Grex Books Conference

Item 71: Books! Books!

Entered by beeswing on Mon Jun 29 04:49:12 1998:

53 new of 53 responses total.


#1 of 53 by beeswing on Mon Jun 29 04:51:41 1998:

I am currently reading _The Manticore_ by Robertson Davies. Can't comment much
on it yet but so far it seems neat.

I highly reccommend John Barth's _The End of the Road_ . Just read it.
You will not be the same person afterward.

I was in a bookstore today and felt swamped... I had no idea what to pick.
That's why I started the item. 


#2 of 53 by omni on Mon Jun 29 06:04:10 1998:

 The Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy.
   I hated to see it end. I cannot exactly put it into words, but it is a must
read. I am better for reading it, and it has made me want to read more of
Conroy's books.

 Colin Powell: An American Life
   This one is about Gen. Powell's life and eventual involvement in the Gulf
War as the Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It gives interesting views into
the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Reagan, Bush and Clinton White House. 


#3 of 53 by jep on Mon Jun 29 15:01:28 1998:

I'm currently reading "Crossing the Chasm" by Geoffrey Moore, at the 
recommendation of the new president/CEO of ArborText.  It's a business 
marketing book which explains how high-tech companies need to appeal to 
mainstream users to "cross the chasm" between being a start-up and 
being an established, profitable company.

It has many technical examples, which are dated (the book was written in 
the early 1990's).  Windows 3.0 was a hot new product.  Lotus 1-2-3 was 
still the dominant spreadsheet.  Oracle had just beaten out dbase III.  
Most public schools still used Apple II computers.

I don't know if the marketing information makes any sense.  I don't know 
anything about marketing.  I guess it's always good to learn about 
something new.


#4 of 53 by rcurl on Mon Jun 29 17:53:40 1998:

Try reading in the books conference, bees, for lots more book suggestions,
many categorized by fiction/fnon-fiction, subject matter, etc. But new
"books" activity here is always welcome so, for those that don't read
agora, I will link this item to books.


#5 of 53 by rcurl on Mon Jun 29 17:56:41 1998:

Item 37 in summer 1998 agora has been linked to books item 71. The title,
"Books!  Books!" is a bit non-descriptive for the books cf. If you are
reading this in agora, come visit books and do a browse. 



#6 of 53 by hhsrat on Mon Jun 29 18:41:21 1998:

Any John Grisham book is pretty good.


#7 of 53 by danr on Mon Jun 29 21:44:15 1998:

I'm currently reading _Keys to the City_ by Joel Kostman.  They are a
series of short stories based loosely on his experiences as a New York
City locksmith.  I got it from the library.  If you like short stories,
you'll like this book.


#8 of 53 by beeswing on Mon Jun 29 22:49:43 1998:

I was unaware of a books conf, but it makes sense that there would be one on
Grex. My bad!


#9 of 53 by gerund on Tue Jun 30 02:45:41 1998:

I'm meandering through a couple of Ayn Rand novels... again.


#10 of 53 by rcurl on Tue Jun 30 04:07:48 1998:

No bad! It's one of the ways the existence of cfs get notice. 


#11 of 53 by gerund on Tue Jun 30 07:56:22 1998:

Oh, btw, those novels would be _We The Living_ and _The Fountainhead_.


#12 of 53 by atticus on Tue Jun 30 14:34:16 1998:

I have finished "Lucky You" by Carl Hiaasen. It was sort of 
disappointing compared to his other novels.


#13 of 53 by beeswing on Wed Jul 1 04:22:09 1998:

A lot of people seem to be fans of Tama Janowitz. Why? I have not read any of
her books. Which one would be a good starter? 


#14 of 53 by tpryan on Wed Jul 1 22:11:40 1998:

        Anybody read up "A Pirate Looks at Fifty" - Jimmy Buffet's new
book?  What do you think?


#15 of 53 by beeswing on Sun Jul 5 04:33:01 1998:

It may be hard to find, as I have heard it is out of print. But, _The Shrine at
Altamira_ by John L'Hereux is pretty cool and an engaging read. Be forewarned,
though: You will learn more about prison life than you will ever care to know
in 2 million years, although that is only a small segment of the story. 


#16 of 53 by omni on Sun Jul 5 05:49:00 1998:

  What was the name again?

  I found "Cell 2455 Death Row" by Caryl Chessman to be a very enlightening
book about the ins and outs of death penalty law, and pre-Miranda justice.
It also shows the wisdom of acting as your own lawyer, and why Mark Twain was
right when he said "He who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client".
  I'm not going to defend Chessman. He was a criminal, but I don't think he
deserved to die. I think that the state should have been satisfied with life
imprisonment with parole. And I think he should have served at least 2/3s of
the sentence.
  I don't think the state proved the kidnap case, and I am really certain that
the LAPD framed him as being the "Red Light Bandit". What I think the LAPD
was is lazy and inefficient.


#17 of 53 by hematite on Mon Jul 6 03:25:45 1998:

Anyone read "The Count de Bragelonne"(or something like that spelling) by
Alexandre Dumas? I'm debating whether or not to read it, I've already read
the musketeer books and can't decide on this one..Help, anyone?


#18 of 53 by tsty on Mon Jul 6 09:37:38 1998:

highly recommend    _where wizards stay up late_ by hafner & lyon.
  
oh, yes ... *those*  wizards!


#19 of 53 by void on Wed Jul 8 07:40:02 1998:

   recently i re-read _switch bitch_ and _my uncle oswald_ by roald
dahl.  currently i'm working on rosemary sutcliff's _sword at sunset_.


#20 of 53 by bmoran on Wed Jul 8 19:17:48 1998:

My Uncle Oswald is on the shelf over my desk. Great story by a great
writer. Yes, the Chocolate Factory author wrote a few 'adult' books as
well.


#21 of 53 by void on Thu Jul 9 05:16:05 1998:

   you'd probably like _switch bitch_ and _kiss kiss_ too, then,
bmoran.  last time i was at barnes & noble i spotted a horror anthology
edited by dahl which looked very intriguing.


#22 of 53 by tendo on Thu Jul 9 18:13:26 1998:

I sujest Wiz Biz. I liked it, you will too.


#23 of 53 by davel on Fri Jul 10 12:50:05 1998:

I'm currently reading Dick Francis's first novel, _Dead_Cert_, from around
1962.  I'd never read anything of his until my mother gave us, for Christmas,
a bunch of miscellaneous mysteries.  Most of them were awful, but Dick
Francis's _Longshot_ was among them, & is **very** good indeed.  Grace found
this (actually, 3 bound together, but I'm a slow reader these days) at the
library.  It also is very good.  Apparently his mysteries are all built around
(or set in) the world of horse racing.  For me, this is no attraction, the
reverse if anything; but his writing is compelling.  Highly recommended. 
(This, his first, has a couple of plot elements I'd quibble with, but England
around 1960 is not my own turf, so I may be wrong.  However, in general it's
as well written as the other book.)


#24 of 53 by senna on Fri Jul 10 22:37:47 1998:

I'm rather happy for the fact that Dick Francis has managed to work past one
of the more notable sports gaffs in the annals with a successful writing
career.  Granted, it wasn't his fault (Devon Loch, the horse he was riding,
was the culprit) but still.


#25 of 53 by scott on Sat Jul 11 12:17:54 1998:

I don't normally contribute to this item...but...

"Nimitz Class", by Patrick Robinson.  GRabbed it at the library as more summer
book fodder.  Very Tom Clancy-esqe, with liberal bashing, military worship,
etc.  Reminds me vaguely of WWII era teen propaganda (See the "Dave Dawson"
series sometime for a laugh), just not quite as extreme.  I'm halfway through
and I'm hoping for a twist at the end, but it's hard to see how the author
will get himself out of an obvious, already set-up outcome.  And mistakes,
despite all the detail and claimed research!  "No, couldn't be sabatage, those
nuclear warheads are *very* hard to get to explode since you need to do [xxx]
just the right way (ignoring the fact that the bomb would have to include the
capability to *do* [xxx] in order to be of any use at all as a weapon), and
also you'd have to have a high level pass to get past multiple guards (whoops,
assuming multiple guards can't be compromised or killed)". 

I'd give up on this book normally, but it's like rubbernecking at an auto
accident or perhaps like reading "Dondi" every week.


#26 of 53 by janc on Mon Jul 13 02:52:36 1998:

I've read all of Dick Francis's books - but I'm not really a 100% fan.

Dick Francis is one of the rare writers who who has been able to
maintain consistant quality book after book after book.  Though his
writing style is utterly different, he reminds me of P. G. Wodehouse,
who also wrote hundreds of meticulously-crafted, highly-entertaining
books, which are all so nearly identical that they all blur together in
your memory.

All of Dick Francis's books are set in "the world of racing."  Each book
has a new hero (I think only one character appears in more than one
book, and then only in two), always somehow connected to horse-racing
but in many different ways.  Part of the charm of each books is
exploring the hero's livelihood - Francis obviously loves researching
these things and sometimes goes a bit overboard in trying to fit all of
his research notes into the plot of mystery.

But although the hero always has a new name and a new profession, it's
plainly always the same guy (I don't think Francis has ever done a
female hero).  The hero is basically a fairly ordinary fellow, no genius
or superman, dedicated to his profession, a loner, very tough, extremely
honorable, and almost pathologically independent.  He almost always gets
beaten to a pulp by the villians (or stomped on by a race horse), but
being a manly man he just wraps his wounds with duct tape and strives on
ahead.  (If someone drags the hero to a hospital while unconscious, he
sneaks out as soon as he regains consciousness.)  He never goes to the
police for help (or, if he does, the police turn out to be total
dummies, doing more harm than good.)  The hero wins by persistance,
intelligence and toughness.

These books are always hard to put down, the plots are twisty.  First
rate entertainment. 

Except somehow I always feel a bit guilty about enjoying these books,
because it is such a simple-minded formula: basic male
ego-gratification.  A world where the tough guy always wins, without
needing any help from such wimp institutions as police forces and
hospitals and courts and laws.  It's a value system that seems much more
admirable in fiction than in the real world.

Still, they are much better than most guy-hero books.  For example, Dick
Francis never spends a whole page describing the hero's gun.  He's much
more likely to spend a whole page describing an artist's painting
technique (paintings of horses), or details of how the textile
manufacture industry works (I can't remember how that tied to horse
racing).  Vastly more intelligent stuff.


#27 of 53 by davel on Mon Jul 13 11:49:12 1998:

All the ones I have read (3 & a fraction, now) are also first person.  That
limits things a bit; yet he does it so *beautifully* that they're a joy to
read.

To an extent Jan's description seems right on target.  Yet it could give the
entirely wrong impression.  For the ones I've read, anyway, the hero is not
(aside from being a jockey or former jockey, a profession given to
self-starvation, painful injuries, etc.) out there looking to be tough.  Not
at all.  He's in one way or another pushed into the situation, pretty much.
Agreed that it's more admirable in fiction than reality.  We can *see* that
these guys' egos aren't the problem (that's a big distinction between the
heros & some of the bad guys), but that's rather more unlikely in real life.
But these are very far from being the one-dimensional tough guys 
that a capsule summary might suggest.

What Jan said about the heroes' livelihoods is indeed a big part of the
attraction, for me anyway.  The first one I read (_Longshot_) involves a
wannabe novelist.  He's till now made his living writing survival manuals,
field-testing them first by having his publishers dump him in the arctic or
on a desert island or whatever with minimal equipment.  Having decided that
he's got to write a novel instead, he's currently starving for real.  Does
that sound unbelievable?   It's told so that it's absolutely solid &
believable.  I expect to read anything of Francis's that I can get my hands
on, over time.


#28 of 53 by chaganti on Mon Jul 13 12:21:10 1998:



#29 of 53 by davel on Tue Jul 14 15:50:11 1998:

Eh?


#30 of 53 by janc on Fri Jul 17 16:37:20 1998:

Jan's Guide to Mystery:

  I'm really more of a Science Fiction fan than a mystery fan, so I like
  really good world-building.  Most mystery seems like just yet another
  detective and yet another dead body.  Basically grim stuff.  I want an
  expertly guided tour though a new world, with likable characters showing
  the way, a plot that is more than a throwaway, and not too much
  shear nastiness.

  - Dick Francis - I'm not sure if I really like his characters - they seem
    a bit inhumane to me, like Ayn Rand characters.  Otherwise, high scores
    on all points.

  - Arthur Upfield - Written in the 1930s through 1950s, these have a half-
    aborigine police detective solving mysteries in Austrialia's outback.
    The hero operates by completely immersing himself in the community where
    the crime occurred and observing in detail, looking for the ripples
    that must spread from a murder, building up a case from nothing.  A
    wonderful character, great plots, and an amazing background. 

  - Ellis Peters - Brother Caedfal is a 13th century monk in a time of war
    and intrigue.  A loving recreation of a time I didn't previously know
    was interesting.  Though the stories might appear to be murder mysteries,
    they are usually really love stories in disguise.

  - Joan Hess - An apathetic police chief watches over her tiny home town
    of Maggody, Arkansas, which is populated by numerous eccentrics.  The
    plots can be a bit contrived, but the humor makes up for it.

Curiously Joan Hess and Ellis Peters each have other series of books which
I find perfectly tedious.  Peters and Upfield are sadly deceased, so there
will be no more from my two favorite authors.  Too bad.


#31 of 53 by krj on Fri Jul 17 17:15:33 1998:

I share some of Jan's interest in world-building mysteries, so 
I'll pass along a list of some I have enjoyed.
You may have to dig in the used shops for some of these:
 
Peter Dickinson:  his earliest novels all featured the same detective, 
      whose name escapes me; a man of decidedly average talents who
      stumbles into a series of murder cases in bizarre, closed mini-
      societies.  THE GLASS SIDED ANT'S NEST is set in a tribe of 
      aboriginal people who have been uprooted and relocated to a 
      group of London row houses.  SLEEP AND HIS BROTHER is set in an 
      asylum for children suffering from a strange neurological disorder.
      The last in the series, ONE FOOT IN THE GRAVE, begins with the 
      detective, confined in a nursing home and suffering from dementia, 
      deciding to end his life; on the way to implement his decision 
      he stumbles over a corpse...
 
      Dickinson stopped writing series but continues working in odd 
      worlds.  KING & JOKER is set among the British Monarchy in an 
      alternate history.
 
James McClure:  novels mostly written in the 1970s and set in South 
      Africa, pairing a white policeman and a black policeman.
      Exceptionally high paranoia content.
 
William Marshall:  best known for a series of police procedurals 
      written in the 70s and 80s (and some in the 90s) set in colonial 
      Hong Kong, in the fictitious run-down neighborhood of Yellowthread
      Street.  Marshall's stock story structure intercuts one pretty grim 
      mystery with a pair of sillier ones; the sillier stories come to 
      happy endings and the grim story proceeds to its ending in a 
      cinematic explosion of violence.

Lindsay Davis:  has a series featuring a "private investigator" which 
      is set in Rome, 70 A.D.

Maj Sjowall & Per Wahloo:  In a series of ten novels they set out to draw 
      portraits of contemporary Swedish society.  I consider the 
      "Martin Beck" series to be the most artful mystery series I have read.
      These should probably be read in order due to the slow-moving changes 
      in the detectives' lives which stretch through the series.
      If you're looking for cheerfulness, the Martin Beck stories may not 
      be your cup of hemlock; I love the characters but most of the stories
      are grim.


#32 of 53 by atticus on Fri Jul 17 20:28:36 1998:

(How about Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose"?)


#33 of 53 by anderyn on Fri Jul 17 23:01:12 1998:

I recommend Kate Ross's Regency mysteries. Alas, she died earlier this year,
with only four written, but they are the BEST mysteries I've read in a long
time. Ken, can I borrow that alternate history mystery?
/


#34 of 53 by danr on Sat Jul 18 19:05:46 1998:

Mysteries have always been a mystery to me.  I've never really gotten
into them.


#35 of 53 by remmers on Sun Jul 19 01:19:37 1998:

I've been reading mysteries off and on for most of my adult life.
In fact, I've gone through periods of extreme addiction, although
nowadays I just read an occasional one.

In regards to mysteries with an exotic setting, don't think anybody's
mentioned Robert Van Gulik's "Judge Dee" series, in which the
protagonist is a provincial magistrate in medieval China. The
depiction of life and society at that time and place is fascinating.

Judge Dee was an actual historical character, and the first of
Gulik's Judge Dee books is a translation of an old Chinese stories
about him. The rest are Gulik's own creations.


#36 of 53 by davel on Mon Jul 20 01:51:52 1998:

I was going to mention the Judge Dee stories, too.  I find them somewhat
frustrating, though.  Quite interesting in many ways, a bit clumsy in others.
Too much pattern in the motives, for one thing.

I'd rank Tony Hillerman very high.

There are lots of mysteries I like very much.  In general, though, I find that
the ones that mystery fans of various types like best are not all that
interesting to me.  What Jan said generally applies to me, I think, allowing
for variations in taste ... & the fact that I haven't read most of the ones
he mentioned.  (Little time for reading, these last few years.  Jan is due
to have a lot less, shortly, too.)  I think of myself as an SF fan, too,
though I have to say I really haven't kept up with *that* since the
early-to-mid-70s, either.  <sigh>  So many books, so little time ...


#37 of 53 by mooncat on Mon Jul 20 13:13:17 1998:

I haven't actually read them... So has anyone here read anything
by the woman that took my name <grumbles> Anne Perry?



#38 of 53 by atticus on Mon Jul 20 16:37:40 1998:

Tony Hillerman stories are just great. I always read them as a source of 
information about the Navajo people and their culture. The mystery part 
is just a bonus. 


#39 of 53 by anderyn on Mon Jul 20 19:30:39 1998:

Anne Perry has two series out there -- one is the Monk series, with 
a protagonist who starts out by being in a cariage accident and then
losing his memory, and who has to reinvent himself along the way. There
are about eight books in that series, and I like them, although she
seems to be running out of things to say, but I will continue to read.
The other series, which I don't like as well is about Inspector Inspector
                     Thomas Pitt, the low-born London copper with a
better-born
                     wife, Charlotte. Set during the Victorian era, Perry's
mysteries
                     usually examine the dark underbelly of aristocratic life.
                     Homosexuality, adultery, and pedophilia have all been
subjects of
                     her previous books; in Ashworth Hall she injects a new
                     ingredient: politics.  (Yes, this last was stolen
from a blurb I had handy.)

Anne Perry is interesting as well for her involvement in a real-life
murder -- you know that movie that came out a few years ago about
the Australian girls who murdered one of them's mother? (That sounds
really icky, but I'm not cleaning up my grammar right now.) she was
the girl who actually did the head-bashing. So I think that it's 
fascinating that she knows the criminal mind so well....


#40 of 53 by mooncat on Wed Jul 22 16:09:24 1998:

The movies is "Heavenly Creatures."  As a joke I've been thinking 
about using the pen name Juliet Hulme (that's the author Anne
Perry's real name) since Anne Perry is taken. <grins>  And I
thought it was her friend that hit her mother with the rock..
Again, bad grammar..  I can't remember very clearly, but I thought
Juliet was more witness...  Oh, and there is a part in the movie
where Juliet finds out that her mother has been having an affair.
The man's name is Bill Perry, and that happens to be my dad's name..
 <grins>  I just can't get away from her! ;) (Oh and it was the
friend's mother that got killed.  When they were released from
prison- two seperate prisons- they had to promise to never see
each other again)



#41 of 53 by remmers on Thu Jul 23 11:50:15 1998:

I've seen "Heavenly Creatures". It's an early Kate Winslet film.
Did Winslet play Hulme or the other girl?


#42 of 53 by mooncat on Thu Jul 23 12:14:49 1998:

Kate Winslet played Juliet Hulme.



#43 of 53 by krj on Mon Aug 24 19:37:29 1998:

After janc's resp:30 and my resp:31 , I got interested enough to 
dig my Peter Dickinson books out of storage.  I reread the first of the 
six Jimmy Pibble stories, THE GLASS SIDED ANTS' NEST; the setting 
of the story is fascinating, the resolution of the mystery somewhat
less so.  But it was Dickinson's first novel.  I'm currently 
trying to figure out how to simultaneously read these books and 
loan them to Twila.  :)
 
Just started this weekend: Greg Egan's PERMUTATION CITY, a science 
fiction novel which seems to have a pretty promising start.  We'll 
see how it goes; I haven't been able to complete reading an SF novel
in maybe five years.


#44 of 53 by anderyn on Tue Aug 25 15:07:15 1998:

Read "Aunt Dimity's Death" by Nancy Atherton this weekend. Am now 
finishing the second in the series and hoping to get the next two frm
the library this afternoon. Wonderful weird wacky books, I have no idea
why they're filed under mystery -- they're romances, ghost stories, 
and just generally great!



#45 of 53 by gibson on Tue Sep 1 02:49:59 1998:

        Ken, why not just read them to Twila?


#46 of 53 by krj on Tue Sep 1 03:05:59 1998:

I can't read that fast...


#47 of 53 by md on Tue Sep 1 10:37:20 1998:

Browsing the poetry section at Borders I noticed a slim volume
by someone named Billy Collins with the title "Picnic, Lightning."
The title is a celebrated quote from Nabokov's "Lolita": "My very
photogenic mother died in a freak accident (picnic, lightning)
when I was three."  Collins uses the quote as an epigraph to the
title poem, which is about how thinking about the various ways
people can die suddenly tends to heighten one's perceptions of
reality.  A couple of the individual poem titles also caught my
eye: "Lines Composed Over Three Thousand Miles from Tintern Abbey";
and "Taking Off Emily Dickinson's Clothes," which concludes:

"What I can tell you is
it was terribly quiet in Amherst
that Sabbath afternoon,
nothing but a carriage passing the house,
a fly buzzing in the windowpane.

So I could plainly hear her inhale
when I undid the very top
hook-and-eye fastener of her corset

and I could hear her sigh when finally it was unloosed,
the way some readers sigh when they realize
that Hope has feathers,
that reason is a plank,
that life is a loaded gun
that looks right at you with a yellow eye."

Readers of Emily Dickinson will hear a pleasant series of bells
going off in their heads when they read that.  Anyway, I bought
the book.  Highly recommended.


#48 of 53 by remmers on Tue Sep 1 17:30:03 1998:

That slim volume sounds downright terrifying. Perhaps I'll buy
it too.


#49 of 53 by md on Wed Sep 2 00:23:04 1998:

I think it's your kind of poetry, John.  In fact, some of it sounds 
like something you might have written, only this Collins guy got 
there first:

"We have listened to their dismay,
the kind that issues from poems
the way water issues forth from hoses,
the way the match always gives its little speech on fire."


#50 of 53 by remmers on Wed Sep 2 12:22:31 1998:

Well, how do you know that this guy isn't one of my pseudos?

By the way, here's the remarkable complete sentence, which I'm tempted
to describe as "epic", from _Lolita_ in which the "picnic, lightning"
phrase occurs:

    My very photogenic mother died in a freak accident (picnic,
    lightning) when I was three, and, save for a pocket of
    warmth in the darkest past, nothing of her subsists within
    the hollows and dells of memory, over which, if you can
    still stand my style (I am writing under observation), the
    sun of my infancy had set: surely, you all know those redolent
    remnants of day suspended, with the midges, about some hedge
    in bloom or suddenly traversed by the rambler, at the bottom
    of a hill, in the summer dusk; a furry warmth, golden midges.



#51 of 53 by md on Wed Sep 2 22:47:32 1998:

Question for discussion: Why does Humbert describe his
mother as "very photogenic"?


#52 of 53 by mcnally on Thu Sep 3 05:25:23 1998:

  If she died when he was three years old I imagine a fair portion
  of his adult image of her would have come through photographs and
  stories related by those who knew her..

  But then I haven't read the book..


#53 of 53 by md on Tue Sep 8 23:04:39 1998:

I saw Joyce Maynard on TV this morning plugging her new
book, "At Home in the World," which just hit the bookstores.
So I went to Borders Farmington Hills and bought a copy.
I've been a fan of Maynard's ever since I read her cover
essay in the NY Times Magazine 30 years ago, and then the
book it turned into, called "Looking Back."  (She was 17 at
the time.)  Her most famous book is "To Die For," which was
made into a movie starring Nicole Kidman a few years ago.
"At Home in the World" is an autobiographical work which 
is making news because it tells about the affair Maynard
had with J.D. Salinger that everyone was buzzing about but
no one ever was able to confirm.  The early reviews are
mixed -- the good news is it isn't a tell-all sleaze bio;
the bad news is it isn't a tell-all sleaze bio.  We'll see.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: