Grex Agora47 Conference

Item 99: THIS IA A TEST TO SEE IF THAT FATASS SLYNNE HAS EVERYONE IN HER TWIT FILTER

Entered by sabre on Fri Oct 17 20:51:14 2003:

She claimed in the partial birth abortion thread that EVERYONE is in her twit
filter. Therefore the  test
52 responses total.

#1 of 52 by janc on Sat Oct 18 00:45:20 2003:

Oh good grief.  Slynne is probably in the list of top ten people the least
likely to have a twit filter.  Do you believe everything people tell you?


#2 of 52 by sabre on Sat Oct 18 19:20:02 2003:

She made the claim herself.


#3 of 52 by remmers on Sat Oct 18 19:25:26 2003:

She was kidding.


#4 of 52 by mcnally on Sat Oct 18 21:26:37 2003:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 52 by mcnally on Sat Oct 18 21:28:02 2003:

re #0:  In Usenet parlance, I think it goes something like this:  YHBT. HAND.


#6 of 52 by sabre on Sat Oct 18 22:30:20 2003:

I'm kidding too..no one has the skin needed for my sense of humor


#7 of 52 by asddsa on Sun Oct 19 04:28:21 2003:

re 1 janc, do you filter anyone?


#8 of 52 by pvn on Sun Oct 19 08:38:03 2003:

Personally I never understood the reasoning behind "twit filters".  If I
wanted to "twit filter" I wouldn't even log into m-net in the first
place.  I would put my hands over my ears and shout out "I'm not
Listening" at the top of my voice and I would keep an Sharpie(TM) majic
marker on the dash when I drive the car to mark off those part of my
glasses where unpleasant or ignorant things are seen.

I think of it as evolution in action.  Anyone stupid enough to use twit
filters will probably be stupid enough to not be able to successfully
breed (like russ?) and so the trait removes itself from the gene pool
eventually.


#9 of 52 by slynne on Sun Oct 19 17:14:07 2003:

This response has been erased.



#10 of 52 by slynne on Sun Oct 19 17:15:22 2003:

oh, this item is so tantalizingly invisible. I can hardly stand it ;)


#11 of 52 by jaklumen on Sun Oct 19 17:23:04 2003:

resp:8 Everyone's got an opinion.  I still note that you can still 
look at responses with a filter on if you want.  Just takes a little 
more time.


#12 of 52 by sabre on Sun Oct 19 21:55:38 2003:

re#8
True...russ is a total idiot.
re#9 and 10
HaHa..I see you had seconds thoughts on your reponse#9
I know how to read it anyway..nothing is lost on this system...HaHa
Really I mean it. It is still readable. Just look in /h1b/bbs/censored.
WHoop whoop there it IS.
 And if this item is so invisible why are you postong to it? Has all that fat
cut off circulation to your cerebral cortex?

Re#11
Oh..it's ole billy eats muff. Back on my porch..jaklulantern.


#13 of 52 by gelinas on Mon Oct 20 03:18:35 2003:

(The file is /bbs/censored and has been depermitted, per a membership vote
some time back.)


#14 of 52 by janc on Mon Oct 20 03:27:33 2003:

Re 7:  I filter out everyone smarter than me, so that I can maintain the sense
of being the smartest person on Grex.  You'll have noticed that I never
respond to md, remmers, or mcnalley.


#15 of 52 by sabre on Mon Oct 20 06:15:35 2003:

re#13
well........that sucks


#16 of 52 by remmers on Mon Oct 20 16:15:49 2003:

Sorry pvn, but I recently started using a twit filter.  (Obviously,
you're not on it (yet).)  Guess my standing with you just went down
the tubes, eh?  I'll leave it to the smarter Grexers to figure out
who I'm filtering.


#17 of 52 by cross on Mon Oct 20 17:13:02 2003:

This response has been erased.



#18 of 52 by mynxcat on Mon Oct 20 17:25:38 2003:

I m getting tired of sabre. His items are dumb. But, we do have 
interesting spin-offs. 

I don't have a twit-filter, mainly because I'm too lazy to figure out 
how to use one. Also, I believe that scrolling past a response I don't 
want to read works just as fine. Twit filters would come in handy for 
times when a twit has been posting all over agora, and you get excited 
seeing that there are 34 new responses, and you find that they're all 
posted by the twit, and like you've wasted your time following his 
inane postings around. Yeah, I guess a twit filter would be good in 
those cases. But like I said, I'm lazy. And those instances are too 
rare for me to bother.


#19 of 52 by md on Mon Oct 20 17:40:39 2003:

Well, I have to guess that Dr. Remmers is using the twit filter on 
sabre.  Nothing interesting there, so why not blank it out?

There are so many fun ways a person like sabre could disrupt some poor 
bbs he's decided to pick on.  The method he picked -- thumping his 
chest, threatening people, accusing people of being thin-skinned or 
humorless when nobody laughs at his unfunny posts, explaining why 
people ignore him by saying they're intellectually inferior to him, 
yada yada yada -- requires no special skill, and consequently is just 
dull and predictable.  We've seen it lots of times before.  Anybody 
could do it.  Janc could write a bot to do, fer chrissake.  "Egotism is 
the anesthetic for the pain of being stupid."

So, here's the challenge: if you wanted to come to grex or mnet and 
really, really shake things up, how would you do it?


#20 of 52 by tod on Mon Oct 20 17:50:52 2003:

This response has been erased.



#21 of 52 by keesan on Mon Oct 20 18:43:35 2003:

To use a twit filter, type (at the start of a line)  ignore sabre
Next time you log on, all of sabre's responses will appear blank.
Unfortunately if sabre was the last one to post in an item, you still
have to look at that item (as a blank).  If you want to add a name to
your twit filter, you have to type in all the previous names as well
as the new one or you will only filter the new one.  


#22 of 52 by mynxcat on Mon Oct 20 19:32:00 2003:

It seems that the using a twit filter will not solve the only problem 
for which I would want to use the twit-filter. Oh well.

Questioning policy seems to be the most reliable method so far of 
shaking things up on mnet/grex.



#23 of 52 by tod on Mon Oct 20 20:02:06 2003:

This response has been erased.



#24 of 52 by slynne on Mon Oct 20 21:45:16 2003:

resp:19 - Well, one time I tried to make a pseudo that would shake 
things up. I tried to come up with a personality that was about as 
offensive as I could think of. I said all kinds of mean and nasty 
things to folks. And do you know what they did? They LAUGHED at me. Oh 
the horror!


#25 of 52 by cross on Mon Oct 20 22:35:26 2003:

This response has been erased.



#26 of 52 by tod on Tue Oct 21 00:05:45 2003:

This response has been erased.



#27 of 52 by sabre on Tue Oct 21 02:48:34 2003:

re#19
Shut up you remmers puppet. remmers did create your persona after all and you
have the nerve to call me uninteresting. Ha. You are so pathetic that the only
way you can get "respect"(as if that would pay for a cup of coffee) is to ride
on the coattails of an old goat like remmers. remmers has me in twit filter
because he lascks the youthful energy needed to spar with my massive
intelligence. I think mary needs to change the geritol bottle on his IV.She
will...as soon as she gets over her menopausal hot flashes.

re#22 mynxcat..a commie liberal like you thinks the solution to a problem is
to eliminate the voice of everyone who doesn't agree with you.
You are just trying to fit in. I haven't read one post of yours that is
original. You are nothing but a liberal parrot spouting out concepts you don't
even understand....let alone truly believe in. You are one of the admirers
of the king's new clothes...you deon't have the guts to stand up and expose
his nudity. You are swimming..no you're DROWNING in the fallacy of ad
populace. You always will be...because there isn't an original thought in that
pretty,empty head of yours.
I mispelled don't due to fast typing but I will not correct it. Do you kn ow
why? Because when morons like the twits on grex focus on such mundane and
trivial issues they miss the whole point of the argument.
Liberal are all idiots.


#28 of 52 by md on Tue Oct 21 03:21:02 2003:

(And you *still* can't get anybody to take the bait.  Doesn't it just 
make you crazy??)

I don't believe questioning policy is the answer.  There were a couple 
of occasions on Grex when the censored log policy caused a lot of 
people to type a lot of words, but that's about it.  mnet is so mired 
in apathy and fatalism that Jamie (I think it was) could enter a long 
jeremiad and get practically nothing but the usual string of one-liners 
in response.


#29 of 52 by mynxcat on Tue Oct 21 05:13:10 2003:

There was that little incident when I deleted twinkie's posts, and then the
whole non-local board member issue on grex. Ok, not really "shaking up", but
the closests it's come to in years.


#30 of 52 by jp2 on Tue Oct 21 12:44:50 2003:

This response has been erased.



#31 of 52 by gull on Tue Oct 21 14:32:29 2003:

I don't use twit filters on Grex because the twit problem has yet to
reach the magnitude that I think it's necessary.  However, I made
liberal use of my killfile when I read Usenet.


#32 of 52 by tod on Tue Oct 21 15:37:40 2003:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 52 by remmers on Tue Oct 21 15:59:29 2003:

The bat computer is wrong then.


#34 of 52 by tod on Tue Oct 21 16:48:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#35 of 52 by cross on Tue Oct 21 17:25:00 2003:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 52 by tod on Tue Oct 21 17:36:23 2003:

This response has been erased.



#37 of 52 by sabre on Tue Oct 21 17:41:56 2003:

re# 33 and 34
I can proxy from just about anywhere I want. Wingate is in wide use.
You will never believe who I really am.

re#24
most people laugh at fatties.
 re#28
"mnet is so mired 
 in apathy and fatalism that Jamie (I think it was) could enter a long 
 jeremiad and get practically nothing but the usual string of one-liners 
 in response."
Sounds more like GREX to me. m-net ROCKS!

re#19 "revisited"
"
 There are so many fun ways a person like sabre could disrupt some poor 
 bbs he's decided to pick on.  The method he picked -- thumping his 
 chest, threatening people, accusing people of being thin-skinned or 
 humorless when nobody laughs at his unfunny posts, explaining why 
 people ignore him by saying they're intellectually inferior to him, 
 yada yada yada -- requires no special skill, and consequently is just 
 dull and predictable.  We've seen it lots of times before.  Anybody 
 could do it.  Janc could write a bot to do, fer chrissake"
janc could write a bot eh? Is that akin to having remmers form this persona
and then handing it over to you? I could write a bot that mimics every
un-original thought in that parrot brain of yours. In fact it would probally
make more sense. Now for those who don't believe that md is a total fraud type
"j pseudo" and read  remmers confession about the many different accounts he
createddd..in fact I will post it here and you can go there for verification
(just in case remmers goes there and scribble /h1p/bbs/censored..has been
deletede thanks to chicken hearted grexers)
 Here is the scoop..right from the horses mouth(for the phony md's sake)

"
#5 of 34: by John H. Remmers (remmers) on Mon, Oct 14, 1991 (11:39):
 Lately I've been doing a number of pseudos on both M-Net and Grex
 which, now that I've decided not to do pseudos any more, I'm giving
 up.  They've become rather high-profile personalities on those
 systems, so in the interest of continuity I've made arrangments
 for other people to take them over.  Hopefully the new folks
 behind these pseudos will try to maintain consistency,
 but if you notice subtle changes in the writing styles or
 odd lapses of memory on the part of 'griz', 'polygon', 'lk',
 'igor', 'md', 'bad', or 'arthur' -- well, now you know the
 reason."

This of course can be verified by reading the psuedo.cnf yourself.

MD..YOU ARE A FRAUD AND A PHONY!!!!!!


#38 of 52 by mynxcat on Tue Oct 21 17:45:48 2003:

Even if that is true, that was 12 years ago. Enough time for all 
those "pseudos" to come up with personalities of their own.

Is this supposed to be even the slightest bit amusing? You're right, 
mnetters know how to lay on the insults in an entertaining way. Too 
bad you haven't learnt much from there


#39 of 52 by sabre on Tue Oct 21 17:49:03 2003:

mynxcat..are sure you're not a natural blond? You sure are stupid enough to
be one.


#40 of 52 by jp2 on Tue Oct 21 17:49:19 2003:

This response has been erased.



#41 of 52 by mynxcat on Tue Oct 21 18:05:25 2003:

ew... White Castle

And sabre.. is that the best you can do? Lame.


#42 of 52 by happyboy on Tue Oct 21 18:26:23 2003:

mmmmm...sliders!


i always refer to 'the castle as "Whitey's Steakhouse" because
of a nighmare i had once



#43 of 52 by sabre on Tue Oct 21 18:46:03 2003:

er.."lame" ? Now how original is THAT?. I shall name my new parrot mynxcat..in
your honor. It seems thats all you do ..repeat what you hear. Have you EVER
had an original thought?
I laugh when I'm asked that...I am the master of original thought. It is sort
of like called Shaq.."shorty" I realise that. In your case...the question is
salient.
 
#re

Yes someone please give this ugly gopher a sack....to put on his head.



#44 of 52 by gull on Tue Oct 21 19:17:35 2003:

I'll take two jalapeno cheeseburgers with ketchup, a 5-piece cheese
stick, and a large Coke.  Thanks.


#45 of 52 by mynxcat on Tue Oct 21 19:23:44 2003:

He'll just ask you if you want fries with that. 


#46 of 52 by cross on Tue Oct 21 23:08:21 2003:

This response has been erased.



#47 of 52 by asddsa on Wed Oct 22 02:57:32 2003:

lame.


#48 of 52 by sabre on Wed Oct 22 07:34:23 2003:

mynxcat...go back to your daddy's 7-11.
gull..I've told you 100s of times don't block my driveway with the garbage
truck..and put the lids back on the cans please.
we know cross..that's why you work at taco bell.



#49 of 52 by i on Sun Nov 2 22:02:28 2003:

I've never bothered to try twit filters, but i don't try to read all the
stuff in agora either.  My impression is that most of the folks who
enjoy playing twit have interesting things to say at times.  And many of
the folks who usually say interesting things react like Pavlov's dogs to
twitting and spew out time-waster responses.  Ergo, twit flitering seems
a poor algorithm for improving the quality of what i read.


#50 of 52 by jp2 on Sun Nov 2 22:24:37 2003:

This response has been erased.



#51 of 52 by slynne on Sun Nov 2 22:42:28 2003:

resp:49 - Darn it! I am really busy right now otherwise I would spew 
out the biggest time-waster response you've ever seen. Haw Haw. 


#52 of 52 by tsty on Mon Nov 3 09:43:14 2003:

     forget is such a blissful command .... apapthy has its place.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: