Grex Agorage Conference

Item 11: Attracting new users....

Entered by cross on Sat Jan 27 20:57:40 2007:

64 new of 84 responses total.


#21 of 84 by cmcgee on Mon Jan 29 18:58:06 2007:

Actually, I was thinking more in terms of a conference on Grex that WOULD be
indexed by search engines.  In joining the conference, you would explicitly
agree that not only would your words be web-readable, but they would be web
searched.  No need for an editor, permissions, etc.  

Some software solution would exist that automatically made those posts visible
on the web, through search engines, linkable to other blogs, etc, etc.  

The idea is that conference would be blog like.  Each item would be a "blog
entry" and each comment would be visible like a comment on a blog entry.  If
you wanted, you could subscribe to an RSS feed for that conference.  

I'm brainstorming here.  I have no idea whether software is available, is easy
to write, would be an add on to front talk, or what.  


#22 of 84 by kingjon on Mon Jan 29 20:26:46 2007:

IIRC, that exact functionality (minus the "search-engine-indexable", which is a
separate issue) was proposed (at least as a brainstorming-session idea, if not
with more weight) by janc as a flavor of Backtalk and as a set of conferences
(separate from the others, and one per user).



#23 of 84 by twenex on Sun Feb 4 00:39:31 2007:

Well, now htat newuser is back up, that should help!


#24 of 84 by vivekm1234 on Sun Feb 4 01:52:08 2007:

Re #2: hehe, hey why don't we run a MUD :) We could all work off some steam
about other ppl's ideas by slaughtering them on the MUD. Plus daemon9, trig
and other like minded individuals can form a PK guild and go around trying 
to kill ppl. We could junk party and use the MUD interface instead.<g>
Plus we have kids logging in (bipolar, thewolf and now the quebeq-ers so..)

The blogosphere idea is a great idea, but we'd better warn ppl about Agora
and it's fractious nature and warn them that we are a little short of users
(we don't want to raise their hopes only to be disappointed) and i hope 
cmcgee or someone selectively paste's stuff after checking with people. 
I don't want my stuff to appear on google though Vivek is a pretty common
name. Actually why have a best of Agora? Why not a best of BBS blog?
#21's a super idea and solves all the above problems! 


#25 of 84 by cmcgee on Sun Feb 4 02:20:04 2007:

vivek, I'm not the least bit interested in becoming a blog editor. My
suggestion is  a conference that people only participate in if they are
willing to have their contributions indexed by search engines.  


#26 of 84 by maus on Sun Feb 4 02:27:25 2007:

I do like the idea of having a small mud on here. I do get sick of
having to use my large machine when I want to game (WoW is a pig, and I
could have damn-near as much fun without the big, resource intensive
graphics)


#27 of 84 by vivekm1234 on Sun Feb 4 03:51:00 2007:

Why not a conf where articles from anywhere on the bbs, are linked in to it,
the conf itself being searchable. However, how do we control abuse? 
We might wind up porting our junk on to the WWW. It will have to be 
moderated in some form :(. I suggest allowing accounts with X points,
access to this facility and a limit of 1 post per month.

Perhaps this method can be used to control SPAM and abuse? Only people
willing to devote a substantial amt of time to using a account get uber
Grex facilities because they will have to build points (measure based 
on time spent logged in, cpu resources consumed, commands typed, posts 
posted, party lines, user feedback etc)? We could try to implement some 
sort of bot-checker using tel?


#28 of 84 by lar on Sun Feb 4 11:32:59 2007:

Why not have a granola bar givaway? Or you could have a eco friendly
"green" contest and first prize could be a bag of trail mix!

hmmm hmmmm good!


#29 of 84 by kingjon on Sun Feb 4 13:46:37 2007:

There was a "best of" conference once, when Grex first started; it's called the
"archive" conference. The last item in it is 2001.



#30 of 84 by cmcgee on Sun Feb 4 15:30:43 2007:

The problem with linking to the searchable conference is huge.

There was a big user controversy when we made Grex web accessible.  That only
happened because the policy explicitly states that the items will not be
searchable on the web.  

There is no way to have items cross linked between a searchable conference
and a nonsearchable one.  For an item posted (whether originally or by
linking) in a nonsearchable conference, replies must be nonsearchable.  

If someone linked an item from the searchable conference into a nonsearchable
one, there is no way to keep replies posted in the nonsearchable conference
from becoming searchable.  

I'm not sure I'd want to, either.  An item with half the replies blanked out
is pretty hard to read through.  


#31 of 84 by vivekm1234 on Sun Feb 4 16:05:21 2007:

Re #29: :) I can see why - some of them are pretty neat. No fights and on
topic.


#32 of 84 by easlern on Mon Feb 5 13:57:10 2007:

Okay, Viv- you can be host of the Grex MUD. Uh, how does it work?  :)


#33 of 84 by vivekm1234 on Mon Feb 5 16:58:06 2007:

Host? you just compile and run it. There will be some default rooms and
stuff. Of course ppl that are interested can update the room descriptions and
add new rooms but i think you need to know LPC for that..or some other MUD
language..


#34 of 84 by easlern on Mon Feb 5 17:15:32 2007:

Isn't it a multiplayer thing that someone needs to host on a server?


#35 of 84 by vivekm1234 on Mon Feb 5 20:24:26 2007:

Yeah..it is multiplayer..It would be hosted on Grex via loopback..


#36 of 84 by cmcgee on Mon Feb 5 23:08:08 2007:

There is a conference that has a few items about muds, and a couple
roleplaying conferences. 


#37 of 84 by maus on Wed Feb 7 02:11:45 2007:

What mud are we thinking of running ? I remember playing in one called
"Major Mud" on a small BBS in Austin and I believe my partner played in
several back in college. 

If there is stuff that needs doing (testing, documenting, etc), I can
probably pitch in a couple of hours a week, but probably not loads more
than that. 


#38 of 84 by nharmon on Wed Feb 7 02:49:48 2007:

Could we run LORD on here somehow?


#39 of 84 by cmcgee on Thu Feb 8 03:07:46 2007:

Actually, there is a conference devoted to muds, called "mud".


#40 of 84 by easlern on Thu Feb 8 14:05:27 2007:

Seek ye the conference known as "mud" and all thy questions shalt be answered!


#41 of 84 by easlern on Thu Feb 8 15:22:42 2007:

I started an item there.  :)


#42 of 84 by naftee on Fri Feb 9 02:57:57 2007:

 :)


#43 of 84 by vivekm1234 on Fri Feb 9 16:11:39 2007:

We need/demand Gnuchess to help while away precious hours!


#44 of 84 by easlern on Fri Feb 9 16:33:58 2007:

Somebody can compile it and make it readable to everyone in their home
directory?


#45 of 84 by trig on Wed Feb 14 06:43:48 2007:

cross per usual has really great ideas that are shot down quickly, also
per-usual. :(


#46 of 84 by ric on Wed Feb 21 14:25:48 2007:

re 0 - hey cross, come to m-net, someone bought you a citizenship :)


#47 of 84 by cross on Wed Feb 21 14:29:06 2007:

I saw that!  I'm on M-Net frequently; I just find that general has more going
on than I can keep up with.


#48 of 84 by ric on Wed Feb 21 14:42:03 2007:

I actually avoided general for pretty much all of last year... sticking to
sports, policy, sysop, programming, etc... I'm back in the general conference
again but only due to LIBERAL use of "forget".   I recently entered items in
the tv conference about LOST and Battlestar Galactica.


#49 of 84 by nharmon on Wed Feb 21 14:42:17 2007:

Don't forget to check out the chess conference where our very own Nate
is getting his ass handed to him by tanis.


#50 of 84 by cross on Wed Feb 21 16:24:25 2007:

awesome.....


#51 of 84 by remmers on Mon Mar 5 17:34:23 2007:

A few ideas have been rattling around in my brain.  I guess there are 
two issues:  (1) How to make Grex more visible, and (2) how to entice 
people to stick around, once they've taken a look at it.

One easy, low-cost way to address (1) is to put out information about 
Grex in public places.  In the pre-internet days of the early 1990s, the 
Grex publicity committee used to walk around Ann Arbor putting up fliers 
with Grex's phone number.

The hardcopy flier approach was pretty effective in its day.  Nowadays 
we can do the equivalent on the World Wide Web, on a global scale, by 
putting up electronic "fliers" on places where people can post things 
and which other people use as resources for finding things.

I'm thinking of social sites like Upcoming (http://upcoming.org) for 
announcing upcoming events, and Delicious (http://del.icio.us) for 
sharing bookmarks.  I've started putting up a few of these electronic 
"fliers" myself.

On Upcoming, I've started posting announcements, in the "Ann Arbor" 
metro section, of weekly Saturday walks and lunches.  At this writing, 
the URL for the March 10, 2007 walk is http://upcoming.org/event/158733/
(although it will disappear once the date has passed), and I'll be 
posting the lunch info on Upcoming as well, as soon as I know the 
location.  Anybody who keeps track of upcoming Ann Arbor events (URL: 
http://upcoming.org/metro/mi/aa) will see this announcement.  (I'm 
attaching a "grex" tag to each such event, so that 
http://upcoming.org/tag/grex gives you a complete list.  Google indexes 
upcoming.org - try a Google search on    "ann arbor" grex.

Another source of visibility is http://del.icio.us, a very popular 
social bookmarking site.  People can post URLs of websites and attach 
descriptive category labels called "tags".  The tags help me find 
websites I've bookmarked and, since they're public by default, help 
other people find websites relevant to their interests.  For example, 
somebody interested in the PHP programming language could open the URL 
http://del.icio.us/tag/php to see a list of all sites any user has 
tagged "php", or go to http://del.icio.us/popular/php to see sites that 
a LOT of people have tagged php.  Sort of like a search engine, but 
returning results based on human judgement of relevance rather than 
Google's algorithmic approach.

As an example of what can be done, I posted 
http://cyberspace.org to Delicious, attached a brief description of what 
Grex is about, and gave it the tags "annarbor", "forums", "unix", "ssh", 
"free", "501c3", "organization", "nonprofit", and "shellaccounts".  (And 
anybody else with a Delicious account can do the same, perhaps with a 
different tag set.)  Anybody tracking any of those topics on Delicious 
will see the listing.  (Go to http://del.icio.us/jremmers/grex to see my 
description.)  I don't know how much effect this will have in attracting 
new people to Grex, but Delicious has over a million users.

There are no doubt a lot of other places on the web where Grex can be 
publicized with little effort and no cost.  And anybody with the time 
and interest can do it - you don't have to be a board or staff member.

Issue #2 - how to make it more attractive for people to stick around 
once they're here - is more difficult.  I have some thoughts about how 
this might be approached for the "bbs" part of Grex, but this response 
has grown way long, so I think I'll save the ideas for later.


#52 of 84 by remmers on Mon Mar 5 17:45:52 2007:

Oops, typo:  The URL for the Ann Arbor metro on Upcoming is
http://upcoming.org/metro/us/mi/aa/


#53 of 84 by cross on Tue Mar 6 13:40:20 2007:

Good stuff, Remmers.  Thanks a lot.


#54 of 84 by cross on Tue Mar 6 13:41:34 2007:

PS: Is anyone willing to write a story about grex for slashdot?  That would
certainly give us visibility in the geek world, which could be really
interesting.  Maybe if there were a call for a grex `project' more people
would be interested; for instance, looking for a replacement for picospan
might draw in some folks.


#55 of 84 by twenex on Tue Mar 6 14:56:12 2007:

Short answer: yes. Long answer: Some info on the history from a personal
perspective would be appreciated. Reachable via the usual email address. All
comers welcome.


#56 of 84 by cross on Tue Mar 6 15:51:42 2007:

A good historical perspective is in Jan's history, on www.unixpapa.com.


#57 of 84 by marcvh on Tue Mar 6 17:44:33 2007:

I'm trying to imagine the results of a slashdot grex article:

  Imagine a Beowoulf cluster of script kiddies...

  In Soviet Union, Grex logs in to you!


#58 of 84 by nharmon on Tue Mar 6 17:55:05 2007:

Heh, marc. Don't forget "Does it run Linux?"

I think we should hold off on attracting new users until the we get the
system to a better state of stability. The last thing I want is for Grex
to go down for a couple of days during a Slashdot article and lose what
chance it might have had.

Also, with that many eyes on Grex how shallow will its security problems
become? For that matter, could Grex handle a slashdotting?



#59 of 84 by tod on Tue Mar 6 18:00:53 2007:

 could Grex handle a slashdotting?

Arbornet did.


#60 of 84 by maus on Tue Mar 6 18:07:07 2007:

Are grex and Arbornet comparable? What is our weakest link? What are our
single point failures? For that matter, what do we do better than others
to attract new visitors? 


#61 of 84 by cross on Tue Mar 6 18:57:09 2007:

Actually, Arbornet (in terms of hardware resources, at least) is significantly
weaker than grex these days.  It runs on a much older system, running an old
version of FreeBSD (though they're upgrading), with much less RAM and much
less hard disc space.


#62 of 84 by cyklone on Tue Mar 6 19:24:35 2007:

Maus should still check out arbornet, even though she'll need a different
username.


#63 of 84 by maus on Tue Mar 6 19:43:31 2007:

Arbornet is the org that runs m-net server? 


#64 of 84 by maus on Tue Mar 6 19:45:59 2007:

Silly question: what is the ratio of horsepower:active_users ? What is
the ratio of horsepower:services_offered? 


#65 of 84 by jep on Tue Mar 6 19:58:54 2007:

Arbornet is the organization which owns and runs M-Net.  You can get to
M-Net by going to:

   http://m-net.arbornet.org


#66 of 84 by tod on Tue Mar 6 20:44:55 2007:

re #64
I'd say the different between M-Net and Grex is nominal.  If any comparison
is to be made, Grex is more robust scientifically.


#67 of 84 by maus on Tue Mar 6 21:29:03 2007:

I would say that a useful metric would actually be those ratios, 
especially if we break the nebulous horsepower into concrete things 
like measurable processing power, available memory, available network 
throughput, &c. How much processing capability *per user* do we have, 
and what would be an acceptable baseline, below which a user does not 
get a nice experience? Same question for available virtual memory per 
user. 

Do we have resource limits in place to make each user play fair, so 
that there is a base amount of resource per user (e.g. if there are 18 
available concurrent ssh sessions, each user might get 5%, leaving one 
session's worth for root and one for the system or something like 
that). 

By how much do we oversubscribe our resources? 


#68 of 84 by tod on Tue Mar 6 22:40:21 2007:

We can't answer that now, Ms.Spock but we know we need to get the Enterprise
into the Slashdot quadrant before the Romulans uncloak.


#69 of 84 by nharmon on Tue Mar 6 23:42:48 2007:

Sorry, Jim. I'm a systems engineer, not a publicist. You simply can't
change the laws of physics.


#70 of 84 by denise on Wed Mar 7 00:25:22 2007:

Hmm, would we get much exposure on the AA [or broader] craigslist page 
in one of their sections?  [A month or two ago, I posted info about a 
group I'm in to the 'group' page and had it sent to the AA as well as 
the Detroit area's list. And I did get some response from it.]  Dunno 
if thhis would work for something like Grex, though.


#71 of 84 by nharmon on Wed Mar 7 00:35:34 2007:

I like that idea Denise! We could do that on a regular basis!


#72 of 84 by cross on Wed Mar 7 03:54:18 2007:

I'd like to see a broader target audience than just the Ann Arbor area,
though.  That said, posting on criagslist is a great idea.  How about some
posts on the Well also?  I imagine that community might be interested in
another Picospan-ish system.


#73 of 84 by krokus on Wed Mar 7 04:11:37 2007:

At least that settles something, maus isn't maus I was thinking of.
I was wondering how Amy got so ComputerGeek savy so fast.  :)


#74 of 84 by tod on Wed Mar 7 23:41:21 2007:

Amy is savy but also wise enough not to spend solar hours on Grex.


#75 of 84 by maus on Thu Mar 8 15:51:16 2007:

This maus is a different small, cute rodent. This maus also demands
offerings of cheese. 


#76 of 84 by cross on Thu Mar 8 16:54:41 2007:

There are too many mice and now I'm just confused.

Will the real Maus please stand up?


#77 of 84 by maus on Thu Mar 8 17:10:25 2007:

I don't know anyone named Amy, but I have been 'maus' on grex for quite
a while (I think late 1990s, maybe 98 or 99). 


#78 of 84 by sholmes on Thu Mar 8 18:05:09 2007:

a maus in da haus !


#79 of 84 by tod on Thu Mar 8 20:35:45 2007:

Not to be confused with chris (mouse)


#80 of 84 by cyklone on Thu Mar 8 20:38:24 2007:

There's plenty of "cheese" on m-net, maus.


#81 of 84 by krokus on Thu Mar 8 21:50:59 2007:

The user known as maus on m-nut is Amy, and has been since, uh... a
long time ago.  :)


#82 of 84 by naftee on Fri Mar 16 18:41:20 2007:

you dream about her at night

dON'T YOU


#83 of 84 by remmers on Tue Mar 20 15:47:33 2007:

Continuing with the ideas of resp:51 - I've begun posting bookmarks on 
del.icio.us to selected Grex items, tagging them with "grex" and other 
tags appropriate to the subject matter of the items.  Thus far, just two 
(though I plan to do more): 

  Item 4 in the web conference (item:web,4).  Tags: grex, microformats,
  semanticweb, web2.0.

  Item 69 in the programming conference (item:jellyware,69).  Tags: 
  grex, programming, goto.

The idea is that a lot of people follow tags on del.icio.us that 
correspond to their interests, either by visiting a page such as
del.icio.us/tag/NAME-OF-TAG or subscribing to the corresponding RSS 
feed. So anyone with an interest in Microformats and following what's 
new on http://del.icio.us/tag/microformats will see the link to the Grex 
item.  If they follow the link, they get to read the item and a notice 
that to respond to it, they need to have an account.  In addition, they 
get other links enabling them to explore Grex further.

I don't know how effective this approach will be in drawing in new 
users, but I have a feeling that doing it enough could bring in some new 
folks.  After all, we have almost sixteen years worth of items here, 
many with quite good discussions, that could be linked to on del.icio.us 
or other public bookmarking sites that are looked at by a lot of 
eyeballs.  Free publicity for Grex, without a lot of work on our part.

Go to http://del.icio.us/jremmers/grex/ to see what I've bookmarked so 
far.


#84 of 84 by eteepell on Sat May 12 20:13:47 2007:

at least we're in wikipedia, search public access unix and we are second after
SDF. (figures).


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: