1 new of 404 responses total.
Re resp:3: What is there to say about a party that spent more time listening to sworn testimony about Clinton's Christmas card list than about Abu Ghraib? The simple fact is they will look the other way at anything Bush does. If Clinton had been accused of domestic spying, the walls of the Capitol would have been shaken by the sheer force of Republican outrage. In fact, that's exactly what will happen if a Democratic President ever tries to use the expanded executive privileges Bush and Cheney have been trying to carve out for themselves. Re resp:33: I disagree. I think they're fine with democracy as long as God-fearing Christians hold all the levers of power. If you'll allow me a little constructive criticism, richard -- I think you often damage your own arguments by overstating them. I noticed today that some right-wing commentators are trying to weasel out of this one with semantics. Now, apparently, what Bush did wasn't "wiretapping," it was "data mining."
You have several choices: