Grex Agora46 Conference

Item 192: Just like in the (B Grade) movies -- Pizza Delivery Man Blown Up

Entered by mcnally on Mon Sep 1 10:34:27 2003:

As if there weren't already plenty of reasons to be glad you're not
delivering pizza..

  http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/01/national/01ERIE.html

Synopsis:  police are investigating the death of a pizza
deliveryman who robbed a bank in Erie, PA.  When police stopped
him not far from the crime he claimed he was instructed to rob the
bank by a man who had forced him to wear a bomb.  Apparently he
wasn't joking -- shortly after the police cornered him the bomb
exploded and he was killed.
61 responses total.

#1 of 61 by russ on Mon Sep 1 16:01:34 2003:

Tom Smith is going to have to re-do "Domino Death" now.


#2 of 61 by slynne on Mon Sep 1 19:13:38 2003:

Wow. I wonder if he put the bomb there and it went off accidently or if 
he was telling the truth.


#3 of 61 by bru on Mon Sep 1 23:49:26 2003:

Thats what the police want to know as well.  They are also investigating the
death of another employee at teh same pizza place yesterday.  The FBI is
involved.


#4 of 61 by tod on Tue Sep 2 16:44:43 2003:

This response has been erased.



#5 of 61 by bru on Tue Sep 2 17:14:21 2003:

it must have been a small bomb.  I am surprised they did not do more than they
did to save him.  I suppose it comes from following preceedure, which calls
for the bomb squad to handle all bombs.


#6 of 61 by gelinas on Tue Sep 2 17:36:51 2003:

The story I read said the bomb squad was on the way.

I've known a few Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) people.  I would NOT
attempt their job without training.  Really.  James Bond screwing out
the fuze of an atomic bomb looks good on film, but I wouldn't try it in
real life.

It's not a matter of "following procedure"; it's a matter of knowing
your limitations.


#7 of 61 by happyboy on Tue Sep 2 18:32:25 2003:

re5:  what would YOU have done?


#8 of 61 by tod on Tue Sep 2 18:37:54 2003:

This response has been erased.



#9 of 61 by bru on Tue Sep 2 19:42:13 2003:

epends on the circumstance.  If it was a small bomb with a known detonation
time, I would have tried to either let him remove it or tried to put something
between him and the bomb.

If it was a large bomb, I would have told him to sit and wait for the bomb
squad.

It did not seem logical to me to hand cuff him, make him sit down, and wait
for a bomb squad that might or might not get there in time.


#10 of 61 by tod on Tue Sep 2 20:02:30 2003:

This response has been erased.



#11 of 61 by rcurl on Tue Sep 2 21:06:10 2003:

Bolt cutter?


#12 of 61 by jmsaul on Tue Sep 2 22:31:13 2003:

I've seen a photo of the thing.  Might have been hard.  Oddly enough, the
collar survived (or at least part of it did).


#13 of 61 by tod on Tue Sep 2 22:58:41 2003:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 61 by jmsaul on Tue Sep 2 23:02:53 2003:

That, plus the way the thing was built was weird.  Layers of metal with space
between them.  I can't find the photo I saw before, but they're circulating
it.


#15 of 61 by tod on Tue Sep 2 23:25:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#16 of 61 by bru on Wed Sep 3 00:57:12 2003:

Wow.  Very much like a handcuff.  They would have had to use a hacksaw or
diamond chain to cut thru the hinge if it was truely hardened steel.  Still,
if I knew he had a bomb and about how much time he had, I might offer him the
chance to remove it knowing what I did might set it off.  Particularly if the
bomb squad was still to far away.

There again, I still don't havea  clear picture of how it was constructed and
what methods could be used to seperate him from the explosive.


#17 of 61 by jmsaul on Wed Sep 3 02:49:52 2003:

I don't either, especially given how much of the collar seems to have survived
intact.  The charge might have been pretty small.  I'd hate to second-guess
the people on the scene, though: his story wasn't believable, and he might
have detonated the explosives while they were trying to help him.  I noticed
they leaned him up against the front of a squad car -- how much you wanna bet
that the back of that car was facing everyone else, and it was pretty far
away.


#18 of 61 by rcurl on Wed Sep 3 05:51:33 2003:

I finally saw the gadget on TV news, and certainly a bolt cutter would not
work. It looked complicated, and not anything I recognized as standard issue.
It must have taken some time to make. We still don't know how it worked,
however. 


#19 of 61 by tod on Wed Sep 3 17:21:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 61 by scott on Thu Sep 4 14:44:34 2003:

If it was just sheet metal then it would be easy enough to see if there was
a booby-trap on the collar.

Something like a Dremel tool with an abrasive wheel would have worked,
assuming no vibration issues with the bomb.  Ard apparently the bomb was quite
small; it was reported to have created a "postage-stamp sized hole" in the
man's chest.


#21 of 61 by tod on Thu Sep 4 18:44:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#22 of 61 by scott on Thu Sep 4 18:45:34 2003:

Wouldn't take as much space as bolt-cutters, and I bet a lot of cop cars have
a pair of bolt-cutters in the trunk.


#23 of 61 by russ on Fri Sep 5 02:30:25 2003:

How often do cops need to cut bomb-collars off of people?

What really bugs me about this is that the cops did not appear to
have made any attempt to protect that poor guy from the bomb.
They could have given him a heavy coat or something to stuff
under the collar, between himself and the bomb.  (They wouldn't
have had to stand nearby while he crammed it in.)  They could have
called an ambulance to stand by to render aid if the bomb went
off before the bomb squad got there.  They might even have let
the guy lie in the trunk of a cruiser while they drove the victim
to the bomb squad.

None of that was done, the guy died from a wound that might have
been prevented with some thick padding, and the best clue as to
the identity of the bomb-maker was lost.  Lousy police work!


#24 of 61 by scott on Fri Sep 5 04:17:48 2003:

Nah, they'll be able to find the marker stuff in the wound, and track down
the source, assuming it's a commercial explosive.

But I agree on letting the guy the stuff something around the explosive.  That
was sloppy indeed.


#25 of 61 by cross on Fri Sep 5 05:27:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#26 of 61 by scott on Fri Sep 5 13:19:05 2003:

THere is still the possibility that he did this to himself.


#27 of 61 by tod on Fri Sep 5 16:25:43 2003:

This response has been erased.



#28 of 61 by cross on Fri Sep 5 16:36:12 2003:

This response has been erased.



#29 of 61 by tod on Fri Sep 5 16:50:19 2003:

This response has been erased.



#30 of 61 by gull on Fri Sep 5 16:52:33 2003:

Re #28: I think that's pretty unfair.  The police were dealing with an
unknown situation, and a person of unknown mental state.  The "death
sentence" was issued by the person who put the bomb on the guy, not the
police.

Re #29: Or run up to the nearest cop, hug him, and set it off.  We still
don't know that this isn't some mentally unbalanced guy who did this to
himself.


#31 of 61 by tod on Fri Sep 5 17:12:00 2003:

This response has been erased.



#32 of 61 by cross on Fri Sep 5 19:22:33 2003:

This response has been erased.



#33 of 61 by tod on Fri Sep 5 20:23:37 2003:

This response has been erased.



#34 of 61 by rcurl on Fri Sep 5 20:43:56 2003:

...with a bomb around his neck. Presumably it was timed to go off if
not neutralized first. He might have known how long he had - I would think
the person that put it there would have said "you have xyz (time)....". 

The bomb might have been made less fatal if it could have been firmly
clamped in some device that would hold the collar and divert any pieces.
For instance, in the gap between those elevator doors that have parts
that both slide up and down. It would perhaps also been useful to slide
the bomb part to the back first. But who could have known that they had
time for anything like that?


#35 of 61 by tod on Fri Sep 5 21:05:49 2003:

This response has been erased.



#36 of 61 by cross on Fri Sep 5 22:09:38 2003:

This response has been erased.



#37 of 61 by jep on Sat Sep 6 02:14:33 2003:

Not many cops have experience with a situation like that one.  They're 
just people.  How could they or anyone else have known how to deal 
with such a situation?

I say to give the cops a break.


#38 of 61 by tod on Sat Sep 6 03:07:53 2003:

This response has been erased.



#39 of 61 by russ on Sat Sep 6 05:04:14 2003:

Re #33:

>I didn't see a pooch. Just a guy that had robbed a bank.

A guy who was obviously in danger, whose story was quite
consistent with his actions (he robbed the bank because he was
under threat of death!)... and the cops took no action to save
him so he could help nail the person truly responsible.

The poor pizza driver was a *hostage*.  The cops treated him like
a piece of meat, and their prophecy fullfilled itself in due time.

The cops really and truly fucked up.  Admit it.  They lost their
only eyewitness and let an innocent man die because they refused
to recognize the weapon being used to coerce him and what it meant.


#40 of 61 by cross on Sat Sep 6 06:38:47 2003:

This response has been erased.



#41 of 61 by mcnally on Sat Sep 6 07:52:23 2003:

  The people who say "Hindsight is 20/20," are underestimating -- it's much
  better than that.  What seems like a simple decision now might've been
  considerably less clear at the time.


#42 of 61 by pvn on Sat Sep 6 08:21:53 2003:

Yah.  Give the cops a break!  Its not like this kind of thing has
happened before (except perhaps in movies and novels which likely
inspired this).  Why do I suspect that the cops are going to have
experience with this type of thing in the future?  It is rather clever
and will probably happen again (I seems to recall the plot of a recent
bad movie that I didn't see but read about.)  To prevent the collar
being removed you merely pass a trigger through the collar - cut it and
boom.  Obviously the solution to this kind of crime is to move to a
"cashless" society.  Some idiot suggested "padding".  Modern explosives
are such that all that would do is slightly reduce the cost of the
funeral if an open casket was asked for - less mortuary wax.


#43 of 61 by scott on Sat Sep 6 13:05:34 2003:

beady gets pretty dumb late at night...  It's not a safe assumption that
"modern" explosives were used.  Not only was it a tiny, concealed bomb, but
may well have been homebrew to avoid having the tracer compounds.


#44 of 61 by tod on Sat Sep 6 13:27:10 2003:

This response has been erased.



#45 of 61 by cross on Sat Sep 6 19:17:40 2003:

This response has been erased.



#46 of 61 by bru on Sat Sep 6 21:28:56 2003:

leaving a suspect cuffed is standard procedure having to do wiht officer and
suspect safety.  But leaving him sitting there alone while the time clicked
down may have been procedure, I am not sure it was right.


#47 of 61 by jmsaul on Sat Sep 6 22:16:23 2003:

The wound was the size of a postcard, not a postage stamp, I thought.


#48 of 61 by gull on Sun Sep 7 00:07:07 2003:

Re #45: So you're saying they should have risked an innocent officer's
life to try to remove the thing, when they knew the bomb squad was on
the way?  If an officer had tried to remove it and it had exploded, you
would be criticizing him for killing the pizza delivery guy by "being a
cowboy" and trying to remove the bomb himself instead of waiting for
trained personnel.  This was quite simply a no-win situation.


#49 of 61 by cross on Sun Sep 7 02:04:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#50 of 61 by pvn on Sun Sep 7 05:17:42 2003:

And cops have bolt cutters in their squads nowdays?  And how do the cops
know there is a bomb before it goes off?  Up until that point he was a
suspect in a bank robbery and the usual practice - by the book- is to
cuff 'em.  Look, the cops are probably even more pissed about this as
somebody used their proceedure against them and made them look bad.  I
can assure you that everyone involved is probably wondering how they
could have improved reaction times and process to ensure better outcome
in the future.  The person to blame is the truely sadistic coward who
made the pizza delivery guy rob the bank.

Personally, I do think that it would have been nice if one of the
officers had thought to toss the guy his vest to put between the bomb
and he but even that would probably have be a futile gesture (would end
up with a broke neck anyways).


#51 of 61 by russ on Sun Sep 7 10:26:20 2003:

Re #48:  They should have loaned the guy a flak vest to stuff under
or around the collar, if they had one.  And if they were concerned
about him running off they could have cuffed him to a sign (leaving
his hands free).  In retrospect a flak vest probably would have
deflected most of the damage; given that the collar was completely
intact after the fact, there were no high explosives involved.

I don't buy this talk about SOP.  You'd expect the poor traumatized
civilian to follow orders after being hooked to a bomb, but the cops
are supposed to be professionals.  They are PAID to do the right thing,
PAID to think in stressful situations, PAID to take necessary risks to
themselves to protect the public.  I didn't see them earning their pay
that day.


#52 of 61 by tod on Sun Sep 7 15:19:48 2003:

This response has been erased.



#53 of 61 by bru on Mon Sep 8 02:33:25 2003:

I still haven't heard if they knew how much time they had.  I didn't say they
did the wrong thing, just that I am not sure they did the right thing.

I don't know what they could have done that would have worked or ifg anything
they did would have.

The flak vest idea probably would NOT have worked.  I wear one of those, and
they don't lend thamselves to bending well.  

If an officer had a vest witha  chest plate, he might, might, have been able
to interpose it.  Even so, the best choice might have been water immerssion
if there was a pond nearby.  even though the DC would still have sent the
signal, if the primer wasn't water proof, it may have doused the bang, it
might have stopped the timer.

Problem is, there are a lot of things I can think to try, but nothing theat
was 100% positive without an expert looking at it before hand.   And many of
the things I can think of might have made it worse if the Bomb Squad had got
there in time.


#54 of 61 by russ on Mon Sep 8 03:16:56 2003:

Re #52:  The cops had enough time to sit around while a TV news
crew arrived, set up and shot footage.  That's plenty of time to
do something.


#55 of 61 by happyboy on Mon Sep 8 08:07:30 2003:

"hey fellers, lets throw apples at the retard wearing the bomb
necklace!"


#56 of 61 by jmsaul on Mon Sep 8 11:44:24 2003:

Bruce's water immersion idea isn't a bad one.  The other quick anti-bomb
method, shooting it with a shotgun, wouldn't have worked out well...


#57 of 61 by goose on Mon Sep 8 14:20:09 2003:

I think the criminals saw the Japanese film "Battle Royale" (Original
title:"Batoru rowaiaru")


#58 of 61 by gull on Mon Sep 8 15:06:18 2003:

I doubt they knew how much time they had.  Bombs only have big red
digital displays that count down to zero in the movies.  I think they
did the right thing -- they cleared the area and waited for the experts
to arrive.  In this case it didn't work, but 99% of the time it would have.


#59 of 61 by tod on Mon Sep 8 16:51:01 2003:

This response has been erased.



#60 of 61 by other on Tue Sep 9 05:07:11 2003:

I suspect that there were things they could have done that they didn't, 
but I also suspect that given how little they knew about the actual 
circumstances leading up to their interaction with this guy, there was 
little that they reasonably should have chosen to do other than what they 
did.


#61 of 61 by pvn on Thu Sep 11 05:52:02 2003:

Again, the collar survived the blast.  IF they had thought to put a flak
vest between his body and the device force of the blast if anything
would have jerked the collar forward even more probably breaking his
neck.  The dude was probably a gonner no matter what the cops did given
the limited amount of time the cops had.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: