Grex Cooking Conference

Item 61: Gadgets and Gizmos

Entered by denise on Sun Dec 19 14:49:38 1993:

I know we already have an item on bread machines [and I think I saw one
on food dehydrators]...  

But I'd like to start an item on other food gadgets/machines/things-to-help-
us-cook-and/or-eat item.

So what kind of gizmos or gadgets wouldn't you live without??  
205 responses total.

#1 of 205 by aa8ij on Sun Dec 19 22:46:09 1993:

 I saw an infomercial for a pasta machine. It's really neat! Just dump in
the ingredients, turn it on, and 2 minutes later, PASTA...

The only thing that really bugs me is that it was invented by Ron Popeil.


#2 of 205 by kentn on Mon Dec 20 03:26:34 1993:

Back during Marriage #1, I had a pasta machine.  Used it about three times.
It was one of those hand cranked ones, and as I remember, the consistency
of the dough was absolutely critical to success (and it was very hard to
obtain a proper consistency).  Even so, the idea of making one's own
spaghetti and lasagna was awfully neat (and fun).
 
Two of my current favorite most-needed gadgets are a can opener and a
garlic press.


#3 of 205 by jdg on Mon Dec 20 04:12:00 1993:

I have a pasta machine.  It's a set of attachments to my Cuisinart.  I
make pasta in it about 6 or 8 times a year.  It extrudes about 5 different
types of noodles.


#4 of 205 by gracel on Mon Dec 20 17:19:37 1993:

The crockpot, unless we turn vegetarian -- about once a month it provides
the first cooking of pot roast, and about twice a year it makes carcass
soup.


#5 of 205 by remmers on Mon Dec 20 19:50:05 1993:

"carcass soup"?  Sounds yummy...


#6 of 205 by chelsea on Mon Dec 20 23:57:30 1993:

She has such a way with words. ;-)

Appliances in the order they'd be thrown overboard if the
wagon was overloaded and we needed to cross the wide Missouri:
 1. The hand-held mixer
 2. The toaster
 3. The electric drip coffee maker
 4. The heavy duty Kitchen Aid mixer
 5. The bread machine (sniffles heard)
 6. The Cuisinart (hysterical sobs)


#7 of 205 by popcorn on Tue Dec 21 02:31:00 1993:

ah, but would you through the appliances overboard *first* or *last*
when you needed to lighten the wagon to cross the wide Missouri?

these days my favorite kitchen gadget is a big strainer.  no moving
parts, easy to clean, useful in practically every meal (eg.: for
washing beans, draining pasta, washing salad ingredients, squeezing
the liquid out of newly thawed frozen spinach, etc.) and it's reasonably
minimalistic.


Gratuitous Food Tip That Doesn't Belong In This Item: A great way to
beat the lines at Kroger's is to go there when everyone else is busy
mobbing the shopping malls to finish up their Christmas shopping.


#8 of 205 by popcorn on Mon Dec 12 09:04:08 1994:

Hey - I noticed the tip at the end of response #7 and realized it's
that time of the year again.


#9 of 205 by danr on Wed Dec 28 19:08:12 1994:

I just inherited a pasta maker.  Haven't had a chance to use it though.


#10 of 205 by popcorn on Sat Dec 31 08:38:12 1994:

Coolness!  Please keep us posted!


#11 of 205 by tsty on Mon Jan 2 00:14:44 1995:

Hmmm, could be part of the makings of a party ....


#12 of 205 by md on Thu Jan 5 18:21:27 1995:

We also have a hand-crank pasta maker, and never used it after
the first few times.  We recently got an electric one (yes, the
Popiel machine) and it's first-rate.  We use it all the time.

I couldn't live without our juice extracters.  The citrus one
we've had forever and it just keeps going and going...  The
other one we use for making apple juice, carrot juice, grape
juice, etc.  Washing and preparing the fruits and veggies
beforehand is time-consuming, and cleaning the thing is a
nightmare, but it's all worth it.

We have one of those hand-crank devices that cores, peels and
spiral slices an apple in ten seconds.  The kids love it more
than the adults.  I prefer the two-dollar metal gizmo you
press down on the apple and it cores it and slices it into
a dozen segments.  Works on pears, too.

For $40 at Williams-Sonoma I picked up a big stainless steel pot
with a steamer insert and a pasta cooking insert.  The latter
is basically a stainless-steel colander made to fit inside the
big pot.  You cook the pasta in it and then lift the whole thing
out to drain when al dente perfection has been achieved.  It's
the best (and curiously satisfying) method for cooking pasta
I know of.


#13 of 205 by chelsea on Fri Jan 6 00:26:32 1995:

Michael, I bought that same pot about six months ago.  I love it.
I also paid about fifteen dollars more. ;-(

I've wondered if extruded pasta comes out with anything near the same
texture as that made by rollers and cutters.  Whenever I've watched demos
the raw pasta looked somewhat gummy and fused. I have an Atlas hand-crank
pasta machine I seldom use because I no longer have a wide enough lip on
the kitchen counter to clamp it securely in place.  So instead I've
been trying different imported dry pastas.  All cooked in this great
stainless steel pasta pot.



#14 of 205 by md on Fri Jan 6 14:34:49 1995:

Well, my mom used to make pasta by forming a kind of 
volcanic atoll out of flour and breaking some egges into        
the middle of it.  Then she'd hand-knead the mess, adding
more flour as required, until it reached the desired
consistency.  Then she'd roll it into a flat sheet with
a special thin rolling pin, and put the flat sheet on
her "guitar," as she called it - a wooden frame with
about fifty steel wires stretched across it - and press
in down through with the rolling pin.  She'd hang the
resulting pasta on a rack to dry, or just toss it straight
into the boiling water.  (Ravioli and tortellini were
a whole different process.)  The pasta produced by our 
machine tastes very much like what la mia mama used to
serve us.  

Re the W&S pasta cooker:  I bought ours a couple of years
ago.  The ones I see in their store now have heavier
handles and are more expensive, which I assume is the
one you have.  Anyway, great pasta-minds think more or
less alike is what this proves.


#15 of 205 by freida on Wed May 17 06:41:30 1995:

I make homemade noodles every holiday...just mix flour, eggs, a pinch of salt
and about 2 tsps of hot water...roll as thin as you can...lay on a towel 
covered table to dry (only until slightly brittle on edges), roll dough 
into a tight tube and thinly slice...voila...ready for cooking!  No 
fancy machines or ingredients...just good homemade noodles!


#16 of 205 by popcorn on Sun Dec 3 16:14:21 1995:

Last weekend, my sister bought me a salad spinner as an early gift for
Chanukah.  She showed me the important salad spinner feature to look for:
a hole in the top where water from the faucet can go into the salad spinner
and reach the stuff inside.  Now I'm all excited about making lots of salad.
This should make it easier to feed clean green stuff to my guinea pigs, too.
I'd been under the impression that salad spinners were expensive electronic
gadgets.  This one isn't: it cost less than $10, and you crank it manually,
no electronics involved.  Cool!


#17 of 205 by popcorn on Sun Dec 24 15:25:55 1995:

I'm steadily less and less impressed by my new Air Bake cookie sheets.
1) They don't have good edges, so it's hard to get a grip on them with a
   pot holder.  Also, cookies could easily drip off the edges.
2) They're not non-stick.  In fact, they behave like they have a "stick"
   coating: the opposite of non-stick.
3) I worry about putting sticky aluminum right next to foods, because
   aluminum may be associated with Alzheimer's.
4) They're non-standard sized, so they don't fit my oven very well.
5) Tried-and-true recipes are failing.  This might be part of the process
   of me adapting to a new oven, I'm not sure.  But stuff is needing to bake at
   a higher temperature for a much longer time than the recipe calls for, and
   even then it's coming out underbaked.


Does anybody out there have an oven thermometer I could borrow to check my
oven with?


#18 of 205 by mdw on Sun Dec 24 20:50:34 1995:

I thought aluminum had been absolved?


#19 of 205 by eeyore on Mon Dec 25 00:29:33 1995:

the air-bake pans are good for things that would normally burn....shortbread,
lebkuechen, and the like...for the rest, they are no good....(at least that
what i've noticed...:)


#20 of 205 by popcorn on Mon Dec 25 13:07:00 1995:

Re 18: I think the aluminum question is still under debate.  Nobody knows what
causes Alzheimers.  Patients with Alzheimer's also tend to have a lot of
aluminum in their brains.  Evidence says that the aluminum in their brains
isn't the *cause* of Alzheimer's.  So presumably something else is both
causing Alzheimer's and also leaving aluminum in their brains.  But, 'til
someone figures out *what* causes Alzheimer's, I'm just as happy to stay away
from eating aluminum.


#21 of 205 by ajax on Thu Dec 28 07:54:05 1995:

I got an Air Bake sheet not too long ago.  Haven't burned anything on it,
but it is a bit sticky.  For butter-laden cookies, no prob, but it definitely
needs lubricants for drier foods...I had to chisel a pizza off it!  Anybody
have recommendations for more general-purpose baking sheets?


#22 of 205 by mcpoz on Thu Dec 28 14:42:21 1995:

Mrs. McPoz does pizza on a flat stone sheet about 1/2" thick.  Great crusts.


#23 of 205 by scott on Fri Dec 29 05:28:58 1995:

You can borrow my oven thermometer, Valerie.  Every apartment has had a
different oven temperature problem...  


#24 of 205 by jiffer on Sun Jun 15 20:57:31 1997:

I guess i am going to try and revitalize this item.  

My favorite is the crock pot  (pop in your meat right before worka nd then
dinner is ready when you get home!), the Kitchen Aide (sob) - how i yearn for
my own!!!!


#25 of 205 by e4808mc on Mon Jun 16 00:54:21 1997:

Heh, one year I began a list of *useless* electric appliances.  I was
wondering how many perfectly good had appliances had been converted to
electricity.  Lets see, there was the electric vegetable peeler, the electric
can opener, the electric carving knife, the electric french fry cutter, the
electric mixer (the kind you use in a glass to mix up diet powders), the
electric frying pan, the electric toaster (yes kiddies, toast can be made
range-top with this cute little pyramid deally), the electric wok, the
electric deep fryer (3 sizes), the electric toaster-oven, the electric coffee
maker, the electric tea-kettle, the electric ice-tea maker, the electric
ice-cream maker, the electric juicer......

What got me was the sheer number of single-use gadgets that took space on your
counter, as opposed to the manual versions that fit nicely into a drawer. 
I think it was the vegetable peeler that set me off.  Anybody else spotted
new and unusually conversions to electricity?


#26 of 205 by void on Mon Jun 16 05:51:19 1997:

   heck, you can make toast over a burner or a fire with a toasting
fork (my mother gathered a somewhat impressive collection of them when
we lived in england).  electric coffee grinders strike me as being
somewhat silly, even though coffee grinders themeselves are single-use
gadgets which don't exactly fit in drawers.


#27 of 205 by valerie on Mon Jun 16 12:51:39 1997:

I've actually seen those electric mixers that you dip into a glass to mix up
diet powders, used to a useful purpose.  A busy mom whose kids I used to
babysit for, used to take a piece of food from the family's dinner, drop it
into a plastic glass, dip a hand-held blender into it, and voila -- instant
home cooked baby food.  This worked especially well with things like yams.

Ya, it could all be done by hand, but it did actually help make things easier
when dealing with a baby and a toddler underfoot.


#28 of 205 by davel on Mon Jun 16 20:32:24 1997:

For that matter, there are plenty of occasions when many of those electric
appliances are pretty reasonable.  I hate electric can openers, myself,
but people with arthritis can have trouble with hand-operated ones, just
as an example.


#29 of 205 by mary on Mon Jun 16 22:11:05 1997:

I use my immersion blender far more often than I use my Cuisinart.  If my
food processor broke tomorrow I wouldn't replace it. 

I would replace my bread machine, my Braun immersion blender, the coffee
maker, the toaster, the waffle maker, the microwave, and the crockpot.
Kitchen Aid mixers *never* die so what's to discuss.




#30 of 205 by i on Mon Jun 16 23:58:47 1997:

My sister's pride & joy is a battery-powered pepper grinder - just press
the button, and...
I think it's the depth of decadence.


#31 of 205 by valerie on Tue Jun 17 02:11:50 1997:

Re 29: I wanna have a kid, just so I have an excuse to go out and buy an
immersion blender.  Those are sooooo cool!


My mom once bought her parents one of those gizmos that scrambles an egg while
it's still inside its shell.  The idea was that you could then make hard
boiled scrambled eggs.  But it never worked very well: The egg would come
oozing out the hole where the scrambler had gone in, long before it solidified
enough to stay where it belonged.


#32 of 205 by mary on Tue Jun 17 13:28:02 1997:

Immersion blenders are inexpensive (my Braun was just under
$20) and worth it for soup preparation alone.  I'm also
fond of fruit-whipped summer drinks.  Anyhow, then you'll
already have it when any babies arrive and you'll be free
to buy other things like strollers and car seats and diapers
and toys and babysitters and Seuss books and so on. ;-)


#33 of 205 by glenda on Tue Jun 17 23:13:32 1997:

Re #30:  we have a battery-powered pepper mill, a black one holding black
peppercorns.  They plan is to get a second (white one) for white peppercorns.


#34 of 205 by i on Wed Jun 18 03:39:30 1997:

(Anyone have a couple-month-old baby that valerie could take care of for a
week?  It sounds like it would be a *VERY* educational experience for her...)


#35 of 205 by omni on Wed Jun 18 08:02:55 1997:

     I have no doubts that Valerie would be an excellent mother. I think she
>would handle it well, like she does everything else.


#36 of 205 by i on Thu Jun 19 00:47:31 1997:

Yea, but cool household gadgets would drop down her priority list like
bricks off the Royal Gorge Bridge.


#37 of 205 by valerie on Thu Jun 19 03:34:56 1997:

(Valerie did vast amounts of babysitting back when she was a teenager, so she
does actually have some idea about what parenthood would be like.)

(Jim, you're a sweet person!)


#38 of 205 by jaklumen on Tue Apr 30 11:08:21 2002:

I see that since this item was alive, valerie became a parent twice 
over.

resp:31 Another Ron Popeil invention, which leads me to ask, re: 
resp:1 -- what the hell is wrong with Ron Popeil inventions?  I've 
seen the infomercial for the pasta/sausage maker, and I think it's 
pretty good.

For meat lovers, I think his Showtime Rotisserie looks pretty good.  I 
had a chance to look it over at Target, and I think it seems pretty 
handy for cooking small meats.  It's very small and compact, it 
doesn't use much energy, and you can steam veggies on top.  Seems like 
it would be a great addition to an apartment.

resp:24 For some reason, I never did get hooked on a crock pot, maybe 
because I don't like to add ingredients and come back later.  I like 
to cook fast and be done, so--

My pressure cooker (item:191) and my veggie/rice steamer are two *big* 
appliances I just cannot do without.  Pressure cooking is just the 
bomb, since it's so efficient.  I can cook small meats easily, such as 
a small whole chicken, a beef roast, or some cuts of pork.  Small 
whole chickens can go as low as 59 cents a pound on sale here, and 
it's easy for me to cook them down this way.  I can do chicken curry 
easy with the pressure cooker and the veggie/rice steamer.

I love juice, so I'd have to keep my Juiceman Jr. juicer, and my 
steamer juicer.  I use the latter when Concord grapes are in season, 
and then I go harvest them at my in-laws and my folks.


#39 of 205 by keesan on Tue Apr 30 15:12:24 2002:

To pressure cook brown rice, add 1.3 cups water per cup rice, bring to 15
pounds, and turn off.  Wait about 20 minutes.  I have seen the steamer
juicers in use.  We use a squeezo or victoria gadget for raw juice.  Lucky
you to have family with grapes!


#40 of 205 by slynne on Tue Apr 30 16:04:34 2002:

I have about 20 concord grape vines in my backyard which you are 
welcome to come raid in the late summer when the grapes come in. But 
you have to get here in a gas guzzling SUV. HAHAHA. Just kidding. I 
have way more grapes than I can pick so if anyone wants some, just let 
me know. 


#41 of 205 by jep on Tue Apr 30 17:21:56 2002:

We had a Ronco rotisserie, which my wife kept when I moved out.  She 
used it once in a while for chicken.  It was very good chicken, every 
time.

Since I've had to learn to survive again on my own cooking, I'd have to 
say my slow cooker is the best thing I have.  I'm eating leftover beef 
stew right now.  I've made the best chili I ever made in it, too.

My son loves the waffles from our electric waffle maker.  We have them 
for breakfast about half of all of our breakfasts.


#42 of 205 by keesan on Wed May 1 02:40:15 2002:

Slynne, thanks for the offer and if we do show up we can look at your cordless
phone and bike and put in a basement phone jack.  Perhaps Jim can design and
build a bike trailer first to cart home grapes.


#43 of 205 by jaklumen on Wed May 1 09:25:15 2002:

resp:39  I do count myself lucky, because I just love home bottled 
grape juice.  I do several large bottles and drink them through about 
half the year.  I've been doing it for a number of years now, and now 
that I'm truly on my own, it's great.

Trouble is just storage.

Only thing with a steamer is you can't get a strong concentration.  
However, it is much easier than boiling it and straining it through 
cheesecloth/pillow case.


#44 of 205 by keesan on Wed May 1 14:44:25 2002:

Our little machines do not require boiling or cheesecloth.  We just feed the
grapes in the top, turn the crank, and juice comes out the holes in a metal
strainer while pulp/seeds come out the end.  We freeze the raw juice.
Boiling might increase the yield.


#45 of 205 by slynne on Wed May 1 21:30:18 2002:

Well, the grapes dont come in until August so if Jim wants to build a 
cart for hauling grapes, he has lots of time. 


#46 of 205 by keesan on Wed May 1 23:31:28 2002:

I thought it was actually September and they hang on until October.  Maybe
you have early grapes - are they purple Concord?  We have a few vines but the
raccoons knock off the grapes while they are green.


#47 of 205 by jaklumen on Thu May 2 08:35:49 2002:

resp:44 You said you used a Victoria strainer?  Interesting.. my mom 
used to use it all the time for tomatoes, but never thought of it for 
grapes.

resp:46 for purple Concord, yes, the grapes come in September and 
generally ripen to their fullest in October.


#48 of 205 by keesan on Thu May 2 14:44:24 2002:

The Victoria has different inserts for grapes or tomatoes (I think it may be
a different spiral on the inside).


#49 of 205 by slynne on Thu May 2 17:29:50 2002:

mmmm. Maybe it was September. I remember that my friend Shannon and her 
family picked a lot of them and her daughter really liked them. 
Normally they live in California. They were at my house in early August 
but they were also staying with me again during the middle two weeks of 
September so maybe I just have my times mixed up. 




#50 of 205 by gelinas on Mon Nov 25 02:21:30 2002:

Reading this item all at once, I'm struck by the difference four years
make, comparing #6 and #29.  So has the pendulum swung back?


#51 of 205 by cmcgee on Mon Nov 25 04:45:13 2002:

me, i like 31


#52 of 205 by mary on Mon Nov 25 12:08:41 2002:

Oh, my, things have changed.

I seldom use the food processor anymore.  The bread machine
went in the great garage sale of 2000 (after a switch to a
lower carbohydrate diet).  The immersion blender has moved
up a few notches as I've started making more soups.  The
Foreman grill has come on the scene and proved very useful.
The big mixer gets hauled out for big production dinners
and is still very helpful so it makes the cut.  And the 
unglamorous toaster does it's thing on a daily basis,
without much recognition.  (Mary makes a mental note
to thank the toaster.)

I think what would top my list at this point is a nice
sharp knife.  I guess this reflects the subtle shift to
more fresh, simply prepared foods in our diet.



#53 of 205 by mary on Mon Nov 25 12:09:32 2002:

s/its/it's  


#54 of 205 by gelinas on Tue Nov 26 00:28:44 2002:

Thank you, Mary.


#55 of 205 by i on Wed Nov 27 02:17:43 2002:

Follow-up question - does valerie now have an immersion blender?
:) 


I've still got (and use and need) the microwave & bread machine.
The sub-micro "food processer" (chopper) & small hand mixer are
stuffed away somewhere.  The folks got the nice toaster i never
used when their old one died.  I make little things in the oven
often enough to occasionally think about a toaster oven.  Recent
purchases have been of heat-proof rubber spatulas, iron fry pans,
a serving bowl, etc. - but i did buy one of those electronic
timer/thermometers with the long-enough-to-snake-into-the-roast-
in-the-oven probe.  I need a soft plastic cutting board for meat. 

Years of idle thoughts have not translated into a heavy-duty mixer
and the biggest lack is that my apartment lacks a dishwasher. 

I could stand to unload some of the dozen little juice glasses,
extra fry pans, etc. at a garage sale, Kiwanis, Treasure Mart, or
something.  


#56 of 205 by scott on Wed Nov 27 03:03:49 2002:

Let's see... I don't use the bread machine as much either, partially because
I don't need to make sandwiches for lunch everyday, and partially because I
don't eat as much carbs as I used to either.  Rice cooker is rarely used.
I probably make a loaf a bread a week, and it lasts 2-3 days.  Toaster gets
used on days 2 and 3 of that loaf.  ;)

What else?  The beer brewing stuff has seen a lot of use lately; I'm
presently sitting on about 5 cases of beer!

I've been baking more, and using my stove a fair amount.


#57 of 205 by slynne on Wed Nov 27 17:53:57 2002:

I have been thinking about getting a bread maker because I really like 
fresh bread plus I want to start eating more whole grains. I figure 
that having fresh whole wheat bread will be nice. 


#58 of 205 by mary on Wed Nov 27 20:15:42 2002:

They are convenient.  I would love waking up on Sunday mornings
to the smell of baking cinnamon raisin bread.  


#59 of 205 by i on Thu Nov 28 02:31:04 2002:

The bread machine is about cost and control for me.  Seriously healthy
bread (low fat/sodium/sugar, heavily fiber enriched, low refined flour,
etc.) that i can tweak for the cost of ingredients (vs. healthy=expensive
store prices).


#60 of 205 by keesan on Thu Nov 28 18:03:58 2002:

We buy bulk baking yeast - would you like some (much cheaper than the little
packets from the store)?  Why are you adding fiber to unrefined flour?


#61 of 205 by i on Fri Nov 29 14:38:35 2002:

I get my yeast at By the Pound (the bulk store in the S. Main Market) and
use only 1/2 t per loaf.  I don't recall the cost per pound - any idea
what you pay?

Experiments with my machine and no-bread-flour loaves never worked out.
There's more fiber in the 2C bread flour / 1C wheat bran that i'm using 
now than in 3C of whole wheat flour.  (I use the fine-cut bran, so it's
not mostly air in the cup.)  Occasionally I see whole wheat bread flour
and use that with good results.  There's also a limit to how many things
i can reasonably stock in my feeding-just-one-person-&-no-chest-freezer
pantry. 


#62 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 29 15:10:57 2002:

So you are mixing white flour and bran?  But then you don't get the germ,
which has a lot of vitamins and minerals.  And most of the taste.
We get our yeast and flour through a buying club.  The flour is about 40 cents
per pound.  The food coop charges something like $1.35 for it.  Organic whole
wheat bread flour in both cases, from the same supplier.  We are sharing the
flour with three other people and we buy it fresh nearly every month now. 
If you have other business in the downtown area and want to stop by with a
milk jug or other container we can sell you about 7 pounds (one gallon).  I
presume our baking yeast costs about half what the coop charges.  We also have
rye flour and cornmeal, both organic.  They are probably fresher than
supermarket whole wheat flour, which can be pretty rancid after sitting onthe
shelves for a few months.  We have also tried adding to bread part durum flour
from the Indian food store, which is yellow and claims to be 'whole'
(entiere), and is higher gluten.


#63 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 1 21:25:19 2002:

If a person is thinking about getting a bread machine for baking whole 
wheat bread, does the brand matter?


#64 of 205 by i on Sun Dec 1 21:59:28 2002:

I dimly recall that some bread machines have a "whole wheat" setting...
which is *NOT* to say that this setting is good for anything but sales.

Brand certainly matters in the sense that it does with any gadget - some
are better performing, more reliable, cheaper, etc. than others.

Are you familiar with bread machines to know of any features that you
want to have?

I don't think they've reviewed bread machines for a while, but i recall
a suggestion or two in a recent Consumer Reports magazine that's around
here somewhere. 


#65 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 1 22:14:19 2002:

I am totally clueless about bread machines. I do want to get one, 
primarily because I want to start baking whole wheat bread so it is 
important that I get one that can handle that. 

What kind do you have, i? 


#66 of 205 by mary on Sun Dec 1 22:18:39 2002:

I had a Panasonic (sold at Williams-Sonoma) and it did a very
good job with whole wheat bread.  But that was eons ago, don't
know anything about the latest models.

Buy it from somewhere that will take it back, used, if you
don't like it.


#67 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 1 22:27:20 2002:

That is good advice. 


#68 of 205 by keesan on Sun Dec 1 22:41:01 2002:

Ours has a whole wheat setting (also about 10 other settings such as sweet
bread) but I don't know what it does.  Perhaps it allows a longer rise.  I
would like one that you could program for as long a rise as you want, and
choose between 1 and 2 rises.  Our first machine was only able to do one
standard setting - short rise - and the bread always came out rather heavy.
We have two machines now with timers that in theory should allow you to make
breads that require first rising the sponge and then adding the rest of the
flour (mix up the sponge, add to the machine, dump flour on top, set on a
timer to start the next morning after the sponge has risen for a while.)


#69 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 1 22:42:42 2002:

That sounds complicated. I dont even know what sponge is. haha. 


#70 of 205 by keesan on Mon Dec 2 15:45:57 2002:

Along with whole wheat and sweet bread, it has rapid and quick breads, so I
suspect these settings are in fact only different timings.  I wonder how rapid
and quick differ.  Sponge is a wet dough that rises for a while and falls back
on itself and then you add more flour to get it to rise again.  It supposedly
gives things a different texture and taste.


#71 of 205 by i on Tue Dec 3 02:05:36 2002:

My machine is a Regal from early '96.  I bought a replacement pan & paddle
for it a year or two ago.

My impression is that many bread machines are bought with good intentions,
then fall into disuse fairly soon.  Depending on your budget, it could be
good to borrow one or buy second-hand.  Consumer Reports briefly lists a
few favored models in their Xmas gift issue - they go for $75 to $100 new.

It's certainly possible to make fancy stuff with a bread machine (if you
have time to burn & itchy fingers), but regular use of one with a proven
recipe pretty much amounts to (1) measure & dump stuff into machine, (2)
plug in machine & push buttons to start it, and (3) remember to remove
finished bread semi-promptly & leave it out to cool for a while.

You'll probably need to add a few standard bread ingredients to your 
pantry.  Yeast and bread flour almost certainly.  Probably oil.  Whole
wheat flour in your case.  There's no need for lots of ingredients; but
somebody somewhere has found & bought & grated & measured 15 different
kinds of cheeses because they just *had* to bake 15-cheese bread.


#72 of 205 by cmcgee on Tue Dec 3 02:13:35 2002:

Item 3 has a lot of stuf about bread machines


#73 of 205 by keesan on Tue Dec 3 02:49:11 2002:

We do not put any oil in our bread, just flour, water, yeast.  Jim has been
experimenting with how much rye flour can be added to the wheat before the
machine overloads and he has to take it apart and replace the thermal cutout.
He is up to about 1/4 now, I think.


#74 of 205 by glenda on Tue Dec 3 03:40:14 2002:

I used mine 2-3 times a week for almost 5 years.  It is in disuse at the
moment because the power set up in this house can't handle it.  As soon as
the house is repaired/remodeled it will go back into regular use.


#75 of 205 by jmsaul on Tue Dec 3 05:05:25 2002:

Re #73:  That's pretty funny.  How many times has he blown the cutout?


#76 of 205 by slynne on Tue Dec 3 16:13:02 2002:

I think I will try to borrow my mom's bread machine. I'll bet she cant 
remember the last time she used it! :) I guess if I break it with my 
whole wheat flour, I'll buy her a new one. 


#77 of 205 by keesan on Tue Dec 3 16:34:00 2002:

Jim has, at present, three bread machines.  The one into which he is putting
rye flour has not 'broken' yet.  One of the others arrived with blown cutout,
which he replaced.  First time he made bread it blew again so he tried a
smaller batch or more water.  Then his housemate blew the cutout on the third
machine.  So the answer is three.  Some of these machines are really not well
designed for non-fluffy type bread.  Another friend with another machine also
had problems with whole wheat bread - it would start moving and then stop
every time until Jim gave him an adjusted recipe.  Until then he would always
take the unkneaded dough out and bake it (without waiting for it to rise) and
eat a hard lump.  He does not quite understand how bread is made.

Two of the three problem machines are Wellbuilt.  The one which always works
well is a Regal, so you might try a Regal for heavier breads.  We actually
paid $20 for it used (at Miller Manor thrift shop).  Kiwanis often has bread
machines for $10-25.

If Slynne's mother's bread machine stops working Jim will be happy to fix it.
Ask him for a recipe suggestion for whole wheat bread.  He did a lot of
experimenting and discovered that it helps to preheat the pan and the water
so it will rise faster.


#78 of 205 by scott on Tue Dec 3 16:35:32 2002:

My Panasonic is a tank - I've had it for 7-8 years, and had to replace the
drive belt after 7 years.  Worth the $160, certainly.


#79 of 205 by scott on Tue Dec 3 16:36:23 2002:

(er, worth the $160 to buy the machine, not to replace the belt.  The new belt
cost something like $10-15 with shipping)


#80 of 205 by slynne on Tue Dec 3 17:22:06 2002:

I definately will ask Jim (and others) for nice whole grain bread 
recipes! 


#81 of 205 by i on Wed Dec 4 12:15:54 2002:

Note that most bread recipes probably need to be tweaked (adjust yeast,
sugar, liquids, etc.) to your machine (which has slightly different times,
temps, pan shape, etc. than the recipe-writer's machine).


#82 of 205 by slynne on Wed Dec 4 18:34:59 2002:

I see. That just might end up being a challenge for me. I am not the 
best cook in the world. Oh well, it will be fun anyways. 


#83 of 205 by i on Mon Dec 23 03:14:12 2002:

I'm thinking more about a toaster oven.  Cooking for one, there are a
fair number of times when turning on the stove's oven just seems silly
(making 6 muffins or some such).  I don't make toast, so the "can also
reheat pizza" bottom-end models are out.  I want something that'll do
a loaf of banana bread, small casserole, etc. 

Measuring tape, etc. will tell me if it would fit in & not blow fuses - 
but how useful are such things?  Are good ones really a smaller version
of a "real" oven, or just glorified TV dinner heaters?  Is "convection"
a real feature or a noisy price-hike? 


#84 of 205 by slynne on Mon Dec 23 04:03:27 2002:

I made my first loaf of bread in my bread machine! It didnt rise as much as
I would have liked but it was edible!


#85 of 205 by cmcgee on Mon Dec 23 12:11:04 2002:

Toaster ovens are Great for small batches.  I even have a set of baking
pans that fit toaster ovens.  It includes a jelly roll pan (the cookie pan
with 3/8 in sides), a 9 1/4 by 6 1/2 by 2 in baking pan that is a great
lasagne size, a 7 1/2 by 3/3/4 by 2 1/4 in loaf pan, three mini pie pans,
and four mini loaf pans. Made by Mirro.  I don't remember the last time I
saw them on sale, but check the (fake) hardware store on Stadium, next to
Big George's. [We all know that Stadium Hardware is the REAL hardware
store on Stadium}. 

Over the years I've collected a couple 6-hole muffin pans, a springform
pan with both a flat bottom and center-hole insert, 7 inch pie pans, two
small round cake pans, and numerous tart pans of various shapes.  I make
biscuits, muffins, cookies, cornbread, and just about everything else in
my toaster oven.  

The Jiffy mix single layer cake mixes make the cutest little layer cakes.
For mixing small batches of cookies, my Cuisinart Little Pro Plus is a
whizz.  (It also whips egg whites, juices limes, lemons and oranges, and
doubles as a salad shooter, with a side-directed, continuous feed shredder
or slicer.)

That said, I don't bake much, compared to many people here.  If I ate
baked goods very often, I'd probably go the big oven, big freezer route.


#86 of 205 by slynne on Mon Dec 23 15:54:21 2002:

Wow. that does sound like something a single person could use.


#87 of 205 by keesan on Mon Dec 23 17:58:02 2002:

I have not used my stove oven for over a year, since we got the bread machine.
I have a small round Nesco electric oven (insulated walls) that works for
potatoes.  Congrats on mastering the bread machine. Whole wheat bread never
rises enough in those.   I wonder if the Nesco would bake bread.


#88 of 205 by jaklumen on Tue Dec 24 08:21:04 2002:

I really wish I had a toaster oven myself.  I don't eat toast as much 
as I used to, and so I really think a slot toaster alone is somewhat 
useless.  It's hard to cook everything on the stove top and I don't 
always like waiting for a large oven to heat.

resp:85 thanks for the tip, even though I must hunt among my own local 
stores.  hehe


#89 of 205 by gelinas on Tue Dec 24 16:01:23 2002:

Hmm... We probably should replace our four-slot toaster; one of the handles
won't stay down, so only two of the slots are useable.  A toaster oven would
be easier for some of the larger things, like bagels.  Hmm...


#90 of 205 by kentn on Tue Dec 24 17:27:06 2002:

We're talking about getting a two-slot toaster that can accept wider
items (like bagels).  There are several of them out there and they
all seem to have a pair of wire grids in the slot that adjust to the
thickness of the item and keep it centered between the heating elements.
Does anyone have any recommendations on this sort of toaster?  Do they
work okay for regular bread?  Do they wear out quickly?  Any particular
brand?


#91 of 205 by slynne on Tue Dec 24 17:42:42 2002:

I have one like that and it works ok. I think it is Proctor-Silex or 
soemthing. I bought mine for a dollar at a garage sale 2 years ago. 


#92 of 205 by mary on Tue Dec 24 18:48:22 2002:

A few years ago I purchased a Cuisinart toaster much like
what kentn described in #90.  Works great on both really
thin toast and thick english muffins and specialty 
breads.  

Plus, it had a line of lights to show the darkness setting.
These lights are always on.  So it's yet one more thing to
glow in the dark come nightime.  I love that.


#93 of 205 by jmsaul on Wed Dec 25 03:23:54 2002:

You can get Hello Kitty toasters at Tsai Grocery.  They even toast a picture
of Hello Kitty on the bread.


#94 of 205 by kentn on Wed Dec 25 04:17:07 2002:

Heh, but will they toast a picture of Hello Kitty on an English
muffin?


#95 of 205 by jmsaul on Thu Dec 26 03:02:40 2002:

Probably screw up the resolution, but what the hell...  ;-)


#96 of 205 by slynne on Thu Dec 26 19:03:15 2002:

Oh man. I might have to get that Hello Kitty toaster. 


#97 of 205 by jmsaul on Fri Dec 27 00:16:31 2002:

I only saw one more there.


#98 of 205 by i on Fri Dec 27 01:25:49 2002:

I've got the latest CR report & ratings on toasters & toaster ovens here
if anyone's interested...


#99 of 205 by gelinas on Fri Dec 27 02:28:59 2002:

Sure.  I'm interested.


#100 of 205 by i on Fri Dec 27 12:43:44 2002:

From Consumer Reports (usual disclaimers here, i own none of these):

(Defaults - slot-type toasters take thick stuff, everything has one-
year warranties, and toaster ovens rates at least "good" for baking &
broiling while holding at least 4 large slices of toast.) 

4-slot Toasters:
Only 2 of the 15 toasters reviewed were 4-slotters -
Proctor-Silex 2444[5] (similar were Hamilton-Beach 24505, 24507, & 24508)
Toastmaster T2050[W]
CR paid $24 for the P-S & $27 for the Tm.  They liked the P-S's overall
performance better & it has a 2-year warranty.  The Tm's shade dial is
"mostly unmarked".  On specifics, they rated the P-S better for ease of
use and the Tm better for producing a full color range.

At the top (ignoring a $100 Kitchenaid) are Philips HD2533 (Target, $30)
and GE 106641 (106691) (WalMart, $20).  Only an average ease of use kept
the P from taking the gold medal, the GE is above average everywhere &
has a 2-year warranty. 

Toaster Ovens: 
...really ain't built to be toasters (is CR's conclusion).  Only 2 of the
10 reviewed are as good at toasting as any of the "slot machines" i listed
above:
Cuisinart TOB-175 (TOB-165, TOB-160) $205
Delonghi XU120 $53
The C is as good a toaster as the $20 GE 2-slotter, but with better ease of
use.  It's also a large convection/broiler/oven with digital controls & a
3-year warranty.  The D is weak at toasting consistent (color) successive
or full batches, but is a bit easier to use than the ToastMaster.
A notch down at toasting ("very good preformance", but its weakness is 
limited color range) is the Sears Kenmore KTES8 at $70.  

The GE & Kenmore units got "CR Best Buy" (based mostly on price/performance).
They didn't look at any Cuisinart slot-type toasters. 


#101 of 205 by i on Sat Dec 28 00:55:03 2002:

FWIW, the toaster oven i'm thinking about is the paint-instead-of-cool-
polished-metal-outside Cuisinart TOB-165; i'd hope to get it for under
$160 at Big Georges (in Ann Arbor).  I don't make toast, so that stuff
mostly doesn't matter.


#102 of 205 by headdoc on Thu Jan 2 16:12:16 2003:

Electric appliances I currently use:  Microwave oven, toaster oven,drip coffee
maker, small electric chopper, and amazingly a new George Forman Grill which
is turning out to be extremely handy.  small appliances I do not use:  bread
machine, cuisinart mixer, electric knife, immersion blender. blender (for
smoothies.


#103 of 205 by keesan on Thu Jan 2 16:16:37 2003:

Do you want to sell your bread machine (I think you are implying that you have
one)?  Or trade it for a repair of something electrical or mechanical? 
(Assuming you live within a few miles or us or come this way occasionally).


#104 of 205 by slynne on Sun Jan 5 21:39:31 2003:

I have been using my bread machine a lot since I got it. My whole wheat 
bread keeps coming out funny though. I mean it looks funny but it 
tastes ok so that is what is important. I have been experimenting with 
adjusting the recipe. I have found that the 1 lb loaf suits my needs 
best. 


#105 of 205 by keesan on Sun Jan 5 22:18:33 2003:

What kind of funny?  Does it maybe rise and then fall again, making the 
top look sort of depressed?


#106 of 205 by mary on Sun Jan 5 22:37:00 2003:

I remember wheat bread as being difficult.  No matter 
what I did it was always a bit dense and gummy.  Then
I bought some gluten and started adding a teaspoon or two
for each loaf.  What a difference.  I purchased it at
Fireside, in Ann Arbor, but they're gone now.  Maybe 
the Ypsi food co-op would carry it?  


#107 of 205 by jmsaul on Sun Jan 5 23:16:03 2003:

You can get it at Hiller's, too.


#108 of 205 by slynne on Mon Jan 6 20:41:56 2003:

re#105 - Yeah, that is exactly what is happening. The bread *tastes* 
great except that it is kind of dense. But that is ok. It is very 
filling which has helped me not eat bad things before lunch since a 
couple of slices of that for breakfast really keeps me full. I might 
try adding some gluten though. I mean, it cant hurt. Is it in the 
baking goods section at Hillers?


#109 of 205 by keesan on Mon Jan 6 23:15:35 2003:

Is there some way to set your machine for a longer rise (or for one long rise
instead of two short ones)?


#110 of 205 by davel on Tue Jan 7 02:30:43 2003:

Usually not, but it may depend on the machine.  Certainly some machines come
with various cycles, some of which have longer rise times.  Usually the
details are not documented.  (In fact, due to our Zojirushi's having died
after 7 years of heavy use, we opened the Wellbilt which we bought (around
1/2 price, when Best went out of business) to have as a backup.  Its
documentation of exactly how long each stage is in each possible cycle is very
complete; if there are temp differences they don't say, though.  The chart
is impressive & likely to be useful.)


#111 of 205 by keesan on Tue Jan 7 02:41:14 2003:

When did Best go out of business?


#112 of 205 by gelinas on Tue Jan 7 03:46:19 2003:

The one on Carpenter closed in . . . '92, I think it was.  Maybe earlier.


#113 of 205 by i on Tue Jan 7 12:28:08 2003:

Gluten's also available at By The Pound (S. Main Mkt.), probably People's
Food Coop (Kerrytown), and (guess) at most big supermarkets.


#114 of 205 by keesan on Tue Jan 7 17:34:46 2003:

There is a food coop in Ypsi, where Slynne lives.
I got my first fax machine at Best. It was a come-on special (for only $300,
took special half-size rolls that you had to roll yourself, and had no paper
feed or cutter) and they tried to talk me into something else.  I did not
realize I got it so long ago.  


#115 of 205 by glenda on Tue Jan 7 18:41:28 2003:

The Ann Arbor People's Food Coop doesn't carry gluten, we also got ours at
Fireside.  Whole Foods sometimes has it in 1/2 - 1 lb packages.


#116 of 205 by slynne on Tue Jan 7 20:38:53 2003:

Yeah, the Ypsi food coop is just a few blocks from my house and I am 
even a member and everything. I'll bet *they* have gluten. 

My bread machine will not allow for a longer rise. It isnt a big deal. 
I have found that if I make the 1 lb loaf, it comes out ok but a little 
over done. The solution might be to make the 1 lb loaf and then just 
take it out early. That works better for me anyway because the 1 1/2 lb 
loaf gets stale before I finish it. 


#117 of 205 by jaklumen on Thu Jan 15 10:07:57 2004:

I bought a griddle/grill for Julie at Christmas and we seem to use it 
all the time now.  It's one of those metal things that fits over the 
burners on your stove-- a griddle surface on one side, and a grill 
surface on the other.  It's not as great as an appliance; I have 
noticed that heating is a little uneven as it comes right from the 
stove coil burners.  Hotter in some places than others, I guess?  But 
we needed to save space and it works reasonably well.


#118 of 205 by eeyore on Sun Feb 15 03:21:06 2004:

You can get gluten from Buy The Pound on Main Street in Ann Arbor.

So I'm back working part time at Williams-Sonoma.....lots of toys there.  I
want them all.


#119 of 205 by denise on Sat Nov 18 03:43:52 2006:

Are there any new cool gadgets out there these days? 

There's been a lot of talk in this item about bread machines. Are people still
using them? 


#120 of 205 by keesan on Sat Nov 18 16:19:32 2006:

Jim uses his as an oven, after mixing the bread by hand.  The machines don't
deal well with sticky rye flour.  


#121 of 205 by cmcgee on Sat Nov 18 17:38:33 2006:

My bread machine makes great rye bread, but the recipe uses about half white
flour.  It makes WONDERFUl whole wheat, with nothing but whole wheat flour.

It's an old Toastmaster.  Don't think they make them anymore.


#122 of 205 by denise on Sat Nov 18 23:02:37 2006:

And those that have one, what's the difference in rice that is cooked in a
rice cooker vs making some on the stove?


#123 of 205 by mynxcat on Sat Nov 18 23:31:14 2006:

When I used a rice cooker I noticed no difference. Except that you
didn't have to watch it so it wouldn't get burnt. Apart from that, I
didn't notice any difference. 


#124 of 205 by cmcgee on Sun Nov 19 02:35:44 2006:

I've never noticed any difference either.  The main reason I don't use one
is that it is simple to use a saucepan.  If you put in any amount of rice,
and fill the pan until the water is 1 inch above the surface of the rice, you
can make perfect rice that doesn't burn.

Bring the rice and water to a hard boil, and boil until the water is reduced
to the level of the rice, usually 5 - 7 minutes.  Do not stir during this
process.  When the water is at the top of the rice, you will see small
"volcanos" forming.  

Turn off the electric burner or turn the gas burner down to the lowest
possible flame.  Put a close fitting lid on the pan.  Let the rice steam 15
- 20 minutes or longer.  After 15 minutes you can turn off the flame, and the
rice will remain hot for another half an hour or so.


#125 of 205 by denise on Sun Nov 19 03:38:33 2006:

Hmm, ok... And thanks for the instructions.  I have a SIL [who is Japanese]
who, I think] still has a rice cooker.  They eat a lot of rice. I did like
the rice I had over there awhile back [I think it was the 'sticky' rice with
a bit of seasoning added to it.] What's added, does anyone know, to make
sticky rice? Though I'm sure I can find out from Kazuko or Mike next time I
see them.


#126 of 205 by cmcgee on Sun Nov 19 15:35:53 2006:

Actually, it is more likely to be the type of rice you buy.  Sticky rice,
brown rice, white rice, sushi rice, these are all varieties of rice that give
different dishes.
Sushi rice will also have a vinegar dressing on it.

BTW, the method above came from my childhood, when the lady from Osaka who
lived next door to us in Hawaii taught my mother to make Japanese rice.  My
mother was a southerner who traditionally put sugar and milk on rice for a
breakfast dish.


#127 of 205 by keesan on Sun Nov 19 16:03:16 2006:

Rice cookers work by being leaky and losing most of the water as steam.  When
enough water has left, the temperature rises and they shut off.  This wastes
a lot of energy as well as steaming up the kitchen.  I think you need to put
in at least two cups of water per cup of rice.  We use a pressure cooker with
1 1/3 cups of water per cup of rice, which heats up quickly to 15 lb pressure,
then you turn it off and wait 5-10 minutes for it to finish cooking as it
cools down (for brown rice, which would otherwise take 45 minutes).  We tried
a microwave pressure cooker but that was slower and quite small.  There is
short, long, and medium grain white and brown rice, and white or brown sticky
(glutinous) rice.  Sushi used to be fermented rice, now it is imitated with
vinegar (like vinegar pickles instead of salt pickles).


#128 of 205 by glenda on Sun Nov 19 23:00:05 2006:

My rice cooker does not steam up my kitchen.  We like it.  Using it means that
a burner (and pan, pans seem to be a limited resource for some reason) is not
being taken up by the rice and can be used for another dish.  It keeps the
rice warm longer than the pan method which is useful when we have varied
schedules.  It means no more burned rice.  Damon does most of the cooking
since I am either covering or taking evening classes and STeve often doesn't
get home until quite late.  Damon has a tendancy to game while cooking, hence
he often forgets to check on things.  If we use the rice cooker and he burns
the chicken or pork chops and veggies, we can at least have buttered rice or
the above mentioned with milk, sugar, cinnamon, and nutmeg. 

Our rice cooker can also do slow cooked soups and stews.


#129 of 205 by keesan on Sun Nov 19 23:01:57 2006:

How much water goes into your rice cooker per cup of rice?  You probably have
a relatively leaky house and don't mind some extra steam in it.


#130 of 205 by mary on Sun Nov 19 23:18:33 2006:

Hah, I got you all beat.  My rice only takes ONE MINUTE!  Which means I 
have more time to develop my plan for world peace and I can save precious 
energy resources at the same time.



#131 of 205 by cmcgee on Mon Nov 20 03:14:18 2006:

World Peace!  You planning on becoming a beauty contestant?


#132 of 205 by glenda on Wed Nov 22 04:43:57 2006:

I use the knuckle medthod of measuring rice and water - rice to the depth of
the first knuckle, water to the depth of the second.  Works in the rice cooker
or in a saucepan.


#133 of 205 by cmcgee on Wed Nov 22 12:27:20 2006:

Actually, mine is the knuckle method as well.  However, you can fill the pan
with any amount of rice.  The only measurement is the 1 knuckle between the
top of the rice and the top of the water.


#134 of 205 by jadecat on Wed Nov 22 13:55:08 2006:

*grins* and here I use measuring cups...


#135 of 205 by keesan on Thu Nov 23 17:37:00 2006:

A knuckly method would only work if you use the same pot and cook the same
amount of rice every time.  


#136 of 205 by glenda on Thu Nov 23 18:35:56 2006:

It has worked every time in every pot I have used it.  It is basically the
same as Colleen's - about 1 inch of water above the level of the rice.  The
second knuckle on my index finger is close enough to an inch that I use it
for measuring while stitching.  It is the easiest measuring device for this
purpose as it is always available, is easy to wash before using, and doesn't
matter if it gets wet.  I have made rice for 1 person to 8-10 people using
it.  I don't know how you came to your conclusion above, especially if you
haven't used the method.


#137 of 205 by cmcgee on Thu Nov 23 23:54:50 2006:

Yes, the knuckle method has worked for my mom and me for over 50 years.  I
have never in my life made rice by measuring either the rice or the water.


Many pots, many stoves, infinite amounts of rice.  It works the same way for
brown rice and white.  I probably err on the "more" side of the joint when
adding water for brown rice.  

I just pour rice into a pot until it looks like the right amount for the
number of people I'm feeding and how hungry they are. 

It's worked for 1-8 people, routinely, for dinner, even when 3 of the 8 people
were hungry teenaged athletes.  I too don't understand how Sindi can tell
those of us who use the method that it doesn't work.  


#138 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 24 04:26:51 2006:

I can't believe this would work, unless you put in too much water every time
and cook it without a cover and boil it until the water is gone.  If you cover
the pot, and use the same pot for 1 or 8 cups of rice, either the 1 cup will
come out much too wet or the 8 cups will burn.


#139 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 05:59:01 2006:

Do you really think that your belief that it wouldn't work is a more
compelling argument than our years of experience feeding people with this
method?


#140 of 205 by glenda on Fri Nov 24 07:52:43 2006:

Really.  I put the lid on EVERY time.  When cooking on the stove and not in
the rice cooker, it is brought to a boil and either turned off or down to the
lowest temp on the burner and left alone for 15-20 minutes for white rice,
35-45 minutes for brown.  No boiling until the water is gone.  Doesn't matter
what pot or how much rice.  The magic is in the inch of water above the level
of the rice.  That is just enough water for the rice to come out light and
fluffy every time.  It is the instructions for cooking rice that is in all
my Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Indian, Persian, and Mid-eastern cookbooks.  It
is also the instructions I got from Chinese and Indian friends.  (I asked just
to confirm how they were taught.)  Since most of them have rice for almost
every meal, and the fact that it has always worked for me, I trust them.  Try
it and see.


#141 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 15:40:42 2006:

Actually, the water isn't gone.  You only boil until the water level reaches
the rice level.  Any more than that and you get burned rice.


#142 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 24 19:54:51 2006:

Re 141, that means you are putting in more water than you need, if you boil
off some of it.   If 1" of water above 8" of rice is enough, then it is too
much above 1" of rice, unless you like added heat and humidity in your
kitchen.  We pressure cook brown rice by just bringing it to 15 lb and turning
it off.  Some time I will measure how much water is above 2 cups of rice when
we add 2.6 cups of water to it.  


#143 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 20:02:08 2006:

If I put in less water, I get burned rice.


#144 of 205 by keesan on Fri Nov 24 20:10:21 2006:

Your pot is probably losing a lot of water to the air.


#145 of 205 by cmcgee on Fri Nov 24 22:49:07 2006:

Well, it's one of those waterless stainless pots, that has a lid that floats
on the steam.  I have butter-steamed new potatoes in it without using any
water at all.  Works just fine with tiny potatoes and butter.  Without having
an seal that withstands multiple atmospheres of pressure, it's one of the best
designed lid and pan sets I've ever seen.  

It was designed in the 50s, and has a cast iron core in the bottom, sandwiched
between layers of stainless steel.  It uses very little fuel to cook with,
and because  of the cast iron core, can finish cooking a dish with the heat
turned off.  

I have a set my mother gave me when I went to college, and have collected all
the other pieces over the years.  The company went out of business in the 70s,
and the pieces are gourmet collectors items because of their fuel efficiency.

It self-seals when used correctly, and the lids are precisely weighted to
provide waterless cooking of vegetables and other foods that contain a fair
amount of natural moisture.  

It does not create a pressure vessel, but short of a pressure cooker, it does
the best job of any professional pans I've ever used.  


#146 of 205 by denise on Sat Nov 25 02:25:55 2006:

Those sound cool; I've never heard of them before. too bad they don't make
them any more...


#147 of 205 by cmcgee on Sat Nov 25 18:34:09 2006:

They are cool.  However, the rice technique works in ANY kind of pan, not just
these way cool ones.  I've cooked in a lot of kitchens, and clearly other
people have used this technique for years without my super cool pans.


#148 of 205 by denise on Sun Nov 26 11:15:41 2006:

Something I'm going to have to pick up when I can is a basic mixer... My old
one has disappeared, apparently not having survived my move back to MI.
There's been a few times recently where I've wanted to use one.


#149 of 205 by denise on Sat Dec 9 10:04:15 2006:

Back to rice: Do y'all tend to season your rice with anything to keep it from
being bland, and if so, what kinds of things do you use? I know one time, my
SIL added some kind of seasoning that included sesame seeds and salt that I
thought was good. And at a restaurant that included rice, it tasted like it
had some herbs of some sort [at a middle eastern place] and maybe some Italian
dressing or oil of some sort. And almonds which were good.  I also know of
that asian stuff [liquid form] that I can't think of the name of right now
[I'm not really crazy about that one, it tastes salty to me, and the flavor
doesn't do much for me--though I know a lot of other people that do like it].


#150 of 205 by glenda on Sat Dec 9 12:31:33 2006:

It depends on what is served with it.  I like rice plain, both white and
brown, when served with most any spiced dish.  The plain rice offsets the
spiciness of the other food.  I like both white and brown rice with butter,
salt and pepper.  I like white rice with milk, sugar, cinnamon, and nutmeg
(really rice pudding without the custard and long cooking).  I like it with
saffron.  I like it curried.  I like what Mom calls Glorified Rice - cooked
white rice with a can or two of fruit cocktail with its juice and whipped
cream mixed in, sort of a cheap ambrosia.  Rice is very versitile and able
to take almost any type of spicing that you care to throw at it.


#151 of 205 by keesan on Sat Dec 9 17:34:27 2006:

Jim eats leftover rice with chopped apples and pomegranate syrup and black
walnuts when he feels like cracking them first.


#152 of 205 by edina on Sun Dec 10 03:35:28 2006:

Re 151  That sounds insanely good.

Re 149  I tend to like plain rice, because like Glenda said, it's more 
on what goes with it.  With indian food, I'll cook basmati rice with 
whole cloves and a cinnamon stick in it, maybe a bit of saffron, but 
nothing else.  


#153 of 205 by void on Sun Dec 10 20:16:40 2006:

Sometimes I cook rice in stock instead of plain water.

Plain rice with slivered almonds, green onions, and Clancy's Fancy is
pretty good.


#154 of 205 by jadecat on Mon Dec 11 14:30:19 2006:

I'm boring, I just tend to have brown rice with a little salt and butter.


#155 of 205 by i on Thu Dec 14 03:53:55 2006:

I always mix rice into a casserole or stew sort of dish.  Cooking for one
makes it easy to avoid the issue.

Whole wheat noodles i sometimes serve plain, then add a bit of olive oil,
salt, & pepper, or maybe plain yogurt.  Depends mostly on what's on hand
and how much time i have.


#156 of 205 by mary on Sun May 11 16:43:58 2008:

I got a rice cooker.  I'm geeked, in a rice cooker kind of way. ;-)


#157 of 205 by furs on Sun May 11 19:04:08 2008:

hahaha.
I know people love those, but for me there is no purpose.  I don't cook
enough rice I guess.


#158 of 205 by tod on Sun May 11 21:32:26 2008:

re #157
They're great if rice is a side dish and you tend to forget it's cooking (thus
it doesn't burn as easily in a cooker)


#159 of 205 by keesan on Sun May 11 22:46:35 2008:

Rice cookers are designed to put a lot of steam into the air, which means they
waste a lot of energy and also make your room very humid.  We cook rice in
a tightly fitting pot and it comes to boiling much faster (and if in a
pressure cooker, you just turn it off once it reaches pressure, after a few
minutes, and it cannot burn).


#160 of 205 by mary on Sun May 11 23:15:51 2008:

All that wasted steam must be what's making my kitchen smell delish at the 
moment.

Tonight, at chez Remmers, it's orange beef stir-fry.


#161 of 205 by edina on Mon May 12 04:22:09 2008:

Steam is just one more excuse to open my pores.


#162 of 205 by keesan on Mon May 12 14:56:21 2008:

It is not good for the structure of whatever you are living in to have water
condensing in it.  Running down the windows.  Puddling on the sills.   Rotting
the wood.


#163 of 205 by mary on Mon May 12 15:03:41 2008:

I'm sure it's not.


#164 of 205 by edina on Mon May 12 16:25:08 2008:

Hi Sindi.  I live in the desert.  Trust me, I'm good.  The house is fine
too.


#165 of 205 by tod on Mon May 12 18:38:43 2008:

re #162
They've invented these crazy lil things called exhaust fans.  When I cook on
the stove, I use it.


#166 of 205 by keesan on Mon May 12 20:44:10 2008:

Do you have an objection to using less energy to cook with?  An exhaust fan
also cools the house (or heats it if it is warmer out).


#167 of 205 by edina on Mon May 12 20:56:27 2008:

I seriously could count on one hand how many times this year I've used
my   rice cooker, so it's not too much an issue.  We just don't eat that
much rice.


#168 of 205 by tod on Mon May 12 22:25:52 2008:

re #166
 Do you have an objection to using less energy to cook with? 

You mean do I object to eating only twigs and leaves like a Giraffe? Yes.


#169 of 205 by keesan on Mon May 12 23:39:30 2008:

Cooked rice does not grow on trees.


#170 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 00:07:14 2008:

Neither do spastic colons.


#171 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 00:35:00 2008:

Do nonspastic colons?
Pressure cooked rice gets very thoroughly cooked.  With brown rice we add 1.3
cups water per cup of rice.  White rice would probably be less.  If you cook
with more water, the rest of it goes into the air along with wasted heat.


#172 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 02:21:53 2008:

re #171
How long does that take?  Do you use a pressure cooker pot on a stove?


#173 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 02:38:49 2008:

Maybe 5 minutes to come to pressure, then 5 to come down?  I never timed it.
It is does before the rest of the meal.  Yes pressure cooker on stove.  We
also have one large electric pressure cooker which is more efficient but too
large (nuisance to clean).  We have at least 10 pressure cookers of various
sizes and designs, and take a small one bike camping with us.  I wonder if
we could cook oatmeal in it (dont' let the pressure come up too far).


#174 of 205 by void on Tue May 13 05:32:07 2008:

What the hell kind of rice cooker causes steam to condense on windows,
puddle on sills, and rot the house frame???


#175 of 205 by jadecat on Tue May 13 13:59:54 2008:

I dunno, but I do know that in the winter, when the air is very dry in
our apartment- a little steam only does good things. We tend to use the
'pot on the stove' method of rice making though- not a specific rice
steamer...


#176 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 15:54:29 2008:

Our house is well sealed, and adding steam to the air causes problems.
Our highest January heating bill was $60 (electric).  DO the rest of you not
believe in global warming or just not personally want to do anything about
it?  Some friends put in a geothermal heating system at great expense but
never insulated or weatherstripped and they now pay $180 in January for heat.


#177 of 205 by edina on Tue May 13 16:25:22 2008:

WTF Sindi?  The occasional use of a rice cooker is going to top the
balance?


#178 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 16:45:38 2008:

re #176
My electric bill in Jan was about $60, too.  I do my part for low carbon
footprint but I also have to do my part for low mildew in rainforest climate.
I'm betting the cooking we do at home(rice rarely) is way more efficient
time, money, energy than restaurant or frozen microwavable.


#179 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 18:56:17 2008:

I am pointing out that there are multiple reasons to cook efficiently.
Seattle does not typically go to -10F in January.  Tod, do you cook things
in tightly sealed pots?  I agree that taking a car to a restaurant wastes far
more fuel that even boiling a lot of water off rice into the air.


#180 of 205 by jadecat on Tue May 13 19:10:27 2008:

My electric bill in the winter was about $30.

Our gas bill was higher, but that's divided up between all the units in
the building.

Sindi- some of us also live in apartments that are run by corporations
that REALLY frown on tenants making their own changes to the apartments.
So we do what we can. 

And for goodness sake, we're not talking about THAT much steam! It's a
rice cooker, not a steam engine.


#181 of 205 by remmers on Tue May 13 19:26:25 2008:

Um, we got a console model rice cooker that sits on the floor, is about
4 feet high and 3 feet across, and weighs 200 pounds.  Whenever we use
it, all the windows fog up, the walls get wet, and the neighborhood
experiences brownouts from the electricity consumption.  If we run it 
with the windows open, the weather bureau issues a local dense fog
warning.

None of these wimpy table model rice cookers for us!






Oops, almost forgot:  :)


#182 of 205 by edina on Tue May 13 19:39:15 2008:

John Remmers, kicking it hard core.


#183 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 19:53:50 2008:

re #179
 Tod, do you cook things
 in tightly sealed pots?

I haven't entertained the idea of a pressure cooker in my house simply for
safety reasons.  In the 80's, a friend of mine suffered major burns when
the pressure cooker where he worked (Big Boy's on 9mile in St.Clair Shores)
exploded.  The risk doesn't seem equitable to energy savings.  Perhaps the
new stovetop pressure cookers are better these days?


#184 of 205 by slynne on Tue May 13 20:43:53 2008:

One thing I will mention even though it doesnt have much to do with
kitchen gizmos is that people should pay attention to their reactions
regarding Sindi's comments about how cooking inefficiently is
contributing to global warming. 

That is why expecting people to change any of their habits out of the
good ness of their heart is never going to work. You have to make policy
that forces them to change their habits. Rice cookers probably dont use
enough energy to really come into play here but I'll bet that if it cost
5 cents to cook rice with a pressure cooker and $5 to cook rice with a
rice cooker, a lot of people would switch to using pressure cookers. 



#185 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 20:51:41 2008:

I'm intrigued simply because my rice cooker works like crap when it cooks
brown/basmati rice.  If I can do it in the same time as white rice by using
a pressure cooker then I'm interested.  I would need assurances that a
pressure cooker isn't going to harm someone, though.


#186 of 205 by edina on Tue May 13 21:25:28 2008:

I love that....I won't make changes out of the goodness of my heart. 
Just because I use my rice cooker maybe once a month I am somehow
condemning the earth.  Nevermind my avid recyclying/reusing or other
things we have done to our home to make it more energy efficient.  Next
you'll be telling my not owning a pressure cooker is me buying into a
patriarchal conspiracy.

I don't use a pressure cooker because A) I don't own one and B) I try to
not own a ton of stuff in my kitchen.  I hate being cluttered in my
kitchen.  I have considered getting a pressure cooker simply because I
love watching them get used on Iron Chef.  But I'm not there yet.


#187 of 205 by keesan on Tue May 13 21:34:19 2008:

We have been pressure cooking for 30 years or so and never had an accident.
We have pressure cookers from the 50s and later.  It is the ones from the 40s
that were not working right.  They are by far the easiest (not just the
fastest) way to cook grains and beans (it helps to presoak the beans but it
not necessary).  Or even potatoes.  We use the special weights that show
pressure (5 10 15 lb) and potatoes need 5 lb, brown rice and beans 15 lb.
Brown rice takes much longer to cook than white rice.  Probably the rice
steamers assume white rice, you add the amount of water that corresponds to
the 20 min it takes to cook rice (it takes 20 min to boil off then the cooker
senses that the temperature has gone up and turns of).  YOu could try adding
twice the water for brown rice.

Pressure cookers do not burn things because they cook mainly with steam, not
just with bottom heat.  My mother used hers for potroasts.  

We tried a microwave rice cooker which took much longer than pressure cookers.


#188 of 205 by tod on Tue May 13 21:55:01 2008:

Where can I find pressure cookers which use weights?  Or is it better to use
the electronic ones with auto shutoff?


#189 of 205 by slynne on Wed May 14 01:19:41 2008:

resp:186 That is my point. *everyone* thinks what they are doing is
reasonable. I know I sure think that I am doing my part. And no...using
a rice cooker is not especially harmful to the environment. And fwiw, I
use the stove top method which is probably the least efficient. Anyways,
I seriously doubt that even the highest energy taxes in the land would
deter someone using a rice cooker since they just dont use that much
energy. But think about how you feel when someone suggests to you that
you should give up the rice cooker. That is how some folks feel about
their SUVs. Guilt will not get them to stop buying them just like no
amount of guilt will stop anyone in this conversation from cooking rice
in the way that works best for them. 


#190 of 205 by tod on Wed May 14 07:57:57 2008:

We made a big pot of rice last night in the rice cooker and I was sure to
towel off the windows and sills while wearing hipwaders.  ;)


#191 of 205 by mary on Wed May 14 12:41:54 2008:

http://tinyurl.com/6gr9b3

You want my rice cooker? You're going to have to pry that baby from my 
cold dead hands.


#192 of 205 by tod on Wed May 14 19:03:55 2008:

From my cold dead chubby fingers!

Look a nice one with a dial setting (instead of weights)
http://tinyurl.com/4qsand


#193 of 205 by slynne on Wed May 14 23:23:29 2008:

Yeah, you would have to pry my rice cooker from my fingers too!

http://www.clearwaterbeachkiku.com/images/ImgLeft_About.jpg



#194 of 205 by edina on Wed May 14 23:56:03 2008:

hahahahahah!!!!


#195 of 205 by mary on Thu May 15 01:20:52 2008:

Good one, Lynne!


#196 of 205 by tod on Thu May 15 05:33:56 2008:

re #193
Why does that guy have my thong on his head?


#197 of 205 by void on Thu May 22 06:04:02 2008:

Dang.  I guess I'll have to quit cooking my rice on a pile of burning
car tires.  I'm really going to miss that special smoky tang.  


#198 of 205 by omni on Fri Aug 29 17:59:09 2008:



#199 of 205 by mary on Sat Dec 13 14:55:44 2008:

I got a new gadget - a milk frother for quick and dirty caps at home.  
Nuke a little milk with or without flavoring.  Froth for 20 seconds.  Pour 
coffee through.  Enjoy.

It works.

http://tinyurl.com/5w4evp


#200 of 205 by keesan on Sat Dec 13 16:44:40 2008:

You put milk into your dirty capacitors?  Does it fix the bulging problem?


#201 of 205 by mary on Sat Dec 13 16:46:38 2008:

Every time.  Almost.


#202 of 205 by keesan on Sat Dec 13 16:52:53 2008:

Is there some additional ingredient you need to add to them?  Hot glue?


#203 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 14 15:38:13 2008:

resp:199 That looks almost exactly like a gadget a friend of mine used
to bring on backpacking trips - to stir koolaid. It is kind of an in
joke but we have a mutual friend who is both into backpacking and into
gadgets. He always made a point to pack as lightly as possible but would
also almost always bring one fancy made for backpacking gadget. My
friend with the koolaid stirrer (which may have really been a milk
frother) would always try to also bring a gadget on every trip except he
would try to make his as useless as possible in order to tease our other
friend. 


#204 of 205 by mary on Sun Dec 14 16:05:28 2008:

Boy, your friends go for the jugular, eh? ;-)


#205 of 205 by slynne on Sun Dec 14 18:53:53 2008:

Yeah. That same friend with the stirrer once went out and bought a $400
tent which made the other friend rather jealous. Once the first friend
realized that, he started setting up his tent in his living room and
talking about it all of the time to the gadget head friend. The gadget
head friend was really excited to see it in action so to speak. Then,
when they next went camping together the guy with the nice tent brought
his $15 K-Mart pup tent and said that the $400 tent was too nice to use
outside ;)


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: