Grex Books Conference

Item 77: The Mysterious Quote - Fall 1998 Edition

Entered by remmers on Sat Oct 3 20:00:17 1998:

47 new of 207 responses total.


#161 of 207 by rcurl on Sun Dec 6 20:59:27 1998:

   "By about four in the afternoon we had crossed the summit of the
   mountain line, said farewell to the western sunshine, and began to
   go down upon the other side, skirting the edge of many ravines and
   moving through the shadow of dusky woods. There arose upon all
   sides the voice of falling water, not condensed and formidable as
   in the gorge of the river, but scattered and sounding gaily and
   musically from glen to glen. Here, too, the spirts of my driver
   mended, andhe began to sing aloud in a falsetto voice, and with a
   singular bluntness of musical perception, never true either to melody
   or key, but wandering at will, like that of the song of birds. As the
   dusk increased, I fell more and more under the spell of this artless
   warbling, listening and waiting for some articulate air, and still
   disappointed; and when at last I asked him what it was he sang - 'Oh,'
   cried he, 'I am just singing!' Above all, I was taken with a trick he
   had of unweariedly repeating the same note at little intervals; it was
   not so monotonous as you would think, or, at least, not disagreeable;
   and it seemed to breathe a wonderful contentment with what is, such
   as we love to fancy in the attitude of trees, or the quiescence of
   a pool."



#162 of 207 by polygon on Mon Dec 7 03:34:26 1998:

Jack London?


#163 of 207 by rcurl on Mon Dec 7 05:44:47 1998:

Not London, but like London, a male.


#164 of 207 by remmers on Mon Dec 7 10:15:52 1998:

Richard Haliburton?


#165 of 207 by jep on Mon Dec 7 15:18:05 1998:

Patrick McManus?


#166 of 207 by polygon on Mon Dec 7 16:13:24 1998:

J.R.R. Tolkein?


#167 of 207 by rcurl on Mon Dec 7 17:58:33 1998:

Do I presume you mean Richard Halliburton, the adverturer? Unlike
Halliburton, our author wrote both fiction and non-fiction, although
they were both well travelled, in fact to even some of the same ports.
However they could not have met, and only one would have known of the
other's writings.

Not McManus, but unfortunately I am not familiar with his work, so
I cannot offer contrasts. Also not Tolkein - they indulged in rather
different styles of fantasy.

I meant to comment on remmer's previous guess of London. It would be
interesting if a critic had compared London to the author. They could have
met and, in fact, briefly lived within a half-days journey of each other.
I am pretty sure that one was familiar with the writings of the other and
was probably influenced by them.

Now, to advance our story a little. I use only the initial for the name of
characters: 

   "F. served my meals in my own apartment; and his resemblance to
   the portrait haunted me. At times it was not; at times, upon some
   change of attitude or flash of expression, it would leap out upon
   me like a ghost. It was above all in his ill-tempers that the likeness
   triumphed. He certainly liked me; he was proud of my notice, which
   he sought to engage by many simple and childlike devices; he loved
   to sit close before my fire, talking his broken talk or singing his
   odd, endless, wordless songs, and sometimes drawing his hand over
   my clothes with an affectionate manner of caressing that never failed
   to cause in me an embarrassment of which I was ashamed. But for all
   that, he was capable of flashes of causeless anger and fits of sturdy
   sulleness. At a word of reproof, I have seen him upset the dish of
   which I was about to eat, and this not surreptitiously, but with
   defiance; and similarly at a hint of inquisition. I was not unnaturally
   curious, being in a strange place and surrounded by strange people;
   but at the shadow of a question, he shrank back, lowering and
   dangerous. Then it was that, for a fraction of a second, this rough
   lad might have been the brother of the lady in the frame. But these
   humours were swift to pass; and the resemblance died along with them."



#168 of 207 by remmers on Mon Dec 7 19:17:45 1998:

London was polygon's guess, not remmers' guess. Yes, I meant
Richard Halliburton, the adventurer.


#169 of 207 by remmers on Mon Dec 7 19:38:02 1998:

It's difficult to deduce the period from the quotes, but if the
author could have known London, that pins it down to late 19th
or earlier 20th century. The spelling of "humours" suggests that
the author is from somewhere in the British Commonwealth.

I'll guess Robert Louis Stevenson. The dates and nationality are
about right.


#170 of 207 by polygon on Mon Dec 7 20:52:58 1998:

Lawrence Durrell.


#171 of 207 by rcurl on Mon Dec 7 21:22:25 1998:

Stevenson is correct. This is one of the 'lesser known' short stories
published by Stevenson, titled _Olalla_, in 1885, when he was in poor
health in Bournemouth. During the same period he also wrote _Kidnapped_
and _The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde_.  Of course I picked
Olalla as being more obscure than those two.  I thought I had diverted
attention from Stevenson with the (less widely known) information that he
had lived (in San Francisco) near London (in Monterey) when London was ca.
3 years old. 

Your turn, John.




#172 of 207 by remmers on Tue Dec 8 01:15:06 1998:

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times..."

Um, no, too easy.

<remmers ponders>

Okay, here goes:

        Helena came over on a hot July day. She was of that
        particular breed which has always made me feel in-
        adequate. Tallish, so slender as to be almost, but
        not quite, gaunt. The bones that happen after a few
        centuries of careful breeding. Blond-gray hair,
        sun-streaked, casual, dry-textured, like the face,
        throats, backs of hands, by the sun and wind of the
        games they play. Theirs is not the kind of cool
        that is an artifice, designed as a challenge. It is
        natural, impenetrable, and terribly polite. They
        move well in their simple, unassuming little two-
        hundred-dollar dresses, because long ago at Miss
        Somebody's Country Day School they were so thor-
        oughly taught that their grace is automatic and
        ineradicable. There are no girl-tricks with eyes
        and mouth. They are merely there, looking out at
        you, totally composed, in almost exactly the way
        they look out of the newspaper pictures of social
        events.



#173 of 207 by remmers on Tue Dec 8 15:11:28 1998:

One hint for now: Author is dead American male.


#174 of 207 by aruba on Tue Dec 8 18:16:53 1998:

Random guess: John Cheever?


#175 of 207 by kaifiyat on Tue Dec 8 18:53:30 1998:

a wild guess - JFK


#176 of 207 by rcurl on Tue Dec 8 20:24:27 1998:

John Updike.....whoops, he's probably still alive.


#177 of 207 by remmers on Tue Dec 8 21:07:21 1998:

Updike is indeed alive and still writing.

Not John Cheever, not JFK.


#178 of 207 by polygon on Tue Dec 8 21:40:49 1998:

Robert Penn Warren.


#179 of 207 by remmers on Wed Dec 9 01:42:12 1998:

Not Robert Penn Warren.


#180 of 207 by remmers on Wed Dec 9 12:17:54 1998:

Another quote from the same work. I've suppressed the name of the
locale in the last paragraph because... because... well, because
that's just the way I am.

        I hung up wondering why they didn't think about the
        bottom of the lake.  She'd had a try at about everything
        else except jumping out a high window. What was the word?
        Self-defenestration. Out the window I must go, I must go,
        I must go...

        Then some fragment of old knowledge began to nudge at the
        back of my mind. After I had the eleven o'clock news on
        the television, I couldn't pay attention because I was
        too busy roaming around the room trying to unearth what
        was trying to attract my attention.

        Then a name surfaced, along with a man's sallow face,
        bitter mouth, knowing eyes. Harry Simmons. A long talk,
        long ago, after a friend of a friend had died. He'd added
        a large chunk onto an existing insurance policy about
        five months before they found him afloat, face-down, in
        [name of location deleted].



#181 of 207 by wgm on Wed Dec 9 22:23:15 1998:

Sounds like it might be Raymond Chandler (The lady in the lake?)


#182 of 207 by remmers on Thu Dec 10 00:47:57 1998:

Not too bad a guess, except that the passage refers to eleven
o'clock TV news. There was no such thing in the 1940's when
_Lady in the Lake_ was written. In any case, it's not Chandler.


#183 of 207 by wgm on Thu Dec 10 01:02:13 1998:

Shucks. Did they have the news at 10, then, because people went to bed
earlier?


#184 of 207 by remmers on Thu Dec 10 02:52:44 1998:

Nah, the just didn't have TV to any great extent.


#185 of 207 by wgm on Thu Dec 10 21:35:56 1998:

So to zero in on dating, we need to know that it was late enough for TV news
and early enough that $200 was a lot of money for clothes.


#186 of 207 by sjones on Fri Dec 11 10:10:37 1998:

late sixties early seventies?  john d macdonald, by any chance?  and boy 
did i have to rack my brain to remember, probably in vain...)


#187 of 207 by sekari on Fri Dec 11 10:45:50 1998:

To my knowledge John D Macdonald is still alive. But that may be the 
other one, I think there are two of them in the literary field. I know that
one of them is a rather obscure author of young-adult sci-fi books. Hmm, 
I'll have to do some checking on that the next time I'm at the library. 


#188 of 207 by remmers on Fri Dec 11 12:19:02 1998:

Re #186: Bingo! John D. MacDonald it is. You got the time period right
too. Quotes are from _The Girl in the Plain Brown Wrapper_ ("A Travis
McGee Novel"), published in 1968. Excellent literary detective work by
wgm and sjones. Shucks, I was hoping it would be harder.

John D. MacDonald passed away a few years ago - sometime in the 1980's,
I think. Although best known for crime novels, especially the Travis
McGee series, he did write a bit of scifi and fantasy (_The Girl, the
Gold Watch, and Everything_, _Ballroom of the Stars_). Nothing
young-adult as far as I know, so sekari's probably thinking of a
different MacDonald.

The location I concealed in the second quote was Biscayne Bay. I felt
that revealing a Florida setting might be too big a clue.

Okay, sjones is up for the next quote.


#189 of 207 by jep on Fri Dec 11 13:40:38 1998:

No, John D. MacDonald did write some young adult science fiction novels.  
I have one of them, though I don't remember the name of it.  I'd read it 
as a kid, then later tracked it down in a used bookstore.

A lot of well-known authors have written science fiction.  Dean R. 
Koontz was a B-grade science fiction author in the 1950's and 60's.  
(They were *awful*.  They gave me hope; if those novels got published, I 
figured I too would be able to write salable science fiction.  When I 
discovered he was a best-selling horror writer, I was pretty surprised.)  
Howard Fast wrote some wonderful science fiction novelettes.


#190 of 207 by mcnally on Fri Dec 11 17:47:11 1998:

  Perhaps some of you are thinking of the science fiction author/editor
  MacDonald and not Remmers' detective-fiction writing MacDonald.


#191 of 207 by jep on Fri Dec 11 19:37:54 1998:

I happened to be in Dawn Treader a little while ago, and I looked to see 
if they had the MacDonald book I mentioned earlier.  They didn't, but 
they did have a few books in the science fiction section by John D. 
MacDonald.  I opened one of them, and saw a list of his other works, 
including the Travis McGee series.  This isn't proof of anything -- I 
wasn't familiar with the book I opened, or any other books I saw there 
by MacDonald -- but maybe it's some indication.


#192 of 207 by sekari on Fri Dec 11 19:43:02 1998:

Yeah, I think we are. I am rather sure that there are two of them because 
I read a book by the sci-fi one and then saw a bunch of books by an 
author of the same name and wondered about it. I will be going to the 
library tomorrow, I'll check this out and report back. 


#193 of 207 by sjones on Fri Dec 11 20:59:58 1998:

well i never!  what a set of mixed emotions - i was delighted when 
sekari said he was still alive, and then secretly rather glad he was 
dead after all since it meant i was right... sorry, john d!  definitely 
more by luck than good judgement, i must admit, although i've enjoyed 
the travis mcgee ones i've read - really excellent characterisation, i 
think.  very dark, though, aren't they?  in terms of the violence, i 
mean.

okay, here's something from a book i was surprised to see on sale at a 
ridiculously cheap price today, which lead to me buying it and taking it 
round to the dinner party i was on my way to, and being rather less 
social than i should have been...

'And now there was an end of path or road.  More than ever the camel 
seemed insensibly driven; it lengthened and quickened its pace, its head 
pointed straight towards the horizon; through the wide nostrils it drank 
the wind in great draughts.  The litter swayed, and rose and fell like a 
boat in the waves.  Dried leaves in occasional beds rustled underfoot.  
Sometimes a perfume like absinthe sweetened all the air.  Lark and chat 
and rock-swallow leaped to wing, and white partridges ran whistling and 
clucking out of the way.  More rarely a fox or hyena quickened his 
gallop, to study the intruders at a safe distance.  Off to the right 
rose the hills of the Jebel, the pearl-grey veil resting upon them 
changing momentarily into a purple which the sun would make matchless a 
little later.  Over their highest peaks a vulture sailed on broad wings 
into widening circles.  But of all these things the tenant under the 
green tent saw nothing, or at least, made no sign of recognition.  His 
eyes were fixed and dreamy.  The going of the man, like that of the 
animal, was as one being led.'

well, i hope *some* of that will prove to be misleading...)[but of 
course that statement itself might be a double bluff...)]

ps i think i'd rather be simon than sjones - would i have to go back and 
create a new account altogether to be able to do that, or is there any 
way i could shortcut it?


#194 of 207 by aruba on Sat Dec 12 03:17:31 1998:

I'm afraid you'd have to create a new account and, as luckj would have it,
someone already has login 'simon'.


#195 of 207 by mcnally on Sat Dec 12 06:16:24 1998:

 re #193:  If you spend enough time encouraging people to call you "Simon"
 it will eventually stick but a lot of people around here (myself included)
 tend to refer to people by login id in the absence of any indication to the
 contrary.  If nothing else it's unlikely to cause serious offense and is
 almost always unambiguous.

 You could always change your name in this conference to "Call me Simon"..
 :-)


#196 of 207 by sjones on Sat Dec 12 09:14:00 1998:

thanks for the advice, folks - i can see the sensible rationale behind 
using login id as a default, and i wondered if such a simple account 
name might have been taken already - glad to have that cleared up...)

and now, thanks to you lot, i'm struggling with the desire to change 
name to 'Call me Ishmael'...)

but happy, as ever, to come in and find that the very next posted 
message *isn't* 'how obvious and easy, the answer is...'!


#197 of 207 by remmers on Sat Dec 12 13:00:03 1998:

Re resp:191 - The John D. MacDonald who wrote the Travis McGee series
also wrote some scifi and fantasy, but I suspect it's a different
MacDonald who wrote the young-adult stuff. A web search turned up a
number of fan sites on the "McGee" MacDonald, and some bibliographies,
but nothing about any young-adult scifi that I could spot. I wait
clarification from sekari.

Re Simon's new quote in resp:193 - Great imagery in that passage. I'm
not familiar with it, although I've a guess as to who the author might
be. Since I just gave a quote, I'll refrain.


#198 of 207 by sjones on Sat Dec 12 13:55:51 1998:

and now i feel as though i'm trying to guess what your guess might be! 
thanks for the name...) [makes me feel as though i'm really here, which 
doesn't sound very rational, but i'll ignore that...]


#199 of 207 by sekari on Mon Dec 14 05:51:35 1998:

it turns out that I was mistaken. The author I was thinking of is James
D. Macdonald. He has written three or four young adult horror novels 
with his wife Debra Doyle. 


#200 of 207 by sjones on Mon Dec 14 14:09:32 1998:

is this one not really working for people, then?  the first big clue i 
can think of is that the film version is probably far better known - and 
also that the tone of the extract is a fair guide to figuring out its 
approximate date... especially (i think) that 'insensibly driven'...!

and happy anniversary, remmers!  does your guess have a film 
version?...)



#201 of 207 by remmers on Mon Dec 14 14:53:09 1998:

Thanks!  As to film version, not that I'm aware of.


#202 of 207 by void on Mon Dec 14 19:27:51 1998:

   hmm.  e. m. forster?  


#203 of 207 by sjones on Mon Dec 14 20:31:40 1998:

i can see why forster, but this predates him, although not by a great 
deal.  on the back of my copy, the publisher's blurb describes it as 
'the only novel that ranks with 'Uncle Tom's Cabin' as a genuine 
American folk possession' - although i'd better come clean and admit 
that took me somewhat by surprise.

i'm *fairly* sure, remmers, that if the text you have in mind doesn't 
have film connections, it's probably off-course - *i* was very much more 
aware of the film than the book.

here's a little more, then:

'Let us add now, the world - always cunning enough of itself; always 
whispering to the weak, Stay, take thine ease; always presenting the 
sunny side of life - the world was in this instance helped by (his) 
companion.
     "Were you ever at Rome?" he asked.
     "No," Esther replied.
     "Would you like to go?"
     "I think not."
     "Why?"
     "I am afraid of Rome," she answered with a perceptible tremor of 
the voice.

He looked at her then - or rather down upon her, for at his side she 
appeared little more than a child.  In the dim light he could not see 
her face distinctly; even the form was shadowy.  But again he was 
reminded of Tirzah, and a sudden tenderness fell upon him - just so the 
lost sister stood with him on the house-top the calamitous morning of 
the accident to Gratus.  Poor Tirzah!  Where was she now?  Esther had 
the benefit of the feeling evoked.  If not his sister, he could never 
look upon her as his servant; and that she was his servant in fact would 
make him always the more considerate and gentle towards her.'

hope that hasn't given too much away...
i'm off home to wales for a fortnight tomorrow, but i'll try and check 
in as often as i can...


#204 of 207 by remmers on Tue Dec 15 14:29:32 1998:

That characterization of the work as a "genuine American folk 
possession", ranking with "Uncle Tom's Cabin", *should* be a big clue I 
guess, though it doesn't suggest anything offhand. (Well, it does tell 
us that the author is American, I suppose.)


#205 of 207 by polygon on Tue Dec 15 19:10:43 1998:

Booth Tarkington.


#206 of 207 by maeve on Mon Dec 21 08:08:17 1998:

randomly..'Towers of Trebizond'?


#207 of 207 by vasil on Tue Jan 2 19:48:58 2001:

sdf


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: