1 new of 107 responses total.
Even conservatives get blasted by klg. Whew, I was thinking there was something wrong with me! re resp:37: Some of your citations used selective statistics which convey inaccurate impressions. Fastcheck.org: He proudly spoke of "writing a new chapter in the story of self- government" in Iraq and Afghanistan and said the number of democracies in the world is growing. He failed to mention that neither Iraq nor Afghanistan yet qualify as democracies according to the very group whose statistics he cited. Answer: The president didn't say they were democracies. Fastcheck.org: He talked of cutting spending, but only "non-security discretionary spending." Actually, total federal spending has increased 42 percent since Bush took office. Answer: How did "non-security discretionary spending" change? Was there more of it, or less? If you're going to dispute the president onfacts, do so by disputing the facts that he said. FactCheck.org didn't really seem to dispute some of the things the president said, but rather stated it would have been nice if he'd said different things, and then called it "misstatements" that he didn't say what they wish he had said. I agreed with some of the things they said but overall I don't regard these people as having any credibility. They don't seem real committed to any reasonable definition of the word, "fact".
You have several choices: