Grex Cooking Conference

Item 151: what am i, part iv

Entered by void on Tue Jan 13 07:02:54 1998:

   this is the game of nutrition facts labels. someone enters the
nutrition facts from the label of a food product, and others guess what
it is. the winner gets to enter the next label.

   this item is usually entered in enigma and linked to kitchen and
puzzles, but i'm breaking with tradition and entering it in kitchen
first.
610 responses total.

#1 of 610 by void on Tue Jan 13 07:05:54 1998:

   serv size: 3 pcs. (2g)
   servings: about 25
   calories: about 10
   total fat: 0g
   cholest: 0g
   sodium: 0mg
   total carb: 2g
   sugars: 2g
   protein: 0g


#2 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jan 13 14:24:11 1998:

Definitely not for diabetics!  Are they normally eaten at 2 a.m.?


#3 of 610 by remmers on Tue Jan 13 14:29:15 1998:

   [This item of fabled tradition is now linked to Enigma.]



#4 of 610 by valerie on Tue Jan 13 21:03:57 1998:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 610 by void on Tue Jan 13 22:45:09 1998:

   you've just about got it, valerie. do i have to wait for the exact
right brand name?


#6 of 610 by orinoco on Wed Jan 14 03:52:36 1998:

Depends on how picky you feel like being.


#7 of 610 by void on Wed Jan 14 09:52:46 1998:

   in that case, valerie has it. the label is from a box of altoids.


#8 of 610 by valerie on Wed Jan 14 17:58:44 1998:

This response has been erased.



#9 of 610 by keesan on Wed Jan 14 19:44:32 1998:

I would still like to know if it is allowed to enter items that are acquired
without a label, such as fresh produce or bulk foods.  If we are going to have
a potluck, it would be nice to have a few more fruits and vegetables.  The
public library has several volumes worth of food values in the reference
section, I think published by the USDA.  (I don't recall seeing kelp in the
vegetable one, and most of them were titled things like:  poultry, fish,
beef...).  We could still required that someone actually have the food in
their kitchen before entering it.


#10 of 610 by mary on Wed Jan 14 19:59:55 1998:

I don't think there are a lot of rules to this thing, keesan.
Enter something fresh and unlabled and see how it goes.  


#11 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Jan 19 04:12:42 1998:

I didn't know you were required to have the food - I thought you just had to
know the stats, from whatever source.


#12 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jan 20 03:55:23 1998:

On the assumption that Valerie's cupboard is bare (it has been five days),
or that she is down with the flu, I will enter the following purchased from
Arbor Farms in a container marked 'High in iron, calcium and protein'.

Net Wt. 12.0 OZ. (340g)
Serving size approx. 1/4 cup (45g)  
Servings per container 8

Calories 160  fat cal. 10

Total fat 1.0 g  2%
Saturated fat 0 g 
Cholesterol 0mg
Sodium 5mg
Potassium 220 mg
Total carb. 32 g 11%
Dietary fiber 6g 24%
Sugars 0g
Protein 5g
Vitamin A 0, Vitamin C 0, thiamine 10%, riboflavin 2%, niacin 4%
calcium 8%, iron 20%

STORE IN A COOL DRY PLACE.....


#13 of 610 by valerie on Tue Jan 20 04:45:32 1998:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 610 by keesan on Thu Jan 22 23:48:15 1998:

The mystery item was purchased in a cardboard box.


#15 of 610 by i on Fri Jan 23 03:17:04 1998:

Hmm.  Rather high in calories & fiber to be dried beans.  Wrong iron/
calcium ratio to be a spud (though maybe with milk added...)  Is this
a mixture, or a one-source food?


#16 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jan 23 03:30:54 1998:

not a mixture, note that it advertises the iron and calcium, which makes it
somewhat different from other items in the same class


#17 of 610 by valerie on Sun Jan 25 16:44:42 1998:

This response has been erased.



#18 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jan 25 20:06:35 1998:

YES!  That was obviously a well-thought-out guess.  You are too modest.


#19 of 610 by valerie on Tue Jan 27 16:27:27 1998:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jan 27 21:00:53 1998:

No, no, no.  I don't buy them in little cardboard boxes, but in 50 pound bags.
This was something more exotic.


#21 of 610 by valerie on Wed Jan 28 04:32:07 1998:

This response has been erased.



#22 of 610 by keesan on Thu Jan 29 19:07:23 1998:

no, no, no, keep trying.  We also bought 50 lb of quinoa.


#23 of 610 by valerie on Fri Jan 30 22:55:36 1998:

This response has been erased.



#24 of 610 by keesan on Sat Jan 31 01:03:18 1998:

sorry, no.  This is 'the smallest grain in the world!'.  Tiny X provides GIANT
SIZE nutrition!  It's high in minerals and has more calcium than wheat or
barley...   But if nobody can guess it in a week I will tell.  


#25 of 610 by i on Sat Jan 31 02:53:09 1998:

In other words, it hasn't been selectively bred for holding freighters
down in the water.  (Maximum tons per acre, whether it's worth harvesting
or not.)


#26 of 610 by valerie on Sat Jan 31 13:48:31 1998:

This response has been erased.



#27 of 610 by valerie on Sat Jan 31 13:49:10 1998:

This response has been erased.



#28 of 610 by keesan on Sat Jan 31 20:51:30 1998:

Arrowhead Mills proudly introduces Teff...the smallest grain in the world!
In fact, 150 grains of Teff weight only as much as a single grain of wheat
- but don't let its size fool you -- Tiny Teff....  Ounce for ounce, Teff has
more nutrient-rich bran and germ than any other grain.

We bought a box of it to grind into flour and made injera, a low-gluten
fermented pancake.  The local restaurants use pastry wheat flour.  You can
use any other low-gluten grain, such as corn or barley.  Mix it up very
liquid, let is sit in a warm place and stir it daily with your hands, removing
anything glutinous.     The box also gives a veggie-burger recipe.

I was not sure anybody out there had actually heard of teff.  Never
underestimate the knowledge of a grexer!  Valerie, your turn, unless some
other grexer has an interesting label or food to enter.


#29 of 610 by valerie on Mon Feb 2 13:59:54 1998:

This response has been erased.



#30 of 610 by keesan on Mon Feb 2 18:42:04 1998:

Valerie, have you any good recipes for bread or pancakes from other less
common grains?  Barley, millet, etc.


#31 of 610 by orinoco on Tue Feb 3 04:25:10 1998:

What sort of plant does this t'eff stuff come from?

(Or would that more properly be t'eff st'uff?)


#32 of 610 by valerie on Tue Feb 3 14:32:53 1998:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 610 by keesan on Tue Feb 3 22:43:21 1998:

Teff is a type of grain, which I presume grows on something like a grass. 
Valerie, that can't be yogurt again, can it?  Something dairy, anyway.  Does
lactose count as a sugar?


#34 of 610 by remmers on Tue Feb 3 22:59:44 1998:

Looks a little high in fat to be yogurt, but it sure seems like
a dairy product. Milk, maybe?


#35 of 610 by orinoco on Wed Feb 4 03:12:15 1998:

Lactose should be a sugar chemically, but I don't know if the FDA counts it...
I don't see why not.


#36 of 610 by i on Wed Feb 4 03:47:27 1998:

Pretty high sodium to be milk.  And where's the carbo's?  But the fat
profile fits whole milk perfectly.  


#37 of 610 by birdlady on Thu Feb 5 00:35:44 1998:

Cheese sticks?  That's a lot of fat, and I noticed the calcium...  Oh...maybe
sticks of butter?


#38 of 610 by valerie on Fri Feb 6 01:28:40 1998:

This response has been erased.



#39 of 610 by birdlady on Fri Feb 6 01:42:57 1998:

Orange creamsicles?  Oh, wait...no sugar.  


#40 of 610 by mary on Fri Feb 6 03:50:39 1998:

Sour cream?


#41 of 610 by valerie on Fri Feb 6 04:37:00 1998:

This response has been erased.



#42 of 610 by birdlady on Fri Feb 6 21:32:30 1998:

Cream cheese?


#43 of 610 by keesan on Fri Feb 6 22:10:36 1998:

I presume serving size omitted is some sort of clue.  2 servings.
Some sort of cheese?


#44 of 610 by valerie on Sat Feb 7 13:24:23 1998:

This response has been erased.



#45 of 610 by keesan on Sat Feb 7 22:04:27 1998:

Whole milk has about half its calories from fat, this was two thirds.  Some
sort of cream?  Light cream/coffee creamer?


#46 of 610 by valerie on Sun Feb 8 15:05:29 1998:

This response has been erased.



#47 of 610 by keesan on Sun Feb 8 16:18:15 1998:

water buffalo milk, which I am told is very creamy?  Goat's milk?  Sheep's
milk?  Camel's milk?  Yak's milk?


#48 of 610 by mary on Sun Feb 8 23:37:40 1998:

Tofu newtons?  (Man, I'm outta ideas.)


#49 of 610 by valerie on Mon Feb 9 12:44:52 1998:

This response has been erased.



#50 of 610 by keesan on Mon Feb 9 19:10:33 1998:

Was something else added to the cow's output, or is this just processedcow
food (possibly with something subtracted).  In other words, one ingredient
or more than one?  (Or is it too early to ask this?).


#51 of 610 by valerie on Tue Feb 10 13:25:03 1998:

This response has been erased.



#52 of 610 by remmers on Tue Feb 10 14:57:22 1998:

Must undergo some sort of extraction processing to be so high
in sodium and contain no sugar whatsoever, then. Hmmm...


#53 of 610 by scott on Tue Feb 10 17:13:19 1998:

Evaporated milk?


#54 of 610 by valerie on Wed Feb 11 17:17:05 1998:

This response has been erased.



#55 of 610 by keesan on Wed Feb 11 19:53:14 1998:

Are you sure it is not yogurt?  Kefir?  Buttermilk would have less fat.


#56 of 610 by keesan on Thu Feb 12 00:41:03 1998:

The lack of carbohydrates should mean something.  Apparently whole milk has
carbohydrates.  11.4 g carbos and 8 g fat.  This has 0 carb and 8 g fat. 
Someone took out the carbohydrates but left the protein.  Cheeses are about
balanced on fat and protein and have little or no carbohydrates (none in
gorgonzola or liederkranz, wonder where they went).  Unripened cheese?  Yogurt
cheese?  (The yogurt is put in a cheesecloth bag and the water-soluble sugars
(lactose) drip out).  This sounds like something Valerie has already tried
making, not too different from wheat gluten in concept.  Is this yogurt cheese
by some other name?  First acidify the milk with the yogurt bacteria, which
causes the proteins to clump together.  I have tried cheesemaking with a
vegetable rennet, very low yield.   Same cholesterol as whole milk, same fat
and protein.  Nothing missing but the lactose, what could it be?


#57 of 610 by scott on Thu Feb 12 01:32:14 1998:

Butter?


#58 of 610 by keesan on Thu Feb 12 15:06:11 1998:

I don't think there is much if any protein in butter, unless you have
discovered a new and more nutritious variety that we should all know of.


#59 of 610 by i on Thu Feb 12 23:44:58 1998:

Interesting.  Valeries clues certainly suggest buttermilk, but my 
nutritional reference shows vastly more carbo's in buttermilk than
she shows in #32.


#60 of 610 by keesan on Fri Feb 13 00:14:41 1998:

The mystery item also has the same amount of salt as cheese, and I have not
had salty buttermilk.


#61 of 610 by i on Fri Feb 13 02:32:09 1998:

My sources agree that buttermilk is much saltier than fresh milk, but
do not disclose how it's made.
s/Valeries/Valerie's in #59.


#62 of 610 by keesan on Fri Feb 13 17:12:17 1998:

I thought buttermilk was made by fermenting the liquid remaining after making
cheese.  Is salt added to controll the fermenation?  Lactic acid bacteria
thrive in salt environments because they tolerate salt.  (That is one reason
why people should be eating some salt, to maintain a healthy stomach flora.
The lactic acid bacteria produce their own antibiotics against some less
harmless bacteria of the type that cause diarrhea, and are why yogurt helps).


#63 of 610 by keesan on Sat Feb 14 01:07:32 1998:

Yes, buttermilk seems to have the right amount of sodium, but it also has the
same amount of carbohydrates as milk.  


#64 of 610 by valerie on Sat Feb 21 04:24:56 1998:

This response has been erased.



#65 of 610 by keesan on Sat Feb 21 04:55:42 1998:

Buttermilk used to be what was left after making butter.  Butter used to be
made by culturing milk and then removing the fat, so it had a lot more
of a sour-cream type of taste and was more self-preserving.  It was cultured
with salt, I think, to favor the lactic-acid bacteria.  I had some like
that once bought in northern Michigan.  I guess you can call anything
that you want buttermilk now, but they should have listed salt, too, as an
ingredient.  In Vermont, an older friend tells me, they used to make butter
from the milk and then pour the buttermilk in the river, but nowadays it
seems like the market has reversed.
Since I have had a few turns, would Walter or anyone else like to go?


#66 of 610 by i on Sat Feb 21 05:04:26 1998:

Could you double check to see if that carbo's # was real, valerie?

Unless someone else wants it, i move that we shanghai the Snord.  He's  
very good at picking things to enter, but is seldom `it'.  


#67 of 610 by omni on Sat Feb 21 06:05:48 1998:

  Guernsey buttermilk is wonderful stuff. 


#68 of 610 by valerie on Sun Feb 22 03:34:02 1998:

This response has been erased.



#69 of 610 by i on Sun Feb 22 22:47:04 1998:

<i scratches his head and doesn't even notice more hair falling out>


#70 of 610 by keesan on Mon Feb 23 05:04:46 1998:

Well, I would not have believed wheat gluten had vitamin C in it.  Things are
not what they used to be, even buttermilk.  (Then again, the label could have
an error, I think my seaweed was listed as no calcium.)  Does anyone else have
a buttermilk label around?


#71 of 610 by keesan on Fri Feb 27 21:59:14 1998:

I don't see any Snords around.  Omni, or anyone else reading this, would you
like to enter a nutrition label for us to guess?  It has been a week now.


#72 of 610 by omni on Sat Feb 28 06:32:59 1998:

 Give me a day and I'll post one.


#73 of 610 by valerie on Fri Mar 6 02:53:19 1998:

This response has been erased.



#74 of 610 by omni on Fri Mar 6 05:40:47 1998:

 <blush> Oops. that was what I forgot. I'll post one soon, I promise.


#75 of 610 by snowth on Sat Mar 7 02:00:30 1998:

<of course there's nobody here. It's all part of the conspiracy. I'd tell you,
but then I'd have to kill you. And that wouldn't be good at all.>


#76 of 610 by keesan on Sat Mar 7 16:24:01 1998:

I know Omni has some food labels in the kitchen, I have seen them there, but
he is probably too excited about his new 486 to think of food.


#77 of 610 by omni on Sat Mar 7 17:06:18 1998:

 I do, but I moved the computer, upstairs, and it's away from the kitchen,
hence the delay. Anyway, I think I have found the perfect label.


#78 of 610 by omni on Sun Mar 8 05:43:13 1998:

  Ok here is the long awaited label

  Serving size 8 oz
  serv per container about 6

  Calories- 100
  Total Fat- 0
  Sodium-   20
  Total Carbs- 30g
   sugars-     27g
 Protein-       0
 
 Vitamin A- 100%
 Vitamin C- 100%

    Good luck.


#79 of 610 by birdlady on Sun Mar 8 10:15:01 1998:

Crystal Light?  Oh wait...too much sugar...

Slim Fast?


#80 of 610 by omni on Sun Mar 8 17:13:04 1998:

  Nope.


#81 of 610 by keesan on Sun Mar 8 17:49:52 1998:

Vitamin enriched Koolaid?


#82 of 610 by birdlady on Mon Mar 9 02:10:29 1998:

Carnation Instant Breakfast?


#83 of 610 by omni on Mon Mar 9 05:21:49 1998:

  Nope, and Nope.

  I can safely say that no one, absolutly nobody can drink just 1 serving,
In my case, it's a little more than that.


#84 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 9 18:58:59 1998:

fruit juice?
(With vitamins added?)


#85 of 610 by omni on Mon Mar 9 21:56:02 1998:

 I don't know how to say this, but I will try. It is more than fruit juice
with vitamins. I would prefer identification of the brand, if you can do that.

 Can you be a little more specific, Sindi?


#86 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 9 22:46:46 1998:

Nope, I don't buy fruit juice, just fruit, so will let others guess at what
else has been added.   But I heard they are now adding Vit C to apple juice.


#87 of 610 by omni on Tue Mar 10 05:56:08 1998:

 It's not apple juice.


#88 of 610 by birdlady on Tue Mar 10 07:55:58 1998:

V8?


#89 of 610 by valerie on Tue Mar 10 22:53:45 1998:

This response has been erased.



#90 of 610 by keesan on Wed Mar 11 01:03:26 1998:

I was not guessing apple juice, they don't add vitamin A to it.


#91 of 610 by omni on Wed Mar 11 06:41:27 1998:

 And we have a winner. Birdlady got it. It's actually V8 Splash, which I drink
entirely too much of, but since it is lowfat, and actually good for you, who
cares.
  V8 Splash combines carrot juice with mango, pineapple, lime and kiwi juice.
It is addictive. There are 2 other varieties; Berry Blend and Strawberry Kiwi.
I'd rather have that than pop.


#92 of 610 by keesan on Wed Mar 11 22:39:08 1998:

I had never heard of it, the original V8 was just vegetables.Sounds yummy!
If we ever have a potluck, bring some (bring lots!).


#93 of 610 by birdlady on Wed Mar 11 22:44:08 1998:

Yuck.  =)  <birdy *hates* V8>

Wow - I never win!  Here goes...

Serving Size: 29g
Servings Per Container: About 12

Calories - 130
Calories from Fat - 40
Total Fat - 4.5g

Cholesterol - 0mg
Sodium - 150mg
Total Carbohydrate - 22g
Dietary Fiber - less than 1g
Sugars - 9g
Protein - 2g

Vitamin A - less than 2%
Calcium - less than 2%
Vitamin C - less than 2%
Iron - 6%
(these are percent daily values)


#94 of 610 by omni on Thu Mar 12 05:05:37 1998:

 re 92-  Not bloody likely.


#95 of 610 by scott on Thu Mar 12 12:11:30 1998:

(At 27g sugar per 8 ounces, that is the same sugar levels as most pop.  So
it may be low fat, but I wouldn't really call it healthy)


#96 of 610 by keesan on Thu Mar 12 19:03:02 1998:

According to my nutrition book, grapefruit juice, one cup, has 24 g
carbohydrate (mostly or all sugar), grape juice 32 g carbohydrate, apricot
nectar 36 g, cranberry apple juice 43 g carbohydrate.  Fruits are high in
sugar, that is why people like them, and it used to be considered healthy to
eat enough calories, for most of human history.  The sugar calories in this
super V8 also come with a broad assortment of vitamins, and are thus much
better for you than pop.  Fruit drinks run about 30, beer 8, whole milk 12
g carbs (sugar).    Tomato juice 10 g, which is probably what keeps the sugar
content of the V8 below most fruit juices.  

        Could the new mystery item be peanut butter?  12 servings/container,
somewhat high in fat....


#97 of 610 by birdlady on Fri Mar 13 20:58:16 1998:

Nope - not peanut butter - but there's a LOT of that in my pantry.  =)


#98 of 610 by keesan on Sat Mar 14 00:45:08 1998:

A cookie?
A peanut butter cookie?  (Had one at lunch).


#99 of 610 by birdlady on Sat Mar 14 17:12:25 1998:

It is a cookie of some sort, but not peanut butter cookies.


#100 of 610 by keesan on Sat Mar 14 17:47:59 1998:

Are they cheaper by the dozen?
Jim does not know anything about store-bought cookies, someone else will have
to narrow it down to variety and/or brand.


#101 of 610 by omni on Sat Mar 14 19:55:13 1998:

  Could they be Oreo's?


#102 of 610 by valerie on Sun Mar 15 14:34:40 1998:

This response has been erased.



#103 of 610 by birdlady on Sun Mar 15 16:45:24 1998:

Not Oreo's or Chips Ahoy.  These cookies are a little better for you (no
chocolate in them).  


#104 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 16 05:41:22 1998:

oatmeal cookies?  (I am trying hard to think of a healthy cookie.)


#105 of 610 by omni on Mon Mar 16 06:01:55 1998:

  Don't you dare sit there and say chocolate is not good for you. We all know
that it is good for the soul.


#106 of 610 by birdlady on Mon Mar 16 20:27:29 1998:

Healthy in the fact that they are good for anemic people - look at the iron
content.  I was told to snack on these since I hardly eat red meat and happen
to be anemic.


#107 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 16 23:34:56 1998:

Molasses picks up a lot of iron from being boiled in iron pots.
Gingerbread cookies?  Isn't there an item on iron deficiency somewhere?


#108 of 610 by birdlady on Wed Mar 18 03:25:43 1998:

Oh my...keesan...you're sooooo close...I'll give it to you.

Gingersnaps!  <birdy *luvs* these and will eat a whole box>


#109 of 610 by keesan on Wed Mar 18 18:27:49 1998:

Keesan did not win, *I* won.  (Keesan is my typist).  I have never seen
gingersnaps sold in quantities of less than than three pounds.  What is the
portion size they expect you to eat, with 12 portions to a container?  Do you
really eat 3 pounds at a time?  (Jim runs off to the kitchen in great
excitement to see if we have anything with a nutrition label.)

Nutrition Facts
Serving size 1 tsp (18 g)
Servings 35  ['this is ridiculous' - that's a clue]
Total fat  0
Sat fat    0
Cholest    0
Sodium     0
Total carb 9 g   13%
Fiber      0
Sugars     7 g
Protein    0
Vitamin A  0
Vitamin C  0
Calcium    2
Iron       4

Single ingredient (this one needs a few clues), which has been processed and
used to have more vitamins, and also has or had estrogen.

No, it is not yogurt, peanut butter, jelly, or Altoids.  Or chocolate.



#110 of 610 by i on Thu Mar 19 03:59:08 1998:

Looks like blackstrap molasses to me.


#111 of 610 by keesan on Thu Mar 19 20:12:48 1998:

Molasses, but not blackstrap, and not made from sugar cane.  This was boiled
down from something else, want to guess what?


#112 of 610 by i on Fri Mar 20 01:58:13 1998:

Sugar beets is the first thing to come to mind. 


#113 of 610 by keesan on Fri Mar 20 02:19:50 1998:

Not sugar beets.  There are a few other sources of sugar, keep trying.
WOuld you like another clue?  This one has more flavor.


#114 of 610 by void on Fri Mar 20 08:02:05 1998:

  the only other kind of molasses that comes to my mind is treacle,
but i can't remember what it's made from.


#115 of 610 by e4808mc on Fri Mar 20 18:34:43 1998:

Sorghum?


#116 of 610 by keesan on Fri Mar 20 20:52:03 1998:

treacle is the British word for molasses. 
Not sorghum.  This stuff is actually labelled XXXX molasses, in the meaning
of a sweet syrup boiled down from some more dilute juice.  You have to guess
what the jucie came from (not sugar cane, sugar beet or sorghum).  I. e., fill
in the XXXX.  I does not normally grow in Michigan (maybe greenhouse?).


#117 of 610 by birdlady on Mon Mar 23 02:51:30 1998:

(The gingersnaps came in a box, and one serving size was 12 cookies - yeah,
right!)  ;-)  Like I ever only eat twelve in one sitting.


#118 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Mar 23 03:27:45 1998:

(what is the difference between blackstrap molasses and normal molasses?)


#119 of 610 by keesan on Wed Mar 25 21:35:15 1998:

Hint:  this 'molasses' is boiled down from a syrup from a fruit.


#120 of 610 by i on Wed Mar 25 23:15:45 1998:

Peaches.


#121 of 610 by keesan on Thu Mar 26 01:05:08 1998:

No, as I said, this fruit does not usually grow in Michigan.  My neighbors
have a peach tree that occasionally bears fruit.  Have you ever had peach
molasses?  Sounds good.  It is not rice syrup either, or barley malt.


#122 of 610 by keesan on Sat Mar 28 16:12:21 1998:

Think Mediterranean.


#123 of 610 by i on Sat Mar 28 23:53:02 1998:

Sounds like figs.


#124 of 610 by keesan on Sun Mar 29 02:32:14 1998:

You are thinking mediterranean, but we have not run across fig syrup, only
fig jam, so far.  Keep thinking mediterranean.  This fruit is not generally
thought of as being very sweet, it is rather acidic.


#125 of 610 by omni on Sun Mar 29 05:50:18 1998:

 maybe olives?


#126 of 610 by i on Sun Mar 29 11:35:13 1998:

Well, acidic suggests lemons or limes - though both were SE Asian natives
brought west by (best guess) Arab traders.  From an Eurocentric point of
view, i guess both would be considered Mediterranean.


#127 of 610 by keesan on Sun Mar 29 15:19:02 1998:

May actually have originated a bit further east, Iran or Iraq, but not China.
(I mean the mystery fruit, not citrus).  I saw it growing in Dalmatia.  Not
quite as cold sensitive as citrus.
Olives are certainly acidic, but I cannot imagine making sweet syrup of them.


#128 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Mar 30 17:30:14 1998:

(really wild guess)  Tamarinds?  


#129 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 30 17:34:56 1998:

No, but we also have tamarind syrup, molasses consistency, and sour.
Tamarind is a legume and the pod is sweet, like honey locust.  I have not seem
them from anywhere west of India, where I think the pulp is used in curries.
Not all that wild a guess, after all.  Keep guessing.


#130 of 610 by danr on Wed Apr 1 02:50:46 1998:

Tamarinds are very popular in Mexico, and I've even seen them at 
Meijer here in AA.


#131 of 610 by keesan on Wed Apr 1 17:53:34 1998:

How are they used in Mexico?  


#132 of 610 by keesan on Fri Apr 3 01:13:03 1998:

The mystery fruit is round, and was known to the ancient Greeks.


#133 of 610 by i on Fri Apr 3 04:48:03 1998:

Grapes fit several of the clues, but they are often thought of as sweet
and grow well north of here (if only in selected sheltered areas).  

Similarly, dates have shape and sweetness problems.

This might well be a melon, but i've no idea which of the infinite 
varieties.

Then there's more exotic stuff like pomegranates....


#134 of 610 by keesan on Fri Apr 3 20:09:23 1998:

Grapes grown on Jim's trellis and our neighbor has a yard full.  One year we
bought a lot and made grape juice, which we canned.  This year a friend had
us out picking and we froze the juice, much better than the cooked stuff.

We also have date syrup, but dates don't grow in Greece.  They apparently grow
in Lebanon or may be imported, and the syrup is eaten on bread together with
tahini from sesame seeds - a bit like BP and J.

I have had candied watermelon rind, but never melon syrup.

The answer is, from the bottle : pomegranate molasses.
It is good on ice cream, or in salad dressing, or over chopped apples,
anyplace you want sweet and sour.  In apple pies.  Mixed with water as a tart
and refreshing drink.  Might try it on toast.


#135 of 610 by valerie on Sat Apr 4 13:00:17 1998:

This response has been erased.



#136 of 610 by keesan on Sat Apr 4 20:47:36 1998:

Forgot, we also had some grape syrup, impossibly sticky and viscous stuff,
you could not get it out of the jar, and would have pulled a tooth out.

The pomegranate syrup is available from middle eastern stores, such as Big
Market or Jerusalem Market or one on Packard (Alladin's).


#137 of 610 by i on Sat Apr 4 23:54:03 1998:

Heat up the grape syrup to get it out of the jar.  Dilute before eating.
(And probably don't expect much but a sugary taste...)


#138 of 610 by keesan on Sun Apr 5 14:19:32 1998:

We solved the problem by giving it to a friend who likes sugar.  It is
difficult to heat up a plastic jar.  Walter, do you have any interesting
labels, or is someone else wishing they could have a turn?

The grape syrup was from the Thai and Lao store on Packard.  I had thought
it was rice syrup, we read the adjacent label, goofed.


#139 of 610 by i on Sun Apr 5 14:28:21 1998:

Microwaves & double boilers can usually heat stuff in plastic jars okay.
I'm delaying a few days in hopes that The Snord will accept my invitation.


#140 of 610 by valerie on Sun Apr 5 15:25:39 1998:

This response has been erased.



#141 of 610 by i on Sun Apr 5 19:05:10 1998:

The sink scheme does depend on how hot your water heater's set.  The 
landlord keeps ours somewhere above 150 degrees, and i've learned 
(the hard way) that JIF peanut butter jars (amoung other things)
start melting if i'm not careful washing them. 


#142 of 610 by keesan on Sun Apr 5 22:34:41 1998:

Don't you mix cold water with your hot water?  I would scald myself if I did
not.  You must have very thick skin on your hands.  There is no need to use
hot water at all unless you are trying to melt solid fat.  We use cold water
except in mid-winter, when the water is very cold and hurts my hands.  If you
melt grease with hot water, it resolidifies in the plumbing, better to just
wipe it off if there is a lot, and then use extra detergent.
(It there a dishwashing conference?)  Has the Snord looked at this item
recently?  Maybe an e-mail invitation would work better.


#143 of 610 by i on Mon Apr 6 03:51:58 1998:

I e-mailed The Snord early yesterday; i'll enter something Tuesday if He
or someone else doesn't.

Washing:  i put anything that i reasonably can in the dishwasher (but use
some combination of pre-soaking, rinsing, a nylon brush, and occasionally
Bon Ami so that the dishwasher never has to deal with "tough" dirt or
much food waste.  For the rest, i put on rubber gloves, pour detergent and
chlorine bleach in the dishpan, fill with hot water, use a trickle of
straight hot water to rinse, and air dry.  I don't have my grandfathers'
"blacksmith hands", and don't keep my hands under the hot water (they
would get scalded, gloves or not).  Yes, this uses extra energy to heat
the water, but i can get by with a pretty slow trickle, and for those-
germs-are-DEAD sanitation it can't be beat.  My cooking style generates
very little grease, and i attack it with a touch of detergent and the
nylon brush (which seems to work much better than hot water anyway). 


#144 of 610 by remmers on Mon Apr 6 17:38:33 1998:

The Snord (that's me, I guess) has been absent from this item for
a while. Thanks for the invitation to enter something, but I think
I shall pass this time. Have at it, Cramer!


#145 of 610 by i on Tue Apr 7 02:34:36 1998:

Serving size:  2 oz. / 8 per container
190 calories
Fat:  15 cal / 1 g / 2%
Saturated Fat:  1 g / 5%
Cholest.:  0mg / 0%
Sodium:  10mg / <1%
Carbo's: 34g / 11%
Fiber:  6g / 24%
Sugars:  0g
Protein:  9g
Vitamin A & C:  0%
Calcium / Iron:  2% / 15%
Thiamine / Riboflavin / Niacin:  20% / 40% / 10%


#146 of 610 by i on Tue Apr 7 03:01:12 1998:

Opps!  Make that 4% for the riboflavin.


#147 of 610 by valerie on Tue Apr 7 16:03:28 1998:

This response has been erased.



#148 of 610 by keesan on Tue Apr 7 20:14:29 1998:

This one sounds pretty nutritious, all those vitamins.  Peanuts are high in
niacin and have no cholesterol and lots of fiber.  Something with lightly
salted peanuts?

Walter, try measuring the actual temperature at your faucet.  If it is under
140, or even if 140 for only a few seconds, you are unlikely to be murdering
any germs with it.  Even if it is, there is no need to use hot wash and hot
rinse, just one would do it (or just soak in very hot water for a few minutes,
then wash in something cooler and rinse in cold).


#149 of 610 by i on Tue Apr 7 23:03:44 1998:

A roast thermometer goes up past 150 degrees under my hot water faucet.
My (limited) understanding is that hot water rinse isn't good sanitation
primarily because of killing germs on contact.  The hot water kills some
germs, washes others off (wet heat is bad for many biological adhesives),
then leaves most of the rest on a hot, dry surface.  High & dry at a high
temp. is something that many bugs comfortable inside a warm, moist human
body can't cope with.  (Though the chlorine bleach in the dishpan is
really my main line of defense.)

Not sugarless granola bars.

Peanuts are WAY higher in fat and lower in carbo's than this stuff.


#150 of 610 by keesan on Wed Apr 8 02:08:49 1998:

Looks like about 50% water.  Some root vegetable?  In a 1 pound can?  No salt
added.  Canned fruit?  Applesauce?


#151 of 610 by i on Wed Apr 8 03:02:40 1998:

Neither canned fruit or veggies.  Add it up again - it's way under 50%
water.


#152 of 610 by valerie on Wed Apr 8 16:10:05 1998:

This response has been erased.



#153 of 610 by i on Wed Apr 8 21:52:29 1998:

Not fortified, not canned (i can't think of anything canned that would 
have so little water).   :)


#154 of 610 by keesan on Wed Apr 8 23:26:55 1998:

dried beans?


#155 of 610 by i on Thu Apr 9 22:37:08 1998:

Nope.


#156 of 610 by keesan on Thu Apr 9 22:54:42 1998:

Is it cheating to look in my nutrition book?  Especially since nobody else
seems to have one?


#157 of 610 by i on Fri Apr 10 18:13:51 1998:

Only if i've been cheating all along by looking in mine.   :)


#158 of 610 by i on Mon Apr 13 23:32:38 1998:

All stumped?  Some people may be peeved with themselves when they find
out what this mystery food is.....


#159 of 610 by keesan on Tue Apr 14 22:20:05 1998:

Can you tell us if it a mixture or one thing?  I am no good at guessing
mixtures, I only buy single ingredients.


#160 of 610 by i on Tue Apr 14 22:45:24 1998:

The nutritional profile is fairly indicative of the mystery food's main
ingredient.   ;)


#161 of 610 by valerie on Wed Apr 15 14:45:58 1998:

This response has been erased.



#162 of 610 by i on Thu Apr 16 02:56:35 1998:

Not peas.


#163 of 610 by keesan on Fri Apr 17 02:52:03 1998:

Walter, I have three more translations to do so please don't take
it personally if I don't get out my nutrition book for a few days.  And we
are hoping to have the living room cleaned out by Saturday.  I have some
interesting new labels that I may either show you then or save for here.


#164 of 610 by carson on Thu Apr 23 15:59:22 1998:

<linked to games; for those of us just joining, the current item to
be guessed is in resp. 145.>


#165 of 610 by i on Fri Apr 24 01:13:57 1998:

And i've given a fair number of clues since then.
<i rubs his hands together in anticipation>


#166 of 610 by keesan on Sat Apr 25 02:00:33 1998:

What number response was the label in? For those just joining.


#167 of 610 by i on Sat Apr 25 03:04:22 1998:

#145.


#168 of 610 by keesan on Sun Apr 26 18:45:30 1998:

Thanks, I did a print screen and will go cheat with my book, while
fetching housebuilding materials for Jim.  Let's see, since fat has twice the
calories of starch or protein, this is about 5/7 starch, 1/7 each fat
(non-animal) and protein, fairly high in iron and B vitamins.  I wonder what
plant product has no sugars at all.  A grain?
Whole grain wheat, cooked, is about the correct fiber carb prot fat ratio.
My book gives vitamin content in mg, not % of daily allowance.  The fiber to
carb ratio is about 1 to 5, and in your mystery item it is about the same.
Is this a grain or made primarily from a grain?  Whole wheat flour?


#169 of 610 by i on Mon Apr 27 21:22:06 1998:

Whole wheat is the primary ingredient in this food.  Some preparation is
strongly suggested before consumption, but it is not flour.


#170 of 610 by valerie on Tue Apr 28 13:24:48 1998:

This response has been erased.



#171 of 610 by keesan on Tue Apr 28 18:51:42 1998:

I don't think bulgur contains anything besides the wheat.  Could this be a
mix for whole wheat bread, including yeast and maybe salt?  I recall Walter
having wheat gluten with vitamin C added to put in his bread machine bread
dough.


#172 of 610 by i on Tue Apr 28 23:03:16 1998:

My main nutrition book agrees that bulgur is nothing but wheat (some 
varieties, processed a certain way).  This food isn't bulgur, and 
may or may not contain secondary ingredients....

At 80mg/pound sodium, i feel safe saying that no salt's been added to 
this food.  (Nor baking soda, baking powder, etc.)  Neither has yeast.  
It's not a baking mix.  But keesan is, in a way, very close to the mark. 


#173 of 610 by keesan on Wed Apr 29 00:55:26 1998:

Do you mean by 'may or may not' that you have a nutrition label but no list
of ingredients, or that variants of this product have different ingredients?
Bread flour?


#174 of 610 by i on Wed Apr 29 22:06:53 1998:

I've got a complete list of ingredient(s).  I'm not committing on how 
many item(s) are on said list.  :)   Otherwise, see #169.  


#175 of 610 by keesan on Wed Apr 29 23:14:39 1998:

Whole wheat noodles with possibly spinach or beets added for color?  They
sometimes come in mixed bags of different colors, and thus each noodle would
have different ingredients.


#176 of 610 by i on Thu Apr 30 01:41:36 1998:

(Pssst, keesan!  Too complicated!  Take a peek at Cooking 136:156!) 


#177 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 1 21:14:02 1998:

Are you telling me this is just whole wheat spaghetti?  If so, I don't know
of any ingredients in it other than the durum wheat flour.  What did you mean
by other ingredients?


#178 of 610 by i on Fri May 1 23:36:11 1998:

Yes, whole wheat spaghetti.  Durum whole wheat flour is the only ingredient
in the brand i bought.  I just didn't want to give a clue as big as "only
one ingredient".

You're up.


#179 of 610 by keesan on Sat May 2 20:05:38 1998:

I have never heard of any spaghetti that had more than one ingredient.
We have only one thing left in the kitchen, other than some rather exotic
canned and dried fruits, which has a nutrition label.

Serving size 2 tbsp (32 g)
Calories 210
Fat cal 170
total fat 19 g  29%
sat fat 3 g 14%
cholest 0
sodium 5 mg 0
carb 5 g 2%
fiber 3 g 12%
sugars 0
protein 6 g
vitamins A and C 0%
Calcium A 0% (sic, this is wrong, there is some calcium)
Iron 4%

servings per container 112 (a large container, not typical)


#180 of 610 by i on Sun May 3 11:31:03 1998:

(Keesan's never heard of spinach spaghetti, lasagne, etc.?????)

#179 looks like a nut butter.


#181 of 610 by keesan on Sun May 3 18:22:10 1998:

No I had not heard of spinach spaghetti, only plain spaghetti.  I had heard
of spinach noodles (macaroni type).  We make our own noodles from durum flour
and don't add coloring, the vegetables get cooked separately.
Not a nut butter.


#182 of 610 by valerie on Mon May 4 04:48:40 1998:

This response has been erased.



#183 of 610 by keesan on Mon May 4 13:45:36 1998:

No, but closer.  The 'calcium A' might be some sort of clue as to the origin
of the container.


#184 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 8 17:04:17 1998:

By that clue, I meant that whoever printed the container did not know much
English, this product is imported.  If nobody can guess any closer in a few
days, I will tell you the region of origin.
        This product can be mixed with another 'what am I" and used to dunk
pieces of bread into.


#185 of 610 by lilmo on Mon May 11 22:56:45 1998:

It's gotta be cheese!  :-)


#186 of 610 by keesan on Tue May 12 00:19:48 1998:

Cheese has quite a bit of sodium (salt) and protein (casein), but I admit that
it also has a lot of fats in it.  The nut butter and sunflower seed guesses
were a bit closer.  It has no cholesterol, and cheese has a lot of
cholesterol, because all animal products have it.  As a hint, this product
is from the same part of the world as our previous entry (pomegranate syrup).


#187 of 610 by i on Tue May 12 03:19:28 1998:

Keesan mentioned using tahini (sesame seed paste) in item #43 and this 
looks pretty close (clues match, too), so i'll guess that.


#188 of 610 by omni on Tue May 12 04:20:26 1998:

 Pickled eyelashes? Bees Knees? ;)

  I just had to add that.


#189 of 610 by keesan on Tue May 12 16:30:52 1998:

Not eyelashes (they probably have cholesterol, as do bees' knees).  Yes, this
is tahini, we bought a large container to add calories and flavor.  I have
used it on boiled potatoes, on salad, etc.  Well, unless I can look things
up in my nutrition book, we are out of labels.  Time to go to the CHinese food
store and get something interesting.  Who wants to go next?


#190 of 610 by i on Tue May 12 22:03:39 1998:

They seem real bashful when we put it that way.  Maybe we should just tell
someone "you're drafted".


#191 of 610 by remmers on Tue May 12 22:40:01 1998:

The person who guessed it doesn't want to go?


#192 of 610 by i on Wed May 13 18:15:56 1998:

You're drafted, remmers!   :)


#193 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 13 18:40:06 1998:

I second the motion!  It is much more fun to guess than to enter labels.


#194 of 610 by i on Sun May 17 17:25:51 1998:

Looks like our draftee is overdue for his physical.  Perhaps the draft
board should refer his file to the dodger patrol.


#195 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 22 23:20:20 1998:

It has been a week, we need a volunteer, quick before I enter a very strange
label from China which nobody will be able to guess.  (Total fat 62 mg,
calories from fat 0 - the new miracle food?)


#196 of 610 by valerie on Sat May 23 02:11:24 1998:

This response has been erased.



#197 of 610 by remmers on Sat May 23 12:01:07 1998:

Hm, I guess I was drafted at some point. Sorry, draft notices
aren't binding unless sent by registered mail (the old-fashioned
kind, not email). Well, *maybe* I'll enter something this
morning, maybe not. If keesan beats me to it, so be it. I
shan't complain.

(I'm the only person in the known universe who still says "shan't".)


#198 of 610 by lilmo on Sat May 23 20:53:23 1998:

Not true!!  I do, too.  Also, re: 62 mg fat, 0 fat calories, fat has 9
calories to the gram, so 62mg would be better expressed as 0.062g, which would
give slightly over 1/2 calorie.


#199 of 610 by keesan on Sun May 24 00:13:24 1998:

Rounded to the nearest calore that is 1 calorie.  Remmers, I can wait.  Shan't
is British English, are you British in background?


#200 of 610 by remmers on Sun May 24 01:01:10 1998:

Nope, not at all. Born and raised in Indiana.

Okay, hm... I'll have to go peruse the pantry contents.


#201 of 610 by orinoco on Mon May 25 21:59:12 1998:

(is there a difference in meaning between "shan't" and "won't", or are tehy
interchangeable?)


#202 of 610 by keesan on Mon May 25 23:03:56 1998:

Shall is British, will American.  In primary school in Boston they tried to
teach us I shall, you will, he will  (or was it you shall?).  Shan't and won't
are the negatives for these.


#203 of 610 by i on Tue May 26 22:33:46 1998:

(Hopefully His Snordship will soon emerge from the pantry.  There might
be plenty of volunteers for the rescue team, but i wouldn't count on any
of them coming back real soon...)


#204 of 610 by remmers on Tue May 26 23:49:21 1998:

Okay, okay, okay. One Mysterious Nutrition Facts Label coming
right up...

        Serving size:   4 Tbsp.
        Calories        80
        Cal's from fat  0
        Sodium          115mg (4%)
        Total carb.     18g (6%)
        Dietary fiber   <1g (3%)
        Sugars          15g
        Protein         1g
        Vitamin A       45%
        Vitamin C       45%
        Calcium         8%
        Iron            15%
        Vitamin D       50%
        Vitamin B-1     60%
        Vitamin B-2     45%
        Niacin          45%
        Vitamin B-6     45%
        Phosphorus      8%



#205 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 27 01:56:37 1998:

Vitamin enriched something, I would bet.  Those numbers look awfully close
to each other.  Sugar-coated cornflakes with vitamins?


#206 of 610 by remmers on Wed May 27 17:06:46 1998:

Yep, it's a vitamin enriched substance that is often consumed for
breakfast. Not cereal though.


#207 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 27 18:41:11 1998:

Since I have no idea what sorts of sugary substances Americans are currently
consuming for breakfast, I will let others guess the details.


#208 of 610 by birdlady on Wed May 27 21:40:38 1998:

Coffee cake?


#209 of 610 by i on Wed May 27 23:05:32 1998:

It appears to be some sort of powdered / syrup breakfast drink mix.
Dunno what.


#210 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 27 23:47:28 1998:

Wonder if it contains chocolate.


#211 of 610 by remmers on Thu May 28 11:53:56 1998:

Not coffee cake. #209 and #210 are on the right track.


#212 of 610 by birdlady on Thu May 28 20:13:48 1998:

Chocolate Slim Fast?


#213 of 610 by lilmo on Thu May 28 21:03:51 1998:

Chocolate Carnation Instant Breakfast?

(If I'm right, I pass to birdlady)


#214 of 610 by birdlady on Fri May 29 04:42:47 1998:

Actually, if you're right, you can take it.  I've posted enough in here
already.  =)


#215 of 610 by birdlady on Fri May 29 04:43:46 1998:

Okay...that should have read, "If *I'm* right, you can take it".  =)


#216 of 610 by remmers on Fri May 29 10:54:05 1998:

Not Chocolate Slim Fast, not Chocolate Carnation Instant Breakfast.
(But the mystery substance *is* chocolate flavored, and also comes
in a non-chocolate version.)


#217 of 610 by birdlady on Fri May 29 22:02:04 1998:

Nestle Quik?  (The lowfat version if there is one)


#218 of 610 by remmers on Sat May 30 00:34:56 1998:

Not Nestle Quik.


#219 of 610 by valerie on Sat May 30 04:28:12 1998:

This response has been erased.



#220 of 610 by remmers on Sun May 31 01:45:04 1998:

Not Chocolate Pop Tarts.


#221 of 610 by i on Mon Jun 1 23:12:51 1998:

Chocolate Ovaltine (sp?)?


#222 of 610 by remmers on Tue Jun 2 01:12:42 1998:

The i's have it!  (chocolate-flavored Ovaltine it is.)


#223 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jun 2 19:27:31 1998:

i, is there any item made of chocolate with which you are not familiar?


#224 of 610 by i on Wed Jun 3 23:22:47 1998:

Re: #223 - There probably is, but i can't think of any right now.

This should be easy for anyone who bakes:
8 oz./serving, 8 servings/container
110 calories, 20 from fat
2.5g (4%) / 1.5g (8%) / 10mg (4%)   fat / sat. fat / cholest.
400mg (17%) sodium
13g (4%) carbo's
0g (0%) / 9g / 8g   fiber / sugar / protein
2% / 4% / 30% / 0%   Vit. A / Vit. C / Calcium / Iron


#225 of 610 by keesan on Thu Jun 4 01:08:29 1998:

Hm, no fiber, no vitamins, not a baked apple.  Has some milk product in it
for the calcium, salt added.  Custard?


#226 of 610 by i on Thu Jun 4 21:41:02 1998:

Not custard, but it is a dairy product.


#227 of 610 by scott on Fri Jun 5 00:33:32 1998:

Duh, butter?


#228 of 610 by birdlady on Fri Jun 5 04:22:07 1998:

<laugh> Cute, Scott.  =)

I want to know where you can find butter that low in fat, though, unless it's
a low-fat variety like ICBINB.


#229 of 610 by i on Fri Jun 5 22:38:36 1998:

2.5g of fat in an 8 oz. serving would be a *mighty* poor brand of butter.
The fat in this food is of dairy origin, though, and butter is, in another
sense, not too far off the mark.   <-- big, fat hint


#230 of 610 by keesan on Sat Jun 6 01:15:07 1998:

Not buttermilk again?


#231 of 610 by i on Sat Jun 6 16:01:21 1998:

Oh, no, never!  This is lowfat buttermilk.

How do we get more people to play this game?


#232 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jun 7 17:50:43 1998:

Could we appoint someone chosen at random from another item?
Calling for volunteers!!!!!!


#233 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jun 12 14:33:13 1998:

Three ingredients to this one, one oddly spelled, one unbelievable, which you
can guess after guessing the main ingredient:
serving size 1 pack (200 g)
protein 3 g
fat 62 mg
No calories from fat, no cholesterol
sugars 79 g
carbohydrate 117 g
saturated fat 27 mg
fiber 8 g
calories 450
VA 0mg
Vc 2 mg
Na 112 mg
Ca 28 mg
Fe 1 mg

net weight 200g


I expect that the figure for VA is way too low, so perhaps the other numbers
are also not too trustable.


#234 of 610 by valerie on Tue Jun 16 03:17:27 1998:

This response has been erased.



#235 of 610 by orinoco on Tue Jun 16 14:44:52 1998:

I seem to remember having seen nutrition info on gum - or at least info on
the number of calories and such. 


#236 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jun 16 15:35:03 1998:

VA - vitamin A (but the 0 figure is definitely wrong)
Vc - vitamin C
62 mg fat = .062 g fat.  200 g total weight.  As someone pointed out a while
back when I brought up 62 mg fat - 0 fat calories.
In this household, if you open a package of anything it becomes a serving (i.
e., it is gone within a few hours if not sooner).
Think no cholesterol (not animal), some vitamins, some fiber, little fat or
protein, one major ingredient, and two (or it could be three) additives which
contribute mainly only calories.
        Think - whoever typed this up was not a native speaker of English. 
It is not something that you would find, in this form, in a supermarket, but
the ingredients in it are common (except possibly for one that is probably
an odd misspelling).


#237 of 610 by i on Wed Jun 17 03:10:48 1998:

Kroger is where i get my lowfat buttermilk.  I bought a half gallon, and
will have to get busy baking chocolate cakes to use it up.  Summer-resistant
frosting may be an interesting experiment - any ideas?


#238 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jun 19 18:04:45 1998:

Butterfat used to be lowfat by definition - it was what was left after you
removed the fat from milk to make butter.  Frosting is based on fat, how can
you make it from lowfat milk?
        On 'what am i' - this is a fruit or vegetable with a minor amount of
additive, fiber and vitamins come with the primary ingredient.  It is rather
a common food but prepared in a way not common here.


#239 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jun 23 17:13:50 1998:

It is normally somewhat sweet, and originated in South American (I think)
but is now widely grown in warm climates around the world.


#240 of 610 by i on Thu Jun 25 17:46:38 1998:

Clues to date suggest sweet spuds or squash, mostly dried out, then 
super-charged with sugar.


#241 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jun 26 14:07:58 1998:

Ingredients:  High Quality Sweet postato, w-
hite Granulated Suger, Malt Dust honeypee.
No, those are not typos on my part.  
Walter, who else can we find to play this game?.


#242 of 610 by i on Fri Jun 26 22:37:16 1998:

Dunno.  Should we give away large cash prizes (and forbid ourselves
from winning), or conduct focus group marketing research?  

Anyone reading this who used to play "What Am I?" more often?  Why don't
you play so much any more?  Please do tell!


#243 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jun 26 23:21:48 1998:

John Morris says he is preparing to enter a nutrition label, but has not
been able to guess any of the previous entries.  Shall we wait for him?
honeypee - bee honey?  I think maybe people have eaten too much yogurt and
can't think of anything else to enter any more.


#244 of 610 by scott on Sat Jun 27 00:43:51 1998:

I used to play, but it sort of got to be too much work.  :/


#245 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jun 28 03:17:48 1998:

Would you like to be 'it' instead?


#246 of 610 by scott on Sun Jun 28 12:02:25 1998:

That is what was too much work.


#247 of 610 by valerie on Sat Jul 11 13:02:41 1998:

This response has been erased.



#248 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jul 12 02:11:02 1998:

Want to post something?


#249 of 610 by i on Mon Aug 10 03:10:35 1998:

It looks like a well-made chocolate bribe would get valerie to post.  But
we need a "critical mass" of people to start and keep playing.  Hmmm.....


#250 of 610 by coyote on Mon Aug 10 04:02:54 1998:

(I'd play, but the entry's are always too hard to think about)


#251 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Aug 20 20:31:10 1998:

I try to play, but everything is always so obscure, I have no idea (plus I
was out of town all summer).


#252 of 610 by valerie on Mon Aug 24 11:40:36 1998:

This response has been erased.



#253 of 610 by lilmo on Mon Aug 24 23:08:56 1998:

But I only just started during the "most recent entries", so all I've seen
are obscure items.


#254 of 610 by i on Thu Aug 27 00:44:06 1998:

Serving size:  1 oz., 16 per container
110 calories, 80 from fat
Fat/Sat. fat/Cholesterol:  9g, 14% / 5g, 27% / 30mg, 9%
170mg / 7% sodium
Carbohydates/Fiber/Sugar:  <1g, 0% / 0g, 0% / 0g, 0%
Protein 7g
Vit. A/Vit. C/Calcium/Iron:  6% / 0% / 20% / 0%

Gurus will kindly abstain from giving this away.......


#255 of 610 by remmers on Thu Aug 27 17:26:04 1998:

Hm... Decent amount of protein, kinda high on fat, insignificant
carbohydrate, good source of calcium. Sounds like some kind of
dairy product, probably solid. Comes in a one pound container.
Some kind of cheese, perhaps?


#256 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Aug 27 21:17:23 1998:

Sliced American cheese for sandwiches!


#257 of 610 by i on Thu Aug 27 21:23:48 1998:

Kroger's Sharp Pinconning Cheese.  John "Guru who, me?" Remmers is up.  :)


#258 of 610 by remmers on Fri Aug 28 13:05:52 1998:

Okay, here goes. Good luck!

Serving size: 1 XXXXXX   (censored, to not give away too much)
Servings per container: 14
Amount Per Serving:
    Calories             190
    Calories from Fat     60
    Total Fat              7gm      11%
    Saturated Fat        1.5gm       7%
    Cholesterol            0gm       0%
    Sodium               135mg       6%
    Potassium            160mg       5%
    Total Carbohydrate    19gm       6%
    Dietary Fiber          2gm       7%
    Sugars                17gm
    Protein               14gm

    Vitamin A             50%
    Vitamin C            200%
    Calcium               45%
    Iron                  10%
    Vitamin D             35%
    Vitamin E            210%
    Thiamin               50%
    Riboflavin            50%
    Niacin               100%
    Vitamin B6           200%
    Folate                40%
    Vitamin B12           45%
    Biotin                30%
    Pantothenic Acid      35%
    Phosphorus            30%
    Magnesium             10%
    Zinc                  50%
    Selenium              80%
    Chromium              80%
    Molybdenum            65%


#259 of 610 by coyote on Fri Aug 28 21:02:52 1998:

Fortified breakfast cereal (milk included)?  (Wild guess, there...)


#260 of 610 by y on Sat Aug 29 01:42:26 1998:

sounds like some powdered nutrition mix.. but not diet, eh?  
.'


#261 of 610 by remmers on Sat Aug 29 02:29:24 1998:

Not cereal, not powdered nutrition mix.


#262 of 610 by coyote on Sat Aug 29 02:53:25 1998:

Weight Gainer?  Y'know, that stuff they sell in GMC's and other sotres of that
sort.


#263 of 610 by remmers on Sat Aug 29 11:58:47 1998:

Not Weight Gainer.


#264 of 610 by lilmo on Sat Aug 29 16:50:58 1998:

No cholesterol, so it's a plant product.


#265 of 610 by valerie on Wed Sep 2 13:08:13 1998:

This response has been erased.



#266 of 610 by remmers on Wed Sep 2 14:03:21 1998:

Not Rice Krispy Treats, or any other form of cereal. But the food
*is* solid in form, not liquid or powder.


#267 of 610 by lilmo on Fri Sep 4 16:36:19 1998:

Do those vitamins occur in the regular ingredients, or are they added to make
it look good?  :-)
(vitamins AND minerals, that is)


#268 of 610 by valerie on Tue Sep 8 12:05:11 1998:

This response has been erased.



#269 of 610 by remmers on Tue Sep 8 14:52:16 1998:

Sorry, not Pop Tarts. This thing is ready to eat and not anything that 
one has to prepare by heating, toasting, etc.

This is a somewhat obscure puzzler, I think, so I'll count as correct 
the first person to come up with the right general category and won't 
expect to see a brand name.


#270 of 610 by i on Tue Sep 8 22:28:24 1998:

Some sort of Yuppie Chow Good-4-U Meal Bar?


#271 of 610 by lilmo on Wed Sep 9 01:14:11 1998:

is #267 being ignored, or overlooked?


#272 of 610 by remmers on Wed Sep 9 15:16:05 1998:

I wasn't sure how to respond to #267, so I put off doing so,
and then forgot about it. I'm not sure how one defines "regular
ingredients" in the context of this product, which is a mixture
of a bunch of things intended to achieve a nutritional ideal.

I guess #270 is close enough. Specifically, it's a Zone Bar.
They're marketed by Barry Sears' EisoTech company. Sears is
the author of the popular "Zone diet" books, and the bars
contain the 40/30/30 calorie percentage of carbohydrate,
protein, and fat that Sears claims is best for most people.

The i's have it.


#273 of 610 by i on Thu Sep 10 02:31:58 1998:

Serving size:  1/4 cup
90 calories
Fat:  45 calories / 5g, 8% / saturated 1g, 6% / cholesterol 40mg, 13%
Sodium:  270mg, 11%
Carbohydrates:  all 0's
Protein:  12g
Vitamin A:  0%    C:  0%    Calcium:  10%   Iron:  2% 

Gurus will *please* try to restrain themselves this time!   :) 


#274 of 610 by remmers on Thu Sep 10 10:44:58 1998:

<remmers looks around, trying to spot gurus>


#275 of 610 by i on Fri Sep 11 01:39:46 1998:

<i hands remmers a mirror>


#276 of 610 by lilmo on Fri Sep 11 01:55:46 1998:

Re #272:  I think that the correct answer would have been that they were in
the ingredients.  Either that, or "no."  :-)

Re #273:  Well, we have cholesterol, so it's from an animal, we have fat,
protein, and calcium, but no starch or sugar (or fiber).  Except for the lack
of sugars, I'd be inclined to guess milk.  In fact, I'll go out on a limb,
and guess, MILK!


#277 of 610 by keesan on Fri Sep 11 13:10:56 1998:

Lactose in milk is a carbohydrate and a sugar.


#278 of 610 by valerie on Fri Sep 11 13:51:45 1998:

This response has been erased.



#279 of 610 by keesan on Fri Sep 11 18:13:38 1998:

1/4 cup equals 2 oz, not a bad serving size for cheese.


#280 of 610 by i on Sat Sep 12 01:03:32 1998:

<chortle>
It's not milk.


#281 of 610 by lilmo on Sun Sep 13 23:43:42 1998:

Well, I said that I didn't think so, but I figured that I didn't lose
anything by guessing.

Is it human-food?


#282 of 610 by remmers on Mon Sep 14 00:25:08 1998:

The ratio of protein to fat, and the total absence of carbohydrate,
suggests some kind of meat, or maybe egg, product, one that's not
excessively high in fat. But Valerie's right, meat isn't usually
measured in cups or fractions thereof. So I dunno...


#283 of 610 by i on Mon Sep 14 03:47:08 1998:

Yes, this food is commonly sold for human consumption.  :)


#284 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Sep 15 23:45:19 1998:

Is is egg white?


#285 of 610 by keesan on Wed Sep 16 00:39:34 1998:

egg replacer?


#286 of 610 by i on Wed Sep 16 02:32:07 1998:

This is neither egg white nor egg replacer.


#287 of 610 by valerie on Wed Sep 16 14:18:29 1998:

This response has been erased.



#288 of 610 by i on Wed Sep 16 22:48:04 1998:

Total Fat 5g    8%
Saturated Fat 1g        6%
Cholesterol 40mg        13%
 - is how it's laid out on the actual label.  (Anyone else find my
squeeze-it-in style too cryptic?)

Nope, not cocoa mix.  1 T of plain cocoa contains 3g carbohydrates - 2 of
'em fiber.  None o' neither in this stuff.

Keep guessing!  <chortle>


#289 of 610 by i on Sun Sep 20 18:03:33 1998:

It seems hard to believe that i've actually stumped a bunch of 
red-blooded American cooks with this traditional, mainstream
food......


#290 of 610 by remmers on Mon Sep 21 10:52:58 1998:

(All the gurus here know what it is, but you've forbidden them from
responding.  ;-)

Actually, I'm stumped at this point...


#291 of 610 by i on Mon Sep 21 23:12:00 1998:

Verbose hint:
   It appears that the collective council of greater gurus have, in their
assembled wisdom, made many assumptions and ruled out many things without
resorting to the chela's crutch of asking whether their seeming enlighten-
ment is the real McCoy......true, enlightened, and forbearing Buddhas
excepted, of course....


#292 of 610 by keesan on Tue Sep 22 15:14:16 1998:

We don't eat traditional mainstream food, or animal products.  Hamburger?


#293 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Sep 22 22:31:53 1998:

Is it canned mea of some kind?


#294 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Sep 22 22:32:53 1998:

er, meat, that is.


#295 of 610 by i on Tue Sep 22 22:44:18 1998:

Looks like lilmo's found the right track.  Not hamburger, through.


#296 of 610 by lilmo on Wed Sep 23 01:37:03 1998:

Vienna Sausage?  Potted Meat?


#297 of 610 by i on Wed Sep 23 02:04:27 1998:

Not Vienna Sausage (loved it as a kid, now i think it's gross).
What's Potted Meat?


#298 of 610 by omni on Wed Sep 23 05:50:54 1998:

  It has to be SPAM! SPAM, SPAM, GLORIOUS SPAM!!!


#299 of 610 by omni on Wed Sep 23 05:52:05 1998:

 Potted Meat is evil. It is made from pig parts that are uh well, better left
unmentioned.


#300 of 610 by i on Thu Sep 24 00:32:30 1998:

Okay, this is definitely NOT potted meat.
It also is not SPAM (or any of the varieties or knock-offs of SPAM) - way
too little fat & sodium!


#301 of 610 by valerie on Mon Sep 28 01:47:00 1998:

This response has been erased.



#302 of 610 by valerie on Mon Sep 28 01:48:12 1998:

This response has been erased.



#303 of 610 by scott on Mon Sep 28 20:27:49 1998:

OK, I hate finding and typing in my own label, but I still want to guess.

Cheese dip?


#304 of 610 by i on Mon Sep 28 20:59:21 1998:

Maybe people need to re-read responses #293 & following...

I second valerie's rejection of Campbell's soup on the ground of 
insufficient sodium.

Nothing wrong with handing off the trophy if you win, scott.  But it's
not cheese anything.

s/nd o/nds o/

<chortle>

(Unlike the previously-known "it's a can", there was a far more subtle 
clue burried in the my plug for this cf. in agora....)


#305 of 610 by lilmo on Mon Sep 28 23:51:22 1998:

Can you tell us the number of servings per container?


#306 of 610 by remmers on Mon Sep 28 23:57:56 1998:

(Re resp:304 - This item is in two conferences. Which one were you
plugging?)

It's not something like canned tuna is it?


#307 of 610 by i on Tue Sep 29 03:43:31 1998:

Seven servings per container.

Cooking cf., which i regard as this item's "home" conference.

Yes, but not exactly.

So what is this and what's the clue in agora??? 


#308 of 610 by remmers on Tue Sep 29 16:57:46 1998:

(Historical note: Cooking is certainly an appropriate home for this item
now, but the very first edition of it started out in Enigma, posted by
yours truly.)


#309 of 610 by valerie on Wed Sep 30 15:13:47 1998:

This response has been erased.



#310 of 610 by valerie on Wed Sep 30 15:25:12 1998:

This response has been erased.



#311 of 610 by valerie on Wed Sep 30 16:19:57 1998:

This response has been erased.



#312 of 610 by i on Thu Oct 1 03:20:24 1998:

No carbo's, so it can't be ravioli.

Like Newton, lilmo's canned meat idea was a big advance *at the time*. 

Yes, canned fish (i'd thought that #306/307 sort of settled that).  
(Meat is defined both in ways that include and exclude fish, hence
my ambiguous "on the right track" response.) 

I've never seen sardines or anchovies in a can big enough to hold 7
1/4 cup servings; the sodium content seems awefully low for them too.

You seem to have a great talent for getting very close, then making
a fast break for parts distant.....

This food has been mentioned a few times in this cf. (very few, if you're
thinking enigma), but i don't believe that it's ever been a mystery food. 


#313 of 610 by remmers on Thu Oct 1 16:41:21 1998:

Canned salmon?


#314 of 610 by valerie on Thu Oct 1 17:27:07 1998:

This response has been erased.



#315 of 610 by i on Thu Oct 1 23:58:24 1998:

His Snordship has it.  

Yep, 6 characters long was a clue in that response (hoping to lure some
crossword puzzlers).  Shrimp, etc. fit too, but i figured the size of 
the can would rule most of 'em out. 

Valerie:  yep, i said "stumped a bunch of red-blooded American cooks 
with this traditional, mainstream food".  If you read a few pages on the 
history of salmon fishing, you'd be able to spot a huge haul of clues in
that short phrase.  References to gurus, etc. sound Indian...and both
Atlantic & Pacific salmon were staples of the American Indian diet (the
early colonists, too).  I spewed loads of clues if you look, but they
were pretty much all small & subtle ones.  


#316 of 610 by remmers on Fri Oct 2 11:27:57 1998:

Grabbed at random from the pantry:

        Serving size 1/4 cup
        Calories 110, Calories from fat 15
        Total fat 1.5g, Saturated fat 0g
        Cholesterol 0g
        Sodium 430mg
        Total carbohydrate 20g, Dietary fiber 1g, Sugars 1g
        Protein 4g
        Vitamin A 0%
        Vitamin C 0%
        Calcium 4%
        Iron 8%


#317 of 610 by i on Fri Oct 2 23:43:18 1998:

Lots of sodium for something so low in fat & sugar....
probably not junk food, but i'd bet the container 
doesn't trumpet the sodium content.


#318 of 610 by remmers on Sat Oct 3 11:22:45 1998:

No junk food in *our* house. Anyways, not much.  :)


#319 of 610 by valerie on Sun Oct 4 00:51:28 1998:

This response has been erased.



#320 of 610 by i on Sun Oct 4 16:39:54 1998:

<i grabs the French bread & gets out some garlic butter....>
Want your garlic bread vegan, valerie?


#321 of 610 by valerie on Mon Oct 5 02:42:24 1998:

This response has been erased.



#322 of 610 by remmers on Mon Oct 5 11:53:12 1998:

Just a reminder that resp:316 contains my poser. Telnetters and
direct dialers can review it by typing   only 316   at the next
prompt.


#323 of 610 by lilmo on Wed Oct 7 02:36:32 1998:

No vitamins, lots of carbs, but calcium and iron.  A type of bean?  Not an
animal product, (no cholesterol), but not much sugar, either.  I'm definitely
leaning twoards a canned bean, of some sort.


#324 of 610 by remmers on Wed Oct 7 13:30:28 1998:

Not bean, and not something that comes in a can.


#325 of 610 by i on Sun Oct 11 20:26:01 1998:

Bisquick, or some similar leavening-already-added flour mixture?


#326 of 610 by remmers on Mon Oct 12 17:16:56 1998:

No, but you're mildly lukewarm.


#327 of 610 by i on Sun Oct 18 00:19:14 1998:

Is it mostly minimally-processed grain products?


#328 of 610 by remmers on Sun Oct 18 13:08:36 1998:

I wouldn't call it minimally-processed.


#329 of 610 by valerie on Sat Oct 24 02:20:27 1998:

This response has been erased.



#330 of 610 by i on Sat Oct 24 17:37:34 1998:

Instant potatoes?


#331 of 610 by remmers on Sun Oct 25 15:18:15 1998:

Not instant potatoes. This food is not usually eaten stand-alone, but 
rather mixed with other things.


#332 of 610 by i on Sun Oct 25 20:25:48 1998:

Seasoned (quick?) rice?


#333 of 610 by remmers on Mon Oct 26 10:53:21 1998:

Not rice.


#334 of 610 by alfee on Mon Oct 26 20:34:21 1998:

Salad croutons?


#335 of 610 by remmers on Tue Oct 27 23:44:00 1998:

Not croutons, but you're warmer...


#336 of 610 by keesan on Wed Oct 28 15:08:49 1998:

breadcrumbs?


#337 of 610 by alfee on Thu Oct 29 01:52:41 1998:

Ooh, that's a good one.


#338 of 610 by lilmo on Mon Nov 2 03:04:10 1998:

How's about stuffing mix?


#339 of 610 by remmers on Mon Nov 2 05:01:15 1998:

Keesan has it in #336 - it's breadcrumbs. The nutrition facts
were from a box of Progresso seasoned breadcrumbs.


#340 of 610 by keesan on Tue Nov 3 19:22:27 1998:

We have nothing else in the house with a nutrition label besides oil and
vinegar, so I will resort to my nutrition textbook's appendix.
This is something I am eating at the moment, but did not come commercially
packaged in my case.  1 oz, 28 g, 7% water, 154 kcal
protein 7 g
carb 5.1 g
fiber 1.54 g
fat 13 g
sat fat 2.46 g
mono 4.05 g
poly 9 g
chol 0 (we are vegans)
calc 12 mg
iron 4.25 mg
magn 152 mg
phos 333 mg
pota 229 mg
sodi 5 mg
zinc 2.12 mg
VT-A (vitamin A) 11 RE
thia .06 mg
ribo .09 mg
niac .50 mg
B6 .06 mg
fola 26 mg
Vit C trace
This is a seasonal food.  Should be easy to guess.


#341 of 610 by keesan on Mon Nov 9 20:52:34 1998:

This should be very easy to guess, especially if you have been reading other
items.  What has no cholesterol, lots of fat and fiber, and is eaten one ounce
at a time?  And is seasonal?


#342 of 610 by remmers on Tue Nov 10 12:04:08 1998:

Whatever it is has 7 gm of protein too. There aren't too many
vegetable foods with a nutrition profile like that. Too much
fat for tofu, though...  <remmers ponders>


#343 of 610 by keesan on Tue Nov 10 22:51:40 1998:

Tofu has a lot more water.


#344 of 610 by valerie on Thu Nov 12 15:25:13 1998:

This response has been erased.



#345 of 610 by keesan on Thu Nov 12 22:51:22 1998:

No. But they do fit all my clues and we have a lot of them.  Chestnuts are,
I think, mostly carbohydrate rather than fat.


#346 of 610 by keesan on Mon Nov 16 19:48:03 1998:

Someone please name all the seasonal foods for this month.


#347 of 610 by i on Tue Nov 17 01:57:59 1998:

Pumpkin, cranberries, turkey, "yams", perhaps various sorts of nuts,
>next, please< 


#348 of 610 by keesan on Wed Nov 18 23:09:12 1998:

The answer is in one of those things you listed.


#349 of 610 by i on Thu Nov 19 01:02:26 1998:

Pumpkin seeds, cranberry seeds, turkey innards, or am i taking your "in"
too literally?


#350 of 610 by keesan on Thu Nov 19 18:58:33 1998:

Nope, you got it (the first guess).  This delicacy was being discussed in
detail in another item at the time I chose it.  Turkey innards have
cholesterol.  Seeds don't.
I told you this one was easy.


#351 of 610 by i on Fri Nov 20 02:10:28 1998:

Trust keesan to be eating unsalted pumpkin seeds! 

5 demerits for i for not checking on the cholesterol in #340.

Anyone else want to enter a mystery food?


#352 of 610 by keesan on Fri Nov 20 23:52:50 1998:

Vegans don't eat a lot of cholesterol.  We cook our own seeds, no salt needed.
I really tried hard to make this one easy.


#353 of 610 by remmers on Sat Nov 21 11:44:39 1998:

Since cholesterol is found only in animal products, I'd think
that vegans eat zero cholesterol.


#354 of 610 by i on Sat Nov 21 20:24:35 1998:

Last i knew, keesan (and Jim) would occasionally eat ovo-lacto stuff
(cholesterol, not that turkey innards qualify).  I've talked to a
number of vegans who are (or claim to be) far more interested in the 
"no exploiting or abusing animals" aspect than in non-consumption of
animal products.  Some of them come across as willing to try steak & 
eggs at a farmer's dinner table if they knew & approved of the way 
that Buttercup & the hens were treated......

#include <drift.h>

#include <drift.c> 

Anyone interested in entering a new mystery food? 


#355 of 610 by keesan on Tue Nov 24 04:15:41 1998:

Jim is trying not to abuse the planet.


#356 of 610 by omni on Tue Nov 24 08:13:32 1998:

  I'll enter something by midnight tommorow. Get your thinking caps out, 
I promise you that it will not be easy.


#357 of 610 by omni on Wed Nov 25 06:58:50 1998:

  OK get out your thinking caps.

  Serving size 8oz
  _________________
  Servings per container-2

   Calories 140  From Fat 0

   Total Fat 0
   Sodium   35
   Total Carb 38g 
      Sugars 38g
   Protein    0g
   Vitamin C  100%


  Good luck kiddies.


#358 of 610 by remmers on Wed Nov 25 12:19:22 1998:

Frozen orange juice?


#359 of 610 by keesan on Wed Nov 25 20:08:23 1998:

Sugar with Vit C added and maybe some flavoring.  Koolaid?  Or some other
premixed sugar-water drink.


#360 of 610 by omni on Wed Nov 25 20:19:36 1998:

 remmers is in the neighborhood.

 No, it is NOT kool-aid. 


#361 of 610 by keesan on Fri Nov 27 17:05:12 1998:

Orange juice or any other real juice does not have 100% of any vitamin, this
looks like they added some exact amount.  Or else the 100% figure is wrong.
I have seen apple juice with Vit C added.


#362 of 610 by omni on Sat Nov 28 10:02:14 1998:

  Well this could go on for years, but essentially remmers got it.
It's cranberry uice.

 take it rembo.


#363 of 610 by remmers on Sat Nov 28 11:39:06 1998:

Oh no! 

(Actually, I've given my share recently, I think. If somebody wants to
jump in with a new puzzler, please feel free. If nobody does, and I
haven't completely forgotten about it, maybe I'll post something in a
few days...)


#364 of 610 by i on Sun Jan 17 02:22:35 1999:

Serving size:  2 Tbsp, about 5 per container
Calories:  30
Total Fat:  0g  0%
Sodium:  20mg  1%
Total Carb.:  6g  2%
Fiber:  1g  6%
Sugars:  3g
Protein:  2g
Vitamin A:  10%    Vitamin C:  10%   Calcium:  0%   Iron:  0%


#365 of 610 by remmers on Sun Jan 17 13:16:57 1999:

(Hm, almost 2 months between my resp:363 and i's poser in resp:364
so I guess I completely forgot about it...)

That's a pretty tiny serving size - 2 Tbsp. Suggests some kind of
sauce or topping. Or maybe powdered drink mix. (I'm not guessing
at this stage, just thinking out loud.)


#366 of 610 by i on Sun Jan 17 19:28:36 1999:

<i figured it was about time for a resurrection attempt & a label was handy>


#367 of 610 by keesan on Mon Jan 18 04:48:29 1999:

Chocolate tends to have fat in it, what else is half sugar?  Some sort of
drink mix with powdered milk in it?  And vitamins added?


#368 of 610 by i on Tue Jan 19 03:14:27 1999:

???  If it was getting the protein from powdered milk, they're be lots
more calcium in it.  Not sure if you think 3g of sugar in 2T is "half
sugar", or you're just noting that half the total carbo's are sugar.


#369 of 610 by keesan on Wed Jan 20 02:08:13 1999:

I will take a closer look at the nutrition facts.  (If it is nutrition
information, the can is out of date, I just learned).


#370 of 610 by keesan on Wed Jan 20 02:10:44 1999:

About 20-25% protein, and a lot of sugar, in a small container.  No fat.
Jim is thinking, hmmmm.  No ideas yet.  We can only guess the single
ingredient stuff easily.


#371 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jan 31 21:58:29 1999:

Could you let us know the number of ingredients?  Or some other hint?


#372 of 610 by i on Mon Feb 1 00:20:12 1999:

His Snordship is on the right track.  This food's nutritional profile is
mostly due to it's main ingredient.


#373 of 610 by i on Sat Feb 27 14:24:26 1999:

Hello, out there!!!  Anybody home???   :)
There's only one ingredient in this mystery food.


#374 of 610 by keesan on Sun Feb 28 02:48:49 1999:

Peanuts?  (Wild guess, but we just bought 25 pounds of them raw).
Is your ingredient whole or refined?


#375 of 610 by i on Mon Mar 1 03:16:56 1999:

No fat & little protein, so peanuts don't have much of a chance.

The ingredient is (as i would use the words) neither raw nor refined.


#376 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 1 22:33:11 1999:

Carbohydrates (sugar) and protein, high in vitamins A and C, 10 tbps per
container?  Some fiber.  Fruit or vegetable?  Not a seed if it has no fat,
but high in protein.  Not refined so no fat removed.  Dried potato?


#377 of 610 by i on Wed Mar 3 03:54:32 1999:

Yes, a fruit or veggie; no, not dried spuds.


#378 of 610 by keesan on Thu Mar 4 23:04:39 1999:

Beans?  What else has that much protein?  Soybeans have fat.


#379 of 610 by i on Sat Mar 6 02:15:43 1999:

Not beans.  This food is not usually considered high in protein.


#380 of 610 by keesan on Sat Mar 6 03:05:32 1999:

Half the carbohydrates are sugar, some sort of fruit?  What sort of unrefined
fruit comes in tablespoons?  No sugar added jam?  Apricot jam?  High in
vitamins A and C.  


#381 of 610 by i on Sat Mar 6 15:03:55 1999:

Not apricot nor jam.  Note how i talked around the "refined" issue in
#375.  I'd call it a fruit.


#382 of 610 by keesan on Sun Mar 7 02:06:49 1999:

Dried fruit?  Dried tomatoes?  Is sugar-added not considered refined?


#383 of 610 by i on Sun Mar 7 21:18:19 1999:

Not dried anything.  I wouldn't call sugar-added "refined"....but no
sugar has been added to this food.


#384 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 8 18:28:48 1999:

Fruit?


#385 of 610 by i on Tue Mar 9 01:30:06 1999:

I'd call it a fruit.


#386 of 610 by keesan on Thu Mar 11 02:01:07 1999:

Tomato?  Pepper?  Eggplant?
(Solanaceae)


#387 of 610 by i on Fri Mar 12 02:47:00 1999:

Tomato paste.


#388 of 610 by keesan on Sun Mar 14 04:27:45 1999:

Dried fruit, like I said.  We like ajvar, which is Macedonian or Bulgarian
and is a combination of cooked peppers, eggplant and tomato with spices, sort
of boiled down to thick.  Available at big market in spicy or less spicy.
If anyone else is reading this item please come up with a mystery food (and
if you want me to guess at it I do better at single ingredient stuff).
Or I will enter something interesting from an ethnic food store again.  We
just ran out of peanut oil and went shopping.

What does one do with only 2 tbps tomato paste?


#389 of 610 by i on Sun Mar 14 21:03:38 1999:

I don't think of tomato paste as a dried fruit because it's not dry.

I'd guess they figure 2T is the amount each person gets from the little
can of tomato paste after you mix it into a pot of spaghetti sauce and
serve it to your family.


#390 of 610 by keesan on Mon Mar 15 03:34:46 1999:

Jim's contribution, nutritional values are from a nutrition book:
1 cup, 175 g, 586 kcal, 20.5 g protein, 128 g carb, 15.6 g fiber, 4.2 g fat
of which .81 sat 1.4 mono 1.51 poly-unsaturated, no chol

calc 200, iron 6.7  Magn 315 Phos 494 Pota 784 Sodi 4 Zinc 4.4 (mg)

VT-A 0 Thia 1.05 Ribo .26  Niac 7.7 V-B6 .37 Fola 52 Vt-C o (mg)
(Vt-A is in RE)

We have some of this product but packaged without nutrition label.
The amount I would use for two of us is about one cup ( 2 servings).
Oh, H2O (%) 11.  For comparison chocolate milk is 82% water, meat about 50%,
yellow cake with chocolate frosting (2 layer cake) 23%, and chocolate chip
cookies home recipe only 3% and macademia nuts 2%.  Lettuce 96% water.


#391 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Apr 13 01:48:21 1999:

some kind of bulk dry breakfast cereal?


#392 of 610 by keesan on Tue Apr 13 03:30:59 1999:

We are trying to remember just what Jim's entry was.  You are close as far
as 'cereal' and 'bulk' but it needs further cooking to be eaten for breakfast,
and is generally mixed with a few other ingredients.  Not just dumped into
a bowl and milk added, or simply boiled.


#393 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Apr 13 22:53:15 1999:

is it oatmeal?


#394 of 610 by keesan on Wed Apr 14 16:54:37 1999:

No, we make oatmeal by simply boiling it.  This is not oatmeal, but it is used
similarly to a cereal=grain though technically not a grain (graminae - grass).


#395 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Apr 15 21:57:27 1999:

Can I guess again, or do I need to let someone else have a try; I think I know
what it is...


#396 of 610 by keesan on Mon Apr 26 02:07:57 1999:

Of course you can guess again, this was a dead item without your input!  Sorry
I have been too busy with computer viruses to get back to here sooner.


#397 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Apr 27 00:19:50 1999:

CORNmeal !!!  It's not a grain, but it's treated that way, often.  You might
use it to make mush, cornbread, etc.  :-)


#398 of 610 by keesan on Tue Apr 27 23:15:05 1999:

Corn is definitely a member of the graminae and thus a grain, albeit
processed into meal.  Wheat flour is also made from a grain, etc.  This is
something else made into flour that is not a true grain.  It can also be eaten
not made into flour.


#399 of 610 by lilmo on Fri Apr 30 21:22:58 1999:

Phooee.


#400 of 610 by keesan on Sun May 2 14:56:45 1999:

Think 'pancake'.  (Not phooee, not wheat, rye, corn, barley, millet, sorghum,
teff, rice, although these all make nice pancakes too).


#401 of 610 by i on Fri May 7 05:05:25 1999:

Potato flour?


#402 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 7 22:33:38 1999:

Nope, and not sweet potato or cassava flour.  BIG HINT:  the name sounds like
a grain even though this is not a grain.
(Not acorn flour, not breadfruit flour)


#403 of 610 by omni on Sat May 8 06:36:45 1999:

  How about buckwheat?


#404 of 610 by keesan on Sun May 9 00:15:41 1999:

Buckwheat it is!  One of the very few things Jim will not eat because it
leaves a metallic taste in his mouse.  He also does not eat raw radishes.


#405 of 610 by omni on Sun May 9 04:28:47 1999:

  give me a few days to find something.


#406 of 610 by keesan on Sun May 9 16:16:32 1999:

Don't tell me your cupboard is bare!


#407 of 610 by omni on Sun May 9 17:21:31 1999:

 Oh no, far from that but you know one has to be creative with this lot. It
doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that I'm going to post something
that's really mainstream, since I don't exactly subscribe to the philosophy
of veganism. I have to be super sneaky, and that, will take a few days.

<evil laugh>


#408 of 610 by keesan on Mon May 10 21:27:09 1999:

Campbell's chicken soup?


#409 of 610 by omni on Tue May 11 08:23:32 1999:

  Why are you entering a guess? I didn't post a label.

  But here is mine.

 Serving size 3 pieces
 Servings per container about 9.

Total Fat 9 grams
Saturated Fat 6 grams
Cholesterol 5 mg
Sodium 55 mg
Total Carbs 22g
  Dietary Fiber less than 1g
  Sugars 4g
Protein 1g



#410 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 12 00:55:11 1999:

Something not vegan, like you said.  5mg cholesterol.    Probably not chicken
soup unless it is restaurant sized (nine servings) and comes in pieces.  Hmmm


#411 of 610 by lilmo on Wed May 12 01:38:12 1999:

High in carbs, but not fiber or sugar, so is very starchy


#412 of 610 by omni on Wed May 12 05:37:44 1999:

  Funny, I really didn't notice the starch...



#413 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 12 16:11:44 1999:

Almost half fat, actually.  Cheese crackers? Cheese something?


#414 of 610 by omni on Thu May 13 06:39:58 1999:

  not cheese. I would never admit to eating cheese. It's terribly fatty,
smells awful and costs a lot of money. ;)


#415 of 610 by omni on Fri May 14 18:07:16 1999:

  I seem to have rendered all the great food detectives inert. 

  A clue: Life without this food would be very boring, and I wouldn't
even dream of seeing a world without it. Some people smoked it, which was
truly bizarre.


#416 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 14 21:52:45 1999:

We must lead very boring lives, as vegans do not eat cholesterol.  I cannot
imagine smoking milk, eggs, or meat (at least in a pipe - I have eaten smoked
cheese and smoked salmon).


#417 of 610 by omni on Sat May 15 07:55:26 1999:

  no milk, nor eggs, or salmon. It's not cheese either. 

  Keep a guessing.


#418 of 610 by omni on Sun May 16 16:57:14 1999:

  Methiks we need another clue. 

<omni sees the clue bus in the distance>

   When I said "Smoked" I didn't mean the kind of smoking that bacon gets,
and no, it's not bacon so don't ask.

<the clue bus leaves in a cloud of blue exhuast>


#419 of 610 by keesan on Mon May 17 02:00:02 1999:

banana skins?
(with cholesterol added)
I am afraid I am not good at guessing animal products, sorry.  Would someone
more creative please make a stab at this one?


#420 of 610 by omni on Mon May 17 06:36:28 1999:

  You have to ask yourself "Would Jim go around eating banana skins?" I think
not. I like what is inside the skins, and I usually throw my old, used skins
away, or compost them for fertilizer.
 You also have to ask "Are banana skins so good that life without them be
worth living?" If banana skins disappeared tomorrow, I wouldn't notice, nor
would I care.

  If the mystery food did that I'd probably call Dr. K.


#421 of 610 by omni on Wed May 19 04:40:49 1999:

   Yet another clue since it is apparent I'm being a little obscure.

   The name of this food is sprinkled liberally throughout this conference
and even this item. One of the users uses this as his name.

   I should add that when I am out of this particular item, I tend to get
bitchy.


#422 of 610 by keesan on Wed May 19 13:33:56 1999:

Dog food?  Not cheese.  Someone else please make a guess at this.


#423 of 610 by lilmo on Wed May 19 21:34:37 1999:

cloves


#424 of 610 by omni on Thu May 20 07:13:41 1999:

  I won't even answer 422.  I have done a lot of weird things in my life,
including eating Milk-Bones, But I don't snack on dog food. Never have never
will. 

  It is not cloves.

 Sigh.


#425 of 610 by keesan on Thu May 20 22:29:43 1999:

I was looking for a play on the word 'bitchy'.  I give up.


#426 of 610 by i on Fri May 21 02:26:23 1999:

Try the middle clue in #421.....


#427 of 610 by omni on Fri May 21 03:48:01 1999:

  You might say that the mystery food is just what the doctor ordered.

 And if that isn't enough of a clue, then I really don't know what to tell
ya.


#428 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 21 13:34:34 1999:

High-cholesterol salt?


#429 of 610 by omni on Fri May 21 17:50:53 1999:

  No. I give up. I have no more clues to give away, so I'll just tell you.

  It's Chocolate. 

  The Ancient indians in Mexico smoked it. I believ it was the Mayas, or the
Incas. The label is from Nestle Treasures with Caramel. I would definitly
feel bitchy if all chocolate disappeared from the planet.

 I was very suprised that i didn't get it, since he uses it in his name.

 I'll pass it to i.


#430 of 610 by keesan on Fri May 21 17:59:48 1999:

milk chocolate, I presume, not chocolate beans or cocoa powder.  I have never
thought of this as a necessity of life, or as something I sprinkle.


#431 of 610 by omni on Sat May 22 07:24:10 1999:

  Yup. And sometimes it's need. Sometimes I just need a big hit of chocolate
to set everything right again.


#432 of 610 by i on Mon May 31 14:49:07 1999:

Serving Size: 1/2 Cup (130g)
Servings per Container: 6
Calories: 150 (10 from fat)
Total Fat: 1g / 2%, saturated fat: 0g / 0%, no cholesterol
Sodium: 550mg / 23%
Total Carb.: 29g / 10%, dietary fiber: 7g / 28%, sugar: 5g
Protein: 7g 
Vitamin A: 0%,  Vitamin C: 0%,  Calcium: 6%,  Iron: 10% 


#433 of 610 by lilmo on Wed Jun 2 00:32:16 1999:

no cholesterol, so it's not a meat product.

REALLY high in sodium, so I almost have to guess that it's canned.

pretty good protein and iron, so I'll say it's some kind of beans.


#434 of 610 by keesan on Wed Jun 2 23:31:55 1999:

Low-fat refried beans?


#435 of 610 by i on Thu Jun 3 10:35:16 1999:

Some kind of beans, not low-fat refried.


#436 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Jun 3 23:49:23 1999:

Woo-hoo!  Are they canned?


#437 of 610 by i on Fri Jun 4 03:12:08 1999:

Yes.


#438 of 610 by gypsi on Fri Jun 11 11:53:06 1999:

Kidney beans?


#439 of 610 by lilmo on Sat Jun 12 19:21:36 1999:

baked beans?


#440 of 610 by i on Sat Jun 12 21:08:55 1999:

Bush's baked beans, lilmo's up.


#441 of 610 by lilmo on Mon Jun 28 23:41:32 1999:

Ack, I'm not at home!!  OK, I do have ONE food item with me, here goes:

Serving size 8 fl oz (240 ml)
Servings per container 3

Calories        70
Total Fat 0     0%
Sodium 55mg     2%
Potassium 30mg 1%
Total Carb 19g 6%
    Sugars 15g
Protein 0g

Not a significant source of ... (various items)


I'm going to try to be here regularly, but if I'm gone too long, feel free
to pick someone to take over.


#442 of 610 by keesan on Sat Jul 3 19:16:54 1999:

Sugar water with a bit of starch added.


#443 of 610 by happyboy on Mon Jul 5 21:46:09 1999:

orange juice


#444 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Jul 8 20:17:14 1999:

I think you need to be a bit more specific, keesan.  :-)  However, I think
you are on the right track.

happyboy:  no fiber, no vitamins...  hmm... not the OJ I know...  :-)


#445 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jul 23 00:58:33 1999:

I am not familiar with the brands of sugar water, sorry.  Maybe someone else
would like to guess the details?


#446 of 610 by i on Sun Aug 22 22:44:22 1999:

One of the sugared, etc. brands of tea-in-a-bottle?


#447 of 610 by keesan on Tue Aug 31 14:57:35 1999:

I just discovered that canned soda (Squirt) has starch in it, so is this
canned soda?


#448 of 610 by i on Sat Sep 4 00:43:51 1999:

It looks like lilmo hasn't been around for a while.....#STATIC#...
...grex calling lilmo....come in, lilmo....#STATIC#.....


#449 of 610 by lilmo on Sat Sep 11 00:01:15 1999:

Sorry, haven't been around in a while.

Not tea-in-a-bottle, not canned soda.  But definitely on the right track.


#450 of 610 by i on Sat Sep 11 02:43:23 1999:

Some kind of coffee?


#451 of 610 by lilmo on Mon Sep 13 21:22:10 1999:

Getting colder...


#452 of 610 by i on Wed Sep 15 04:21:02 1999:

<groan>


#453 of 610 by gypsi on Thu Sep 16 22:06:25 1999:

That Sobe stuff...it's an energy drink.


#454 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Sep 21 21:09:11 1999:

No, but close enuf, since I'm getting tired of not being able to guess.  It
was actually Powerade.  Your turn, gypsi!


#455 of 610 by gypsi on Thu Sep 23 01:52:38 1999:

<raises eyebrow>  Ummm...okay.  =)


#456 of 610 by gypsi on Thu Sep 23 01:57:41 1999:

Serving size: 1/4 cup (36g/1.3oz)
Servings per container: about 6

Calories 150
Calories from Fat  35

Total Fat: 4g
Saturated Fat: 2g
Cholesterol: 0mg
Sodium:  270mg
Total Carbohydrate: 26g
Dietary Fiber: 2g
Sugars: 10g
Protein: 2g

Vitamin A: 0%
Vitamin C: 0%
Calcium: 4%
Iron: 6%


#457 of 610 by omni on Thu Sep 23 07:41:06 1999:

  Haagen Dazs?


#458 of 610 by remmers on Thu Sep 23 10:36:42 1999:

Hm... Cholesterol content is zero and fiber is non-zero.  This suggests
it's not a dairy product, like ice cream.  It packs a lot of
carbohydrate and sugar into 1/4 cup.  Maybe some highly concentrated
cereal product.


#459 of 610 by gypsi on Thu Sep 23 20:07:40 1999:

Not Haagen Dazs, not highly concentrated cereal product...but that's kinda
on the right track...


#460 of 610 by keesan on Fri Sep 24 16:34:11 1999:

What is Powerade?


#461 of 610 by lilmo on Sat Sep 25 01:40:31 1999:

Coke's version of Gatorade.  It comes in a handy squirt bottle with a valve
in the cap (so it doesn't leak) and a hinged top over that.

Hmm... no Vit A or C, so not a yellow or green veggie, nor likely a fruit,
but fiber indicates that it's not likely to be meat, either.  Is it some kind
of nut? that seems to fit the fiber, iron, and protein.


#462 of 610 by gypsi on Thu Sep 30 07:27:51 1999:

Nope.  Not a beverage, and not a nut.

Hint:  Yes, you can use it for a breakfast food, but it isn't a food itself.


#463 of 610 by i on Thu Sep 30 23:52:51 1999:

Some kind of spread?
<i is unsure about "it isn't a food itself">


#464 of 610 by gypsi on Fri Oct 1 04:06:37 1999:

Meaning I don't know anyone who would eat it.

Not a spread.  Think internally...as in ingredient...


#465 of 610 by lilmo on Fri Oct 1 18:07:05 1999:

Is is a shake mix?  (eg, carnation instant b'fast or SlimFast)


#466 of 610 by gypsi on Fri Oct 1 19:35:34 1999:

That is so close I could scream.  =)  "Mix" is correct...now gimme a popular
brand name for mixes.  Think coffee cake and muffins.


#467 of 610 by happyboy on Fri Oct 1 22:17:48 1999:

jiffy mix?


#468 of 610 by i on Fri Oct 1 22:59:57 1999:

Shake & Bake!!!     :)


#469 of 610 by keesan on Sat Oct 2 03:38:34 1999:

Bisquick.  I remember doughboys for breakfast at summer camp.  Freshly picked
blueberries and raw dough, we never could wait for them to char on the stick.


#470 of 610 by gypsi on Sat Oct 2 03:59:04 1999:

Happyboy has it!  =)


#471 of 610 by happyboy on Sun Oct 3 01:50:01 1999:

cool...i feel like the fonz!
ok...

corn syrup, dextrose, high fructose corn syrup, crackermeal,
modified wheat starch, partially hydrogenated soybean oil,
dried strawberries, natural berry flavor, dried apples, citric
acid, xanthan gum, red #40, soy lecithin, blue #2

hint: the ingredients listed are only *part* of the product
      AND you need not name the *exact* subspecies of this
      cheerful beast.


#472 of 610 by gypsi on Sun Oct 3 03:30:34 1999:

Nutri-Grain Fruit Twists?


#473 of 610 by happyboy on Sun Oct 3 20:27:12 1999:

that's a negatory, mama-bear.


#474 of 610 by gelinas on Mon Oct 4 03:27:48 1999:

Well, except that it's crackermeal instead of flour, I'd say it sounds
like a Pop Tart.


#475 of 610 by keesan on Mon Oct 4 14:53:27 1999:

Did the rules of the game just change from listing nutritional content to
listing actual ingredients?


#476 of 610 by omni on Mon Oct 4 15:04:16 1999:

 I don't think so, but maybe some people just don't understand the rules of
the game.


#477 of 610 by keesan on Tue Oct 5 00:24:10 1999:

I don't mind playing by different rules for a change, except that makes it
impossible to list any 'food' that does not consist of multiple ingredients.
For instance I could not enter a tomato, only tomato sauce or pizza.


#478 of 610 by happyboy on Wed Oct 6 01:45:40 1999:

r474 gelinas...EXACTAMUNDO!  you GOT IT!


#479 of 610 by gelinas on Wed Oct 6 05:13:36 1999:

Oof.

Serving size: 1 0unce ; fourteen servings per container
110 calories, 5 from fat
Total Fat: 1g, saturated fat 0g
Cholesterol: 0mg 
Sodium: 200mg
Total Carbohydrate: 24g
Dietary fiber: 2g
Sugars: 0g
Protein: 3g
Vitamin A:  0%        Vitamin C: 0%
Calcium:    4%        Iron:      2%



#480 of 610 by happyboy on Fri Oct 8 03:08:04 1999:

putayter chips?


#481 of 610 by gelinas on Fri Oct 8 05:16:05 1999:

No, but probably close enough.  Differentiating between potatoes and corn
after they've been through that particular process is done only by taste.

So you're up.  :)


#482 of 610 by happyboy on Fri Oct 8 23:02:32 1999:

okie doke:

tomato puree (water, toamto paste), water,
cooked enriched macaroni product (flour
enriched with niacin, ferrous sulfate thiamine
mono-nitrate and riboflavin), high fructose corn syrup,
salt, enzyme modified cheddar cheese (cheddar 
cheese [milk, cheese culture, salt, enzyme], water
disodium phosphate), vegetable oil (corn, cottonseed
or partially hydrogenated soybean oil), enzyme modified
butter, oleoresin paprika, spice extract, citric acid
and nonfat dry milk.


#483 of 610 by i on Sat Oct 9 02:29:58 1999:

SpaghettiOO's (or however it's spelled).


#484 of 610 by happyboy on Sun Oct 10 02:40:03 1999:

YAY!!!


#485 of 610 by i on Tue Oct 12 02:54:11 1999:

(Does #484 mean i actually got it, or ?????)


#486 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Oct 12 23:05:34 1999:

methinks so.


#487 of 610 by happyboy on Fri Oct 15 00:33:58 1999:

yup


#488 of 610 by lilmo on Fri Oct 15 20:02:38 1999:

Go for it, Doc!


#489 of 610 by i on Sat Oct 16 02:47:16 1999:

Serving Size:   1 T
Per Container:  about 47
Calories:       20      from fat: 10
Total fat:      1.5g    2%
Saturated:      1g      4%
Cholesterol:    0mg     0%
Sodium          0mg     0%
Total Carbs:    3g      1%
Diet. Fiber:    1g      6%
Sugars: 0g
Protein:        1g
Vitamin A, C, Calcium:   0%
Iron:           4%


#490 of 610 by keesan on Mon Oct 18 03:00:05 1999:

Jim guesses Miracle Whip.  (No eggs?)


#491 of 610 by i on Mon Oct 18 11:03:16 1999:

I'd think Miracle Whip would have loads more fat and sodium.  In any
case, it's not that.


#492 of 610 by keesan on Mon Oct 18 14:46:08 1999:

Miracle Whip Lite, he meant.  But you are right about the sodium.  Half its
calories from fat sounds like a lot to us.  Some kind of unsalted spread?


#493 of 610 by remmers on Mon Oct 18 15:29:40 1999:

The numbers in resp:489 don't add up right.
    * 1.5 gm fat = 13.5 calories (not 10 as stated on the label)
    * 3 gm carb = 12.0 calories
    * 1 gm protein = 4.0 calories
for a total of 29.5 calories, not 20.


#494 of 610 by keesan on Mon Oct 18 16:21:00 1999:

Labels are often wrong.  A 2-pound container of feta cheese says servings are
1 oz and there are 500 servings.  A package of bamboo shoots claims to have
0 g fiber.  The people who make the rules about labels must not read them very
closely, or else only read the fat and cholesterol info, currently in fashion.


#495 of 610 by i on Tue Oct 19 01:17:12 1999:

Neither Miracle Whip Lite nor any unsalted spread.

I checked the numbers in #489 against the label - they're "right".  My
guess is that 1.5 g fat means 1.5 +/-.25 g fat, etc. and they don't
count the calories in the fiber.


#496 of 610 by lilmo on Tue Oct 19 01:50:05 1999:

Also, 10 cal means 1O +/- 5 cal.  And I'm pretty sure you're right about the
fiber calories being defined as 0.

Hmmm...  no salt or sugar at all.  It must not be American.  :-)


#497 of 610 by i on Sun Nov 14 19:39:59 1999:

The mystery food up in #489 isn't incredibly obscure or hard to guess....
BUT YOU GOTTA PLAY TO WIN!
:) 


#498 of 610 by keesan on Mon Nov 15 21:39:13 1999:

peanut butter?


#499 of 610 by lilmo on Mon Nov 15 22:24:12 1999:

only if it's all-natural


#500 of 610 by i on Wed Nov 17 03:33:35 1999:

1 T of peanut butter has far more grams of 'most everything....especially
fat (though much less of it is saturated).


#501 of 610 by carson on Sat Nov 27 11:30:10 1999:

(the serving size suggests something like a condiment or a mix orf
some sort. the lack of sugar is definitely confusing, even though it
*should* help to narrow it down. "half" the calories from fat suggests
... is it cocoa?)


#502 of 610 by i on Sat Nov 27 18:31:52 1999:

And the label says........

Ghirardelli Premium Unsweetened Cocoa!

...so carson's up next.


#503 of 610 by carson on Sat Nov 27 23:02:45 1999:

(oh my. I guessed it from looking at a can of Hershey's. cool.) :)

(ok... here's the stuff for my food:)


Nutrition facts

Serving size  1/4 cup (40g)
Servings per container  about 11

Amount per serving

Calories                    130

                 % Daily Value*

Total fat  0g                0%
  Saturated fat 0g           0%
Cholesterol  0mg             0%
Sodium  10mg                 0%
Potassium  310mg             9%
Total carbohydrate  31g     10%
  Dietary fiber  2g          9%
  Sugars  29g
Protein  1g
Calcium  2%           Iron   6%


(the asterix is the standard "based on 2000 calorie diet" disclaimer. the
box also says that the food is "not a significant source of vitamin A and
vitamin C.")

(finally, I'll note that some numbers don't add up exactly. it's a 2.5 cup
container, 425g. hope that helps!)


#504 of 610 by keesan on Sun Nov 28 03:35:24 1999:

Sugar with some minerals added.  Kool-Aid?  Tang?  Honey? Maple syrup?
Sorghum?  (What would one do with a 'serving' of sorghum?).
40 g - about 1.5 ounces -1/4 cup, so it is not liquid, but a powder, cancel
the honey and sorghum.


#505 of 610 by gelinas on Sun Nov 28 03:41:04 1999:

Not Tang; not enough Vitamin C.  But I don't have a food to post, so I'm not
going to guess.  :/


#506 of 610 by carson on Sun Nov 28 10:45:27 1999:

(not Kool-Aid, not Tang, not honey, not maple syrup, not sorghum...
and not a powder. I am amazed, however, that you've guessed three
of the items I'd considered using.)


#507 of 610 by i on Sun Nov 28 13:00:56 1999:

Is it come kind of powdered drink mix?


#508 of 610 by keesan on Sun Nov 28 15:39:07 1999:

Sugar also weighs nearly 2 ounces/quarter cup, I guess.  Sugar is not
considered a powder, unless it is powdered.


#509 of 610 by carson on Sun Nov 28 21:40:03 1999:

(not a powdered drink, and not sugar. seriously, it's not powdered.)


#510 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Nov 29 05:22:01 1999:

Maple candy.


#511 of 610 by carson on Mon Nov 29 17:19:51 1999:

(not maple candy, but that's closer.)


#512 of 610 by keesan on Mon Nov 29 17:49:34 1999:

You mean not refined cane sugar.  It has to be some type of sugar plus a few
minerals, according to the nutrition label.  Candy is mostly sugar, so is
maple syrup (sugar plus water plus whatever minerals the tree needed).


#513 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Nov 29 19:15:23 1999:

Molasses maybe?  That wouold explain the iron content.


#514 of 610 by carson on Mon Nov 29 20:53:27 1999:

(yes, it's sugar plus minerals, but that's misleading. no, it's not
molasses. yes, it's a common food.) ;)


#515 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Dec 2 20:52:44 1999:

remember it has fiber, but not a lot.  No cholesterol, so it's a plant
product.  A wee bit of salt, but lots of potassium.  Hmm.  Dried banana chips?


#516 of 610 by carson on Fri Dec 3 03:53:39 1999:

(that's the closest guess anyone's made yet, lilmo. no, it's not
dried banana chips.)

(side note: I'm not sure where the sodium comes from. it's not added
as an ingredient.)


#517 of 610 by lilmo on Sat Dec 4 18:47:31 1999:

Is banana part of it?


#518 of 610 by carson on Sat Dec 4 22:52:22 1999:

(no, banana is not part of it.)


#519 of 610 by orinoco on Sun Dec 5 00:20:41 1999:

dried apple?


#520 of 610 by carson on Mon Dec 6 21:10:21 1999:

(no, not dried apple.)


#521 of 610 by i on Tue Dec 7 04:30:39 1999:

Some other dried fruit?


#522 of 610 by carson on Tue Dec 7 18:43:09 1999:

(please be more specific.)  :^)


#523 of 610 by keesan on Tue Dec 7 19:57:32 1999:

Dried mangos?


#524 of 610 by carson on Wed Dec 8 01:28:05 1999:

(not dried mangoes.)


#525 of 610 by lilmo on Thu Dec 9 22:05:36 1999:

Is it some other dried fruit?  (if it's not, I don't want to read pages and
pages of different kinds of dried fruit being guessed.)


#526 of 610 by i on Fri Dec 10 03:59:06 1999:

Prunes!


#527 of 610 by orinoco on Fri Dec 10 08:09:35 1999:

ooh...good guess.


#528 of 610 by carson on Fri Dec 10 17:54:56 1999:

(ok, yes, it's a dried fruit. no, it's not prunes. I *think* there's
only one more common dried fruit left to guess.) ;)


#529 of 610 by keesan on Fri Dec 10 18:25:05 1999:

figs or dates


#530 of 610 by happyboy on Fri Dec 10 23:39:44 1999:

cranberries?


#531 of 610 by carson on Sun Dec 12 22:00:56 1999:

(not figs, not dates, not cranberries...)


#532 of 610 by happyboy on Sun Dec 12 23:29:47 1999:

dingleberries?


#533 of 610 by gelinas on Sun Dec 12 23:44:50 1999:

{Would someone please guess "raisins"?  I don't wanna put up a description.}


#534 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Dec 13 00:40:26 1999:

<slaps forehead>
raisins?


#535 of 610 by keesan on Mon Dec 13 18:37:46 1999:

Neither did I. :>  
A friend with a dehydrator has been experimenting - dried bananas, dried kiwi
fruits, tomatoes, avocadoes (don't work well, too greasy), apples, pears,
peaches (these are a sticky mess, we have tried them), peppers.  We buy dried
sweet potatoes from China, I think they are first boiled in sugar.  Dried
litchis, dried jujubes (some are smoked), dried persimmons (flattened), dried
lotus root, chestnuts (presoak, cook with rice gruel), haws (for tea).


#536 of 610 by orinoco on Mon Dec 13 23:41:56 1999:

What are haws?


#537 of 610 by carson on Tue Dec 14 01:15:16 1999:

(raisins it is. ;)  Mr. Velleman, you're up.)


#538 of 610 by orinoco on Tue Dec 14 03:54:28 1999:

Serving Size 2 tbsp (30ml)
Servings per container about 12

Amount Per Serving      2 tbsp  1/2 cup
Calories                40      150
Calories from fat       20      80

Total Fat 2g*           3%      13%
Saturated Fat 1.5g      7%      27%
Cholesterol 10mg        3%      10%
Sodium 30mg             1%      5%
Potassium 90mg          3%      10%
Total Carbohydrate 3g   1%      4%
Sugars 3g
Protein 2g

*Amoung in 2 tbsp

Vitamin A               0%      6%
Calcium                 8%      30%
Vitamin D               6%      25%
Riboflavin              6%      25%
Phosphorous             6%      20%



#539 of 610 by keesan on Tue Dec 14 22:26:36 1999:

butter?
Haws grow on hawthorn trees, which grow around the A2 public library next to
the parking lot.  They have smelly white little flowers, and then small red
fruits that hang on through the winter.  The Chinese ones have larger fruits
and are eaten by people, ours are eaten by birds ones they get hungry enough.
They are small trees with large thorns and a tendency for form a thicket.
Blackhaws are also edible, and unrelated.  Viburnum species.  Hawthorn is
Crataegus and there are wild species of it and cultivated ones.  


#540 of 610 by lilmo on Fri Dec 17 22:30:52 1999:

Butter is not half fat, but ALL fat.  Also, I don't think it has any sugar
or protein, or other nutritional value (vitamins & minerals).

I'll guess peanut butter


#541 of 610 by keesan on Fri Dec 17 23:13:48 1999:

Butter:  1 tbsp is 14.2 g, of which 16% is water, 100 kcal energy, 1 g
protein, 92 g fat, two thirds of that saturated.  It contains some calcium,
iron, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, lots of salt in the salted variety,
106 units of vitamin A (fat-soluble vitamin, none is found in olive oil), no
vitamin C, minute amounts of other vitamins.
In other words, not all the milk solids or even water are removed when making
cream into butter and buttermilk.  It is mostly, but not all, fat.
Lard has no water and almost no vitamins or minerals (a bit of zinc).
Margarine has vitamin A added, and sodium (salt).
Olive oil has a bit of iron.
You are right, butter is not half fat.


#542 of 610 by orinoco on Sat Dec 18 00:32:03 1999:

Not butter, nor peanut butter.  Nor haws neither, just for the record.


#543 of 610 by keesan on Tue Dec 21 21:40:19 1999:

Peanuts have no cholesterol.  This is some animal product, cheese spread?


#544 of 610 by happyboy on Wed Dec 22 19:21:04 1999:

ear wax?


#545 of 610 by orinoco on Thu Dec 23 17:22:45 1999:

It is an animal product, indirectly, but it isn't cheese spread or earwax.


#546 of 610 by i on Fri Dec 31 01:15:34 1999:

Looks like a dairy product.....


#547 of 610 by orinoco on Sun Jan 2 22:48:19 2000:

<nods>


#548 of 610 by lilmo on Wed Jan 5 21:36:37 2000:

thank you for the correction, keesan


#549 of 610 by i on Thu Jan 6 03:49:37 2000:

Sour cream?


#550 of 610 by orinoco on Thu Jan 6 05:40:33 2000:

Closer in terms of texture, but still no.


#551 of 610 by i on Tue Jan 11 02:30:20 2000:

A "lite" cream cheese?


#552 of 610 by orinoco on Tue Jan 11 04:32:14 2000:

nope.  this is proving harder than I expected....I'll give a hint as soon as
I can think of one.


#553 of 610 by i on Sat Jan 15 05:59:50 2000:

Yogurt?


#554 of 610 by orinoco on Sat Jan 15 23:47:40 2000:

Not yogurt.  But it is a dairy product that has had something done to it. 
It is not eaten as it comes, but rather is used as an ingredient, or has what
was done to it reversed.


#555 of 610 by happyboy on Sat Jan 15 23:52:11 2000:

powdered milk?



#556 of 610 by keesan on Sat Jan 15 23:52:16 2000:

Condensed milk?  (add water)


#557 of 610 by orinoco on Sun Jan 16 01:11:06 2000:

Keesan has it.  


#558 of 610 by keesan on Mon Jan 17 20:21:32 2000:

Would anyone else like 'it'?  I have already entered lots of foods.
Happyboy, do you have anything you would like to enter?  You came pretty
close to the answer.  (Or do people really want to be guessing things like
preserved mangosteen, as we have very few other foods with nutrition labels).


#559 of 610 by happyboy on Mon Jan 17 20:31:08 2000:

you do it!
you do it!


#560 of 610 by keesan on Tue Jan 18 20:11:22 2000:

If happyboy does not want to be 'it', any other volunteers?  People tend to
have a tough time guessing the only sorts of food that we have around with
labels on them (dried seaweed, pumpkin seeds, pomegranate syrup).


#561 of 610 by keesan on Thu Jan 20 23:40:51 2000:

No volunteers?  This time I will post an easy one.  As usual, it is a single
ingredient rather than a mixture, and this time it is something that you can
buy in a supermarket or even probably a small grocery store.  Since we buy
everything in bulk (or pick it ourselves) the nutrition info is from a book:
1 cup  234 g  85% water (in prepared form) 145 kcal 6 g protein 25.2 g carb
9.23 g fiber 2.4 gg fat (sat .44, mono .84 polyunsat 1)
cholesterol none, calcium 20 mg, iron 1.59 mg, Mg 56 mg, potassium 132 g
sodium 1 mg (without salt added), zinc 1.15 mg, A 1.15 RE, no C, reasonable
amounts of B vitamins


#562 of 610 by lilmo on Sat Jan 22 22:40:35 2000:

soybeans?


#563 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jan 23 18:24:41 2000:

Soybeans have more fat:10 grams per cup cooked. 235 kcal (double, probably
due to the fat) and 19.8 g protein.  Not soybeans but your'e sort of in the
right category, something dry that you cook.


#564 of 610 by happyboy on Sun Jan 23 19:08:59 2000:

oatmeal?


#565 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jan 23 20:39:18 2000:

You are IT!  (No backing out this time, you guessed right).  This must be a
new record for fast guessing.  


#566 of 610 by happyboy on Fri Jan 28 03:22:08 2000:

Ingredienser:
Honsekod 42%
Svinekod 23%, Vand 22%,
Oksekod 8%, Salt 2%,
Krydderurter, Krydderier,
Maelkeprotein,
Stabilisator: E451,
Antioxidant: E300,
Konserverings-
middel: E250.


#567 of 610 by cmcgee on Fri Jan 28 18:54:35 2000:

Wurst?


#568 of 610 by keesan on Fri Jan 28 21:55:10 2000:

Pate de fois gras?  With a bit of fat pig thrown in?
Looks like the Swedes/Dane/Norwegians or whatever this is have different
labelling rules than the USA, where you only list ingredients in order and
don't know where the 2% cutoff is, allowing manufacturers to make honey coated
peanuts with a tiny trace of honey added to the white sugar.  Interesting.


#569 of 610 by happyboy on Sat Jan 29 00:25:18 2000:

re567: what kind?  :P


#570 of 610 by cmcgee on Sat Jan 29 00:34:53 2000:

Worst.


#571 of 610 by happyboy on Sat Jan 29 02:43:03 2000:

you get it...some sort of import *Coctail Polser*
:)


#572 of 610 by keesan on Sat Jan 29 03:28:20 2000:

What was the language?  


#573 of 610 by happyboy on Sat Jan 29 18:18:44 2000:

i dunno, but there were lot's of
funny things by the letters and
a line thru the O


#574 of 610 by keesan on Sun Jan 30 04:36:03 2000:

I think that is Danish.  Swedish would have .. over the o instead.
Is there any hint on the package, such as Kobenhavn?


#575 of 610 by cmcgee on Mon Jan 31 04:21:45 2000:

Serv Size 1/2 C

Calories         80
Fat Cal           0
 SatFat           0
Cholest           0 mg
Sodium          760 mg
Total Carb       19g
  Fiber   1 g
  Sugars 11 g
Protein          2 gm

Vit A  10%
Vit C  10%
Calcium 2%
Iron    2%


#576 of 610 by i on Tue Feb 1 03:34:07 2000:

Sauerkraut


#577 of 610 by cmcgee on Tue Feb 1 06:32:38 2000:

nope


#578 of 610 by keesan on Tue Feb 1 22:37:52 2000:

Sauerkraut has more fiber and less sugar (the sugar has mostly been fermented
to lactic acid.  I have made sauerkraut.  Don't think there is much Vit A).


#579 of 610 by cmcgee on Sat Feb 5 21:46:48 2000:

Only one guess since Monday. 

Clue 1:  Although the serving size is 1/2 cup one would usually dilute this
food.


#580 of 610 by keesan on Sun Feb 6 18:42:31 2000:

Canned soup?  Tomato soup in a can?  (tomatoes are sweet, soup is salty)


#581 of 610 by cmcgee on Mon Feb 7 09:51:01 2000:

Hrmph.  Musta made it too easy.  

Yes, this is classic Campbells Tomato Soup.


#582 of 610 by keesan on Tue Feb 8 03:02:15 2000:

Would somebody else please enter something?  (Yes, your clue was far too
revealing - I could not think of any other 1/2 cup that gets diluted.)
If I enter something it will most likely not be easy.  


#583 of 610 by keesan on Tue Feb 8 21:53:35 2000:

Really, you don't want to be guessing Chinese olives (not related to the
European ones).  Someone with American eating habits please enter something.


#584 of 610 by orinoco on Wed Feb 9 01:17:25 2000:

I'm not in regular contact wiht packaged food; I just eat whatever the dining
halls give me.  If you want a really sadistic one, I might be able to swipe
a few nutrition information cards....


#585 of 610 by keesan on Wed Feb 9 01:36:05 2000:

Go to it!


#586 of 610 by keesan on Mon Feb 14 01:37:16 2000:

Jim decided it is his turn.   No nutrition label on this one, it came by UPS
in a box, in bulk.
1 cup 143 g 40% water 350 kcal 4.5 g protein 75.7 g carbohydrates 18.5 g fiber
3.1 g fat (poly or mono unsaturated)  no cholesterol
Minerals: 42 mg Ca, 1.3 mg iron, 47 g Mg, 153 g phos 846 g K 3 g Na
Not a whole lot of vitamins other than 1.92 g niacin  100 g folacin
(For comparison 1 cup cottage cheese has 135 g Ca,.26 g iron, 11 g Mg, 297
g P   190 g K 911 g Na, .30 g niacin, 27 g folacin, making this mystery item
relatively high in calcium, iron, magnesium, and potassium/sodium ratio. 
Cottage cheese has 0 fiber and 34 cholesterol.)


#587 of 610 by keesan on Tue Feb 15 22:13:41 2000:

Clues - as always this is not someone's prepared mixture but a single food,
and there is mention of it in winter agora in one item.


#588 of 610 by keesan on Mon Feb 21 18:31:22 2000:

In the title of the item.


#589 of 610 by i on Fri Feb 25 03:51:08 2000:

It's gotta be either the reindeers or the chestnuts.    :)


#590 of 610 by keesan on Fri Feb 25 16:55:32 2000:

You got it.  Reindeers are not high in fiber or carbohydrates.
We have frozen most of our chestnuts.  They boil up like new and we put them
in our oatmeal, mix them with green beans, etc.  Very sweet flavor.


#591 of 610 by i on Wed Mar 1 00:40:16 2000:

Serving size:   30g (lots per container) 
Calories:       90  (5 from fat)
Total Fat   1g   2% 
Total Carb. 22g  7% 
D. Fiber    5g  20%
Protein     3g 
Iron        4% 
(Saturated Fat, Cholesterol, Sugars, Sodium,
Vitamin A, Vitamin C, and Calcium:  0%) 


#592 of 610 by keesan on Wed Mar 1 04:28:06 2000:

30 g per serving implies that the carbohydrate is sugar rather than starch,
and Dr. Chocolate implies that there is chocolate in it somewhere.  Right?
Jim says 30 g is about 1 oz, or 2 tbps.  (He learned this in nursing class).
A spread of some sort?  Jim says 'raspberry jam'?  (It would at least go well
with chocolate).   I say it can't be, no Vitamin C. Peanut butter is too oily.


#593 of 610 by i on Fri Mar 3 01:17:50 2000:

It's buried at the bottom, but the label proclaims 0% for sugar.
A bit of arithmetic:  30g (serving) - 1g (fat) - 22g (carb.) - 3g
   (protein) = 4g for everything else.
30g is about 1 oz.....*if* this food's density is about the same as
   that of liquid water.  (If you're talking weight oz's instead
   of fluid oz's, the 30g thing is true regardless....but then 1 oz
   may not equal 2 T.) 
I've been calling myself "Dr. Chocolate" in the cf. for years, so 
   it might not be safe to make the assumption...


#594 of 610 by keesan on Fri Mar 3 04:14:02 2000:

Jim asks 'rice cracker'?  No salt, no sugar, no chocolate.  No fun. :}
(Jim asks why not :) - I tell him that } shows his beard)


#595 of 610 by i on Sat Mar 4 03:19:03 2000:

Not rice crackers....much closer, though.


#596 of 610 by keesan on Thu Mar 16 17:23:39 2000:

Wonder Bread or some variation on it without added vitamins?


#597 of 610 by i on Fri Mar 17 02:29:28 2000:

The food has *way* too much fiber to be any member of the WonderSponge
family.  You're right that no vitamins (or minerals) were added.


#598 of 610 by keesan on Fri Mar 17 20:16:02 2000:

Would someobody else please guess at this one?  Nobody wants to be guessing
at the sort of food we would post if we guessed right.  Bran?


#599 of 610 by i on Sat Mar 18 02:29:04 2000:

It's only 1/6 dietary fiber (by weight).  Is any sort of "bran" that
fiber-poor?

(You are getting closer to the identity of this upstanding member of
the cerials food group;) 


#600 of 610 by void on Mon Mar 20 22:29:00 2000:

   wheat germ?


#601 of 610 by i on Tue Mar 21 01:43:36 2000:

Wheat germ contains more protein and fat, but less carbo's than this
food.  Besides, there's no wheat in it.


#602 of 610 by keesan on Tue Mar 21 18:51:16 2000:

Corn chips, baked?


#603 of 610 by i on Sun Mar 26 01:12:06 2000:

It's not a ready-to-eat food.  And corn can't match this food's
fiber content.


#604 of 610 by keesan on Fri Apr 7 02:54:03 2000:

Oatmeal? (says Jim)  Quinoa?
Looks like one of these dry cereals but they are ready to eat.  Wheaties have
about the right ratio but you said no wheat, and not ready to eat.
Someone else please guess.  If we win again we will enter one of those things
we just bought at the Chinese grocery store (not the pickled pomelos).


#605 of 610 by i on Fri Apr 7 03:57:54 2000:

It's a dry cereal(grain), but not a dry cereal(breakfast).


#606 of 610 by keesan on Fri Apr 7 12:39:07 2000:

Who would eat just 30 g (1 oz) of a dry cereal?  
Cereals:  millet, sorghum, rye, barley, oats, teff, rice.
Buckwheat is not a grain.
Amaranth.  Spelt and kamut are types of wheat, as are emmer and einkorn.
We cook grains by the 8 or 16 ounces.
You can make noodles from corn, wheat, mung beans, or sweet potato starch.


#607 of 610 by i on Fri Apr 7 23:47:09 2000:

It's rye flour.  The 30 g is probably what you'd get from a couple slices
of rye bread.

Who wants to pose a mystery food next?


#608 of 610 by keesan on Sat Apr 8 04:04:30 2000:

But who would cook with 30g rye flour?


#609 of 610 by i on Sat Apr 8 19:07:32 2000:

Well, the 30g is about 1/4 C....so if there's 2 C of rye flour in the
loaf of rye bread that you make, and you eat 1/8 of the loaf in your
sandwich, then you've gotten about 30g of rye flour.

Same principle as the nutritional info on a box of baking soda.  The
1/8 t serving size doesn't represent the amount used in any recipe, 
but how much baking soda they expect one person to get when homemade
biscuits are served with dinner.


#610 of 610 by keesan on Sun Apr 9 01:31:45 2000:

I make loaves with 4 cups flour and eat half a loaf at a sitting, or more.
Jim eats a whole loaf.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: