1 new of 404 responses total.
Re resp:78: So basically, you assume that Clinton would have done anything to protect his personal life, but give Bush the benefit of the doubt by suggesting he might have good reasons for doing what he's done. Your partisanship is showing. Actually, the partisanship and hypocrisy in this whole issue is kind of disgusting. Clinton was subjected to a long, multi-million-dollar fishing expedition by a political party that was desperate to destroy him. No allegation was too minor for them. They investigated a 20 year old failed land deal. They probed his private life. They listened to 140 hours of testimony about his Christmas card list. They conducted a Congressional investigation of his pet cat's fan club. They picked that administration apart, top to bottom, and at the end of it all they could come up with was that he'd gotten a blow job. Now the same party is showing a marked lack of interest in investigating serious allegations of wrongdoing by Bush. The same people who castigated Clinton for getting a blow job are making excuses for our current President. I kind of expected more from the party that claims to represent morality and transparent government.
You have several choices: