Grex Agora47 Conference

Item 157: ARBORNET

Entered by willcome on Thu Nov 6 19:04:12 2003:

Arbornet's dead: 
http://www.cis.state.mi.us/bcs_corp/dt_corp.asp?id_nbr=700873&name_entity=A
RBO
RNET

LINK COURTESY OF JP@ JAMES PATRICK "JAY" HOWARD
46 responses total.

#1 of 46 by richard on Thu Nov 6 19:08:47 2003:

automatic dissolution? what happened, nobody remembered to renew the
paperwork?


#2 of 46 by goose on Thu Nov 6 19:10:15 2003:

So, what now?


#3 of 46 by willcome on Thu Nov 6 19:17:08 2003:

DON"T LOOK TO ME FOR GUIDANCE< I"M JUST PROPAGATING THE LINK!


#4 of 46 by goose on Thu Nov 6 19:17:55 2003:

It was more of a rhetorical question......


#5 of 46 by jp2 on Thu Nov 6 19:23:47 2003:

This response has been erased.



#6 of 46 by richard on Thu Nov 6 19:41:13 2003:

how can m-net continue to operate given that its corporation, arbornet,
was automatically dissolved as of 10/01/03?  There is no longer an
Arbornet, therefore the board of directors no longer exists as a legal
entity. It would seem that mnet's equipment is now owned by whoever
physically possesses it.  The hardware can't be owned by the members of a
company that no longer exists.  In fact, if a corporation has been legally
dissolved, would they not have been legally required to liquidate all
assets before the dissolution date?  I don't think the state of Michigan
would be happy to see a corporation still functioning after its
dissolution date.  Couldn't there be fines involved 

I would think mnet's hardware and operations need to be owned and operated
by a 501(3)(c).  Perhaps the users of mnet should ask Cyberspace Inc.
(Grex) to take over ownership of the hardware and become mnet's new parent
company.  Surely that is preferable to m-net becoming owned by any single
person.  

But then again, establishing who has the legal right to buy or acquire
mnet's properties would seem to be a difficult question to answer until
you know who actually owns it now.  Arbornet doesn't own it anymore,
arbornet doesn't exist anymore.  


#7 of 46 by willcome on Thu Nov 6 19:42:57 2003:

I'd rather have jp2 own it than Grex!
./


#8 of 46 by remmers on Thu Nov 6 19:48:00 2003:

I don't know the legalities, but the questions in #6 definitely need
to be addressed.

Too bad.  Hope m-net doesn't disappear as a result.  Regardless of
what one may think of m-net's quality over the last few years, we
need all the free speech forums we can get.


#9 of 46 by tod on Thu Nov 6 19:48:34 2003:

This response has been erased.



#10 of 46 by richard on Thu Nov 6 20:06:30 2003:

I noticed in mnet's policy conf that a board meeting for November was
scheduled.  They should not have a board meeting, because it would be
illegal to do so.  Such meetings would be seen by the state as evidence of
continuing operation as a company past the date it was legally dissolved.
Those who WERE members of the board of Arbornet could get themselves in
legal trouble if they met in any official capacity under the
circumstances.  They would no longer be authorized to sell or give mnet's
assets to jp2 or cyberspace inc. or anybody else.

I'd suggest a committee of mnet's users be formed, and that committee-
claiming to act on behalf of the users of mnet-- can seek legal advice.  

Also, as arbornet inc. has been dissolved, mnet probably needs to cease
using the "arbornet.org" domain name asap.  That domain name is registered
to the dissolved corporation, and its continued use could be seen by the
state as evidence of continued operation of that dissolved corporation.
Which would obviously now be illegal.  The state could levy fines and/or
seize whatver assets are left.  


#11 of 46 by polygon on Thu Nov 6 20:23:44 2003:

Um, our synagogue failed to file renewal papers for a number of years.
I noticed this fact and brought it to the attention of the administration
there.  Some late fees were paid, and the paperwork brought up to date.

So, this is not necessarily a catastrophe for M-Net.


#12 of 46 by cross on Thu Nov 6 20:37:06 2003:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 46 by rcurl on Thu Nov 6 20:48:51 2003:

I agree with polygon and cross. The posting doesn't mean much, but they
better get in their reports (and payments). 

Articles of Incorporation normally list the distribution of assets of
a corporation in the event of its dissolution. 


#14 of 46 by tod on Thu Nov 6 21:05:13 2003:

This response has been erased.



#15 of 46 by jp2 on Thu Nov 6 21:14:02 2003:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 46 by tod on Thu Nov 6 21:24:02 2003:

This response has been erased.



#17 of 46 by other on Thu Nov 6 21:52:18 2003:

Three years delinquent?  No wonder.  So, who's paying the co-lo 
bills?


#18 of 46 by tod on Thu Nov 6 22:21:15 2003:

This response has been erased.



#19 of 46 by naftee on Thu Nov 6 23:19:06 2003:

Michigan State law sucks.


#20 of 46 by jep on Fri Nov 7 03:42:43 2003:

Richard raced over to M-Net to give us all advice because this story 
was so exciting to him.  Fortunately, it looks like the Arbornet board 
is taking a slower approach to the oversight.  M-Net is still on-line 
and accessible via the corporate domain, arbornet.org, as it should 
be.  Aside from jp2, richard and between 2 and 8 Canadian teenager 
clones, no one is much excited over there.


#21 of 46 by mynxcat on Fri Nov 7 04:16:53 2003:

You forgot twinkie. He seems to be raising quite a fuss too. I'm not sure if
it's tongue in cheek in his case, though.


#22 of 46 by rcurl on Fri Nov 7 04:18:07 2003:

The Michigan Resident Agent for a corporation does not have to be
an officer or a board member. He/she does not even have to be a "member".
However the resident agent *must* be a reliable contact person for the
delivery of official material from the State to the corporation. 


#23 of 46 by jp2 on Fri Nov 7 13:12:42 2003:

This response has been erased.



#24 of 46 by remmers on Fri Nov 7 14:23:55 2003:

Could it be a toaster?  A sump pump?  A George Foreman grill?


#25 of 46 by gull on Fri Nov 7 14:30:43 2003:

Re #21: It's always hard to tell with him. ;>


#26 of 46 by jp2 on Fri Nov 7 14:40:09 2003:

This response has been erased.



#27 of 46 by willcome on Fri Nov 7 16:22:39 2003:

Why'd you put a comma there?


#28 of 46 by cross on Fri Nov 7 17:40:10 2003:

This response has been erased.



#29 of 46 by rcurl on Fri Nov 7 17:55:18 2003:

MI 450.2241 Registered office; resident agent

Sec. 241.

Each domestic corporation and each foreign corporation authorized to
conduct affairs in this state shall have and continuously maintain in
this state:

(a) A registered office which may be the same as its place of business.

(b) A resident agent, which agent may be either an individual resident in
this state whose business office is identical with the corporation's
registered office, a domestic or domestic business corporation, or a
foreign or foreign business corporation authorized to conduct affairs or
transact business in this state and having a business office identical
with the corporation's registered office. 



#30 of 46 by md on Fri Nov 7 18:23:29 2003:

So, Cyberspace could be Arbornet's resident agent?


#31 of 46 by remmers on Fri Nov 7 18:49:54 2003:

Looks like it.  Or General Motors.  Or Meijers Shifty Acres.


#32 of 46 by jp2 on Fri Nov 7 19:20:31 2003:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 46 by willcome on Fri Nov 7 19:48:50 2003:

;)


#34 of 46 by tod on Fri Nov 7 20:16:25 2003:

This response has been erased.



#35 of 46 by gull on Fri Nov 7 20:59:55 2003:

For a moment I read that as 'defective agency', which might be appropriate.


#36 of 46 by tod on Fri Nov 7 21:08:42 2003:

This response has been erased.



#37 of 46 by jmsaul on Fri Nov 7 23:27:19 2003:

All Arbornet has to do is pay a late fee.  Shrug.


#38 of 46 by pvn on Sat Nov 8 06:41:46 2003:

Seems unfair even.


#39 of 46 by lk on Sat Nov 8 21:10:09 2003:

Just wait until the shareholders find out....  I'm sure this will
eclipse Worldcom and Enron. I'm sure NETI is involved somehow.

Hard to believe that this hasn't yet been reported to the SEC.

Dammmit. Is Arbornet's pension plan secure or should I start worrying?!


#40 of 46 by remmers on Sat Nov 8 21:34:21 2003:

If you have to ask, then it's too late for worrying.


#41 of 46 by lk on Sat Nov 8 21:57:19 2003:

What are you saying?!  Up to now the Board kept telling me that I
couldn't collect until age 60 or so....


#42 of 46 by tod on Sun Nov 9 00:49:03 2003:

This response has been erased.



#43 of 46 by naftee on Mon Nov 10 01:10:15 2003:

re 39 Too many abbreviations!


#44 of 46 by tsty on Sun Nov 16 08:00:48 2003:

ask mdw ... neti== ????


#45 of 46 by willcome on Thu Nov 27 09:31:01 2003:

omg, one time I was fucking this whore and she DISSOLVED when I was done.


#46 of 46 by flem on Tue Dec 2 22:17:26 2003:

Was she a kleenex?


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: