1 new of 290 responses total.
Re #72: I think most people only watch a handful of channels out of the number available, no matter whether they're technophiles or neo-luddites. But yes, movies and sports are two big things for which many viewers are willing to pay extra for improvements in content and/or video quality (though I do know people who got digital cable just so they could watch BBC America.) I got it mainly so that I could get movies in HD. Channels like QVC would have a negative a la carte price, since they actually pay the cable companies to be carried. I suppose that the Jebus channels could also get carried under similar terms if that's important to them. But, oddly enough, Pat seems to be the only one complaining about it. I haven't heard the homosexuals complain that a la carte pricing would reduce the reach of Bravo and Logo. Re #73: Does that mean DBS isn't a viable solution in southeast Alaska? I know that the terrain is rugged and the satellites would be pretty low in the sky...
You have several choices: