Grex Cinema Conference

Item 63: Underappreciated Movies

Entered by slynne on Mon Apr 5 18:07:28 2004:

74 new of 144 responses total.


#71 of 144 by remmers on Thu May 6 12:38:24 2004:

If it hasn't been mentioned so far - another underappreciated Coen
brothers film is their early gem, "Murphy's Crossing", a beautifully
photographed period piece about Irish gangsters.  Oh, those *hats*...


#72 of 144 by gregb on Thu May 6 14:19:23 2004:

Re. 70:  If half of how Steve Jobs was portrayed in the movie was true,
I'd never want to work at Apple.  I remember the scene where Jobs is
asking one of his minions...er, employees, "How's it going?"  The
slave...er, employee responds, "Good sir.  I've been at it almost 70
hours now" while shaking from too much caffine, or worse.

I remember seeing the actor who played jobs at one of Apples big todos,
again playing jobs.  After a couple minutes the real Steve came on stage
saying, "No no, your doing it all wrong..." and showed the actor how it
was done.  That was pretty cool.


#73 of 144 by twenex on Thu May 6 14:21:39 2004:

Steve Jobs seems to be one of those people that some people love to hate, and
others love to love. I know Andy Hertzfeld, former employee at Apple and later
part of the team at Eazel that created Nautilus, said that when Jobs left
Apple the company lost its soul. Given the new-found confidence and
profitability at Apple, I'd say there is a good chance he was spot on.


#74 of 144 by mcnally on Thu May 6 16:19:49 2004:

  Or it could just be that they got saddled with John Sculley at that point..


#75 of 144 by twenex on Thu May 6 16:27:58 2004:

<twenex grins>

Yes, but between Scully and Jobs, the Revenge there were also Markkula and
Gil Amelio. And maybe someone else, so....


#76 of 144 by jor on Fri May 7 01:56:48 2004:

        Unreal. I was in a class with Hertzfeld
        in 1978, 'advanced topics in operating systems'.
        Thing is, the prof gave me a copy of his paper on 
        'distributed computing', an early network 
        effort. It was an example of a better paper.

        I *think* I still have it.

        "Miller's Crossing"?  or "Murphy's War"?



#77 of 144 by twenex on Fri May 7 23:51:10 2004:

That's cool, jor.


#78 of 144 by remmers on Sat May 8 01:25:55 2004:

Re #76 re #71:  Oops, got the title wrong.  It's "Miller's Crossing".


#79 of 144 by richard on Fri May 14 00:27:34 2004:

JESUS OF MONTREAL-- This is another movie from a few years ago that came
and went under the radar.  It was made up in Quebec, and is about a
theater group in Montreal that does a Passion Play, and the play becomes
more and more real.  The guy who plays the guy who plays Jesus really
starts to get into the part.  I found this to be a quite moving movie,
about the power of belief.  Its on video, I'd recommend it as a rental.


#80 of 144 by twenex on Fri May 14 00:58:27 2004:

That's interesting. The BBC did something a couple of years back (for tv),
which although I didn't watch it seemed based on the same sort of idea. I
wonder if it's a case of independent invention, or if one was based on the
other.


#81 of 144 by tsty on Thu May 20 03:16:42 2004:

thnking of overlooked movies..... you only need to see this one once, but
  ...   the farmer  ....   is pretty thought-provoking, to say the least.
  
btw, NOT for the kiddies under 25-ish.


#82 of 144 by jvmv on Sun Jun 13 06:23:09 2004:

They mentioned many different good movies but didn't mention American Beauty.
American Beauty is one of the most important movies of the century. 20th
century, i mean. I think that movie have shocked a lot of people, including
those here in this conf, because it exposed the bitter north american pattern
& his innocuous lifestyle. Certainly, American Beauty will be in a lot of
people's memory as a picture faithful of the life & soul of some real
characters.


#83 of 144 by tod on Mon Jun 14 16:19:49 2004:

This response has been erased.



#84 of 144 by maura on Tue Jun 15 04:52:47 2004:

Some of my favorites have been mentioned here, although many don't 
really qualify as "underappreciated," such as "The Princess 
Bride."  "Local Hero," a great movie, solidified my own 
Hibernaphilia.  How about "Strictly Ballroom," a very funny Australian 
film?  (Not to mention "Priscilla, Queen of the Desert," so much 
better than the idiotic American remake "To Wong FU...")

Anything by the Coen brothers is pretty good in my book.  "The Big 
Lebowski" is one of the best.  Since the success of "O Brother Where 
Art Thou," though, the Coen brothers can hardly be called 
underappreciated.

I am also partial to anything done by Christopher Guest.  "A Mighty 
Wind" was extremely funny...I love folk music, but the next concert I 
attended (John McCutcheon) was made inadvertently funny for me because 
of having recently seen "A Mighty Wind"...darned if many of the folk 
music cliches that Guest skewered in that movie weren't right there at 
the concert...   I finally saw "This is Spinal Tap" last year, and 
since then my husband and I have seen all of these mockumentaries.


#85 of 144 by slynne on Tue Jun 15 16:23:34 2004:

I loved "Strictly Ballroom". Usually, I tend to like all of a 
director's work but I hated Moulin Rouge so much I couldnt even sit 
through it. 


#86 of 144 by mcnally on Tue Jun 15 17:21:03 2004:

  Are they the same director?


#87 of 144 by mcnally on Tue Jun 15 17:23:27 2004:

  BTW, I agree with slynne about "Moulin Rouge".  I probably would
  have walked out if I hadn't had someone else at the movie with me.
  I can't say that I loved "Strictly Ballroom", though I thought it
  was enjoyable.


#88 of 144 by tod on Tue Jun 15 17:25:05 2004:

This response has been erased.



#89 of 144 by edina on Tue Jun 15 17:31:20 2004:

"Strictly Ballroom", "Romeo and Juliet" (with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire
Danes) and "Moulin Rouge" are the Baz Luhrman trifecta.


#90 of 144 by slynne on Tue Jun 15 17:50:46 2004:

See. I loved that version of "Romeo and Juliet" too! So what was so 
terrible about Moulin Rouge. I couldnt believe how much I hated it.  

Ok, mcnally, you are now officially on my good list. ;) 


#91 of 144 by mcnally on Tue Jun 15 18:51:04 2004:

Great.  Is there some sort of seal-of-approval icon I can put on my web page?


#92 of 144 by tod on Tue Jun 15 19:59:37 2004:

This response has been erased.



#93 of 144 by gelinas on Wed Jun 16 03:57:37 2004:

(Is that the version of Romeo and Juliet featuring 9mm pistols made by
"Sword"?)


#94 of 144 by slynne on Wed Jun 16 15:26:21 2004:

resp:91 Hahaha. Now that is a good idea! I'll have to make one. 


#95 of 144 by edina on Wed Jun 16 17:15:16 2004:

I didn't hate "Moulin Rouge".  I just didn't like it.  The singing was great,
the music great, the dancing great, the costuming, etc.  I just didn't like
it.  


#96 of 144 by twenex on Wed Jun 16 17:18:08 2004:

Didn't even touch Moulin Rouge with a bargepole.


#97 of 144 by jvmv on Thu Jun 17 05:40:10 2004:

     
     To compare Saving Private Ryan impact with American Beauty impact is a
completely mistaken thing. The difference among the two movies is gigantic.
Reaaly, this is an opinion from who doesn't know the difference between the
sugar and the salt.




#98 of 144 by jvmv on Thu Jun 17 05:57:52 2004:


     I agree with you Maura, anything by the Coen Brothers is
     pretty good. The Coen brothers is great and irreplaceable.
     Each movie these guys is an art. The Big Lebowski is a
     very very good movie but I think Bloody Simple and Fargo
     are the best productions under all point of view.




#99 of 144 by tod on Thu Jun 17 15:58:51 2004:

This response has been erased.



#100 of 144 by richard on Fri Jun 18 05:30:30 2004:

re #82..."American Beauty" doesn't quite count as "overlooked" since it won
the best picture oscar in 2000.  But it is a great movie.

Speaking of films that won best picture, and today might be overlooked by
younger generations, I was in the video store the other day and was
looking at a dvd and a kid of 17 or 18 saw it and said, "never heard of
it, any good?"  The movie was "Midnight Cowboy", the 1969 best picture
winner.  

"Midnight Cowboy" is a great movie, a story of friendship and love between
two drifters, Joe Buck (Jon Voigt) and Ratso Rizzo (Dustin Hoffman)  It is
really a love story, about how we all need and look for someone to love
and care about.  There is great chemistry between Voigt and Hoffman in
this movie.  One of the most moving scenes in any movie I can recall is in
this, when Ratso Rizzo dies on the bus, and Joe Buck (Voigt's character)
puts his arm around him and holds him tightly as the bus goes down the
road.  In a lonely world, if you find something or someone you really care
about, you hold onto it for all its worth.  When you find love, you don't
want to let it go.




#101 of 144 by jvmv on Sat Jun 19 07:48:29 2004:

   I agree with you Richard, "Midnight Cowboy" is a great movie.
   "Midnight Cowboy" is director John Schlesinger's best movie.
   I believe Schlesinger had luck of getting a good screenplayer
   (Waldo Salt)to write this beautiful story. Unhappily Schlesinger
   doesn't have a great philmography; his movies oscillate
   between reasonable quality movies. 
   The performance of Dustin Hoffman is magnificent. Dustin knew
   how to give to his character a convincing & touching charisma.



#102 of 144 by jvmv on Sat Jun 19 08:32:42 2004:

 

     re #99
     If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign
     you're not doing anything very innovative.
     quote by Woody Allen



#103 of 144 by jvmv on Sat Jun 19 08:52:28 2004:

     re #99
     I forgot to say that we don't need to try the flavor
     of the acid to feel its "impact".
     We just need knowledge.



#104 of 144 by jvmv on Sat Jun 19 09:05:19 2004:

     Marlon Brando remember me a great John Huston movie,
     "Reflections in a golden eye".
     This movie is a classic as well as John Huston for
     the movies.



#105 of 144 by tod on Mon Jun 21 15:56:55 2004:

This response has been erased.



#106 of 144 by jvmv on Tue Jun 22 05:28:54 2004:

     John Carpenter isn't a filmmaker,
     he's a truck farmer.



#107 of 144 by remmers on Fri Jun 25 21:38:05 2004:

Nah.  He's done some turkeys (e.g. "Ghosts of Mars"), but at his best,
he's pretty good.


#108 of 144 by jvmv on Sat Jun 26 06:16:31 2004:

     John Carpenter should work at a grocery store, he's a
     great salesperson of green vegetables or something
     like that.
     Although his products have few nutritious as well as
     the films he directs.



#109 of 144 by mary on Sat Jun 26 12:52:49 2004:

You should tell him that next time you sit down to lunch. ;-)


#110 of 144 by jvmv on Sun Jun 27 07:25:38 2004:

     Yes. And I shall ask to him personal questions
     relating to his life. Ex. "Did you ask Pumpkin
     whether he bought the yatch yet?"



#111 of 144 by tod on Sun Jun 27 18:41:21 2004:

This response has been erased.



#112 of 144 by jvmv on Mon Jun 28 07:51:26 2004:

 
     I thought about Bob Crane thing but it's been
     in all media gossip columns, y'know. :P



#113 of 144 by tod on Mon Jun 28 15:55:40 2004:

This response has been erased.



#114 of 144 by remmers on Tue Jun 29 01:55:58 2004:

No, it's a different John Carpenter.


#115 of 144 by jvmv on Tue Jun 29 07:17:25 2004:

     I'm afraid we're talking of the same Carpenter.
     Are there how many Carpenter & Crane in the same situation?



#116 of 144 by tod on Tue Jun 29 17:23:33 2004:

This response has been erased.



#117 of 144 by salad on Tue Jun 29 21:36:15 2004:

That's a damn lie.


#118 of 144 by jvmv on Wed Jun 30 07:31:41 2004:

     Here we go again...like Halloweenn series( I want your blood...)
     Is it just me, or has John "Truck Farmer" Carpenter made more
     bad movies than most other directors can even dream off?



#119 of 144 by tod on Wed Jun 30 16:34:12 2004:

This response has been erased.



#120 of 144 by jvmv on Thu Jul 1 05:55:48 2004:

     Well, one thing you must learn from the movies is to
     force you to think, no matter how hard it is to
     contradict you.
     American History X wont force you to think.
     John Truck Farmer Carpenter's films will force
     you to think in pumpkins.



#121 of 144 by tod on Fri Jul 2 13:40:53 2004:

This response has been erased.



#122 of 144 by jvmv on Sat Jul 3 07:19:37 2004:

     This is the second step, tod.
     First you'd force your brain to think over ideas.
     Pumpkins aren't ideas.


#123 of 144 by tod on Sat Jul 3 22:50:18 2004:

This response has been erased.



#124 of 144 by jvmv on Mon Jul 5 07:09:58 2004:

     You're right tod, we don't have to understand the ideas for
     a movie to happen. Perhaps this is the simple reason which 
     Hallowen was made for people that don't think. 
     But all good film says a message.
     And speaking honestly tod, I don't believe that an intelligent 
     guy like you is just going to the movies to see images, special   
     effects and dialogues.

  


#125 of 144 by gelinas on Mon Jul 5 20:21:54 2004:

"If you want to send a messasge, use Western Union!"


#126 of 144 by tod on Tue Jul 6 16:37:38 2004:

This response has been erased.



#127 of 144 by jvmv on Wed Jul 7 06:47:11 2004:


     #re 125
     Joe, say that to John "Truck Farmer" Carpenter.
     I think this is the only way that 
     John "Truck Farmer" Carpenter knows to send 
     messages.

     #re 126
     It doesn't matter what that sounds. The fact 
     is that we're here to talk about films...criticizing 
     or not criticizing. That only depends on your knowledge.
     The one just matter is we discuss points of views, 
     peacefully.
     
     "Taxi driver":
     That's a nonsense, VIP. You mentioned a film 
     in which is replete of messages and honestly
     I believe that you didn't understand anything 
     about "Taxi Driver".
     Paul Schrader is, first of all, a good writer. Didn't 
     you learn literature at school, VIP?
     Look, I'm sorry if you're offended about John "Truck 
     Farmer" Carpenter.
     


#128 of 144 by remmers on Wed Jul 7 15:45:22 2004:

#127: "The one just matter is we discuss points of views, peacefully."

I wish you'd apply that principle to your own posts.  You seem to be
mainly into stating your own views and insulting anyone who challenges
them.  I don't call that "discussion".

On the topic of this item (which is "Underappreciated Movies", in case
you forgot), I'll mention last year's "Northfork", a fictional account
of the evacuation of a small Montana town in the 1950s that is being
evacuated to make way for a new dam, given an epic quality by its
stunning photography and larger-than-life characters.


#129 of 144 by tod on Wed Jul 7 19:07:15 2004:

This response has been erased.



#130 of 144 by jvmv on Thu Jul 8 06:44:42 2004:


   #re 128
   Are you lawyer of tod?
   Well, about peacefully: I didn't mean that someone was not being 
   peaceful. I think that you didn't understand the point.  
   About insulting: where are you reading some insult?
   Look,I recommend that you pay attention where our discussion began 
   exactly. My discussion concentrated in John "Truck farmer" Carpenter  
   when then tod provoked me with ironies.  
   Did you think I'd be quiet? Ah no way mr. lawyer, I'm not afraid of 
   discussing point of view because I have how justifying my arguments.  
   But that doesn't seem common here. Some people don't have enough  
   arguments to debate an idea then they use ironies or something like  
   that. 

     


#131 of 144 by jvmv on Thu Jul 8 07:07:01 2004:


   #re 129
   Iris? What it means? Insult or praise?
   And how I'll call you from now on? I'll think it soon.
   Say or think or do whatever you want but that won't change 
   the fact that John Truck Farmer Carpenter is a terrible director
   and his films was made for people that don't think.

   p.s. Look, how much did your defense cost to remmers?



#132 of 144 by mary on Thu Jul 8 11:23:33 2004:

Hi, Vito.  Welcome to Grex, where we do, in fact, say and think
whatever we want, and your opinion is just that.


#133 of 144 by remmers on Thu Jul 8 14:10:59 2004:

Re #130:  I rest my case.  :)


#134 of 144 by tod on Thu Jul 8 15:38:40 2004:

This response has been erased.



#135 of 144 by albaugh on Thu Jul 8 19:05:50 2004:

I do try to iron all my comments before posting...


#136 of 144 by jvmv on Fri Jul 9 06:16:19 2004:


     #re 134  
       
     Dear tod, I know that Iris is a character of the film. I also  
     know what she represents in the film and represents for   
     Travis Bickle. We can discuss the plot if you maybe want that one.    
  
     But in the context of our debate I didn't understand why you'll   
     call me Iris. Metaphorically I could understand the meaning  
     however I don't really know what you want to achieve.  
       
     So that you didn't prove your point.  

     Listen tod, I don't have anything against you. I'm not your enemy 
     and just consider you my opponent in a kind of game. So I
     shake hands with you.  
 


#137 of 144 by jvmv on Fri Jul 9 06:30:27 2004:

   
     re# 132
     Thank you Mary.

     re# 133
     Although you haven't won the cause, don't forget 
     to send the charging of the defense to tod. 
    
 


#138 of 144 by remmers on Fri Jul 9 20:53:34 2004:

I wasn't speaking of Tod specifically, just making an observation about
your posts.


#139 of 144 by jvmv on Sun Jul 11 08:35:56 2004:



     I'll see you in court. LOL


     


#140 of 144 by tod on Mon Jul 12 16:15:16 2004:

This response has been erased.



#141 of 144 by jvmv on Mon Jul 19 01:38:33 2004:


     I notice that you're obtaining positive results 
     in studying movies. Dont stop doing it.

     Let's clear this up. I suppose that there's nothing 
     much one can do about the debate here except to accept 
     it philosophically.  

     Well, I thought that we were speaking about messages 
     in Taxi Driver & now you mention an underlying message.
     Wish it were that simple. Listen, I haven't counted the 
     exact number of messages, but I would say that at least "many". 

     I don't get someone to agree with me but it's no wonder 
     that you will have it that you is right. Okay, I'm prepared 
     to improvise if necessary. 
  
     You know Scorsese films has psychotic characters living 
     in closed worlds where their lunatic behavior seems 
     the norm then Taxi Driver underscores Travis' outsider status 
     by giving us a realistic world that he is isolated from,
     is the story of a man living the proverbial life of 
     quite desperation. Travis, like Norman Bates hides his 
     insanity behind a facade of banality & nurses it with 
     his loneliness.

     Jodie Foster, playing the child prostitute to whom 
     Travis hopes to play savior, still has the youthful 
     freshness and wise innocence that made her a shape of 
     hope in the world. Travis wants to save her & Iris is 
     saved from the clutches of evil & Travis has become a hero.
     Well, Scorsese at least suggests anyway that in the 
     end Travis Bickle is still insane, & armed & dangerous.

     But Scorsese provides us with at least two great 
     scenes. It was when as a passenger graphically 
     boasting of his plans to murder his wife seems to 
     be Scorsese's way of showing that there are people 
     who are even crazier than Travis. Why? To suggest that 
     Travis is justified in his paranoia?
 
     Also the final climatic bloodbath provided only a 
     cheap shock at the time. Such over the top mayhem 
     doesn't underscore the brutality of the violence, it 
     trivializes the rest of the fim.

     ...
    


#142 of 144 by tod on Mon Jul 19 18:30:54 2004:

This response has been erased.



#143 of 144 by jvmv on Thu Jul 22 08:35:17 2004:

  
     Way Out -- playtime



#144 of 144 by remmers on Fri Aug 6 11:10:13 2004:

A restored 70mm print of Playtime is making the rounds in the US.
I hope that it comes to Ann Arbor at some point.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: