Grex Cflirt Conference

Item 29: Man on Man anyone?

Entered by mynxcat on Fri Apr 26 19:54:39 2002:

31 new of 51 responses total.

#21 of 51 by michaela on Wed May 1 19:36:29 2002:

I agree.  :)

#22 of 51 by jaklumen on Thu May 2 08:20:42 2002:

pardon me, but I was just waiting for that =)

#23 of 51 by mynxcat on Thu May 2 14:59:53 2002:

This response has been erased.


#24 of 51 by vidar on Sat May 4 15:46:40 2002:

People who obsess about romantic relationships (real or potential) in 
TV series really need to get a life.

#25 of 51 by jaklumen on Sun May 5 09:36:35 2002:

resp:23 no, for resp:21, actually.

#26 of 51 by jmsaul on Sun May 5 16:00:04 2002:

Re #24:  This is going to sound nastier than I mean it, but I'm not sure
         adults who wear diapers should be taking shots at other people's
         sexual fetishes.

#27 of 51 by oval on Sun May 5 21:29:04 2002:

..and how hypocritical given how romaannnnnntic diapers are!

#28 of 51 by vidar on Mon May 6 01:25:11 2002:

resp 26: Actually, it's mostly a gripe I had from being a fan of 
Farscape (and sometimes looking at Sci Fi's Farscape Message Board).  I 
had difficulty continuing to watch the show after the body switching 
episode and another with Jothee and Chianna.  Waaayy too many people 
there were obsessed with a relationship of 2 of the main characters - 
reading their posts made me physically sick.  Besides, I knew someone 
would respond to my post here in a semi-negative way. :-p

#29 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 03:48:46 2002:

Hey, I'm not into slash fiction either, or diapers, for that matter.  (Forced
to make a choice, I'd go for slash, but that's just me.)

#30 of 51 by jazz on Mon May 6 04:08:48 2002:

        It's not as bad if someone takes a picture of you reading poorly
written erotic fan fiction.

        I just don't understand fan fiction.  It doesn't bother me.  It's just
wish fulfilment fantasy set in someone else's fantasy world, and no more
derivative than Arthurian fantasy, if less snooty.  If it was well-written,
I guess I'd read it;  I just haven't found any that is.

#31 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 04:40:54 2002:

I don't think I'd be interested in well-written Starsky and Hutch slash
fiction, even.

#32 of 51 by jaklumen on Mon May 6 05:38:11 2002:

What's wrong with Starsky and Hutch gettin' it on?

#33 of 51 by phenix on Mon May 6 13:23:27 2002:

ugh
that's as bad as vadar and the light saber

#34 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 13:36:54 2002:

Re #32:  Nothing, as long as they're both consenting.  I'm just not into
         reading about it.

#35 of 51 by mynxcat on Mon May 6 16:25:11 2002:

This response has been erased.


#36 of 51 by vidar on Mon May 6 16:32:37 2002:

resp 27: lol.

#37 of 51 by phenix on Mon May 6 17:19:48 2002:

re 35: bad 70's psudocop drazma

#38 of 51 by mynxcat on Mon May 6 18:07:48 2002:

This response has been erased.


#39 of 51 by lelande on Mon May 6 19:36:10 2002:

not that i possess the collector-mentality, but now one thing i'm dying to
get my hands on is a picture of joe saul reading slash porn in a diaper.

#40 of 51 by mynxcat on Mon May 6 19:41:39 2002:

This response has been erased.


#41 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 19:52:25 2002:

Wow.  Well, I guess I'd be a hypocrite if I criticized your kinks, lelande.

#42 of 51 by phenix on Mon May 6 23:37:26 2002:

no. no it's not interesting
oi
RED!

#43 of 51 by mynxcat on Tue May 7 03:59:07 2002:

This response has been erased.


#44 of 51 by jazz on Tue May 7 18:25:06 2002:

        I'M NEVER GOING TO GET THOSE MOMENTS BACK.  THANKS FOR THE VISUAL.

        Ugh.

#45 of 51 by mynxcat on Tue May 7 21:02:45 2002:

This response has been erased.


#46 of 51 by phenix on Tue May 7 22:24:41 2002:

i tried a safeword:)

#47 of 51 by lelande on Tue May 14 09:35:45 2002:

you safe word, you eat it

#48 of 51 by phenix on Tue May 14 18:18:59 2002:

eat what. and that's not exactly an ssc sentiment

#49 of 51 by lelande on Thu May 16 00:44:14 2002:

it's a safeword diet, smurfy.

#50 of 51 by phenix on Thu May 16 03:26:29 2002:

right.

#51 of 51 by mynxcat on Fri May 17 07:22:35 2002:

This response has been erased.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: