 01:20:52 2008:

Good one, Lynne!


#196 of 205 by tod on Thu May 15 05:33:56 2008:

re #193
Why does that guy have my thong on his head?


#197 of 205 by void on Thu May 22 06:04:02 2008:

Dang.  I guess I'll have to quit cooking my rice on a pile of burning
car tires.  I'm really going to miss that special smoky tang.  


#198 of 205 by omni on Fri Aug 29 17:59:09 2008:



#199 of 205 by mary on Sat Dec 13 14:55:44 2008:

I got a new gadget - a milk frother for quick and dirty caps at home.  
Nuke a little milk with or without flavoring.  Froth for 20 seconds.  Pour 
coffee through.  Enjoy.

It works.

http://tinyurl.com/5w4evp


#200 of 205 by keesan on Sat Dec 13 16:44:40 2008:

You put milk into your dirty capacitors?  Does it fix the bulging problem?


#201 of 205 by mary on Sat Dec 13 16:46:38 2008:

Every time.  Almost.


#202 of 205 by keesan on Sat Dec 13 16:52:53 2008:

Is there some additional ingredient you need to add to them?  Hot glue?


#203 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 14 15:38:13 2008:

resp:199 That looks almost exactly like a gadget a friend of mine used
to bring on backpacking trips - to stir koolaid. It is kind of an in
joke but we have a mutual friend who is both into backpacking and into
gadgets. He always made a point to pack as lightly as possible but would
also almost always bring one fancy made for backpacking gadget. My
friend with the koolaid stirrer (which may have really been a milk
frother) would always try to also bring a gadget on every trip except he
would try to make his as useless as possible in order to tease our other
friend. 


#204 of 205 by mary on Sun Dec 14 16:05:28 2008:

Boy, your friends go for the jugular, eh? ;-)


#205 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 14 18:53:53 2008:

Yeah. That same friend with the stirrer once went out and bought a $400
tent which made the other friend rather jealous. Once the first friend
realized that, he started setting up his tent in his living room and
talking about it all of the time to the gadget head friend. The gadget
head friend was really excited to see it in action so to speak. Then,
when they next went camping together the guy with the nice tent brought
his $15 K-Mart pup tent and said that the $400 tent was too nice to use
outside ;)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: