Grex Agora46 Conference

Item 28: Children's nudist camps

Entered by richard on Tue Jun 24 23:33:07 2003:

From wire reports:

"Camping in the Buff
Nudist Camps for Kids Get Mixed Reaction

By Jill Barton
The Associated Press


W E S T  P A L M  B EA C H, Fla., June 24  U.S. Rep. Mark Foley urged 
Florida officials to investigate a nudist camp for children, saying it 
subjects the children to denigrating and dangerous behavior and could 
expose them to pedophiles.  
 
The weeklong summer camp run by the American Association for Nude 
Recreation outside of Tampa allows children ages 11 to 18 get together 
for games and sports and discussions about their choice to stay in the 
buff. 

Foley, co-chairman of the Congressional Missing and Exploited 
Children's Caucus, sent a letter Thursday to Gov. Jeb Bush and Attorney 
General Charlie Crist asking them to determine whether the camp was 
legal and to consider toughening state statutes against such activities.

"Obviously I have no way of knowing whether illegal behavior is taking 
place in this camp, but the situation clearly raises legitimate issues 
that should be addressed given that it involves minor children," Foley, 
R-West Palm Beach, said in the letter.

Bush had not yet reviewed the letter and had no comment, spokeswoman 
Alia Faraj said on Thursday.

Erich Schuttauf, executive director of the American Association for 
Nude Recreation, said he applauded Foley for looking to protect 
children.

"We're on the same team. We're about the same thing, we believe in 
strong families," Schuttauf said. "Here, we talk frankly about body 
parts, about how to respect your body and make sure everyone else does, 
too."

Though some trespassers have entered the camp, security officials 
always have removed them from the private property before they 
interacted with any children or teenagers, he said.

Steve Vickers, who went to the summer camp for five years before 
becoming a counselor, said Foley has the wrong idea about the camp. He 
said a strict line is drawn between nudism and sexuality, and no one 
would consider abusing the distinction.

"There was a definite split. When you're nude, it's like family time," 
Vickers said. "And when you're at school, and you see the same people, 
then you could talk about dating or things like that."

Vickers grew up at a nudist resort in Kissimmee, about 85 miles east of 
the summer camp held near Tampa in Lutz. He said some of the 30 
children and teenagers who attended the camp also lived at nudist 
resorts across the country but others lived in traditional 
neighborhoods and took off their clothes only on weekends.

He described himself and others at the nudist camp as "moral 
extremists," noting that several of his friends at the camp remained 
virgins through high school, unlike many other teens they knew.

Still, Foley questioned how such an environment could be described 
as "wholesome."

He also distinguished it from computer-related behavior, such as 
Internet porn and child modeling, that he's spoken out against. Those 
activities at least must go through filters, he said.

"In this particular situation, you're actually putting these children 
together with adults," he said. "It's a little bizarre to me that 
parents would even consider putting their children in such a situation."

 
60 responses total.

#1 of 60 by richard on Tue Jun 24 23:35:25 2003:

what do you think of this concept?  It is true, surveys have said, that 
many children and teenagers grow up too "body sensitive"  Nudist 
advocates would surely say that a children's nudist camp would teach 
them to become more comfortable with their bodies and thus with the 
world in general.

But others would say that nudist camps for children has more of a 
downside to it as a concept than its upside


#2 of 60 by cross on Tue Jun 24 23:41:50 2003:

This response has been erased.



#3 of 60 by rcurl on Wed Jun 25 00:01:12 2003:

What do most families do about nudity at home when their children are growing
up? We never made anything of nudity when it was natural to be nude. I
wonder if these blue-noses followed some rules about being undressed
when they were growing up. 


#4 of 60 by jmsaul on Wed Jun 25 02:40:38 2003:

The kids going to this camp are children of nudists.  If this camp didn't
exist, they'd be hanging out at nudist resorts with their families anyway.
You have to consider it in that context.


#5 of 60 by jazz on Wed Jun 25 03:13:16 2003:

        You know, I've heard, though I haven't seen evidence, that urinating
in a public park is now considered an offence that puts you on the sex
offender list.  If so, it and this join the ranks of some of the sillier ideas
that I've heard of people getting confused in their zealotry against sexual
abuse.


#6 of 60 by polygon on Wed Jun 25 04:23:49 2003:

Justice Voelker of the Michigan Supreme Court wrote a great opinion
about this issue in the 1950s -- a decision which essentially legalized
private nudist camps in Michigan.  (State police invaded a private nudist
camp near Battle Creek and arrested everyone, mainly on the notion that
minors were present; the state supreme court threw out the convictions.)

Mark Foley is a fascinating case himself: a conservative Republican
politician who has always been widely known in Florida political circles
to be a gay man.  He openly attends events with his male partner, and is a
regular at gay bars and nightclubs in Florida and in Washington.  However,
only recently has this been mentioned in the press.  Foley, who is a
candidate for a U.S. Senate seat next year, has reacted angrily to what he
sees as an infringement on his privacy.

But how much privacy can a US Senate candidate in a large state really
expect, over a personal issue he has never bothered to conceal before? 
The debate rages on in both the straight and gay media.

Funny time for him to blast the nudists.


#7 of 60 by bru on Wed Jun 25 08:51:58 2003:

It allows him to show himself as a defender of children by discriminating
against a small minority.  It distances himself from one of the more severe
beliefs people have about gay men;  That they are abusers of young men.


#8 of 60 by jep on Wed Jun 25 12:37:43 2003:

My home runs like Rane's, I guess.  We're usually dressed but don't 
make anything of it if we're not, in private.

I'd have been terrified at the idea of going to a nudist camp for 
kids, myself, when I was 11-18.  And of course, excited.

As a parent, I wouldn't pick such a place to send my son.  If he 
really, really wanted to go, I'd probably consider letting him, but it 
seems pretty far-fetched.  I don't expect he'll want to.  He doesn't 
seem the type.

re resp:6: Can't gay men go on moral crusades, too?  Maybe it'll 
distract the press a little from his homosexuality.  Probably not, and 
probably it won't have any effect; this seems like an awfully minor 
issue.  He needs to catch Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein raising 
money for his opponent by selling drugs to 5th graders.  I bet there 
are a lot of nudist camps in Florida and they aren't a very big 
political topic.


#9 of 60 by jmsaul on Wed Jun 25 13:58:10 2003:

Re #8, 3rd para:  As I said, the kids going to this are already nudists, who
                  have been raised in nudist families.


#10 of 60 by gull on Wed Jun 25 14:30:25 2003:

Re #8: Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein are love partners.  I saw it
in the Enquirer. ;)


#11 of 60 by orinoco on Wed Jun 25 14:41:11 2003:

Of course, it's also possible that Mark Foley approves of homosexuality and
disapproves of public nudity around children.  There's no real contradiction
there.  


#12 of 60 by tod on Wed Jun 25 16:28:21 2003:

This response has been erased.



#13 of 60 by jmsaul on Wed Jun 25 16:31:23 2003:

You don't have to be out of this country for it to be legit.  It's legit on
private property right here in the US.


#14 of 60 by tod on Wed Jun 25 16:37:53 2003:

This response has been erased.



#15 of 60 by jmsaul on Wed Jun 25 16:53:08 2003:

There are also some public nude recreation areas, but I don't know their
policy on children.


#16 of 60 by tod on Wed Jun 25 16:55:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#17 of 60 by jmsaul on Wed Jun 25 17:00:48 2003:

A lot of them are, but not all.

By the way, I don't think that the existence of pedophiles is a justification
for preventing kids from going nude any more than the existence of
conventional hetero rapists would be for preventing women from going nude.
That's the same species of argument Moslem governments give for legislating
hijab (or worse): since there are bad people out there who might attack women
if they see their faces, the answer is to cover women's faces.  I do agree
that you have to be careful, supervise, and watch out for the bastards.


#18 of 60 by flem on Wed Jun 25 17:08:34 2003:

Bah.  Yet another "Protect the children!  Vote for me!" campaign.  

The number of people in this country who push their own agenda by claiming
that it's for the good of the children is just disgusting.  What's even more
disgusting is that it works, as often as not.  


#19 of 60 by scg on Wed Jun 25 17:52:00 2003:

Nudity seems to be at least tolerated on the more secluded California (or at
least Bay Area) beaches, with some of them drawing huge crowds of naked   
people.  There's at least one state-run public beach just South of San    
Francisco that's officially clothing optional.  I'm not aware of any      
restrictions on children at any of those.

All the same, I found the comments by the camp spokesperson in this article
a bit creepy for some reason.  It seems to me there's a big difference between
taking off your clothes because you feel like it and you're around a group
of people who don't object, versus the formality this group seems to be
putting around it.


#20 of 60 by oval on Wed Jun 25 17:52:57 2003:

we live in a country who's president doesn't even support sex ed for kids,
claiming that abstinence is the only way to keep them safe.

inserting a kids nudist camp is a risky idea, if only because the US is such
a prudish culture.



#21 of 60 by oval on Wed Jun 25 17:54:26 2003:

19 slipped. i agree it's a bit creepy - in our culture there seem to be a lot
of sexually repressed perves. look at the church.



#22 of 60 by tod on Wed Jun 25 17:56:46 2003:

This response has been erased.



#23 of 60 by oval on Wed Jun 25 19:13:12 2003:

dunno what amber alert is man..


#24 of 60 by richard on Wed Jun 25 21:35:23 2003:

They have a public nude beach in San Diego, I've been there before 
(clothed though)  It is right near UC-San Diego, you have to climb down 
a steep cliff to get to it, which is I guess why it is allowed


#25 of 60 by tod on Wed Jun 25 21:43:50 2003:

This response has been erased.



#26 of 60 by cross on Wed Jun 25 21:47:57 2003:

This response has been erased.



#27 of 60 by tod on Wed Jun 25 22:08:39 2003:

This response has been erased.



#28 of 60 by keesan on Thu Jun 26 02:01:24 2003:

My 6 year old neighbor was out on the sidewalk without clothes a few days ago
after he got cold in the pool and the wet clothing made him colder.  Am I
liable for prosecution since I was there?

In Italy little children are expected to swim without clothing, and their
mothers dress on the beach.


#29 of 60 by orinoco on Thu Jun 26 16:33:08 2003:

I think the best rule of thumb is to avoid being much nuder or much less nude
than everyone else.  If I decide to stroll naked through downtown Manhattan,
I'm going to make myself pretty conspicuous, and I could wind up attracting
all sorts of unpleasant attention.  If I go naked at a nudist gathering, I'm
actually gonna be making myself less conspicuous.  

In a country where nudity is the norm for small kids, letting your kid go
naked is probably perfectly safe.  In a country where even little kids are
expected to be fully clothed, it might be more dangerous.  


#30 of 60 by cross on Thu Jun 26 17:28:01 2003:

This response has been erased.



#31 of 60 by oval on Thu Jun 26 17:38:17 2003:

this is true. i actually saw it once, though not in manhattan, but just over
the bridge in williamsburg, brooklyn. woman was just walking down the street
naked. later the police were cruising around trying to find her. no biggie
really, just bizarre.



#32 of 60 by goose on Thu Jun 26 17:46:13 2003:

I'll bet they were looking for her....


#33 of 60 by tod on Thu Jun 26 19:37:53 2003:

This response has been erased.



#34 of 60 by richard on Thu Jun 26 21:10:30 2003:

here in nyc, nobody pays any attention to anyone else.  one could be 
walking nude down the street, and nobody would pay it any mind.  until 
some cop comes along who feels like writing out a ticket.  you see 
enough bizarre stuff living in the big city that after a while you 
become de-sensitized and very little shocks you.  I once saw a couple 
in central park, pretty clearly having sex, and people jogging right 
past them not even noticing or caring.  


#35 of 60 by tod on Thu Jun 26 21:14:30 2003:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 60 by dcat on Thu Jun 26 21:40:37 2003:

Someone should probably change the MOTD, according to which this is the
GrexWalk item. . . . .



#37 of 60 by orinoco on Fri Jun 27 03:02:26 2003:

All right, so I picked the wrong city for my example... :)


#38 of 60 by scg on Fri Jun 27 03:56:31 2003:

re 36:
        I fixed the MOTD for this week, but there's probably some automated
process that needs to be fixed for the long term.  I sent mail to staff asking
them to do a long term fix.


#39 of 60 by naftee on Fri Jun 27 04:22:16 2003:

This response has been erased.



#40 of 60 by polygon on Fri Jun 27 07:35:52 2003:

As I recall, a New York State judge ruled some time ago that display of a
nude female torso was not indecent exposure and not a crime.  In other
words, if men could legally be shirtless, it was a violation of equal
protection to prosecute women for it.

I saw a partly nude man in a crowded subway station (Lexington Avenue
line) in NYC a few years back.  I would guess he was somewhat disturbed. 
A few minutes later, I saw him being led away by police.


#41 of 60 by mary on Fri Jun 27 10:46:45 2003:

I look at nude people for a living.

Next. ;-)


#42 of 60 by gull on Fri Jun 27 13:18:29 2003:

Re #40: I don't know about New York, but I think that was ruled to be
the case in Ontario.


#43 of 60 by jmsaul on Fri Jun 27 13:26:31 2003:

New York too.


#44 of 60 by cross on Fri Jun 27 16:41:30 2003:

This response has been erased.



#45 of 60 by other on Fri Jun 27 16:58:01 2003:

Mermaid Parade?


#46 of 60 by mynxcat on Fri Jun 27 17:30:35 2003:

Yeah, Mermaid Parade??!!


#47 of 60 by other on Fri Jun 27 18:09:25 2003:

Google it.  (I did.)


#48 of 60 by mynxcat on Fri Jun 27 19:36:58 2003:

Too much work


#49 of 60 by i on Sat Jun 28 01:57:16 2003:

To judge by cultures where substantial clothing isn't usually worn
(generally primitive tribal), nudity isn't much of a turn-on to folks
who generally go naked when they have a choice.  From nudists i've
talked to, it sounds like expressing a "nudity means sex" attitude is
a quick way to get marked as "a creep or loser who needs to be thrown
out".

This still leaves the issue of protecting the kids from sickos trying
to sneak in past the guards.  But since the politician is a southern
conservative, there's an easy answer - let the kids pack heat and
teach 'em to use it.  NRA'll cover the cost - think of the publicity
when Amy (age 8) offs a creep who broke in and "was trying to fondle
little Billy" (age 4)! 


#50 of 60 by tsty on Thu Jul 17 06:51:00 2003:

nambla to the 'rescue'?  frothing pedofiles are breathless.


#51 of 60 by arabella on Sat Jul 26 18:41:17 2003:

There were a number of topless women at the Aqua Park (huge pair of 
swimming pools) attached to my hotel in Plovdiv, Bulgaria.  It looked 
odd to me, but the women were completely unconcerned.  One of our 
(stranger) singers had his picture taken with two such women, though, 
on the basis that no one back home in New York would believe him 
otherwise.  (Ask me about "Robert, the annoying tenor" sometime.)  
Also, there were quite a few naked little kids.  Nudity (or semi 
nudity) is definitely much more acceptable in Europe.


#52 of 60 by scott on Sat Jul 26 20:31:57 2003:

When I was in Norway I was told that the topless thing had stopped a few years
ago (now the fashion is a regular swimsuit), although there are a few nudist
beaches around.  Women would sometimes still flash a little boob when
changing, though, instead of trying to hide under a towel.


#53 of 60 by keesan on Sat Jul 26 21:00:58 2003:

When I was in Bulgarian they were fining men $5 and women $10 for nude
bathing.  Topless women got fine $5.  In Munchen there was a nude beach in
the middle of town on a river.  Maybe the fashions are changing as the baby
boomers become disatisfied with their shapes.


#54 of 60 by rcurl on Sun Jul 27 06:58:25 2003:

They fined people in US dollars in Bulgaria? Is this in order to obtain
a "hard" currency?


#55 of 60 by keesan on Sun Jul 27 15:18:58 2003:

Five levs.  I was trying to get a point across.


#56 of 60 by tod on Sun Jul 27 18:43:11 2003:

This response has been erased.



#57 of 60 by lynne on Mon Jul 28 01:12:31 2003:

At the Freibad (public pool) where I lived in Germany, there was a sunbathing
area where maybe every fifth or so female would be topless.  I believe there
was also an all-nude beach a relatively short bus ride away.


#58 of 60 by richard on Tue Jul 29 22:34:26 2003:

On the other extreme, in Malaysia (a muslim country), nude sunbathing 
on a public beach could get you twenty years in jail.  When I was there 
last year I was told how seriously they take their laws there.  If you 
were even caught smoking one marijuana joint in Malaysia, it is grounds 
for the death penalty.  And in Singapore, nude sunbathing might get you 
caned...


#59 of 60 by kami on Thu Jul 31 05:22:26 2003:

Gee, I'd like to know more about this camp- I think my boys would love it.
I, on the other hand, are just more comfortable with more clothing and less
sweat.
I'd like to see what sort of background checks the demand from the staff.
I gather, as someone sort of pointed out, that Naturist culture strictly
forbids oggling, touching, or any sexual behavior in "public".

I'm guessing it never will "coss the desk" of Gov. B.- too much hassle for
a non-issue.


#60 of 60 by bonfire on Tue Aug 12 06:18:04 2003:

I think that if they arent doing anything illegal, than it should be fine,
and if the kids dont want to go, they dont have to.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: