1 new of 404 responses total.
cross, you wrote, and I quote... "That said, the second amendment is outdated. Hunting rifles and revolvers are not going to contributed to a well-ordered and equiped militia in this day and age. This sort of thing comes from the days where members of the US military supplied their own weapons and uniforms (yes, there was such a "time). This in no way invalidates what the second ammendment was put in for. It isn't there to require you be a member of the militia to own a gun. It is there to make sure you are able to defend yourself and your family from a government gone wild. "It's like this. If you're one of those Ruby Ridge whackos with a bunch of 9mm handguns and some paramilitary camp in the mountains, and they sent me in with my equipment, weapons, and body armor, well...shoot at me all you want, but I guarantee that the bullets will bounce off of me and stick to you." What I am pointing out to you is that your armored vest is not going to stop a .300 remington, nor is your face shield going to stop a .30-06 You are not a tank nor an armored vehicle, and people in this country carry ammo just as big or bigger than anything you carry, and those trained from an early age in how to shoot can probably outshoot most marines. I know I can, because I have done it. And that Ruby ridge wacko was a veteran Green Beret. And we won't get into why you think it is okay for the FBI to shoot a boys dog, shoot the boy in the back killing him, and then have a sharpshooter kill an unarmed woman holding a baby. Houriuchi should have been tried as a criminal, as should the managers of that debacle.
You have several choices: