Grex Agora56 Conference

Item 158: South Dakota challenges Roe v Wade

Entered by richard on Tue Mar 7 16:43:30 2006:

1 new of 254 responses total.

#27 of 254 by marcvh on Tue Mar 7 18:22:35 2006:

Thank god, another abortion item!  We haven't had enough of them.  Any,
I've already posted my reasoning for why I think that, if you're going
to be pro-life, you can't permit abortion in the case of rape or incest
unless your real motive is anti-slut.

Re #11: Sounds like you disagree with the fact that this law does allow
the state to commit "infanticide" (which is really embrocide or
fetuscide) in some cases, such as when the mother's life is in danger.
The state also permits infanticide in other cases (for actual infants),
such as separating conjoined twins even if that condemns one of them to
death.  Not sure how you (or other pro-lifers) feel about that.

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: