1 new of 140 responses total.
I don't think he owes Mickey an apology. I think the offense stems from differing interpretations of what gull wrote, that Mickey has chosen the most objectionable interpretation, and that another quite justifiable meaning is probably what gull had in mind. If I write a statement of the form "Texans enjoy <x>" you can choose to read that as "all Texans enjoy <x>" or you can accept that what I almost certainly meant was "many (possibly most) Texans enjoy <x>" I doubt we'd even be having this discussion if the claim in question was something like "Texans enjoy barbecue", even if a Texan respondent had piped up with "I'm a militant vegetarian and a Texan and *I* don't enjoy barbecue," because none of us would think that gull had meant to imply *all* Texans by such a statement.
You have several choices: