Grex Agora47 Conference

Item 4: Grex System Problems - Fall 2003

Entered by i on Wed Sep 24 10:52:23 2003:

This item is for system problems.  If something on Grex isn't working 
right (line noise on a modem, weird behavior from a program, etc.), 
this is the place to announce it.  Except for security holes.  If you 
find a hole in system security, mail information about it to "staff".
291 responses total.

#1 of 291 by dah on Wed Sep 24 11:22:48 2003:

Yup.


#2 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Oct 6 06:11:22 2003:

This isn't a grex "problem", but there being no other item for discussing
grex operations (and this item isn't getting much use): 

I discovered that CAEN (UM engineering computer network) has the option to
read and reply to one's unix box mail via the web. This does not require a
client - any browser will do. The functionality is quite limited, though: 
for example, one cannot use one's addressbook (but can create a new one). 
The mode has some other awkward properties - but for logging in to read
and reply to one's mail when one is travelling and has access only to the
web (not telnet) it is quite useful.

Could grex implement a similar mode?


#3 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Oct 6 07:16:37 2003:

This has been discussed before and rejected.  The argument against is that
grex's primary mission involves getting people into the conferences.  A
web-based mail client (also POP and IMAP) would remove an incentive (and
opportunity) to discover the conferences.


#4 of 291 by gull on Mon Oct 6 12:58:38 2003:

Free web-based email sites tend to be popular, as well...possibly too
popular for our connection and hardware to handle.  I suspect it's
unlikely web-based email would attract enough new paying members to pay
for the upgrades that would be necessary.


#5 of 291 by jp2 on Mon Oct 6 13:01:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#6 of 291 by goose on Mon Oct 6 13:04:47 2003:

This could be a nice feature to offer members.


#7 of 291 by scott on Mon Oct 6 13:08:30 2003:

Except that we don't offer special privileges to members.  The only exception
is outgoing internet, and that's because of the validation issue.


#8 of 291 by goose on Mon Oct 6 16:04:18 2003:

Oh well, it could make a nice incentive.


#9 of 291 by cmcgee on Mon Oct 6 16:34:47 2003:

as much as I'd like web-based email, I'd rather not start creating incentives,
priveleges, etc for members.


#10 of 291 by remmers on Mon Oct 6 16:41:38 2003:

I agree.


#11 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Oct 6 19:58:02 2003:

I brought it up because I'd like to be able to access my e-mail on grex
when I am travelling. Telnet capability seems to be disappearing from
publically accessed computers (the one I tried was at WMU). I'm  not seeking
special privileges as a member - just remote e-mail access. 

At one site I was able to download and install a telnet client on a
public computer, but this capability seems also to be becoming rarer:
I think more public sites don't want their users running telnet. 

This doesn't seem "fair". 

What really is the difference between accessing e-mail on grex via
a telnet client vs via a browser? (Especially if the browwser access is
as lame as the one on CAEN, at which one cannot access much e-mail
functionality - at CAEN, in addition to not having access to the
addressbook, one also cannot delete mail from the inbox.)


#12 of 291 by cross on Mon Oct 6 20:24:36 2003:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Oct 6 20:40:22 2003:

Did you install it? I've only done that on Apple computers, for which I
am familiar with telnet clients (and installing such).  


#14 of 291 by cmcgee on Mon Oct 6 20:46:28 2003:

you could always create a .forward file to hotmail while you are traveling.


#15 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Oct 6 20:57:09 2003:

That's  a thought - I could do the same thing to my CAEN account. Now,
why didn't I think of that.....(probably because I've not used the
.forward function on grex for a long time, and it slipped from my mind). 


#16 of 291 by aruba on Mon Oct 6 21:02:44 2003:

Rane - the arguments against allowing web access to email are

1) Grex doesn't want to compete with HotMail, and we're afraid if we
offered web-accessable mail, we'd be swamped. 

2) Grex would like to be a community, where people come to interact with
people, and not just a mail drop.  So we require people to log in to get
their mail, in the hopes that they will decide to look around and get
involved.


#17 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Oct 6 21:22:07 2003:

Am I a problem in that regard?    8^}

Grex hasn't tried (lame) e-mail access by web, so you  don't know what
the consequences would be. 


#18 of 291 by aruba on Mon Oct 6 21:27:18 2003:

No, it's nothing personal, Rane.  But I think if we just gave access to you,
and no one else, that would be a little unfair. :)


#19 of 291 by cross on Mon Oct 6 21:57:46 2003:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 291 by tpryan on Mon Oct 6 23:14:50 2003:

        Another solution would be to carry one of those jump drives
in your pocket that would have a USB interface and your choice of
software on it.  Then plug in and run your software on the public
machines (install it to the jump drive and that way you take it 
with you).



#21 of 291 by mcnally on Mon Oct 6 23:17:07 2003:

 re #12, 13, 19:  Rane probably missed the fact that you were talking about
 a Java applet that loads from a web server and runs in the browser.  

 On machines which are locked down to disallow the system telnet app but not
 so locked down to prevent running applets, Java ssh and telnet client applets
 are a boon to those of us who prefer our e-mail the old-fashioned way.


#22 of 291 by mcnally on Mon Oct 6 23:18:06 2003:

  re #20:  machines where the system telnet app is locked out almost never
  allow you to install your own applications or run them from removable media.


#23 of 291 by drew on Tue Oct 7 00:01:45 2003:

I just switched over to the Yale Java ssh applet. It gave me a bunch of stuff
about "do you want to install stuff on this machine" which I answered yes,
but chickened out and said No when it wanted to create a directory. It's
running anyway, though I got some wierd "File functions disabled" message.

Most Lib machines seem to have Java and JS turned on; there are ample pop-up
ads to testify to this. This might be a feasible option, and with password
security as a bonus.


#24 of 291 by rcurl on Tue Oct 7 05:55:09 2003:

I've only run applets from web sites, so I don't  quite know what is
being talked about. For the dummies here (like me), what does one do
to get telnet access with an applet on a public machine?


#25 of 291 by mcnally on Tue Oct 7 06:27:05 2003:

  You go to the web site with the applet and the applet loads and runs
  on the JVM already installed on the machine and most likely displays
  in the browser.

  It's somewhat more complicated than this, but you can think of an applet
  as a specially restricted type of Java program.  Unlike a Java application,
  applets have some substantial restriction on the types of things that they
  can do -- they can only open certain kinds of windows, can only open net
  connections according to certain rules, etc.  The trade-off you get in
  exchange for these restrictions is that an applet is allowed to run in
  most Java-capable web browsers.



#26 of 291 by gull on Tue Oct 7 13:11:38 2003:

How does the Yale SSH applet get around the Java security model that
only allows connections back to the machine that the applet was served
from?  Are they also doing port forwarding?


#27 of 291 by cross on Tue Oct 7 14:12:57 2003:

This response has been erased.



#28 of 291 by rcurl on Tue Oct 7 16:13:27 2003:

Where is a website that provides an applet for making a telnet connection
from a browser?


#29 of 291 by tod on Tue Oct 7 17:03:47 2003:

This response has been erased.



#30 of 291 by other on Tue Oct 7 17:20:03 2003:

What use is that?  It won't let you telnet to another host, even if you 
login to mnet first.


#31 of 291 by jp2 on Tue Oct 7 17:31:39 2003:

This response has been erased.



#32 of 291 by aruba on Tue Oct 7 18:06:02 2003:

Rane: cross gave the address http://www.yale.edu/ssh/ in #12.


#33 of 291 by rcurl on Tue Oct 7 19:43:19 2003:

Unfortuneately, I can't test it from here as "This applet also does not
function on Macintosh computers.". However I will make note of it for
the next time I seek to use a PC while traveling (after first trying
telnet://....).

Is there a version somewhere for Macs?


#34 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Oct 7 22:21:37 2003:

"Due to differences in Java security implementations on the Macintosh, the
Yale-signed web-based SSH applet will not work on a Macintosh."


#35 of 291 by mcnally on Tue Oct 7 22:47:49 2003:

  That's what I love about Java.  It really lives up to the promise of
  "write once, run everywhere.."


#36 of 291 by remmers on Tue Oct 7 23:13:31 2003:

Should be revised to "Write once, run most places maybe if you're lucky"?


#37 of 291 by cross on Tue Oct 7 23:54:13 2003:

This response has been erased.



#38 of 291 by gull on Wed Oct 8 13:46:25 2003:

Re #31: I think that's an excellent idea.  (In the mean time, someone
who wanted to use it could *probably* just install it in their own
public_html directory, I imagine.)


#39 of 291 by asddsa on Wed Oct 8 23:22:47 2003:

re 33
Who the hell taught you to spell words like "Unfortuneately" ??


#40 of 291 by rcurl on Thu Oct 9 06:04:06 2003:

What's an extra e among friends?


#41 of 291 by mcnally on Thu Oct 9 07:26:02 2003:

 frieends.


#42 of 291 by tsty on Thu Oct 9 08:39:29 2003:

friendes


#43 of 291 by gull on Thu Oct 9 13:43:01 2003:

Just don't leave out the 'r'.


#44 of 291 by jhudson on Thu Oct 9 14:41:45 2003:

I would agree to put it in my home dir, but I think we are not supposed 
to upload java applets there.


#45 of 291 by jhudson on Thu Oct 9 14:42:22 2003:

Oops, meant html dir


#46 of 291 by remmers on Thu Oct 9 15:25:27 2003:

Can't recall if there's a policy on applets.  They run on the
user's browser and hence don't strain Grex's processing resources.

A concern with posting graphic images - which *is* against policy
- is that they tend to be large and therefore would excessively
tax Grex's limited network bandwidth as hundreds or thousands of
internet users download them, especially if they are inline images
on someone's web page and hence downloaded automatically as people
access the web page.  Applets on the other hand tend to be an
order of magnitude smaller than images and are invoked only at the
user's request.  So as long as there are no copyright issues with the
applet, I don't see that the same rationale applies as for images.

Do any other staffers recall if we have a policy on applets?


#47 of 291 by keesan on Thu Oct 9 16:03:30 2003:

My image (not inline) was 8K gif (small).


#48 of 291 by cross on Thu Oct 9 16:09:40 2003:

This response has been erased.



#49 of 291 by remmers on Thu Oct 9 23:03:39 2003:

That was my point, expressed better than I expressed it.

There is a 1mb limit on disk usage that one shouldn't exceed.


#50 of 291 by gelinas on Fri Oct 10 04:53:59 2003:

(Sindi, you (should) know that staff can't be put into the position of saying,
"Yes, that one is all right, but no, this one is not."  Explanations are never
satisfactory.  A blanket ban really does work better.)


#51 of 291 by keesan on Fri Oct 10 10:41:55 2003:

I was not complaining, just pointing out that images can be small and not
waste a lot of bandwidth.


#52 of 291 by janc on Sat Oct 11 13:13:40 2003:

We should put up a telnet and/or ssh applet for connecting to Grex on
Grex's web site.  It's something I've been meaning to do for years, but
haven't gotten around to.


#53 of 291 by asddsa on Sat Oct 11 17:47:36 2003:

Then, by all means, please do so.


#54 of 291 by cmcgee on Sun Oct 12 01:27:16 2003:

would that allow me to go to the web page, then click on the applet, then come
in and do everything I'm used to doing?


#55 of 291 by mcnally on Sun Oct 12 01:34:36 2003:

  That would be the idea, yes..


#56 of 291 by malymi on Sun Oct 12 09:43:22 2003:

http://3sp.com/products/sshtools/sshterm/sshterm.php


#57 of 291 by other on Sun Oct 12 09:56:50 2003:

webpage doesn't work in netscape (on macintosh).
applet doesn't work in explorer (on macintosh).

last, applet runs ssh2, which grex doesn't have yet.


#58 of 291 by malymi on Sun Oct 12 12:35:04 2003:

well, it's not my web site, though i see nothing in it that should
be a problem for a macintosh -- i'm reading it with a text mode
browser.

as for functionality -- oh well, that's the breaks.  perhaps mindterm or
jta will work better for you.  i've got them installed in my web space here
<http://www.grex.org/~malymi/>, temporarily.  but as grex is a tad slow
and the mindterm jar is signed i've also got it installed elsewhere, at
<http://malymi.multics.org/mindterm-applet.html>.  (since the jta jar is
not signed you can only connect back to the server from which it was
loaded so you must get it from grex.)  original url's for the fearful /
security minded / curious are <http://www.isnetworks.net/ssh/index.html>
and <http://www.mud.de/se/jta/>.


#59 of 291 by rcurl on Sun Oct 12 14:21:58 2003:

"Applet failed to load from URL" (on Mac G4 running OS 9.2.2 and Netscape 7).


#60 of 291 by other on Sun Oct 12 16:04:40 2003:

mindterm:
Netscape Communications Corporation -- Java 1.1.5
Type '?' for options.
Symantec Java! ByteCode Compiler Copyright (C) 1996-97 Symantec 
Corporation
# Error: The certificate issuer for this server is not recognized by 
Netscape. The security certificate may or may not be valid.
Netscape refuses to connect to this server. (-1987)
#       jar file: /The Source/Temporary Items/jzip1
#       path:     /The Source/Temporary Items/jzip1
# Error: loading of signatures has failed (-1)
#       jar file: /The Source/Temporary Items/jzip1
#       path:     /~malymi/
# Verifier error mindbright/application/MindTerm.initGUI()V: Cannot find 
class java/awt/event/WindowListener
# Applet exception: class mindbright/application/MindTerm got a security 
violation: method verification error
java.lang.VerifyError: mindbright/application/MindTerm
  at java.lang.ClassLoader.resolveClass(Compiled Code)
  at netscape.applet.AppletClassLoader.loadClass1(Compiled Code)
* at netscape.applet.AppletClassLoader.loadClass(Compiled Code)
  at netscape.applet.AppletClassLoader.loadClass(Compiled Code)
  at netscape.applet.DerivedAppletFrame.run(Compiled Code)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Compiled Code)


#61 of 291 by other on Sun Oct 12 16:06:08 2003:

jta:
# Verifier error de/mud/jta/Applet.init()V: Cannot find class java/awt/
event/ActionListener
# Applet exception: class de/mud/jta/Applet got a security violation: 
method verification error
java.lang.VerifyError: de/mud/jta/Applet
  at java.lang.ClassLoader.resolveClass(Compiled Code)
  at netscape.applet.AppletClassLoader.loadClass1(Compiled Code)
* at netscape.applet.AppletClassLoader.loadClass(Compiled Code)
  at netscape.applet.AppletClassLoader.loadClass(Compiled Code)
  at netscape.applet.DerivedAppletFrame.run(Compiled Code)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Compiled Code)


#62 of 291 by malymi on Sun Oct 12 20:19:42 2003:

those are security issues.  further checking of the isnetworks archive
finds this problem described in an example html file, thusly:

[converted to plain text]
| Netscape will not accept the signed applet unless you trust the
| ISNetworks Root CA.  You can install that certificate by clicking here
| if this web server has the .cacert MIME type mapped to
| application/x-x509-ca-cert or from ISNetworks' site.  You'll need to
| trust the cert for signing software and then restart Netscape for the
| permissions to take effect.

[the cacert file is not in fact available from my web space, since the 
appropriate extension mapping is not set on grex.]

similar for msie.  and probably any other java enabled browser.  it
worked for me after a security dialog was presented and i accepted,
using mozilla 1.2.1 and sun java 1.4.2_01.

worse, i first learned of the mindterm applet elsewhere, and i see they
have bleak words to confirm what you've already found:

| Note that there are version requirements on the web browsers you can use
| with this applet.  This applet also does not function on Macintosh
| computers.  If your web browser is too old to use this applet, download
| a newer browser from Netscape or Microsoft.


oddly, while the jta applet isn't signed it shouldn't have any security
issues as it only connects to the originating site.


oh well, this experiment was a dismal failure.


#63 of 291 by jep on Tue Oct 14 21:03:23 2003:

Grex was either down or off the Internet (both WWW and telnet) from 
yesterday sometime maybe in the late morning until today sometime, 
maybe in the early afternoon.  Could someone please explain what 
happened?

Thanks!


#64 of 291 by davel on Wed Oct 15 00:25:53 2003:

I'm curious, too.  Since dialins connected to the terminal server, got the
this-may-take-a-while message, and disconnected in approximately 10 seconds,
I'd say Grex was likely totally down.  Didn't realize it was so long, though.


#65 of 291 by gelinas on Wed Oct 15 02:19:08 2003:

Grex was down.  STeve rebooted it on his way to work this morning.


#66 of 291 by charcat on Wed Oct 15 07:05:39 2003:

I again tip my hat to the fixers and keepers of grex


#67 of 291 by tsty on Fri Oct 17 07:08:11 2003:

  http://3sp.com/products/sshtools/sshterm/sshterm.php
  
werkx on xp home, netscrape 7.x, jave enabled (oops)


#68 of 291 by sholmes on Sat Oct 18 02:30:05 2003:

I got this while I was in party 
Received disconnect from 216.93.104.34: Command terminated on signal 9.


#69 of 291 by cmcgee on Sat Oct 25 12:57:41 2003:

Is it true that the fourn dial-in numbers now have to be dialed separately
if 3000 is busy?  I tried it and it worked, but was that coincidence (all four
lines really were busy, and someone ended just as I called the second number)?


#70 of 291 by tpryan on Sat Oct 25 15:08:06 2003:

        Same here.  3000 was busy, 3554 was disconnected, 3451 connected.
What happened to the truck hunt, and when was the disconnected phones
put into an agora item 3?


#71 of 291 by aruba on Sat Oct 25 15:56:40 2003:

We dropped to 4 lines on Wednesday.  We're supposed to have a trunk hunt on
them - if it's not working, that's something I can call Ameritech about. 
I'll try to check that.


#72 of 291 by aruba on Sat Oct 25 16:00:50 2003:

I just checked, and it looks like Colleen and Tim are correct that there is
currently no hunt on the lines.  I will call Ameritech about it, but I don't
know if I can get any action before Monday.  In the meantime, dialing each
line (3000, 5041, 3411, 3451) individually works.


#73 of 291 by gull on Sat Oct 25 22:36:59 2003:

When I try to telnet or ssh to Grex, I get 'connection refused'.  I'm on
dialin right now.


#74 of 291 by gelinas on Sat Oct 25 22:56:29 2003:

Grex was down for backups.  It came back online about one minute before your
response.  Which means that you wouldn't have been able to dial in, either,
a minute (or so ;) earlier.


#75 of 291 by gull on Sat Oct 25 23:00:01 2003:

Heh.  What a coincidence!


#76 of 291 by keesan on Sat Oct 25 23:35:27 2003:

Is there any progress on getting grex some working faster modems?


#77 of 291 by glenda on Sat Oct 25 23:39:53 2003:

I think that getting NextGrex up and running is more important for staff to
work on, than trying to upgrade equipment on the old Grex.


#78 of 291 by bhoward on Sun Oct 26 01:10:22 2003:

I agree, Glenda.


#79 of 291 by cross on Sun Oct 26 01:59:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#80 of 291 by gull on Sun Oct 26 03:23:43 2003:

Are there dialin-quality USB modems?  I've found out the hard way that a
typical consumer modem does not do well in dial-in service.


#81 of 291 by mcnally on Sun Oct 26 03:30:39 2003:

  Other than reduced power consumption what would be the advantage
  to spending money on new hardware to replace stuff that's still
  working and already functional?  I'm sure I'm biased here, as USB
  modems just sound like an awful idea to me, but I can't in any
  case see the real advantage.


#82 of 291 by cross on Sun Oct 26 05:00:19 2003:

This response has been erased.



#83 of 291 by rcurl on Sun Oct 26 06:30:54 2003:

My incoming mail is now running 75% to 80% spam - and very repetitious
spam at that. I dutifully forward the spam to uce. Will this situation
improve - that is, will be able to filter spam conveniently?


#84 of 291 by cross on Sun Oct 26 06:42:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#85 of 291 by mcnally on Sun Oct 26 09:38:13 2003:

  I'm currently in the middle of preparing spamassassin to roll out
  for the ~4000 customers at the ISP I've recently begun working for.
  I've had good results with it personally so far -- it's remarkably
  good at catching spam and has a very low false positive rate so far..
  Given the size of Grex's user base and all the other demands on the
  hardware, it might be too resource intensive for Grex to use sitewide,
  however.  I'd say it's worth looking into.



#86 of 291 by tod on Sun Oct 26 12:27:33 2003:

This response has been erased.



#87 of 291 by gull on Sun Oct 26 20:45:54 2003:

Re #82: My experience is with US Robotics Sportster modems.  They work 
great for dial-out, but on dial-in seem to have reliability and 
compatibility problems.  We were using one for dial-in service at work, 
and I had all kinds of problems with it hanging in the middle of the 
handshaking phase while talking to certian other brands of modem until I 
replaced it with a Courier.  This suggested to me that there are 
definate design differences between the average consumer modem and ones 
intended for dial-in service.


#88 of 291 by cross on Sun Oct 26 21:15:06 2003:

This response has been erased.



#89 of 291 by munkey on Wed Oct 29 07:11:00 2003:

I just joined this item and read about SSH java client. I have been using
Mindterm ssh client for some time now. One day I tried telnetting from school
and it wouldn't allow it anymore! So  I was desperate cus I had to Grex ;)
and so I found Mindterm. I get the same errors as Drew gets, it asks me to
create a directory, I say no and then it lets me telnet anyway. I was thinking
I could install Mindterm on www.grexergallery.net . I'll look into it.


#90 of 291 by dpc on Wed Oct 29 14:25:26 2003:

Just now I tried to check my mail.  Here is what happened:

Ok: !mail

/tmp: write failed, file system is full
/tmp: No space left on device


#91 of 291 by gelinas on Wed Oct 29 18:23:03 2003:

(/tmp is down to 85% now.)


#92 of 291 by nafteee on Sat Nov 1 05:05:41 2003:

My account got splatted for no reason, I would like it back please.

asddsa@grex.org's password:
Permission denied, please try again.
asddsa@grex.org's password:
Permission denied, please try again.
asddsa@grex.org's password:
Permission denied.


#93 of 291 by cross on Sat Nov 1 05:49:48 2003:

This response has been erased.



#94 of 291 by dsaasd on Sat Nov 1 05:59:36 2003:

You have a stupid way of proving how stupid you really are.


#95 of 291 by dsaasd on Sat Nov 1 06:04:25 2003:

cross; Give me one good reason why my account was splatted, or the fact that
I'm currently  banned.


#96 of 291 by cross on Sat Nov 1 06:26:24 2003:

This response has been erased.



#97 of 291 by cross on Sat Nov 1 06:27:07 2003:

This response has been erased.



#98 of 291 by keesan on Sat Nov 1 09:33:57 2003:

Polite people don't log in with a different login every time, which makes it
more laborious to filter them out.  But they already know that.


#99 of 291 by mcnally on Sat Nov 1 09:55:35 2003:

  Given that we have open newuser on this system, is there any practical
  effect, other than to satisfy a personal sense of spitefulness,
  of disabling an account?


#100 of 291 by bhoward on Sat Nov 1 13:33:38 2003:

Yep.  Raising the incremental cost of creating BS accounts for one.



#101 of 291 by goose on Sat Nov 1 13:50:50 2003:

I can ssh or telnet to www.grex.org and get a login prompt, but just grex.org
gets me nowhere.


#102 of 291 by gelinas on Sat Nov 1 18:01:18 2003:

I _can_ ssh to grex.org.  Both grex.org and www.grex.org get to the same IP
address, that of grex.cyberspace.org.


#103 of 291 by tpryan on Sat Nov 1 18:14:11 2003:

re 99:  Loss of personality.  It has transformed some people in order
to get their personality account back.
        disabiling an account should be total disable.  No reading of 
the old account by a newuser.  Makes one need to again write or upload
scritps, etc.


#104 of 291 by gelinas on Sat Nov 1 18:59:05 2003:

The staff command "lockuser" depermits the files as well disabling logging
in.

Locking an account is of varying utility.  Some times, it's a "throw-away,"
and the locked out user never comes back.  Other times, the locked out
user didn't realise they were causing problems, so their asking for the
account back is an opportunity to inform and educate.  And still other
times, stronger measures are required.


#105 of 291 by soup on Sat Nov 1 23:07:23 2003:

re 97 Your actions can hardly make someone less angry at you.


#106 of 291 by salad on Mon Nov 3 22:28:35 2003:

GreX is dying!

last pid: 18774;  load averages:  8.46,  8.03,  7.18                           
         17:27:06 185 processes: 179 sleeping, 5 running, 1 stopped CPU states:
15.0% user,  2.5% nice, 27.5% system, 24.4% idle, 30.5% spin Memory: 234M
available, 162M in use, 72M free, 7520K locked

  PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE   TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
16819 debayan1  83    0 2352K 1756K run/3   0:57 35.20% 35.16% lynx284
13284 root     102   19 2832K 2220K run/3  32.0H 23.86% 23.83% perl
18370 zickal    70    0 3380K 3668K run/0   0:14  6.26%  6.25% top
18229 gillu      3    0 2468K 1536K sleep   0:12  8.59%  5.86% lynx284
18767 nobody    57    0  340K  512K run/2   0:01 32.39%  4.69% backtalk
 6991 root       1    0   19M   19M sleep 646:12  3.13%  3.12% named
18155 gef        3    0 2196K  320K sleep   0:09  6.27%  2.73% pine
15369 samovolk   1    0  932K  948K sleep   1:18  2.35%  2.34% bash
18775 root       3    0  140K  236K sleep   0:00 30.77%  1.56% idled
17643 mirchi     1    0 2536K 1688K sleep   0:26  1.57%  1.56% lynx284



#107 of 291 by glenda on Tue Nov 4 03:03:00 2003:

I wouldn't say that listing is an indication of Grex dying.  It looks to me
like an indication of most people either on the drive home from work or going
out to dinner.


#108 of 291 by keesan on Tue Nov 4 03:07:04 2003:

Or maybe cooking and eating dinner.


#109 of 291 by glenda on Tue Nov 4 03:20:21 2003:

True, I keep forgetting that it is normal to have a fully working kitchen.
One of these days I will have one again.


#110 of 291 by bhoward on Tue Nov 4 05:35:30 2003:

How does re#106 indicate that the system is dying?  Do you think the
system is too busy or not busy enough?

Or something else?


#111 of 291 by salad on Tue Nov 4 17:06:02 2003:

It's a solemn indication of what to come.



#112 of 291 by tpryan on Thu Nov 6 18:41:53 2003:

        Lunch is on the dinning room table.  So is Grex.  I tend to
Grex at meal time.


#113 of 291 by cross on Thu Nov 6 20:22:32 2003:

This response has been erased.



#114 of 291 by keesan on Sun Nov 9 03:55:14 2003:

I cannot dial in - grex does not answer.  Had to telnet, which works.
I don't get no carrier, just a blank screen, when I dial.  Please fix.


#115 of 291 by gelinas on Sun Nov 9 04:11:28 2003:

(I'm guessing a visit to the Pumpkin will be necessary, which I can't do right
now.)


#116 of 291 by keesan on Sun Nov 9 04:15:49 2003:

I was dialing in on 5041, in case that matters.  Thanks for planning the visit
eventually.  Is there any progress yet on finding some replacement modems that
come with instructions?


#117 of 291 by glenda on Sun Nov 9 06:06:50 2003:

How many times do we have to tell you that getting NextGrex up and running
comes before replacing anything.  Why bother replacing obsolete equipment on
an obsolete box that is going to be retired in a short while.  We are having
enough trouble getting staff time to work on NextGrex and you want to pull
them away to waste time updating outmoded technology on a box that will only
be running for another 3 months or so.  Wait until the new box is online an
stable.  Or upgrade yourself into, at least the late 20th century.


#118 of 291 by twenex on Sun Nov 9 08:20:42 2003:

Feel the anger.
Be cool, dude.
Glenda the Plan9 bunny? ;-P


#119 of 291 by keesan on Sun Nov 9 15:31:18 2003:

I asked about modems because I think it was gelinas who had a lead on a set
of faster used modems.  I forget what happened about this.  My modems are
faster than what grex is using.  And I do think it would be helpful to have
more reliably working modems even for this grex.  I hate telnetting and a
number of grexers are not paying for at home ISP service and can't even telnet
during emergencies like this.  Can't modems be transferred between computers
if they can be made to work on teh current one?


#120 of 291 by cross on Sun Nov 9 16:27:31 2003:

This response has been erased.



#121 of 291 by aruba on Sun Nov 9 17:21:55 2003:

We don't have a ton of money.  But I agree we should look into the cost of
4 new/better modems.  The staff was very insistent at one time that the
modems all have hardware jumpers to make it impossible for them to dial out,
and that was hard to find in new modems.


#122 of 291 by tpryan on Sun Nov 9 18:13:16 2003:

        I thought the Purchase Order was supposed to have been 
written by last Jan 30 for NextGrex equipment.  Has that been
done yet?  


#123 of 291 by aruba on Sun Nov 9 18:43:36 2003:

All the NextGrex equipment was bought by May of this year, and is now
running at the Wolter-Mates house.


#124 of 291 by cross on Sun Nov 9 18:49:26 2003:

This response has been erased.



#125 of 291 by goose on Sun Nov 9 18:52:48 2003:

I'm not complaining about the volunteer staff, but sheesh, what is taking
NextGrex so long to put together?


#126 of 291 by jep on Sun Nov 9 20:08:18 2003:

I asked that question in the coop conference on October 17.  That led 
to cross (who's on the staff) speculating the staff should set a goal 
of 3 months.  He seems to be assuming they have set such a goal, from 
which I gather they've discussed it, and I hope they've even got 
consensus on it.  There has been no announcement, or discussion other 
than what cross has said, as far as I've discerned.  I lack confidence 
that cross represents the staff and their commitment to the project.


#127 of 291 by davel on Sun Nov 9 20:20:09 2003:

I saw the same behavior keesan reported in #114 - modem connected and then
just sat there.  Mine also was on 5041.  I can't telnet in, so I tried 3000,
and it let me in.  Since there was no "this will take a few seconds" message,
I suspect the termserver port.


#128 of 291 by tpryan on Sun Nov 9 22:41:36 2003:

        ditto


#129 of 291 by tpryan on Sun Nov 9 22:45:03 2003:

        I think the question I wanted to ask was:
"Is NextGrex coming together at such a pace, that all voluneteers 
are needed simultaniously to put it together?".  
        It is only being put together when the committee can all
be present to work on it?


#130 of 291 by remmers on Sun Nov 9 23:22:40 2003:

The hardware is all assembled and working, and has been for some time.
The machine is on the internet.  Staff can log in remotely and work
individually.

There's been extensive discussion of NextGrex in the Coop conference.
Read Item 11 if you're curious about the status.  It's a long item --
recent discussion starts at resp:434.


#131 of 291 by cross on Mon Nov 10 00:19:47 2003:

This response has been erased.



#132 of 291 by keesan on Mon Nov 10 01:08:42 2003:

Thanks davel, I will try 3000 next time.  I had assumed the trunk hunt would
at least work.  


#133 of 291 by goose on Mon Nov 10 01:53:33 2003:

Wow...the hardware was purchased in May and is not yet "Grex"?  At this pace
it will be outdated before any of us mortals use it.  I'll look at the current
discussion in Coop, thanks John.

For a computer group, Grex moves r-e-a-l-l-y s--l--o--w.....


#134 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Nov 10 02:32:40 2003:

I stopped by the Pumpkin, but then realised I didn't have enough
information.  I could, and did, at least disable the unworking modem,
so 5041 will currently ring open.  I'll get the information I need and
stop back by the Pumpkin later this evening.


#135 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Nov 10 04:19:12 2003:

I've now put a different modem (and thus terminal port) on 5041.
Please report here if problems continue.

FWIW, there is a note in the Pumpkin indicating the hunt order as of 
12 Aug 1997.  The numbers from that list that are still active, in order
of appearance, are:

        761-3000
        761-3411
        761-3451
        761-5041


#136 of 291 by aruba on Mon Nov 10 04:32:05 2003:

The order they hunt in now should be 3000, 5041, 3411, 3451.


#137 of 291 by aruba on Mon Nov 10 15:19:28 2003:

The load average was up around 50 a few minutes ago.  Haven't seen Grex that
slow in a while.


#138 of 291 by keesan on Mon Nov 10 16:20:29 2003:

I just dialed in on 3000.  First try did not connect, had to redial.

I would be willing to wait a bit longer for the next grex if it could
including more reliable modems.


#139 of 291 by bhoward on Mon Nov 10 23:03:02 2003:

Not me.  Perhaps it is just the times-of-day when I sign into grex but
regularly encounter spikes of "slowness" that bring my conference buffer
editing sessions to a crawl.

I'm willing to queue up to get into the system but once in, I'd like to be
able to interact and respond at some approximation of normal typing speed.


#140 of 291 by pvn on Tue Nov 11 08:33:00 2003:

Yo, bro!  #3 son is headed to Iraq as the 25th Infantry is headed there
and he's part of the 'round out' from the NG.  Call mom on account she's
pissed as she thought he'd only been on alert for N. Korea.  You guys
don't call enough, and what, you never heard of email or what?

Hmm, May was it.  Dual motherboard with SATA is pretty common now.
Are we suggesting that 'new' hardware is obsolete and more expensive
before it was even deployed?






#141 of 291 by tsty on Tue Nov 11 09:30:01 2003:

/emote salutes son #3!
  
good luck and godspeed!


#142 of 291 by naftee on Tue Nov 11 16:54:06 2003:

/d is full

/dev/sd7g            1971009 1773872      37   100%    /d  


#143 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Nov 11 21:12:02 2003:

Thanks for the report; I'm working on it.


#144 of 291 by tod on Tue Nov 11 21:22:39 2003:

This response has been erased.



#145 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Nov 11 21:28:15 2003:

I made some progress, but I have to stop now. /d is at about 98%.


#146 of 291 by gull on Tue Nov 11 21:31:38 2003:

Minor nagging problem: The logo for the Co-op conference home page in 
Backtalk has been broken for a while now.


#147 of 291 by naftee on Tue Nov 11 22:44:28 2003:

re 145 Thanks!


#148 of 291 by russ on Sun Nov 16 16:38:01 2003:

Despite the fact that a number of good, full-speed-capable
modems were just freed up, at least one of the modems near
the top of the trunk hunt is stuck at the miserable transfer
speed of perhaps 610 bytes/sec when Grex can do at least 1300.


#149 of 291 by keesan on Sun Nov 16 16:46:22 2003:

I got disconnected when I dialed 5041, but that happens often, especially when
writing emails with Pine.  At this point I would choose faster and more
reliable modems over getting newgrex online sooner.


#150 of 291 by tpryan on Sun Nov 16 18:21:31 2003:

        Why would modem replacement take more than taking the
two disconnected and replaceing the first two in the trunk hunt?
THEN IF problem persists.  Swap those two for the last two.  Is 
that more than a 22 minute visit at the pumpkin?


#151 of 291 by keesan on Sun Nov 16 18:34:16 2003:

There has already been lots of modem swapping and half of the time it just
makes things worse.  These modems are not reliable.


#152 of 291 by gelinas on Sun Nov 16 19:27:42 2003:

So far as I know, there has been no swapping of modems in recent memory.

The next time I'm out, I'll swap in a couple of the recently retired modems.


#153 of 291 by keesan on Sun Nov 16 20:36:34 2003:

Scott swapped modems not too long ago and what he put in was worse, I don't
recall exactly how.


#154 of 291 by tsty on Tue Nov 18 07:00:01 2003:

nto a happy sight ...
 
 df
Filesystem            kbytes    used   avail capacity  Mounted on
/dev/sd0a             109823   76941   21900    78%    /
/dev/sd0d             156783  137446    3659    97%    /usr
/dev/sd6h            1971009 1804600       0   102%    /usr/local
/dev/sd0e             706783  354791  281314    56%    /bbs
/dev/sd0f             471183  450069       0   106%    /x
/dev/sd6g            1969885 1219140  553757    69%    /var
/dev/sd3h            1944365 1222411  527518    70%    /var/spool/mail
/dev/sd2a              31023   17781   10140    64%    /rootbak
/dev/sd2d              31023   16038   11883    57%    /suidbin
/dev/sd2f              62863   11755   44822    21%    /tmp
/dev/sd2h             842574  686687   71630    91%    /s
/dev/sd4a            1944365 1577694  172235    90%    /c
/dev/sd1c            1944365 1059672  690257    61%    /a
/dev/sd7g            1971009 1766520    7389   100%    /d
/dev/sd2e             699223  455142  174159    72%    /oldvar
/dev/sd0h             284215  252695    3099    99%    /oldbbs
  


#155 of 291 by bhoward on Tue Nov 18 07:36:45 2003:

That's the second time recently that /d filled, isn't it?


#156 of 291 by twenex on Tue Nov 18 10:18:41 2003:

argh. I'd be more concerned about /usr/local "running at" 102%. Filesystems
aren't Hollywood nuclear submarine or starship  warp engines, and don't run
well over capacity...

(Not to mention /x at 106%...


#157 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Nov 18 12:15:15 2003:

It's more than the second time, I think.

Yes, filesystesm can run at more than 100%; the OS keeps a cushion available.


#158 of 291 by davel on Tue Nov 18 13:19:43 2003:

(Only root can allocate disk blocks once 100% is exceeded.  So no, things
mostly don't run well at over 100%, but /x & most likely /usr/local may not
notice the problem until they actually run out.)


#159 of 291 by russ on Tue Nov 18 14:01:10 2003:

As the last of four dial-in users this morning, I got a decently
fast connection.  This might be helpful to whoever is doing the
debugging.


#160 of 291 by twenex on Tue Nov 18 14:27:22 2003:

Ah. After gelinas 2cents I suspected that "100%" actually meant "100% of the
space not reserved to root." QED.


#161 of 291 by gull on Tue Nov 18 14:47:01 2003:

It's tricky because it's OS-dependent.  Most Linux distributions report
percentages of the total disk space.  BSD and SunOS report percentages
of the disk space available to users.  So it's possible to fill a BSD
file system over 100% but not a Linux one.


#162 of 291 by twenex on Tue Nov 18 14:49:20 2003:

Hmm. Does POSIX have anything to say on this?


#163 of 291 by jhudson on Tue Nov 18 15:43:41 2003:

I've gotten two different takes on full filesystems under Linux.
It seems to matter which df I use (I have three of them: one from
my distribution, one from busybox, and one from asmutils).


#164 of 291 by twenex on Tue Nov 18 15:57:56 2003:

Hmm. What's the behaviour from your distro's version? I'd consider that
standard (for Linux).


#165 of 291 by gull on Tue Nov 18 18:49:09 2003:

In at least one version of df it's a compile-time flag, so you can have
it either way.


#166 of 291 by krj on Tue Nov 18 20:57:09 2003:

www.cyberspace.org is not loading for me or for two other party
users in widely separated locations.  


#167 of 291 by gull on Tue Nov 18 21:25:13 2003:

It times out for me, too.


#168 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Nov 18 23:23:15 2003:

I swapped out the first two modems (3000 and 5041) for two recently removed
from service.  I also updated the phones script.

It looks like whatever was bothering httpd has now been fixed.


#169 of 291 by other on Wed Nov 19 03:00:04 2003:

/x is not a user partition at all, so its being over 100% is of no 
consequence.


#170 of 291 by russ on Wed Nov 19 23:40:19 2003:

Speed on the modems is vastly improved.  Thanks to gelinas.


#171 of 291 by gelinas on Thu Nov 20 05:03:09 2003:

Glad it helped.  Wish I knew which of the two removed from service was bad.


#172 of 291 by rcurl on Thu Nov 20 16:38:58 2003:

I have been a supporter of Grex in the past by having several small
 non-profit organizations with which I have been associated join Grex and
 use it at least as their website and board mail reflector. The latter,
 however, has become untenable because of spam. There is nearly ten times
 more spam being distributed to the boards than board correspondence. Is
 there any hope of soon having access to a filter here for spam? I will
 probably move an organization off Grex (and thereby cancel membership)
 unless there is some recourse against this avalanche of junk e-mail.


#173 of 291 by gelinas on Fri Nov 21 17:51:16 2003:

} #233 of 233: by Rane Curl (rcurl) on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 (11:18):
}  Could Grex use the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) to block spam? See
}  http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/howtouse.html


#174 of 291 by rcurl on Fri Nov 21 18:06:11 2003:

(Gag...I did it again - entered that item in oldagora. I always scan
oldagora before agora, and have been forgetting where I am.... thanks
Joe, for bringing it over.)


#175 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Nov 25 19:35:32 2003:

From the previous agora:

} #234 of 234: by Joshua (jhudson) on Tue, Nov 25, 2003 (10:33):
}  We will have to put a kludge in it as cyberspace.org sometimes ends
}  up on various spamblock lists. Might be worth considering though.


#176 of 291 by naftee on Sun Nov 30 01:09:20 2003:

Help! Jan Wolter's test backtalk site is nonexistant!


#177 of 291 by dcat on Sun Nov 30 05:01:26 2003:

Help! Jim Daloonik's forebrain is nonexistant!


#178 of 291 by other on Sun Nov 30 20:53:33 2003:

HAHAHAHAHAHA-SPLONK@!  <lmao>


#179 of 291 by willcome on Sun Nov 30 22:57:19 2003:

AHAHANH DCAT"S FORESKIN IS NONEXISTANT!  AHAHAHaha


GOOD ONE< OTHER


#180 of 291 by naftee on Mon Dec 1 03:48:44 2003:

AHAHAHAHAH DCAT"S GOT SOME FORESHORTENING IN HIS DICK AHAHAHAHA () WHAT A
SPANKER>


#181 of 291 by willcome on Mon Dec 1 03:51:30 2003:

AHAHAHa


#182 of 291 by other on Mon Dec 1 04:05:16 2003:

FOAD


#183 of 291 by willcome on Mon Dec 1 04:06:29 2003:

TOAD!
AHAHAha


#184 of 291 by naftee on Mon Dec 1 04:09:52 2003:

SMOTHER MY MOTHER, OTHER! AHAHAHAA


#185 of 291 by willcome on Mon Dec 1 04:10:07 2003:

AHAHAHA!


#186 of 291 by naftee on Mon Dec 1 04:14:29 2003:

BUNCHA _ HOOLIGANS THESE GUYS

root  Operator   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
woot  STeve Andre's root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
gcoot  Greg Cronau's root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
noot  Scott Helmke's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
hoot  Rob Henderson's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
zoot  Valerie Mates's root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
joot  John Remmers' root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
loot  Mike O'Leary's root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
moot  Mic's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
foot  Marcus Watt's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
soot  Steve Weiss's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
coot  Jan Wolter's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
scoot  Steve Gibbard's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
doot  Daniel Gryniewicz's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003  
koot  Jeff Kaplan's Root   Thu Nov 20 18:42:59 EST 2003 


#187 of 291 by gull on Mon Dec 1 15:20:33 2003:

w00t


#188 of 291 by null on Mon Dec 1 19:38:45 2003:

I was getting this earlier when logging in with ssh:

Server refused to allocate pty
Warning: no access to tty; thus no job control in this shell...
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected
stty: TCGETS: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
stty: standard input: Operation not supported on socket
mesg: I/O stream 2 improperly redirected

There were approximately 39 people on at the time.


#189 of 291 by scott on Mon Dec 1 20:49:15 2003:

Yeah, that just happens now and then.  Often when Grex is heavily loaded.


#190 of 291 by gull on Mon Dec 1 21:09:07 2003:

You'll get 'refused to allocate pty' any time there's a telnet queue.

Will NextGrex still be restricted this way, or will we be ditching the
telnet queue when we move?


#191 of 291 by null on Mon Dec 1 22:23:11 2003:

I thought the telnet queue starts much higher than around 39 users.  
Isn't it around 80?


#192 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Dec 1 23:18:48 2003:

Seventy-two.  However, there seem to be certain circumstances that will create
a queue with fewer than seventy users logged on.


#193 of 291 by naftee on Wed Dec 3 04:15:54 2003:

GreX IS THE DEVIL!!!

bash-2.05$ uptime
 11:15pm  up 49 days, 13:13,  42 users,  load average: 6.66, 5.90, 5.60


#194 of 291 by willcome on Wed Dec 3 04:50:25 2003:

HEAL!


#195 of 291 by gull on Wed Dec 3 14:48:41 2003:

6.66, 1/100th of the beast?


#196 of 291 by naftee on Wed Dec 3 16:15:12 2003:

It's the closest we could get.


#197 of 291 by mcnally on Wed Dec 3 20:26:42 2003:

  Grex:  99% less evil than AOL.


#198 of 291 by twenex on Wed Dec 3 21:28:17 2003:

The simulator on the GE 635 for the new Multics machine
(codenamed the 636) ws called 6.36, because it ran at a tenth
the speed of the eventual 645.


#199 of 291 by mcnally on Wed Dec 3 22:35:59 2003:

  Shouldn't it, then, have been the 63.6  (or perhaps 64.5)?


#200 of 291 by jep on Thu Dec 4 16:16:18 2003:

re resp:197: You aren't being very kind to Grex.


#201 of 291 by mcnally on Thu Dec 4 17:34:01 2003:

  Surely satanic-looking load average figures don't lie, jep..


#202 of 291 by twenex on Thu Dec 4 17:51:02 2003:

Re: #199. Good point.


#203 of 291 by gelinas on Fri Dec 5 08:01:12 2003:

This morning, we were having some network problems, apparently between
        ge-3-4.a00.chcgil07.us.ce.verio.net
and
        428.at-0-1-0.rtr0.chcg1.il.voyager.net

I don't know what caused them, but lots of people were summarily cut off.


#204 of 291 by bhoward on Fri Dec 5 11:19:19 2003:

It appeared like the routing was flapping between a good and bad interface
somewhere between these two.  One moment, connectivity two grex's network
was fine.  The next, routing just stopped cold at the interface between
the two networks.


#205 of 291 by gelinas on Sat Dec 6 19:03:07 2003:

From the previous agora:

} Response 235 (235) Rane Curl (rcurl) Sat, Dec  6, 2003 (09:12) 4 lines:
} 
}  I'm telnetting in from Madeira Beach FL. I cannot connect to Grex
}  directly as I get a "not responding" response, but I have telnetted into
}  CAEN, and then telnetted over from there. Why won't Grex respond directly?

I don't know why the connection would be timing out.  I'd run traceroute
from the originating machine to grex, to see where the connection failed.


#206 of 291 by rcurl on Sun Dec 7 04:33:55 2003:

Unfortuntely, I can't. I am connected only with PPP to an ISP, so don't
have a local account from which to issue traceroute. 


#207 of 291 by gelinas on Sun Dec 7 04:36:42 2003:

Your machine doesn't have a traceroute?  What kind of machine is it?  If it
can establish a PPP connection, you should be able to run network utilities
on it.


#208 of 291 by jor on Sun Dec 7 09:35:54 2003:

        has grex's idle daemon suffered a sneak attack?



#209 of 291 by jor on Sun Dec 7 10:27:02 2003:

        ah, false alarm.

        scratch one bug report.


#210 of 291 by naftee on Sun Dec 7 18:53:14 2003:

                        I'm relieved.


#211 of 291 by rcurl on Sun Dec 7 19:29:22 2003:

Re #207: an Apple Powerbook 145B - I  do have on it clients for Turbogopher
and Anarchie - but not traceroute. Maybe I can find one on the web (with
Netscape 2.0)?


#212 of 291 by naftee on Sun Dec 7 22:33:43 2003:

Mommy!!!

27202 darkyy    88    0  252K  476K run/3   0:11 19.95% 19.92% tar
27500 naftee    88    0 3380K 3688K run/2   0:07 19.20% 16.41% top
13284 root     102   19 2880K 2064K run/3 348.8H 16.43% 16.41% perl
26183 root       1    0   19M   18M sleep 530:25 10.95% 10.94% named


load averages going down now.


#213 of 291 by gelinas on Sun Dec 7 22:37:58 2003:

Sounds like MacOS 9.  Look for WhatRoute, Rane.  It's available from

        http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~bryanc/

Interestingly, he has released a MacOS X version, too.


#214 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Dec 8 02:35:16 2003:

Mac OS 7.1. I did some web creeping for traceroute but have not yet
found one for this OS. (This machine tops out for OS 7.6   - but at least
that supports java.)


#215 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Dec 8 02:55:41 2003:

7.6 is still MacTCP, isn't it?


#216 of 291 by bhoward on Mon Dec 8 03:04:34 2003:

/d is 100% full again right now.


#217 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Dec 8 03:37:34 2003:

Thanks for the reminder.


#218 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Dec 8 03:42:03 2003:

Yes, still MacTCP 2.0.6.


#219 of 291 by gelinas on Mon Dec 8 07:55:58 2003:

Looks like MacTCPWatcher might work:

        http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/mac/4191


#220 of 291 by twenex on Mon Dec 8 19:41:23 2003:

The new AMiga OS is going to use Am iga-specific tcp-ip stack and
configuration tools. Aargh.


#221 of 291 by gull on Mon Dec 8 21:15:36 2003:

You didn't really expect it to use something normal, did you?

A friend of mine was trying out a version of that.  He was less than
amused when he found out it supports only one specific ethernet card. 
If it's not a PCI NE2000 clone, forget it.


#222 of 291 by mcnally on Mon Dec 8 21:47:08 2003:

  On the bright side, PCI NE2000 clones are about as cheap and 
  as common as you can possibly get.


#223 of 291 by remmers on Mon Dec 8 22:47:40 2003:

(People are still writing OS's for the Amiga?)


#224 of 291 by scott on Mon Dec 8 23:01:09 2003:

Re 222:  In fact, there's a joke in there somewhere.

"I was at the computer store, and the sales guy was supposed to give me $7.12
in change.  He was out of dimes, but instead of 2 nickels I grudgingly
accepted an NE2000 clone."


#225 of 291 by mcnally on Tue Dec 9 00:45:44 2003:

  Shouldn't you have gotten a dozen of them for your dime?


#226 of 291 by gull on Tue Dec 9 01:11:39 2003:

<chuckle>  True. I do think it's ironic that we're still using PCI
clones of one of the worst ethernet card designs ever.  On the other
hand, CPUs are so fast now that hardware efficiency hardly matters for
such things.  I use 'em and they work great. :>


#227 of 291 by rcurl on Tue Dec 9 05:24:19 2003:

I found the MacTCPWatcher website and downloaded the utility. However the
Trace option was grayed out and the documentation declares " Note that
Traceroute is an OT only function. You cannot use it under MacTCP.  (The
button greys out under MacTCP.)" I guess it should be called
MacOpenTransportWatcher.) Anyway, PING works, but returns no responses
from cyberspace.org.



#228 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 9 05:34:39 2003:

Shoot.  We need traceroute, to find out where the packets are dropping.


#229 of 291 by other on Tue Dec 9 05:40:13 2003:

Can we run it in the other direction?  Trace from Grex to Rane's 
machine, provided he can identify its IP?


#230 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 9 05:45:21 2003:

Last I heard, only staff could run traceroute.  If we know when he is online,
and the IP address, we can give it a try.


#231 of 291 by twenex on Tue Dec 9 08:18:50 2003:

Re: #226: We're still using clones and kludged upgrades of one of the
worst-designed CPUs ever, too. There are rumours that IBM was going to
go for the MC68000 for the original PC design, but rejected it on the
grounds that it was too expensive and there weren't many expansion
cards available for it... If only...!


#232 of 291 by cmcgee on Tue Dec 9 13:46:15 2003:

Yellow Alert:
In the next few weeks, UM ITD and CAEN will stop allowing telnet and FTP to
and from there.  Sometimes I try to telent over to grex from school.  The few
times I've tried SSH, I get cut off because Grex is using some funny version.

Until now I didn't care; telnet and FTP worked.  Soon they won't and I wont
be able to get to Grex during the day.

Can someone help me figure outhow to check email and move files when telent
and FTP are forbidden?


#233 of 291 by other on Tue Dec 9 13:58:11 2003:

Hmm.  My machine's version of SSH is too new to be compatible with 
Grex, so I told it to use rlogin (whatever that is) and I've had no 
difficulty establishing or maintaining a connection using the SSH 
utility since.

I'm not sure if that translates, but perhaps someone with more 
knowledge than I about these things can use it to help you.


#234 of 291 by gull on Tue Dec 9 14:16:40 2003:

Re #232: Grex is running an old version of SSH.  What client are you
trying to use to connect?  If you have the option, make sure you tell it
to use SSH protocol version 1 instead of version 2.

rlogin is non-encrypted, so it's not as good as SSH but it's no worse
than telnet.

If you get SSH working you can use SCP to copy files to and from Grex,
assuming you can find a client.  (Under UNIX-ish operating systems the
'scp' command should work.)

I don't know of a good SCP client for Windows that works on Grex. 
Normally I use WinSCP, but it doesn't seem to work with Grex...I get
this error:

Error listing directory "/a/g/u/gull".
Unexpected directory listing line "drwxr-xr-x   5 gull         2560 Dec
 8 18:00 .".
Operation aborted

Maybe Grex should upgrade to a newer version of SSH.


#235 of 291 by jp2 on Tue Dec 9 14:30:23 2003:

This response has been erased.



#236 of 291 by gull on Tue Dec 9 14:34:21 2003:

I assume that will happen some time in the next decade, when NextGrex
comes online. ;>


#237 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 9 15:43:36 2003:

I've just logged in to grex from ITCS' login servers (login.itd.umich.edu),
using the version of ssh installed there.  Because my login id on both
systems is the same (but the passwords aren't), I created a new id to
test with; that one also worked from login.itd

I did get the warning about the server lying about its key size, but it
still worked.

If you are not using login.itd, you may need to talk to the administrators
of the system you are using.


#238 of 291 by sholmes on Tue Dec 9 17:01:19 2003:

I too get the  warning about the server lying about its key but it's not
always . ..sometimes I get it and sometimes I don't.


#239 of 291 by mcnally on Tue Dec 9 17:20:02 2003:

  re #232:  if "ssh grex.org" doesn't work because the host you're trying
  from wants to talk a newer version of the ssh protocol, you might try
  "ssh1 grex.org".  Some machines support an "ssh1" command for backwards
  compatibility.



#240 of 291 by jhudson on Tue Dec 9 19:17:13 2003:

For windows, try putty and psftp to connect to grex.
To find them, try this
http://www.google.com/search?q=putty+download


#241 of 291 by aruba on Tue Dec 9 22:42:07 2003:

Right, putty works great, and it has a pscp client (though you download that
separately).

Colleen - I happen to be in the UM library at the moment, and I couldn't ssh
directly to Grex either (using SSH Secure Shell, version 3.2.3).  It says
it's downgrading to version 1 to connect to Grex, but then it craps out
anyway.

However, I am able to use Secure Shell to connect to login.itd.umich.edu,
and then from there type "ssh -l aruba cyberspace.org", which connects me to
Grex just fine.  Kinda clunky, bt it does work.


#242 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 9 22:59:56 2003:

Hmm...  which OS are the Library machines running?


#243 of 291 by jmsaul on Wed Dec 10 00:57:59 2003:

I've never been able to get putty to work with Grex.  Might be a configuration
issue.


#244 of 291 by rcurl on Wed Dec 10 03:47:52 2003:

Re #s 227-230: I will probably be on too irregularly from Florida - and only
until tomorrow....so we'll probably not be able to trace this problem....
oh well, I have been able to get on these past few days.


#245 of 291 by scott on Wed Dec 10 04:42:27 2003:

I used to use putty with Grex all the time.  Worked fine, I used ssh from an
NT 4.0 box.


#246 of 291 by remmers on Wed Dec 10 13:31:02 2003:

Re #243:  I assume you can get other ssh clients to connect to Grex in
the same environment?  I use PuTTY to connect to Grex also.  Configuration
could be the problem.  I had to fiddle with the "ssh" settings a bit.


#247 of 291 by twenex on Wed Dec 10 14:49:52 2003:

I can confirm that PuTY does indeed work with Windows, (XP in my case)


#248 of 291 by mynxcat on Wed Dec 10 15:30:29 2003:

PuTTy works. Except that the motd would scroll by too fast. Annoying


#249 of 291 by aruba on Wed Dec 10 15:58:58 2003:

Re #242: I didn't check the OS, but it looked like XP to me.

I also use Putty to SSH to Grex, and it works well.


#250 of 291 by dcat on Wed Dec 10 17:50:03 2003:

the lab machines in the library (which are lab machines that happen to be in
the library, not library machines that happen to be in a lab, i.e., ITD deals
with them and libstaff don't know a thing about them (what, me, former UGL
staff?)) run Windows XP and Mac OS X(.2, i *think*), as do all other ITD labs
on campus.

most library workstations run OS X, but some may be stuck on OS 9.

i've never had a problem ssh'ing to grex from Pitt's unix server.


#251 of 291 by gull on Wed Dec 10 19:01:34 2003:

Re resp:248: You can always read it with the motd command.  motd | more
if you want it to pause after each screenful.


#252 of 291 by mynxcat on Wed Dec 10 21:20:08 2003:

Don't always remember to. 

Another annoying thing. I use Dos telnet to telnet into grex from 
home. When I read agora, at the beginning of each item it 
says "Warning: Terminal cannot scroll back Press <Return>". This 
started happenning recently. I must have changes something, but I'm 
not sure what.


#253 of 291 by tod on Wed Dec 10 21:23:38 2003:

This response has been erased.



#254 of 291 by jmsaul on Thu Dec 11 00:52:34 2003:

Re #246:  Haven't tested others.  It's a really irritating problem, but it's
          a paging problem, so Tod's probably right.


#255 of 291 by rcurl on Thu Dec 11 00:59:30 2003:

Re #244 - not being able to telnet directly to Grex from Florida: I should
have mentioned that I have also been unable to telnet directly to some of
the CAEN servers of the form xxxxx.engin.umich.edu or to
login.itd.umich.edu.  I am on now by telneting to xxxx = login but xxxx =
maize or blue do not work. Yesterday xxxx = login would not work but =
maize would. blue hasn't worked since I've been here.Does this information
suggest anything about the cause of the problem?



#256 of 291 by tod on Thu Dec 11 01:11:10 2003:

This response has been erased.



#257 of 291 by gelinas on Thu Dec 11 03:42:07 2003:

It sounds more and more like a routing problem from the Florida end, Rane.


#258 of 291 by rcurl on Fri Dec 12 01:53:34 2003:

I'm back now and my one-week account in Florida is history, so I won't
be able to follow up on this. But at least I was able to connect, even
if not directly. (It's is nice being back on a fast machine with a 56K
modem now....)


#259 of 291 by twenex on Fri Dec 12 09:13:08 2003:

"A Fast machine with a 56K modem"? Wow, that really puts things into
perspective. I'm on 56K right now, and it sure as hell doesn't feel
fast. Although that might havew something to do with the fact that the
ISP keeps disconnecting me this morning. I don't have any leverage
over the choice of ISP here, but anyone in or cdoming to the UK take
note; Freeserve might just as well be Crap-no-serve.


#260 of 291 by willcome on Fri Dec 12 09:18:25 2003:

AHAHAHAH< GOOD WORDPLAY< TWENEX


#261 of 291 by phani on Fri Dec 12 11:12:46 2003:

hai jana annaaaa


#262 of 291 by kjana on Fri Dec 12 11:20:33 2003:

hello ra phani
how are you


#263 of 291 by willcome on Fri Dec 12 11:49:28 2003:

happy


#264 of 291 by keesan on Fri Dec 12 13:45:50 2003:

Grex seems super fast this morning.  Is this the new grex?  My automated login
and password script could not keep up and somehow my password got entered
instead of my login (which I know is backwards from how a fast grex should
behave).  I have been unable to get mail from a mail list because grex accepts
it too slowly and it all bounces - should I try signing up for a fifth time
now?  Even Pine was fast this morning.  


#265 of 291 by gelinas on Fri Dec 12 13:47:36 2003:

No, we are not on new hardware.  I don't know why it might be faster than
usual this morning.


#266 of 291 by naftee on Fri Dec 12 19:01:08 2003:

The new GreX...will appear..


#267 of 291 by rcurl on Sun Dec 14 18:19:58 2003:

Re #232: I looked on CAEN for info on Telnet being discontinued, but
didn't find it. Where is there more information? 

I found and installed MacSSH on this (Mac G4) machine and could ssh to
a CAEN server, but not to Grex. I presume this is the problem that
cmcgee referred to. Is there some configuration that should work? 


#268 of 291 by gull on Sun Dec 14 19:21:43 2003:

Does MacSSH have an option to choose what SSH protocol to use?  Grex
only supports protocol version 1, and some programs default to version 2.


#269 of 291 by lorance on Mon Dec 15 02:33:07 2003:

MacSSH only supports SSH2. The FAQ on the website datails
this. NiftyTelnet 1.1 SSH r3 supports only SSH1. Google
for the download link. NiftyTelnet is also mirored all
over the net.


#270 of 291 by rcurl on Mon Dec 15 06:39:41 2003:

MacSSH also supports rlogin, rsh, rexec, and raw TCP: any of those
protocols compatible with Grex?


#271 of 291 by gull on Mon Dec 15 16:43:55 2003:

rlogin should work.


#272 of 291 by cmcgee on Mon Dec 15 18:54:58 2003:

re: 267 yes.  I can get here with SSH, but then get turned away because of
something funny about the Grex version.


#273 of 291 by davel on Tue Dec 16 20:17:20 2003:

The voters command is broken.  (Unlike the members command, it does
not understand about continuation lines in the group file.)


#274 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 16 21:08:16 2003:

It's probably the same script as the 'member' command which was recently
removed.  Thank you for reporting the problem.


#275 of 291 by rcurl on Tue Dec 16 21:10:37 2003:

Re #271: it does: I am now connected via rlogin under MacSSH. However
rlogin does not provide ssh type security. 


#276 of 291 by rcurl on Tue Dec 16 21:14:38 2003:

Oh yes - but now the new problem is that the default seems to be
white text on a black background - I like it the other way around,
but haven't yet found a way in MacSSH to set that. I seem to have
to select it on each login under the Session menu. That will be a
pain.


#277 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 16 21:32:48 2003:

I tried, unsuccessfully, to fix the 'voters' command, so I've move it out of
the way.


#278 of 291 by aruba on Tue Dec 16 21:58:29 2003:

Re #273, 277: type "members -v | fmt" for a list of voters.


#279 of 291 by remmers on Tue Dec 16 22:02:22 2003:

And "members -h" for a list of command options.  (Discovered the -h
by trial & error.  Can't find documentation or source for "members" --
which appears to be a compiled C program -- anywhere on line.)

I wonder who wrote it.


#280 of 291 by aruba on Wed Dec 17 01:11:27 2003:

I wrote it, to STeve's specifications, back in 1995.  The source is in
~aruba/src/members.


#281 of 291 by rcurl on Wed Dec 17 04:07:17 2003:

Further to my problems of telnetting to Grex and CAEN from Florida, I have
been discussing it with CAEN Service & Support, and there is a modification
of what has been said about CAEN shifting to SSH in January. Here is a
remark from CAEN:

"Upon further inspection, it appears that our Linux servers are not
allowing Telnet connections. I am investigating why this is, but for now,
try connecting to loginsun.engin.umich.edu. This routes you directly to
our main Sun servers.  Of course, as I said, SSH should cause you no
problems. 

"Also, please know that this has no relation to login.itd.umich.edu or
cyberspace.org, but I believe login.itd.umich.edu may be blocking Telnet
as well." 

So the mystery of being unable to telnet from FL to Grex remains. 



#282 of 291 by gelinas on Wed Dec 17 04:09:35 2003:

(Telnet will work on login.itd until January 5, 2004.)


#283 of 291 by bru on Wed Dec 17 14:33:41 2003:



#284 of 291 by naftee on Fri Dec 19 04:05:04 2003:

bruce died.


#285 of 291 by bhoward on Fri Dec 19 05:31:59 2003:

I did?


#286 of 291 by willcome on Fri Dec 19 05:36:59 2003:

Yup.


#287 of 291 by naftee on Sat Dec 20 04:30:55 2003:

Sure did.


#288 of 291 by twenex on Tue Dec 23 15:25:02 2003:

System Problem: Agora has not rolled over.


#289 of 291 by gelinas on Tue Dec 23 18:35:43 2003:

Welcome to life in the fast lane, twenex.


#290 of 291 by twenex on Tue Dec 23 18:45:43 2003:

Oh, ha ha.


#291 of 291 by davel on Tue Dec 23 21:43:13 2003:

Or in the grex lane ...


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: