Grex Books Conference

Item 3: What Was the Last Book You Read?

Entered by danr on Fri May 6 16:12:18 1994:

111 new of 298 responses total.


#188 of 298 by mcnally on Sun Mar 28 18:12:24 1999:

  For those trying to find it in the library, you'll find "The Princess
  Bride" filed under "Goldman, William", and not "Morgenstern, S."
  (Goldman presents the story as the creation of the fictional S. Morgenstern)

  "The Princess Bride" is a delightful book, even better if you haven't
  had it spoiled for you by the movie..

  Has anyone read "S. Morgenstern's" other book (the one about the
  gondoliers)?  Is it any good?


#189 of 298 by jazz on Mon Mar 29 15:39:49 1999:

        There's a used bookstore on Cross street in Ypsilanti near Vinyl Joe's
that has a rare two-colour edition of _Princess Bride_, with the 'real'
portions in red and the 'story' in black (or is it vice versa?) that might
be a real find for a fan.


#190 of 298 by bookworm on Wed Mar 31 02:55:28 1999:

Amen


#191 of 298 by gelinas on Mon Sep 27 05:03:47 1999:

The book I finished most recently is _The_Number_of_the_Beast_, by Robert
Heinlein.  I think this is the second time I read it; the first time was
July, 1980 (the publication date is August, 1980).

I'm working on _The_Last_Temptation_of_Christ_.  I have a copy of
_Symbolic_Logic_ from the library, which I will probably read before I
return it.  (I read it the first time in 1980, too.)


#192 of 298 by lilmo on Fri Oct 1 18:15:55 1999:

I had to watch the movie version of _Temptation_ a couple years ago for a
class, and, even tho' I am a Christian, I was not offended by it, as I had
feared, after all the hype about it.  There were certainly a number of things
about it that I did not like at all, but it wasn't as bad as I had feared.
Of course, it wasn't a terribly good movie even on its own terms, but that's
beside the point.

Sorry about the movie talk.  I have right beside me the book version of
_The_Phantom_MEnace_.  :-)  So far, so good (p36, of 300+).


#193 of 298 by orinoco on Mon Oct 4 20:53:12 1999:

I just finished _The Practice of the Wild_ by Gary Snyder, which I think was
reccomended somewhere in this conference, but I'm too lazy to find where and
by whom.  I was really impressed -- most "save the earth, stop
oppression"-type books make my mind turn off immediately no matter how much
I agree or disagree, but Snyder's writing really held my attention.  Not
surprising, given how much I like his poetry.


#194 of 298 by oddie on Mon Oct 11 04:53:49 1999:

Can somebody tell me what _The Last Temptation of Christ_ is about? The only
thing I know about it is that Peter Gabriel did the music for it :)
I read a lot of stuff over the summer which I will write something about later
'cause it's getting late.


#195 of 298 by mcnally on Mon Oct 11 05:16:45 1999:

  It's about an alternate universe where Christ is seduced by the dark side.
  (Oh, no, wait, that's the Star Wars "prequel"..  Nevermind..)


#196 of 298 by gelinas on Mon Oct 11 05:19:49 1999:

Jesus, a carpenter in Nazareth, makes crosses for crucifixions.  He has
been subject to fits since he realised that he loved his cousin Mary.
That rejection led Mary to a life of prostitution, also in rebellion against
her father (a rabbi).  (So she has mixed motiviations. Don't we all?)

Some suspect that Jesus is the Messiah, but they neither can nor want to
believe it.

I've not gotten much farther than that, and I'm not willing to repeat
the summarisations offered by others.

It's written by the same guy who did _Zorba_the_Greek_.


#197 of 298 by lilmo on Tue Oct 12 23:16:59 1999:

To continue:

Jesus spends some time with a group much like the Essenes (kind of like Jewish
monks), and then begins a ministry much like that described in the Gospels,
but he is very unsure of himself.  Eventually he becomes more self-confident,
and goes to Jerusalem.  There, he sends his oldest and closest friend, Judas
Iscariot, to betray him to the Jewish leaders.  While on the cross, he is told
by an angelic figure that his debt is paid, and he can come down.  He marries
Martha *and* Mary (whose brother Lazarus was killed before he was arrested),
and later confronts Paul of Tarsus, who is preaching Christianity.  He is
dying in bed as Jerusalem burns in AD 70, when Peter and Judas come to tell
him how badly he screwed up.  He then prays for God to return him to the
cross, where he can correct the error that led to the rest.  God does, and
the rest, as they say, is history.

Anyone who notices an error in my summary is free to say so.


#198 of 298 by otaking on Thu Oct 14 13:48:46 1999:

I finished _Ecstasy_Club_ by Douglass Rushkoff recently. It started out well
as a story about a motley bunch who decided to buy a warehouse and have raves
every day, with a different theme for different subcultures (goths, gays,
ravers). Then it turned into this bizarre conspiracy story involving Tesla
and Scientology (called Cosmotology in the novel). The ending was very
unsatisfying. I enjoy conspiracy theories, but this book left me feelin like
I wasted my time. Stick with his non-fiction if you read anything by Rushkoff.


#199 of 298 by lilmo on Fri Oct 15 20:05:18 1999:

By Tesla, you do'nt mean Nikolai Tesla, do you?  He was dead long before raves
started, I think.


#200 of 298 by omni on Sun Oct 17 07:28:30 1999:



#201 of 298 by otaking on Sun Oct 17 15:53:50 1999:

Re #199: Yes, Nikolai Tesla. The conspiracy theory involved telepaths and time
travel.


#202 of 298 by mcnally on Sun Oct 17 23:36:11 1999:

  Most of the better conspiracy theories do..


#203 of 298 by otaking on Mon Oct 18 14:23:25 1999:

My favorite conspiracy theories are either plausible or completely loopy. The
best are both.


#204 of 298 by jazz on Mon Oct 18 17:48:52 1999:

        Like the one about that project where the government spent billions
researching some obscure physics theories that might have applications, while
a war was going on?


#205 of 298 by pfv on Mon Oct 18 18:07:11 1999:

        hehe ..which war? ...which theories?

        Yah, we all "know" the conspiracies are fantasies, eh?


#206 of 298 by otaking on Mon Oct 18 20:25:20 1999:

Remember, just because you're not paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not
out to get you.

"Perfect paranoia is perfect perception." - a line from Stephen King's Golden
Years


#207 of 298 by i on Tue Oct 19 01:26:50 1999:

The most unbelievable thing about most of the interesting government
conspiracy theories is that our government is intelligent and
competent enough to be involved in such things, without it being
more widely known than the Watergate scandal and more bungled than
the Vietnam War.


#208 of 298 by lilmo on Tue Oct 19 02:09:26 1999:

That's what I find to be the most effective argument against most of them.


#209 of 298 by mcnally on Tue Oct 19 05:25:31 1999:

  re #207, 208:  That's *just* what They WANT you to think..    ;-)


#210 of 298 by otaking on Tue Oct 19 13:03:27 1999:

A lot of conspiracy theories fall apart when you realize that no plan, however
ingenious, goes off as planned. Plus, the more people involved, and the wider
the conspiracy, the more likely it's going to be discovered.


#211 of 298 by jazz on Tue Oct 19 13:13:50 1999:

        That's not necessarily true.  We've managed to do a few things in
complete secret and away from the public eye, like developing thermonuclear
weapons and breaking the German and Japanese main ciphers, that were only
revealed after they'd ceased to be useful to keep secret.  The government
isn't as bungling as you might think - they're just bound to the ebb and tide
of public opinion and political process when they act in an open manner.


#212 of 298 by otaking on Tue Oct 19 15:20:27 1999:

With the Manhattan project, there were leaks, but those leaks were very
quickly suppressed. Scientists would go to nearby diners and say the wrong
thing. Army officials would very quickly converge on these places and swear
the people inside to secrecy.

As for the Enigma project, the way it was kept secret was by letting the
Germans bomb some of their targets without resistance. It was costly, but it
worked.

I can agree that the government is perfectly capable of doing things in
secret. My point is that world-wide conspiracies can't exist to the extent
that the theorists say because the more people involved, the greater the risk
of exposure. Everyone within a group has their own agenda. They may act with
or against others in the group for the sake of furthering their personal
motives.  Even when a group is in agreement with an agenda, they may disagree
with the means used to carry out a plan.


#213 of 298 by jazz on Tue Oct 19 18:16:54 1999:

        Unless someone at some level comisserates with someone else.  It's
not difficult at all for gas stations, for instance, to maintain
near-identical price levels despite the vagrarites of gas prices and shipping
to various markets.  


#214 of 298 by otaking on Tue Oct 19 19:30:25 1999:

Yes, but in the instance of gas prices, you're dealing with multi-national
corporations with interlocking boards of directors, ensuring that no one oil
company will try to undercut another. On the more local level, gas stations
will compete with other places down the street, but they do agree not to step
on each other's toes too much. They want the appearance of competition.

On to the actual topic though...

I just finished reading Japanese Mythology by Juliet Piggott. I enjoyed the
brief historical overview and the survey of Shinto and Buddhist beliefs. It
also had a decent selection of Japanese myths, legends and stories. It wasn't
very comprehensive though. I much preferred "Myths and Legends of Japan" by
F. Hadland Davis. That book had more stories that were divided into varoius
topics (animals, mirrors, Mt Fuji, etc.). Both are enjoyable reads.


#215 of 298 by jazz on Wed Oct 20 03:54:28 1999:

        I'm much more concerned that corporations would attempt to conspire
than governments.  And they do.  When they're not all owned by the same
people.


#216 of 298 by oddie on Wed Oct 20 04:29:01 1999:

Some of the books I read over the summer:
_Borderliners_ by Peter Hoeg. I picked this one up because I loved _Smilla's
Sense of Snow_. I didn't like this one quite as much, because the tone is 
darker and a bit depressing. The story is about an orphaned boy called Peter
who is taken out of a state home (in Denmark) and sent to an expensive private
school called Biehl's Academy. He forms friendships with two other
"outsiders," a disturbed boy named August and a girl called Katarina. (er,
I think I have those names right.) They try to discover the details of the
reason that they have been brought to the academy. There is also a lot of 
philosophical speculation  on the nature of time, and towards the end these 
passages get in the way of the story a bit too much. Still, I thought it was
a very engrossing and thought-provoking book. (I'd like to smack the person
who wrote the blurb on the jacket. It gives away two of the major important
points of the plot.)
Also read _The Woman and the Ape_ by Hoeg. I thought it was awful: a sort of
bizarre pseudo-fantasy plot and a mystery story that doesn't hang together
very much.
I went to hear Ray Bradbury talk at the Chautauqua Auditorium and while
there bought a copy of _Quicker than the Eye_, a collection of stories,
and got it signed. It is a bit of a mixed bag, but because of the several
truly wonderful stories in it-"The Electrocution", "Hopscotch", "The Finnegan,"
"The Very Gentle Murders," (both of which are rather like updated Poe 
stories), "The Witch Door," "Last Rites," and "The Other Highway"-I have
probably missed a few good ones; those were just my favorites-it is well
worth the $12 I paid for it. Ray Bradbury is a great speaker, BTW.
I might write about some others if I can remember them. At the moment I am not
getting to read a lot because of schoolwork. :(


#217 of 298 by mcnally on Wed Oct 20 05:17:01 1999:

  I don't think I could read another Hoeg book after "Smilla's Sense of Snow"
  It built up so nicely that the ending was a shocking disappointment.


#218 of 298 by oddie on Thu Oct 21 04:05:08 1999:

Was it the SF-like component of the ending that you didn't like? It seems
from reading the customer comments on Amazon that a lot of people (probably
those who are into mystery novels but not science fiction) think the ending
was a sort of copout. Personally, I think the final mysterious, inconclusive
paragraphs are wonderful. The ending of _The Once and Future King_ (which
I read for school) is a bit like that too. (I loved TOAFK as well).
Another book has come to mind, _Red Shift_ by Alan Garner. Now *this* is
one of the strangest books I have ever read. It is a bit more difficult to
get through than the average "young adult" novel; sometimes I lost track of
who was speaking in the dialogue passages, as there are no cues from the
narrator. There are three interwoven plots: one concerning two teenagers
engaged in a strange sort of romance in the twentieth century, one set
during one of the Roman occupations of Britain and involving a boy in
a Roman legion who has epileptic-like visions, and one set in England's 
civil war. The ending complicates the puzzle of how the plots fit together
rather than clearing it up. I hope to read the book again later and try to
understand it better. 


#219 of 298 by mcnally on Thu Oct 21 04:12:38 1999:

  I thought it was a copout but not because of the bizarre/fantastic
  element..  It just didn't seem to fit with the rest of the story --
  all the hints that something dark and sinister was going on would
  have worked just fine with any number of strange endings, just not
  the one that Hoeg chose..


#220 of 298 by jazz on Thu Oct 21 04:44:50 1999:

        I actually enjoyed the ambiguity of the close, and the realism of the
core of the sinister "conspiracy" being something relatively mundane.  But
that's just me.


#221 of 298 by lilmo on Thu Oct 21 20:18:20 1999:

Re resp:218 - Which of England's many civil wars?  King John vs the barons,
the war of the roses, the one that brought Cromwell to power, the one that
restored the monarchy ... ?


#222 of 298 by oddie on Mon Oct 25 04:02:39 1999:

The parliament vs. King war, the one that brought Cromwell to power. I was
going to say that, but I thought that "the English civil war" always 
refered , ack, referred, to the same one. I stand corrected :)
I thought the monarchy was restored in a bloodless "revolution"; am I
confusing it with something else?


#223 of 298 by lilmo on Tue Oct 26 18:21:33 1999:

That's entirely possible.  However, I am not quite enuf of a history buff to
know the names to everything, I just know what happened.  :-)

After Cromwell, Charles ( whose (grand?)father was executed ) became king,
if I recall correctly.  The Glorious Revolution resolved a succession problem,
I believe.  Some king's heirs were Catholics?  I don't remember exactly, and
you could be right again.  :-)


#224 of 298 by mcnally on Tue Nov 30 01:02:13 1999:

  Because of the holiday I had a fair amount of time to read this weekend
  and because of all of the work *before* the holiday I chose for
  entertainment more than anything else..

  Tim Powers -- "On Stranger Tides"..   John Chandagnac, a puppeteer and
  amateur scholar is sailing to the new world to claim his grandfather's
  estate when his ship is captured by pirates.  Sooner than you can say
  "shanghaied", he's pressed into service aboard by the rather odd pirates
  and soon he's "Jack Shandy", unwilling participant in a power struggle
  between voodoo practicing pirates, a one-armed Oxford don seeking to
  restore his wife's spirit -- to his daughter's body, and other typically
  strange Powers characters.  Entertaining, but not as good as his other
  books.  Powers writes entertaining books filled with strange characters
  who are involved in bizarre plots.  Instead of "On Stranger Tides" I
  would recommend:

     "Last Call": which has a strangely similar plot, but takes place
     in modern times, with sorcerous card sharks taking the place of
     the voodoo-practicing pirates, as they vie to unseat the magical
     Fisher King of Las Vegas and become king themselves.. -or-

     "the Anubis Gate": a time-travelling poet encounters plotting
     Egyptian sorcerers, a body-swapping werewolf, and a killer clown
     who performs awful medical experiments in the sewers of 18th-century
     London..


 -------------


  Sara Paretsky -- "Hard Time"..   Latest in the V.I. Warshawsky series.
  Tough and independent Chicago private-eye Warshawsky manages to tick off
  the wrong people and is soon caught up in a complicated plot that everyone
  else begs her not to unravel.  How is this different from every other
  V.I. Warshawsky novel, you ask?  Clearly it's not, but it's a pretty good
  formula if you like mystery novels.  Nothing new here, but after all of
  the other books in the series fans probably know what to expect.  

  Recommended for fans of the series -- people who haven't read the other
  books will be confused by all the peripheral characters who've been
  acquired in the other books and remain part of the continuity.  Probably
  best to start with an earlier installment..


 -------------


  Dick Francis -- "Second Wind"   Francis could do with a bit of a "second
  wind" (or third, or twelfth, or whatever it takes..) himself.  Having by
  now almost completely mined out his trademark gimmick (every mystery 
  involves horseracing in some way, although in this latest the connection
  is slapped on pretty haphazardly..) Francis is showing the dark side of
  the formula problem.  While fans of the rest of Paretsky's books will
  probably enjoy the new V.I. Warshawsky novel, it's difficult to imagine
  *anyone* particularly enjoying Francis' latest offering.  The plot makes
  little or no sense, the characters' actions are all annoyingly irrational,
  and even the villains have little idea what they're doing.  It's clearly
  not up to the standards of Francis' usually successful (if completely
  predictable) suspense formula. 

  Strong recommendation against.  His fans will probably buy it anyway,
  but I can at least say "I told you so."  Seriously, though, this one
  stinks.  You'd be far better off re-reading any of his previous works.
  Don't say I didn't warn you..


#225 of 298 by otaking on Tue Nov 30 16:05:59 1999:

I just finished reading "Doomsday Book" by Connie Willis. I highly recommend
this book. It follows the tale of Kivrin, a 21st century college student who
is sent back in time to 14th century Skendale, a village outside of Oxford,
to study the Middle Ages. Trouble begins when people in the 21st century
succumb to a mysterious illness, hampering any attempt to retrieve her from
the past.

I don't know how to adequately describe this novel in the short amount of time
available to me, except to say that it's the best novel I've read this year.
I can't recommend it enough to fans of SF or medieval history.


#226 of 298 by gelinas on Fri Apr 7 04:23:11 2000:

The 'last' book I read was _The Neutronium Alchemist Part 1: Consolidation_,
which is the third paperback in a six-book "trilogy" (apparently, it was
originally published in three hardcover volumes).  I'm working on the
next part, "Conflict" now.  Fun stuff, but there are a lot of characters,
a lot of plot lines; about what you would expect given that each paperbook
runs over 500 pages.


#227 of 298 by gorwell on Sun May 7 00:52:59 2000:

I finish and re-reading The radiant future, the invisible writings, The age
of longing, the first is buy alexander zinoviev, second is arthur koestler.


#228 of 298 by otaking on Sun May 7 06:14:38 2000:

I finished reading Feng Shui for Apartment Living recently. Good book.


#229 of 298 by md on Mon May 22 12:32:05 2000:

I want to finish my George Eliot marathon this summer
but I keep getting interrupted.  At Borders yesterday
I picked up two irresistible interruptions: _Nabokov's
Butterflies_ and Borges' _Complete Fictions_.

The title of the Borges book sounds a little bit affected.
Why "fictions"?  There are no novels or novellas, so why
not call them "short stories" like everyone else?  Well,
first of all, "ficciones" is what Borges himself called
them.  Secondly, many of them are unclassifiable -- not
stories, exactly, but not essays or reviews, either.
Some of them read like essays and reviews, but the authors
and works they deal with are all invented by Borges.
Anyway, here, between two covers, is everything Borges
wrote of that nature.  Many old favorites of mine, and
many more I'd never heard of, all in brand-new translations.
The translator takes a big risk in renaming one of Borges
most famous "fictions" from the familiar "Funes the Memorious"
to "Funes, His Memory," explaining that "memorious" is
not a good translation of "memorioso" ("elephant-memoried"
would be more like it, he says).

_Nabokov's Butterflies_ tries to collect everything Nabokov
ever wrote of the subject into one volume.  It has the entire
"Butterflies" chapter from _Speak, Memory_, the butterfly
parts from all of his novels and stories, excerpts from
interviews and letters, all of Nabokov's scientific papers,
selected diary entries, and various other stuff from the
Nabokov Archives including plans of projected works.  It is
almost 800 pages long and is filled with illustrations --
photographs of Nabokov in collecting mode at all ages, 
photographs, Nabokov's own drawings, ec., etc.  This is one 
of thise books that can fairly be described as "sumptuous."


#230 of 298 by gerund on Mon Dec 4 03:36:40 2000:

Stephen King, _On_Writing_.

Having read most of it I'd have to say it's thoughtful and entertaining,
providing insights of a man who's been writing for many many years. It provides
more than that, however, in giving Mr. King's perspective on his life as well
as that fateful day in 1999 that almost ended his life. You'll get a sense of
the man that I think might be hard to gleen if you've only read his fiction.



#231 of 298 by remmers on Mon Dec 4 14:41:59 2000:

John Grisham, _The Runaway Journey_.  Got it to pass the time on
a recent airplane flight.  Never read Grisham before.  Probably
won't again.


#232 of 298 by remmers on Mon Dec 4 14:42:31 2000:

Oops, make that _The Runaway Jury_.


#233 of 298 by mcnally on Mon Dec 4 21:54:19 2000:

  So you read "The Runaway Jury" on your runway journey?


#234 of 298 by remmers on Tue Dec 5 02:37:34 2000:

Exactly!


#235 of 298 by m1a1crew on Thu Dec 7 13:47:22 2000:

Eniac by Scott McCartney. Have become very interested in Computer History
lately, this is a good intro book to lay some framework on the subject. I
thought it was an objective look at who stood where in the development of the
first working computer and the spread of computer science. The author
sets the record straight as too VonNeumann's role in the birth of computers,
he contributed greatly to the birth of computer science while it was Eckert
and Mauchly who bore the first working computer. Although I was very
disappointed that there was no mention of Turing and Colossus. Many people
dispute this as the first true working computer and Turing as the real father.
Also many places where details would have been appreciated, the author vaguely
described the events and moved on. Overall still a good read.


#236 of 298 by mcnally on Thu Dec 7 22:04:18 2000:

  If you're in Ann Arbor, have you stopped by the EECS building to view the
  piece of ENIAC that's on display near the front of the atrium?


#237 of 298 by md on Sun Jan 14 14:05:45 2001:

Mayflies, by Richard Wilbur.  An extremely slim volume of poems by our 
greatest living poet.  Maybe his last, as he turns eighty this year and 
his output seems to have slowed down sadly.  

Spaking of poetry, I was reading a volume of Robert Frost's letters the 
other day, and noted that he said "Cadmus and Harmonia" was his 
favorite long poem by Matthew Arnold.  The title meant nothing to me, 
which was alrming because I know, or thought I knew, all of Arnold's 
poetry.  

The Oxford Authors selection of Arnold's poetry and prose (published 
fifteen years or so ago) didn't have "Cadmus and Harmonia" in either 
the ToC or index, but it doesn't purport to be complete.  I have two 
collections of Arnold's poetry that call themselves "complete," both 
from the late 19th century shortly after Arnold's death, one by Oxford 
and one by Macmillan.  The Macmillan volume didn't have anything 
called "Cadmus and Harmonia," but the Oxford edition did: both the ToC 
and the title index showed "Cadmus and Harmonia" as starting on page 
112.  But on turning to that page, I found myself in the middle 
of "Empedocles on Etna," near the end of the first act.  

I must've rechecked the ToC and index of the Oxford volume three or 
four times, in growing disbelief.  I started to feel like a character 
in a Borges story.  Finally, as a last resort, I pulled down Stedman's 
Victorian Anthology and the 1879 Golden Treasury selection of Arnold's 
poems.  The Stedman had nothing; but there, in the little Golden 
Treasury selection, was my poem.  I recognized it immediately as the 
passage from the first act of "Empedocles on Etna."

All I can think is that Palgrave excerpted the passage from the verse 
drama, which was much too long to include in full in the Golden 
Treasury edition, and published it as a standalone poem in the 
collection, with or without Arnold's permission, and that that is where 
Robert Frost saw it.  It probably became a Victorian sentimental 
favorite, and so earned the oblique reference in the Oxford edition.  
100 years ago, that reference wouldn't've puzzled anyone.

The poem is about a man and a women who saw their children all killed, 
and who were turned into snakes by the gods, in an act of mercy, and 
sent to a beautiful hillside overlooking the ocean, where they lived 
ever after in blissful reptilian ignorance.  Frost's reference to it 
was in a letter written around the time his daughter Marjorie died of 
puerperal fever after giving birth to her only child.  The tragedy as 
much as killed Frost's wife, and sent Frost into a deep depression.  
Just a few years later and they could have saved Marjorie with 
antibiotics.


#238 of 298 by md on Sun Jan 14 17:01:23 2001:

Okay, the Oxford Authors edition has a note to the "Empedocles on Etna" 
passage remarking that it was published separately by Arnold as "Cadmus 
and Harmonia" as early as 1852.

Also, Frost didn't say it was his "favorite long poem by Matthew 
Arnold," but his favorite poem, period, "long before I knew what it 
would mean to us."  I've got to stop quoting stuff from memory.  Worked 
ten years ago, doesn't work now.


#239 of 298 by oddie on Mon Jan 15 05:02:11 2001:

"started to feel like a character in a Borges story." 
What a great description. :-)


#240 of 298 by md on Mon Jan 15 14:18:43 2001:

Thanks.  I was thinking of "Tlon, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius," where the 
narrator finds a long article on Uqbar in a bootleg edition of an 
encyclopedia, but then can't find it in the original edition and, 
what's much worse, can't find any reference to Uqbar anywhere else.


#241 of 298 by md on Mon Jan 15 14:38:06 2001:

Btw -- continuing the Borders bashing from another conference -- I was 
at the big Borders in Farmington Hills a few days ago while I still had 
Matthew Arnold on the brain, so I decided to see what they were 
carrying by Arnold.  Answer: absofuckinglutely nothing.  Not one volume 
of poems, no prose, no biography, no criticism.  Nada.  I don't even 
want to know who else they don't carry anymore.  It went from Maya 
Angelou to John Ashberry, as I recall.  

(A blind item in the old Spy magazine told about a "respected American 
poet" who, when was asked by a student at an Ivy League reading what he 
thought about some poem by Maya Angelou, replied that he had never read 
anything by Maya Angelou.  When the student expressed shock, he 
said, "But nobody actually reads Maya Angelou.  She's one of those 
poets whose sole function is to be taught in schools.")


#242 of 298 by oddie on Tue Jan 16 04:26:01 2001:

re240 - yes, I know the story. Last year in English we got to write one
"research paper" on any topic we liked, and I did Borges.


#243 of 298 by md on Tue Jan 16 15:13:14 2001:

I used to love open-topic "research" assignments.

So, what do you think "Tlon, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius" is all about?  I 
used to think it was about an alien culture, from another dimension or 
something, taking over earth.  Lately, I'm thinking it's an allegory of 
the triumph of American popular culture (Tlon was made in the USA, 
after all) and the real danger of it replacing native cultures 
everywhere.  Borges was probably thinking of movies and jazz back then, 
but nowadays there would be language and history as well.  The scary 
part, at the very end of the story, is when even such things as 
language and history become distorted and eventually completely 
changed.  Spot quiz: Whay are mirrors and fatherhood abominable?


#244 of 298 by oddie on Mon Jan 22 08:11:22 2001:

*wracks [racks?] brains* Obviously it's because they both have to do with
multiplying the number of things, but why this is abominable to Borges
I've forgotten if I ever knew. Why is it?

I guess I was exaggerating a bit when I said I "knew" the story, as now
that I try to think about it my recollection is distinctly fuzzy (it
wasn't one of the stories I read closely for the research paper, and now
I can only remember the part about the encyclopedia entry and something
about things coming into existence when they were written about.) I'll
be down at the library some time this week though and will look for the
anthology in which I originally read it, and then I might be able to
write something meaningful.

The research assignment was a whole lot of fun. I can't say that I'm
too happy with the final product as a whole, because it doesn't really
have much of a thesis--I have a tendency to start writing such things with
only a general sort of "focus" in mind, in this case the theme of the
labyrinth, and hope that by the end I'll have discovered something which then
can be made into a thesie statement. In this case it didn't really work,
principally I think because I kept hoping to find that the stories featuring 
labyrinths would turn out to have a kind of philosophical consensus,
and they rather obviously don't, as I belatedly realized at 2a.m. on the
morning of the day the paper was due. For example: in the famous "Garden
of Forking Paths" Borges presents the idea that the universe is constantly
being duplicated in slightly different forms as decisions are made, so the
number of "possible futures" increases exponentially with the passage of
time. But in "A Survey of the works of Herbert Quain" he seems to present
the opposite view, in the form of a book with nine possible stories of
Evening #1, three possible stories for Evening #2 and only one for the
third evening. (He then goes on to say that this is only a poor imitation of
the universe's true scheme, which would feature [naturally ;-] an infinite
number of branches). There are other examples too, like "The Lottery in
Babylon" where the labyrinth is constructed not by conscious decisions but
by chance. Borges is less interested in presenting a single view of the
world than he is in toying with the various possibilities. At least that's
what I think. :-)

(Apart from a couple of interviews in which he talks about his innate
philosophical skepticism [fairly selective it seems, since he also has a
great interest in mysticism and suchlike], I think it was "The Library of
Babel" that led me to this conclusion. The Library is obviously the universe,
and there are descriptions of various groups who seem to symbolize different
"ways of knowing", to borrow the relativists' phrase; the narrator expresses
distrust for more or less all of them.)

(Another story I really enjoyed was "Death and the Compass", which has both
a nice symmetry of construction [to go along with the symmetry of the 
mansion?] and a macabre murder mystery keeping up the pace.)

--
query: what are the four elements of fantasy, according to Borges? I remember
the story within the story but not the other three.



#245 of 298 by oddie on Mon Jan 22 08:16:18 2001:

hehe...I just realized that I used the phrase "distinctly fuzzy" up there,
which isn't really an oxymoron but sounds like one.


#246 of 298 by gelinas on Wed Jan 31 16:23:47 2001:

At the end of November, my wife gave me Tom Clancy's _The_Bear_and_the_Dragon_.
 When I started reading it, I realised that he had covered a lot of ground
since _The_Sum_of_All_Fears_, so I went to the library and got
_Without_Remorse_, _Debt_of_Honor_, and _Executive_Orders_.  When I finished
them, I went back to _Bear_, and discovered there was another one,
_Rainbow_Six_.  So I got it and started reading.  Got a little bit into it, and
decided that _Bear_ was chronologically earlier, so I went back to that. Then I
came across a reference to Rainbow which made it clear that I was wrong, so I
finished _Rainbow_ before continuing with _Bear_.  Now I'm done.

Clancy is an exciting writer, but I've decided he is also a poor writer.
It's not just the proofreading, which seems to be a general problem these
days, and it's not just the inconsistency in continuity, which is more
important to his books than to some other authors'.  But I can't quite
put my finger on why he leaves me dissatisfied.  I guess it is the details
he gets wrong after appearing to be putting so much effort into getting
them right.

Consider.  He designates a Marine helicopter squadron as "VMH-1".
Problem is, the "V" means "fixed-wing"; Marine helicopter squadrons are
designated HM_-xx.  The third character identifies the kind of helicopter:
Attack, Light, Medium, and Heavy are the usual choices.  The squadron he is
talking about in his books doesn't quite follow that pattern; it is HMX-1.
I know he wants to avoid entanglements with Real Life, but this isn't the
way to do it.  Change the third character from an X to an M or an L or H;
change the number to 5.  But calling a rotary-wing unit by a fixed-wing
designator is Just Wrong.

Inconsistency in Continuity:  In _Debt_, _Orders_, and _Rainbow_, he
calls the successor to the KGB "RVS."  In _Bear_, he changes it to SVR.
EXCEPT at the top of one page its RVS, and then toward the bottom of
that same page it is back to SVR.  (That's also a proof-reading problem,
isn't it?)  In the first three, John Clark uses the Russian name Ivan
Timofeyevich Klerk.  In _Bear_, it's Ivan Sergeyevich.  Except at the
very end when he's called "Ivan Timofeyevich" again.

I won't comment on the physics he uses at the end of _Bear_ to build
fake-suspense, but I will say that I *still* haven't figured out how
six plus two equals ten.


#247 of 298 by jocky71 on Thu Nov 8 02:11:07 2001:

I am reading "The Corresctions" by johnathon Frazen. BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


#248 of 298 by md on Fri Nov 9 14:44:40 2001:

Franzen is reportedly a good writer (I've only read a couple of his New 
Yorker pieces) but a social idiot.  When The Corrections was selected 
as the next Oprah Club book, Franzen made some supercilious remarks 
about the Oprah Club, whereupon Oprah Winfrey announced that she was 
skipping The Corrections and going on to the next book.  This was after 
Franzen's publisher had increased the first printing from 80,000 to 
500,000 on the strength of the Oprah Club selection.  Franzen issued an 
apology, but it was too late.  Then he started a book-signing at some 
chain store with a remark about how lowbrow he thought chain-store book 
signings are.  


#249 of 298 by cpnmonk on Mon Jan 21 18:54:24 2002:

I just finished reading _Primary Colors_ by Annonymous, not a bad book althoug
I did find it far more gripping then the movie version of the story. 
Certainly the ending was a bit more satisfying overall.



#250 of 298 by gelinas on Mon Jan 21 20:34:01 2002:

I think the last book I read was _The_Return_of_the_King_.  I'm currently
reading _Fire_Bringer_.


#251 of 298 by davel on Mon Jan 21 23:27:22 2002:

First time on the Tolkien, Joe?


#252 of 298 by gelinas on Tue Jan 22 00:50:54 2002:

Nope.  I read it the first time in Sep/Oct '73; a month or later I dipped into
it for "research" and ended up reading the last half or more.  Then I read
it again in Dec '73/Jan '74.  And so many times since that I can no longer
count.  It just happens to be the most recent book I've finished. :)


#253 of 298 by cpnmonk on Wed Jan 23 15:04:16 2002:

Read Tolkien quite a bit ago, when I was in high school in the early 90s. 
What makes me chuckle is the large number of people who say "Wow the movie
was really awesome, I am going to read the triology right away!"  My response
"Did you read the Hobbit?" "Naw...couldn't get into it."  "Finish the Hobbit
and then try the triology, might be better that way."  If you can't finish
the _Hobbit_, and correct me if others disagree, the triology is not going
to be much better



#254 of 298 by gelinas on Wed Jan 23 15:37:18 2002:

I disagree; I find LotR much more readable than _The_Hobbit_.


#255 of 298 by orinoco on Wed Jan 23 17:20:37 2002:

Interesting.  You're the first one I've heard say that.  I know lots of people
who _like_ LotR better, but even most of the fans seem to agree it's pretty
dense.  


#256 of 298 by rcurl on Wed Jan 23 20:31:29 2002:

Harold Schechter, _The Hum Bug_, Pocket Books, 2001. 

This is novel written in the first person of Edgar Allen Poe about a
series of grisly murders in New York City in ca. 1844, in connection with
which Poe is described as helping to investigate. There are many subplots,
the major one of which is Poe's association with P. T. Barnum and his
"American Museum" in New York of "oddities", of animals, objects, and
humans. 

As far as the murder mystery theme is concerned, it is less skillful than
the real Poe's stories. There are a lot of subplots involving strange
characters, while real clues to the murders appear in contrived manners
and often much delayed - that is, the reader is not provided clues early
enough to get involved in the unravelling of the crimes.

Of much greater interest to me than the story was the persona presented
for Poe. He arrives in New York accompanied by his wife, who's name is
Virginia but who is called "Sissy", and referred to by Poe as his "wifey",
with much ado about his devotion to his delicate helpmate. Also in the
family is his wife's mother, who is spoken to as "Muffy". (In real life
Poe's wife is his first cousin, so his mother-in-law was also his aunt,
and this is briefly alluded to in the story.)

So Poe comes across as a somewhat fastidious romantic very solicitous of
his family members, devoting his time only peripherally to his writing. 
This was very much at odds with my preconception of Poe from only reading
his stories and brief biolgraphies (usually emphasizing his drinking and
monetary problems). 

A brief diversion in the story involves Poe suddenly deciding he wanted to
write a poem in his frequent theme of the death of a beautiful woman. He
titled the resulting work _The Raven_.

The more interesting character in the novel is P. T. Barnum, the ultimate
humbug, self-promoter, and bon-viant. 

The author, Schechter, a professor of literature, has written the
non-fiction books _The A-Z Encyclopedia of Serial Killers_, _Bestial_,
_Depraved_, _Deranged_, Deviant, Outcry, and the prior "Poe" novel
_Nevermore_. 



#257 of 298 by gelinas on Thu Jan 24 04:51:27 2002:

There are two items for discussing Tolkien: 80, which is a general
conversation, and the (current) last item, which was started by asking about
the "meaning" of LotR.

Yes, LotR is "denser" than _The_Hobbit_, but I still find it easier to read.


#258 of 298 by i on Fri Jan 25 03:40:10 2002:

LotR is an adult book, Hobbit is a not-bad-for-adults kid book. 


#259 of 298 by gelinas on Wed Feb 6 05:29:52 2002:

Sunday night/Monday morning, I finished Trevanian's latest offering, _The_
_Incident_at_Twenty-Mile_.  Classic Western, but typical Trevanian, too.
Quite fun.


#260 of 298 by mcnally on Wed Feb 6 06:19:00 2002:

  I'd never heard of Trevanian before a friend recently recommended that
  I read the ultra-cheezy sounding spy novel "Shibumi."  The way it was 
  described, it sounded just bad enough to be good..


#261 of 298 by gelinas on Wed Feb 6 06:55:14 2002:

Sounds like it was poorly described.  But it's a big book; no short review
will do it justice.

I don't know that I would call his stuff 'great literature', but it is
certainly worth the time it takes to read.

I've liked all of his books that I've read: _The_Eiger_Sanction_, _The_Loo_
_Sanction_, _The_Main_, _Shibumi_ and _The_Summer_of_Katya_.  Now I need
to find that collection of short stories I just found out about yesterday.

One of my English teachers started with _Summer_; she liked it so much
that she went looking for his other stuff.  Boy, was she surprised by what
she found.  I had read the others, so I was just as surprised by _Summer_.
Now, I see the similarities and links between all of his books, so I'm
inclined to re-read them.


#262 of 298 by lelande on Fri Mar 15 23:55:33 2002:

the sound and the fury
faulkner


#263 of 298 by gelinas on Sat Mar 16 03:13:17 2002:

The last one I remember finishing was _Airframe_ by Crichton; before that,
I read _Timeline_.

It passed the time.


#264 of 298 by nikita02 on Sat Mar 23 18:50:05 2002:

The book that I'm currently reading is _The_Wheel_Of_Time_ Series, book number
five _The_Fires_Of_Heaven_.  Is anyone else reading this awesome series by
Robert Jordan?  These books are awesome, I've been recommending them to any
fantasy fiction fan I can get ahold of - at my school I suggested them to a
friend who inturn suggested them to his friends.. let's just say now like half
the class is reading his series, it is soo awesome.  Exciting, Moving,
tastefully written, and in times very humourous.


#265 of 298 by gelinas on Sun Mar 24 04:23:45 2002:

I've been meaning to try Jordan.  I'll have to add that to the list.

I finished _John_o'_the_Green_ a day or so ago.  Written in the '30s,
probaby by an Englishman, but placed in the Age of Chivalry, with language
to match.  The author was very fond of "stilly water".  The language
didn't much disguise the '30s love/adventure story.

The frontispiece listed a good two dozen books by this guy.  I don't think
I'll bother with them.  Wish I could recall his name, though.


#266 of 298 by davel on Sun Mar 24 12:35:59 2002:

I also like the Jordan series very well.  He's visibly improved (in things
like economy of style) as he's gone on.  I'm beginning to wonder if he'll ever
get to the point where he can wrap things up, though.  (And he's already put
in some hooks for a followup series, at that.)  He's now done at least as many
books as called for by his early projections, and he's got so many plot lines
open that he can't reasonably finish in less than another couple of books;
these very large books are now covering a time span of a month or two at most.


#267 of 298 by otaking on Tue Dec 3 02:51:15 2002:

I just finished reading the Ender Quartet by Orson Scott Card. Ender's Game,
the first book in the series was a brilliant military science fiction novel.
The three that came after that had very interesting moral considerations, but
the fourth novel kinda fell flat to me. Overall, it's a great series though.
I look forward to readinf Ender's Shadow and Shadow of the Hegemon in the near
future.

Currently, I'm reading What If?, an anthology of alternate history scenarios
written by military historians. Very fascinating stuff.


#268 of 298 by gizlnort on Thu Apr 3 18:02:20 2003:

I just finished reading _1919_ by Dos Passos.  A fascinating look at the
nature of World War I from the viewpoint of average individuals. Wonderful
fiction, and also part two of the USA triology


#269 of 298 by polytarp on Fri Apr 4 04:47:09 2003:

I finished !!!SALMAN RUSHIDIE"S !!!    SATANIC VERSES1

I like butter, I like toast.


#270 of 298 by dcat on Wed Aug 13 22:27:50 2003:

Currently reading Archer Mayor's _Bellows Falls_, in which one of the side
characters is a police Officer named Padgett.  Those who were at Huron HS in
the 80s/early-mid 90s may be even more amused by this than I am.


#271 of 298 by cmcgee on Thu Aug 14 01:39:37 2003:

Tanya.


#272 of 298 by md on Tue Aug 19 01:59:42 2003:

Dartmouth snotnoses (moi aussi, sniff) used to call it "Fellows 
Balls."  Probably still do.


#273 of 298 by md on Sun Nov 2 19:25:33 2003:

Just finished _Live from New York_, by Shales and Miller.  It's 
an "uncensored" oral history of Saturday Night Live.  Interviews with 
dozens of cast members, hosts, writers and others, broken up and 
arranged by topic.  Just about everyone gets his or her two cents in, 
except for the dead ones.  Lots of good gossip.

Now I'm browsing through _The Early Stories, 1953 - 1975_, by John 
Updike.  It was advertised in the last New York Review and gets a nice 
notice by Lorrie Moore in the current New York Review (it's a small 
club), so I went out and bought it.  838 pages.  I have most of the 
original collections, but I figuered what the hey.  Wonderful book, 
anyway.


#274 of 298 by gelinas on Wed Mar 17 00:24:25 2004:

I'm always reading, it seems.  Recently, I finished "Tales from Earthsea" and
"The Other Wind", re-reading "A Wizard of Earthsea" between them.  I enjoyed
the original trilogy when I first read it, but I didn't like the second and
third as much when I re-read them a few years back.  The fourth book,
"Tehanu," just irritated me.  I think "The Other Wind" just about finishes
Earthsea.

I also read "Don't Shoot the Dog", by Karen Pryor.  A very interesting book.
I'm hoping to get a few others to read it.

Right now, I'm reading Gerry Spence's book on winning arguments (I don't
remember the exact title) and "MacOS X for Unix Geeks" (the Jaguar version).
Both have a lot to offer. :)


#275 of 298 by mcnally on Wed Mar 17 00:42:38 2004:

  I think that's more Le Guin than I could stand -- for whatever reason I
  never really warmed to her stuff.  


#276 of 298 by gelinas on Wed Mar 17 01:04:30 2004:

I"ve found that I like some of her stuff, but not all of it.  For example,
I liked "The Wind's Four Quarters" (or something similar), but I didn't much
care for the one that opened with the king laying the keystone of an arch
("The Left Hand of Darkness"?).


#277 of 298 by munkey on Thu Jul 8 05:48:56 2004:

I finished reading _Years of Wonders: A Novel About the Plague_. A very
interesting book based on the 1665 plague in Eyam, England. 


#278 of 298 by denisea on Wed Dec 28 01:53:34 2005:

I just finished reading _The Autobiography of Santa Claus_ and its sequel,
_How Mrs Claus saved Christmas_ at told to Jeff Guinn. I enjoyed them both,
especially the first one-but both were good. There's lots of history in these
readings with the Christmas twist.


#279 of 298 by kingjon on Wed Jan 11 23:54:21 2006:

The last thing I read (and I'm in the middle of it again) is _A Civil Campaign_
by Lois McMaster Bujold, subtitled "A Comedy of Biology and Manners." I think
it's her best novel (out of 17 total, if I count correctly) -- and that's
saying something, since in my opinion even her worst is as good as or better
than most authors' best. (Anne McCaffrey is quoted as saying, "Boy, can she
write!") The one caveat with this novel is that, unlike all the others in the
"saga," its story depends somewhat (though not enough to preclude reading it if
you could only read one) on the previous novel, _Komarr,_ which is not quite up
to her usual (but that's still very good!), and I definitely regret reading
_Komarr_ second because of the emotional content of the two.



#280 of 298 by bhoward on Thu Jan 12 05:17:31 2006:

I'm making steady progress through Neal Stephenson's "Cryptonomicon".

Man, and I thought Michener wrote long books.


#281 of 298 by mcnally on Thu Jan 12 08:54:03 2006:

 Hah.  You'll laugh at those words if you ever progress to Stephenson's
 "Baroque" trilogy.


#282 of 298 by bhoward on Thu Jan 12 09:02:01 2006:

This is my first by by Stephenson.  I'm quite enjoying this one.
Are his others worth reading?


#283 of 298 by mcnally on Thu Jan 12 18:09:55 2006:

 Yes, quite, but I wouldn't advise going to the Baroque trilogy next,
 though it is his work which is most similar to "Cryptonomicon" (too
 similar, perhaps -- the affectation of having all of the characters'
 ancestors entangled in the same plot 300 years before is a little
 distracting sometimes.

 But I'd highly recommend "Snow Crash" and "The Diamond Age."

 Also, if you like "Cryptonomicon" you might like Thomas Pynchon, 
 who clearly influenced Stephenson.  In fact "Cryptonomicon" reminds
 me a lot of "Vineland," (and the Baroque cycle, to a lesser extent,
 remind me of "Mason & Dixon") neither of which is the kind of work
 that made Pynchon's literary reputation but "Vineland" is entertaining
 and is a good place to start (much better than launching into the
 bewildering maze of "Gravity's Rainbow.")


#284 of 298 by cyberpnk on Fri Jan 13 18:39:59 2006:

The Vampire Book by J. Gordon Melton.


#285 of 298 by tod on Fri Jan 13 21:50:58 2006:

Wizards of Langley and NIST 800 Series are my current reading material.


#286 of 298 by juicy on Sat Apr 22 19:10:27 2006:

currently between books (it's end of term, and i'm moving at the end of the
month), but read Stephen King's "Dark Tower" series last year.  It's very
different from most of his other work---it's much more on the fantasy end of
things then horror---although some of the books' references won't be
understood if you *haven't* read the other ones.  If you pick up one of the
most recent editions of the DT series, look for the bolded titles in the list
of his previous books---those are the ones referenced in the DT books.



#287 of 298 by tod on Sat Apr 22 22:15:18 2006:

Just read "In the name of the Law" by Thomas Puccio


#288 of 298 by mth on Mon Jun 12 16:54:23 2006:

I recently finished "Freakonomics" by Dubner and Levitt (IIRC). It was
allright, and fairly interesting at times, but no huge "a-ha!" experiences.

As for my next book; I'm not really sure. On the one hand I've been thinking
about getting back into some science fiction; on the other hand I am seriously
considering reading Paul Auster's "Brooklyn Follies", which I bought for my
sister some time ago (with the purpose of - eventually - reading it myself).


#289 of 298 by slynne on Mon Jun 12 17:42:51 2006:

I very much enjoyed "Freakonomics." I particularly liked the chapter 
about the business of dealing drugs and how labor theory applies even 
to black market labor. 


#290 of 298 by cmcgee on Thu Jun 15 19:53:22 2006:

I know it's late but "Snow Crash" was fantastic!  
It was published in 1994 or so, but is even more relevant today.


#291 of 298 by rcurl on Sat Sep 16 06:46:12 2006:

_Independent People_ (1946) by Halldor Laxness, Literature Nobelist in 
1955. This novel is set in the eartly 20th century in northeast Iceland, a 
land of vast treeless moors on rolling hills of volcanic soil between 
enormous glacial rivers. The protangonist is Bjartur, who took up sheep 
farming in the hills, a crofter, to seek independence from the businessmen 
of the cities. Its a rough life in a house made of blocks of sod with one 
room above and the sheep below. There is a story of Bjartur and his two 
wives, a sort-of step-daughter, several sons, and his dog and sheep, and 
his associations with other crofters and the powerful people in the nearby 
cities and their politics, but the evocation of the land and the society 
and social forces far beyond Bjartur's control are the central concepts.

I seldom read fiction, but read this novel after spending two weeks in 
Iceland. The locations in the story are fictional although the geographic 
settings frame the events. What did surprise me is that what surprised me 
in visiting Iceland, the fact that there is no "night" in summer (and, 
what I did not experience, very little "day" in winter), is hardly invoked 
in this story, presumably because it is so much a part of the lives of 
Icelanders that it gets no particular mention in their stories.

Crofting as a lifestyle has disappeared in Iceland today and the lands 
once scattered with crofts are now empty and their primitive buildings in 
ruin. Sheep are still raised for wool but as businesses, not as a way of 
life. 


#292 of 298 by gelinas on Sat Dec 16 05:53:16 2006:

I finished Updike's _The_Witches_of_Eastwick_ the day before yesterday. 
Interesting and entertaining.  I'm still reading _The_Dirty_Dozen_, the 
first edition of Harold McGee's _On_Food_, and, sort of, the second edition
of McGee's book.  I've also read _Dragon_, _Issola_ and _Dzur_, all by
Steven (Stephen?) Brust, in the past month.


#293 of 298 by cyberpnk on Sun Dec 24 02:41:29 2006:

Does reading manga count?


#294 of 298 by slynne on Sun Dec 24 14:23:15 2006:

The last book I read was _Cesar's Way_ which is Cesar Milan's book. 
Mostly it is about dogs but he also talks about his background. One 
part I really liked was when he told the story about how he came to 
this country as an illegal immigrant (he is here legally now). I also 
like that he wrote that he was not ashamed of that and why he wasnt. 



#295 of 298 by remmers on Sun Dec 24 15:48:29 2006:

RE #293:  Sure, why not?


#296 of 298 by cyberpnk on Fri Dec 29 16:13:41 2006:

In that case, I've been reading Alice 19th, a manga from Viz Comics.


#297 of 298 by rcurl on Wed Aug 8 20:24:59 2007:

_Under the Glacier_ by Halldor Laxness (published in Icelaandic as
_Christianity at Glacier_, 1968).

Under the Glacier is a tale of a deputy (Embi) to the Lutheran Bishop of 
Reykjavik (Iceland), who is sent to a somewhat remote part of Iceland, the 
town of Glacier on Iceland's Snaefellness <"snowy peninsula">, just below 
Snaefellsjokull <"snowy mountain glacier">. (The mountain is one of the 
most famous sites of Iceland, primarily due to the novel Journey to the 
Center of the Earth (1864), written by the French author Jules Verne, in 
which the protagonists find the entrance to a passage leading to the 
center of the earth on Snaefellsjokull).

Although set in the 60's, Glacier is still pretty remote. Embi was sent to 
Glacier to report on rumors of some problems with the church there; 
apparently services no longer being held, the church boarded up, the 
graveyard neglected, a body allegedly transported in a coffin to and left 
on the glacier, and the pastor no longer performing his ecclesiastical 
duties. This turns out to be the case. Embi (= "Em-basador of the Bi-shop) 
interviews numerous locals in these regards. This book is a record of the 
notes and tape-recordings taken by Embi.

The English translation is by Magnus Magnusseon, and this edition was 
published by Vintage International, with an introduction by Susan Sontag.
Here is what Sontag said of the book in the Introduction:

  "A marvelous novel about the most ambitious questions....It is one
   of the funniest books ever written."

There is certainly an odd cast of characters engaged in odd pursuits (the 
Pastor repairs Primuses, and does other odd jobs around the area). They 
also engage in rambling philosophical discussions. 

The coffin put on the glacier is in the end brought down - and turns out 
to be a sealed metal box containing, frozen in ice, a large salmon. 
Why...you will have to read the book to discover. Oh...there is also a 
love interest, of sorts.

I read the book because we visited Iceland last year, and we have been 
indulging in books and movies by Icelandic authors both before and since 
the two-week trip. Our trip is recorded in slides in two subalbums, at 
http://s111.photobucket.com/albums/n154/ranecurl/ There are several views 
of Snaefellsjokull in the series.


#298 of 298 by papa on Fri May 18 07:10:31 2018:

The Adventure of Huckleberry Finn

I never read it before. A very enjoyable classic that gives insight
into a forgotten place and time, and gives humanity to characters who
are usually portrayed as stereotypes.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: