Grex Agora47 Conference

Item 101: Islam

Entered by sj2 on Sat Oct 18 07:14:12 2003:

On one hand: http://www.islamvision.org/Kafir.asp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Kafir  
  
  The word Kaafir most probably should be one of the most 
misunderstood terms in the history of world languages. The term has 
been abused & projected by media in such a fashion that it induces 
spontaneous hatred among people to whom this term is being referred. 
Any language at it's best, conveys what it's made out to convey. 

Factually speaking there is nothing derogatory or insulting about the 
term Kaafir. The term (derived from Kufr in Arabic language) 
means 'One who rejects (denies) the truth' or 'One who does not 
believe' or a 'Non-believer'. A person who is not a Christian is 
called a Non-Christian; a person who is not a Hindu is known as a non-
Hindu; similarly, a person who is not a Muslim is called a non-Muslim, 
which when translated in to Arabic language is called a Kaafir. 

It's as simple as that. In fact, the term Kaafir relates more to the 
status of a person's belief system and reflects less about the 
physical entity that he is. A more apt, politically and socially 
significant term Zimmi used in Arabic literature to denote non-Muslims 
has been ignored and has gone unnoticed by Muslim bashers. 

A non-Muslim subject in an Islamic state is called Zimmi (derived from 
Zimma meaning responsibility) meaning a subject whose life, honour and 
property will be protected by the Islamic State. He will have freedom 
to follow his own belief system. He will have his own set of laws, 
administered by his own tribunals and own judges, without any 
interference on the part of the Muslim authorities. He will also be 
exempted from participation in the wars, 

otherwise compulsory to the Muslim subjects of the state. He will not 
be required to pay the compulsory annual Zakaat (a type of compulsory 
tax collected annually from all Muslims by Islamic Governments and 
disbursed to poor Muslims). Against all these privileges the non-
Muslim subject Zimmi have to pay a nominal tax called Jizya. 

The quantum of Jizya will be reasonable enough as not to be a 
financial burden on him. In case of any uncertainty with respect to 
the safety of non-Muslim subjects, an Islamic state will forfeit its 
right to collect such tax. History tells us that the second Caliph 
Umer (RA) returned a huge sum of money collected through Jizya to the 
non-Muslim subjects in one such compelling circumstance. 

The Zimmis also will not be allowed to participate in legislation 
process. For that matter, not even the Muslim subjects. Because the 
law making (Legislation) authority rests with Allah and hence will be 
solely based on Qur'an & Sunnah. 

The Islamic State will only be a law-enforcing agency. At the time of 
the revelation of the Holy Qur'an, when most of the non-believers in 
Mecca and Madina had waged a pitched battle with believers; Allah 
(SWT) sensing the question upper most in the minds of most Muslims 
with respect to their dealings with other non- believers who were not 
hostile to them issued the following instruction: "Allah does not 
forbid you to be kind and deal justly with non-Muslims, who do not 
wage war against you on account of your religion and do not drive you 
out of your homes. Verily Allah loves those who are just". (60-8) 

The above-mentioned verse in fact is a policy statement in this 
matter. This is further exemplified by Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) who 
said: "One who kills a Zimmi, will not get even the scent of the 
paradise. In another statement he said: " I shall stand witness 
against the believer, who will be guilty of persecuting a Zimmi." It 
should be noted that while discussing the rights of neighbours and the 
wayfarers, Islam does not make any distinction between Muslims and non-
Muslims. 

A non-Muslim neighbour has as much rights over his Muslim neighbour as 
the other Muslim neighbour next door. There can not be a better 
example to illustrate Islam's stand vis- -vis the treatment to the 
non -Muslims, than the story narrated by Abu Uzair (RA), one of the 
companion of the Prophet Mohammed (pbuh), before embracing Islam. "I 
was one of the prisoners-of-war and was handed over as captive to one 
of the Ansars (residents of Madina). 

Ever since Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) instructed his companions to look 
well after the captives, the situation used to be that my Ansar host 
used to eat only dates while providing me a stomach full meal." No 
wonder, the entire Christian population of a border town, preferred to 
live as Zimmis under the rule of Hazrat Umar (RA) ,the second Caliph 
of Islam instead of becoming sovereign subjects of a Christian king in 
640 CE. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
58 responses total.

#1 of 58 by sj2 on Sat Oct 18 07:16:29 2003:

On the other hand: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?
ARTICLE_ID=29709
-------------------------------------------------------------------
GLOBAL JIHAD
Sheik: 'It's OK to kill non-Muslims'
London Islamic cleric caught on tape calling for death of Americans

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 19, 2002
1:49 a.m. Eastern

  2002 WorldNetDaily.com 

A London-based Muslim cleric has been caught on film urging his 
followers to kill non-Muslims   particularly Americans   and to commit 
other acts of terrorism. 

Sheik Abu Hamza, affiliated with London's Finsbury Park mosque, tells 
an audience that non-believers should be killed or sold into slavery 
in a tape converted to digital files and smuggled onto the Internet. 

The tapes were reportedly given by Hamza to a researcher who posed as 
a supporter and infiltrated his inner circle. "If a kafir person (non-
believer) goes in a Muslim country, he is like a cow," explains 
Hamza. "Anybody can take him. That is the Islamic law." 

"If a kafir is walking by and you catch him, he's booty," he says on 
one tape. "You can sell him in the market. Most of them are spies. And 
even if they don't do anything, if Muslims cannot take them and sell 
them in the market, you just kill them. It's OK." 

Hamza praises the al-Qaida bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and 
Tanzania that killed 224 people. 

"If Muslims are having a war against these people, than yes, it is 
legitimate," he says. 

He praised attacks against ships from non-Muslim countries: "If a ship 
which loses its way and comes to a Muslim land, they'll take it as 
booty." 

A terrorist attack in 2000 on the USS Cole killed 17 American sailors. 
The attack has been linked to Muslim militants in Britain, but Hamza 
has never been charged. 

Despite accusations he recruits for al-Qaida, Hamza's only punishment 
in Britain has been a High Court order banning him from preaching at 
the Finsbury Park mosque. However, when the Ottawa Citizen visited the 
mosque several weeks ago, worshippers had his phone number handy, the 
newspaper reported. 

"It's all fabrication. He's just taking clips and taking it out of 
context, as usual," Hamza said last night when asked about the videos. 

He scoffed at suggestions the tapes may lead to his arrest. 

He said he can't be accused of inciting people to commit violent acts 
because he's a cleric who only preaches Muslim law. "I say the reality 
that's in the Muslim books anyway. Whether I say it or not, it's in 
the books." 

The sheik, who was born in Egypt and grew up in England, then alluded 
to more violence   using language similar to that used by Osama bin 
Laden. 

"Just as non-Muslim blood is hot, Muslim blood is hot, too," he 
said. "It's for them to worry about. When they kill, they will be 
killed."



#2 of 58 by tod on Sat Oct 18 14:39:53 2003:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 58 by lk on Sun Oct 19 03:13:38 2003:

From what I know, the text in #0 is very misleading. Islam distinguishes
between non-Muslims who nonetheless believe in God (Allah) and those who
are non-believers.  The status of dhimmi (meaning protected) can only be
achieved by Jews and Christians. Non-believers (e.g. polytheists) are to
be put to death.

That the non-Muslim neighbor has just as much right as the Muslim is also
a bunch of crock. Non-Muslims are not allowed to testify in Muslim courts
(the only game in town in Muslim lands). Many other restrictions were
placed on Non-Muslims (Jews & Christians) -- for example, synagogues and
churches had to be less grand than the mosques.  Nor could dhimmis hold
public office or ride on camels or horses (only donkeys, I believe).

Does anyone really believe that the poll tax on dhimmis was typically
less than the tax on Muslims?  (One anecdotal story of one Caliph
refunding this tax should raise more questions than it answers).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmi

http://www.dhimmi.com/

http://answering-islam.org.uk/Index/D/dhimmi.html

http://www.secularislam.org/articles/bostom2.htm
http://www.secularislam.org/jihad/subjects.htm


#4 of 58 by cross on Sun Oct 19 04:40:57 2003:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 58 by rcurl on Sun Oct 19 04:58:53 2003:

This all makes me support the First Amendment with even more fervor. If
Bush can't get Iraq to adopt the equivalent, he will have lost the real
battle.


#6 of 58 by gelinas on Sun Oct 19 06:17:58 2003:

The best hope for a 'freedom of religion' clause in an Iraqi constitution is
neutrality between Sunni and Shia, just as ours was neutrality between various
Protestant Christian sects.  (Ours has grown since then, but that really was
where it started.)


#7 of 58 by pvn on Sun Oct 19 07:39:58 2003:

Stand down folks.  Islam as a religion is generally where the x-ers were
about 1400-1200 years ago in the 'western' tradition.  (Do you know any
Lutherans?  They were the Taliban of their founding.)  (Or how about the
Mormons?  They had their "Daanites" (al_Qudes) and they were the
prefered candidates for FBI agents until recently...since then it has
become black muslims?)  Unfortunately the evolution of the Islamic faith
has cost us a number of planes and buildings full of people recently but
in the long run this will change.  Exchange of information and the
Internet leads naturally to that (so long as we can keep the hands of
Government off it  (Government being the modern GOD).  

It is odd to note that 'kaafir' in South Africa (x-ian state era) was a
term for black person especially since at the time of its most common
use it was hardly an Islamic State.


#8 of 58 by mcnally on Sun Oct 19 08:04:12 2003:

  "kaffir" != "kaafir"


#9 of 58 by pvn on Sun Oct 19 08:24:54 2003:

I suggest it damn well is/was obviously.  Both by derivation and usage.


#10 of 58 by keesan on Mon Oct 20 18:47:21 2003:

The English used to not allow Catholics to attend university or hold office.
The communists used to not allow non party members to attend university or
hold office.
The Chinese communists would not let people attend university (at one time)
if their parents had been intellectuals.


#11 of 58 by rcurl on Mon Oct 20 19:00:01 2003:

Education is tightly controlled in totalitarian communities. The Taliban
forbade it to women. At one time the American medical community did too. 


#12 of 58 by tod on Mon Oct 20 20:03:25 2003:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 58 by sj2 on Tue Oct 21 06:08:21 2003:

NYTimes editor Friedman had some good insights on Islam and terror in a 
programme on CNN yesterday. He also commented on Mahatir Mohamed's 
controversial speech. He rightly pointed out that while the Malaysian 
PM's remarks about jews were shallow and inflammatory but the bulk of 
his speech about muslims was deeply critical of the muslim world and 
bold.



#14 of 58 by gull on Tue Oct 21 14:41:14 2003:

Catholic politicians were regarded with suspicion in the U.S. for years,
because it was thought that if they were elected to office they would be
controlled by the Pope.  Ironically, we've now come full circle, and
Gov. Granholm has been picketed by Catholics for not following the
Vatican's line on abortion.

(You know, it's interesting that pro-abortion Catholics are picketed,
but pro-death penalty Catholics aren't.)


#15 of 58 by tod on Tue Oct 21 15:38:26 2003:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 58 by remmers on Tue Oct 21 16:02:09 2003:

Re #14: What broke the back of that attitude was the 1960 presidential
election.  Kennedy was elected, and the dire predictions that he'd be
in the Vatican's pocket proved false.


#17 of 58 by other on Tue Oct 21 16:23:18 2003:

Waaaaaaay false.


#18 of 58 by tod on Tue Oct 21 16:53:46 2003:

This response has been erased.



#19 of 58 by bhelliom on Thu Oct 23 19:51:09 2003:

resp:16  Because he was in Marylin's skirts at the time.  You can't
serve to masters.  God, or p- well, you know.


#20 of 58 by bhelliom on Thu Oct 23 19:51:36 2003:

er two masters


#21 of 58 by tod on Thu Oct 23 20:09:11 2003:

This response has been erased.



#22 of 58 by bhelliom on Thu Oct 23 20:18:40 2003:

Since when?


#23 of 58 by tod on Thu Oct 23 20:27:38 2003:

This response has been erased.



#24 of 58 by other on Thu Oct 23 20:33:28 2003:

<lol>


#25 of 58 by bhelliom on Thu Oct 23 20:35:46 2003:

If one pays me enough, I can learn.


#26 of 58 by goose on Fri Oct 24 14:30:03 2003:

One must be careful with offers like that....


#27 of 58 by bhelliom on Fri Oct 24 16:08:04 2003:

Tee hee...the way I look at it t'would be a win-win-win situation.


#28 of 58 by tod on Fri Oct 24 20:15:28 2003:

This response has been erased.



#29 of 58 by bhelliom on Tue Oct 28 18:45:25 2003:

Hahahahahahahahahahahahhaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


#30 of 58 by twenex on Sun Nov 9 09:16:05 2003:

Whether or not they apply the term correctly, white South Africans
and whites in other Southern ASfrican countries often refer to
blacks as "kaffirs". The term therefore has negative connotations,
just as "Deutschland ueber alles" has been blacklisted because it
was used by the Nazis, even though it means "Germany is my first
priority", not "Let Germany March Across the Face of the World".

Re 10: Can known Communists live in America without fear or
retribution, or not?

Yes, I know they are supposed to be out to destroy America. That's
what the English used to say about Catholics...


#31 of 58 by russ on Sun Nov 9 14:45:44 2003:

Re #30:  Unless I've missed something, the Marxists at places like
UC Berkeley and UW Madison include people on state salary.


#32 of 58 by gull on Mon Nov 10 19:58:03 2003:

You can't become a citizen if you're a Communist party member, however.


#33 of 58 by tod on Mon Nov 10 20:12:44 2003:

This response has been erased.



#34 of 58 by tsty on Tue Nov 11 09:49:56 2003:

citizenship adn political pursuasion are mutually exclusive.


#35 of 58 by tod on Tue Nov 11 21:31:48 2003:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 58 by slynne on Tue Nov 11 22:02:11 2003:

I know lots of immigrants who came here legally. None of them snuck 
over the border and only a couple of them are even Mexican. Anyone with 
half a brain can get in here if they want to. 


#37 of 58 by tod on Tue Nov 11 22:07:46 2003:

This response has been erased.



#38 of 58 by slynne on Wed Nov 12 01:29:07 2003:

Well anyone except members of the Communist party and there might be 
some smart guys in Al quada or similar groups who cant get in. 


#39 of 58 by tod on Wed Nov 12 17:51:51 2003:

This response has been erased.



#40 of 58 by slynne on Wed Nov 12 23:19:29 2003:

Which countries? I have met immigrants from Lebenon, Syria, Iraq, 
Egypt, Algeria, Libya and Yemen


#41 of 58 by tod on Wed Nov 12 23:41:19 2003:

This response has been erased.



#42 of 58 by slynne on Thu Nov 13 01:23:27 2003:

Haha. What are you going to tell them, tod. That I happen to live near 
Dearborn? hahaha. 


#43 of 58 by gull on Thu Nov 13 19:11:04 2003:

Re #36: I know someone who came here legally.  It was a long,
frustrating, expensive process involving hiring a lawyer and enduring
lots of bureaucratic foul-ups and long waits in waiting rooms.  But what
do you expect?  What political point is there in properly funding and
staffing an agency that, by definition, deals almost exclusively with
people who cannot vote?


#44 of 58 by tod on Thu Nov 13 19:41:59 2003:

This response has been erased.



#45 of 58 by happyboy on Thu Nov 13 20:32:51 2003:

and the other part comes from eating KING VITAMIN CEREAL.


#46 of 58 by mcnally on Thu Nov 13 21:40:04 2003:

  We might be in serious trouble, then..  Do they still make King Vitamin?


#47 of 58 by slynne on Thu Nov 13 22:48:27 2003:

resp:44 - I agree with that and, personally, I would like to see more 
relaxed immigration laws. I also would like to see more King Vitamin 
cereal. ;)


#48 of 58 by tod on Thu Nov 13 22:55:40 2003:

This response has been erased.



#49 of 58 by other on Fri Nov 14 01:41:29 2003:

It's "King YouDaMan" now, and they've switch from cereal to jelly.


#50 of 58 by lk on Fri Nov 14 09:22:19 2003:

At least they're not writing bibles anymore.

(In specially marked boxes of....)


#51 of 58 by gull on Fri Nov 14 14:07:29 2003:

I'm too young for King Vitamin.  I remember when Post decided having the
word "Sugar" in a cereal name was no longer good advertising, though,
and changed "Sugar Crisp" to "Golden Crisp".


#52 of 58 by goose on Fri Nov 14 15:27:32 2003:

I ate KV as a kid, and I still see it on some store shelves (I think).
I also ate Sugar Smacks, before they became Honey Smacks, and Sugar Pops
before thay became Corn Pops.


#53 of 58 by keesan on Fri Nov 14 16:52:15 2003:

What are 'glazed walnuts'?  We got a coupon for them in our bag of walnuts
in the shell.  Is this another name for sugar coated?


#54 of 58 by happyboy on Fri Nov 14 17:56:33 2003:

yes.


#55 of 58 by tod on Fri Nov 14 18:02:24 2003:

This response has been erased.



#56 of 58 by willcome on Thu Nov 27 08:13:53 2003:

whore.


#57 of 58 by bhelliom on Mon Dec 1 16:54:37 2003:

resp:45 - And here I though it was Ovaltine.


#58 of 58 by niji on Fri Dec 19 21:36:06 2003:

?


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: