Grex Auction1 Conference

Item 79: Auction Recap

Entered by popcorn on Tue Aug 27 19:03:24 1996:

Now that it's all done, what did you think of the Grex auction?
It brought in about $1100 of income to Grex.  It gave a lot of people who
don't do JCC sales a way to support Grex.
Also, I thought it was fun.

I suppose it goes without saying that anything that brings $1100 in to Grex
is a Good Thing.  I'd like to know what we can do to make the next auction
even better.

Did you join the auction conference?  If so, thanks!  If not, what would
have convinced you to go look at it?

If you joined the auction conference, did you donate and/or bid on anything?
If you did, thanks much!  If not, what would have convinced you to do it?

Thanks again to everybody who donated something to the auction and everybody
who bid on things in the auction.  A special big thanks to Mark Conger, for
doing lots of extra treasurer work, to Rob Argy for dealing with lots of
auctioned-off stuff from Grex's JCC pile, to Jan Wolter, for keeping running
totals and other statistics, and extra-big thanks to Rob Henderson, for many
things, including doing an amazing job of keeping track of which items were
available, closing, or sold.
31 responses total.

#1 of 31 by popcorn on Tue Aug 27 19:03:50 1996:

(This item is now linked from coop 105 to auction 79.)


#2 of 31 by bjorn on Tue Aug 27 19:07:25 1996:

I believe that this conference was run just fine as it as.  I had only a
little trouble actually receiving the item I bid on, and donating was easy.
Though I do think it might be better if merely entering the item of donation
were permissible.


#3 of 31 by jenna on Tue Aug 27 20:18:17 1996:

No more group items ??? those were confusing. Maybe I'd have donated
some money if I had some money to donate. But I'd be more likely
to buy a membership if I did. Stil I thought it as run pretty well,
and I'm glad it masde so much money, and I think you should definitely
do it again next year.


#4 of 31 by scott on Tue Aug 27 23:11:59 1996:

The auction was Great!  I just wish I'd had something cool to donate.

Thanks to Valerie and Robh for doing this.  :)


#5 of 31 by selena on Wed Aug 28 00:26:37 1996:

I didn't join, 'cause I thought it was tacky.


#6 of 31 by carl on Wed Aug 28 00:55:51 1996:

I missed it, since I was catching up on other conferences.  All the
things I would have bid on were sold by the time I caught up.  I'll
definitely tune in for the next one!


#7 of 31 by popcorn on Wed Aug 28 02:01:54 1996:

Re 3: Definitely!  Having one item with a bunch of Stuff was confusing.
Next time we'll put the Stuff into separate items.


#8 of 31 by scg on Wed Aug 28 03:53:47 1996:

I liked it.  Unfortunately, I didn't have anything cool to donate, but I bid
on lots of things (all of which I got outbidded on, meaning that I was able
to increase the amount of money that went to Grex without actually having to
pay anything.  Cool!).


#9 of 31 by nephi on Wed Aug 28 05:13:37 1996:

Heh.  I still have money to pay . . . A copule hundred dollars, I think.  

(Yipes!)


#10 of 31 by tsty on Wed Aug 28 08:24:09 1996:

ooooh, thakxx for the reminder .. ahve to go read auction again.
  
from what i remember, it was great!! thankxx to all who kept reading ...


#11 of 31 by tsty on Wed Aug 28 08:43:50 1996:

hmmmm, missed a thing or two by my absence and a +$0.50 late bid that
was let stand. oh, well.


#12 of 31 by adbarr on Fri Aug 30 21:01:31 1996:

I still owe $7.51 for a book, but paid all else.


#13 of 31 by denise on Sun Sep 1 21:34:35 1996:

Hmm, I participated!!  And will be going up for my week in WVa
this fall sometime, I hope!  Though I didn't send in the rest of
my payment for my other items yet--too much else going on and I
forgot til just now.  I'll see if I can find the address yet again
[I still owe $31.50] and assume I will get my remaining items after
I send in my $$. Sorry about the delay!!


#14 of 31 by popcorn on Mon Sep 2 03:15:19 1996:

The address to send payments to is:

Make your check payable to Cyberspace Communications and
send it to:

        Cyberspace Communications, Inc.            ****************
        P.O. Box 4432                              * NEW ADDRESS! *
        Ann Arbor, MI 48106-4432                   ****************

Thanks!


#15 of 31 by arthurp on Mon Sep 9 03:18:11 1996:

It was great.  The group items were hard to follow.  It was fun, and I would
have bid on an XT if Steve had put it up.  ;)  The stuff doesn't have to be
cool in your eyes.  Someone will want it...


#16 of 31 by snafu on Mon Sep 9 04:10:54 1996:

true, true. I enjoyed following it.. saw a few things I would have bid on, but
got there too late. oh well. I'll have to keep up on things better next time..
There will be a next time, right?  Oh, a suggestion for group items: put each
thing for sale in it's own seperate item, even if you have two of one thing.
better to have a few more items to read than having to try to sort all of them
out...


#17 of 31 by janc on Mon Sep 9 16:34:19 1996:

I think multiple identical things in the same item works fine.  Lots of
people would be confused by separate items, accidentally getting two of them
when they only wanted to be sure to get one, and if the users followed the
opitmum strategy (always placing your bid in the item with the lowest current
high bid), then it would end up being almost exactly the same as a single
item, only more difficult to follow.


#18 of 31 by bjorn on Tue Sep 10 17:17:02 1996:

I'm still waiting on confirmation of someone's payment, sos I can ship the
item he won to himm.


#19 of 31 by robh on Tue Sep 10 18:16:40 1996:

I'm waiting on several payments for these games that are still
sitting here in my living room.


#20 of 31 by popcorn on Tue Sep 10 20:27:42 1996:

We need to sit down with the various lists and figure out who still needs to
send in money for which items....


#21 of 31 by tsty on Wed Sep 11 17:34:52 1996:

i JUST heard fro freida ... i'm guessing i wil send the pics back to her
even though someone wanted to see them first ... oh, well.
  


#22 of 31 by freida on Thu Sep 12 14:14:40 1996:

Yup!  Freida finally made it back after being in MD working on the mural for
6 weeks!  Robh, have your sis give me a ring or write me a letter or email
me about what kind of painting she would like to have.  Or she could send me
several photos which could be incorporated into a painting...remember to tell
her that I do not do people yet!  Otherwise, anything else is okay.

Denise, please feel free to let me know when you would like your week's
stay...I'm looking forward to it!

I thought the auction was run really well and I was happy I could donate and
purchase stuff to help out grex.  I agree that there should be no multiple
listings...like with the books.  Each item should be seperate...yet, I also
agree with janc, that like items should be listed in the same item.  I had
lots of fun participating in the auction!

BTW, robh, your sister could look at my paintings on the web...nephi scanned
some of them in for me and you can see them at 
http://mike.accessus.net/pics/freida
If anyone does look at them, you will have to let me know what you think!

GREAT JOB on the GREAT GREX AUCTION!  Again, thanks!


#23 of 31 by srw on Tue Sep 17 07:16:01 1996:

Freida! welcome back.

I looked at a few of Mike's scans. Those are big scans. i didn't have time
to d/l too many, but I really liked the 3-d cinder block effect that I saw
in #20. Cool. What an interesting treatment.


#24 of 31 by russ on Tue Sep 17 15:03:07 1996:

I looked at a few.  My impression:  nice artwork, but the photographer
needs to learn about lighting and glare.


#25 of 31 by janc on Tue Sep 17 17:30:54 1996:

I think those are scans of pictures frieda took.  I don't think she is a
professional photographer, but I also think she was in part trying to capture
the reflections.  One of the aquatic murals is on the wall of a swimming pool,
so there are reflections off the water that dance across it in wave patterns,
which frieda thought was a neat effect.


#26 of 31 by tsty on Wed Sep 18 08:23:27 1996:

all the d/l scans failed although the failure was nto realized until
the images were opened after the d/l.


#27 of 31 by nephi on Sat Sep 21 23:03:43 1996:

(Sorry scans were so big.  I did that so there would be more bits to work with
if they ever had to be altered, which is something I though was imminent. 
They do show *lots* of detail otherwise lost, though . . . )


#28 of 31 by popcorn on Sun Sep 22 04:21:12 1996:

The ones I looked at looked good to me.....


#29 of 31 by russ on Sun Sep 22 07:17:14 1996:

They were beautiful scans.  I think the lighting needed work, though;
the internal flash on an SLR just isn't up to big jobs or shiny surfaces.


#30 of 31 by tsty on Tue Sep 24 18:31:15 1996:

to d/l i'll have to use a less loaded b0x than grex.


#31 of 31 by nephi on Wed Oct 9 03:54:52 1996:

<nephi topples over laughing at the thought of someone
considering Grex as a site to download those several
megabytes worth of images>

You *would* have to have some patience to download
those to Grex.  8^)  They load pretty quickly from a
T1 though . . .


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: