To continue the discussion that started in the 'General Announcements' item: What are the appropriate ages to legally drink and to legally drive?42 responses total.
I think 16 for driving is fine, but I also approve of the restrictions many states have implemented, such as "only one other person in the car" and "no driving after 11:00 p.m.". I think the drinking age should be 18. I would be surprised to hear there's been any reduction in alcohol/drug impaired driving accidents by teenagers because of raising the drinking age above 18. It's only slightly more difficult for 18-to-21 year olds to get alcohol because of these laws.
This response has been erased.
This response has been erased.
I agree, teach responsible drinking at home. My parents weren't big drinkers, but we got sips when they did have something. When we got old enough to ask for a drink at a family function, we were allowed to have it. I have done the same with my two kids. Staci doesn't like the taste or smell at all and refuses to even try. Damon got scared by how much it took to make him feel the effects. He does have to occasional glass of pear or apple ale when I buy it, or a beer with STeve or a margarita if we make them. We aren't big drinkers either, but they have seen us have a drink how and then, usually when we go out for a nice dinner (and then only one of us drinks and we made a big deal of deciding who was drinking and who was driving when the kids where young).
When I was a kid, my dad announced that the drinking age in our house was 11. After I was 11, I was allowed to have wine with dinner and stuff. I tend to agree that helped me learn how to drink responsibly. I also went through a big binge drinking phase when I was 15. It was luckily over by the time I was 16 and driving. Here is a thought though. Alcohol is a drug. Some people would consider it child abuse for a person to give their kids drugs. Is it legal to give a child under 18 alcohol?
This response has been erased.
I bet it would look bad in a child custody case though. So if you give your kids alcohol, dont plan on getting divorced.
This response has been erased.
My three children, all "of age", either do not drink or drink very little, usually as wine with a meal. We never denied them "sampling" alcoholic drinks at any age, but then we were never bad examples of overindulgence either. I'm inclined to think it is bad parental examples that lead most people to excessive drinking (and raging teetotalers are also bad examples).
It's done a lot; if it's illegal, there's a lot of scofflaws out there. I'm one. I let my son have a sip of my beer occasionally, if I'm having a beer when he's around. He loves beer. A year or so ago, I bought him some O'Douls, figuring it's got practically no alcohol and wouldn't hurt him. It turned into a social problem; he started naming his toy animals "O'Douls Beer Drinker", and telling everyone about how his dad lets him drink O'Doul's. His mother raised a fuss about it, and so I had to cut him off. Since then, I don't drink beer much when he's around, and so there's not much occasion to let him have any sips. It'll be interesting to see how I handle his desire to drink when he's 15. My feeling now is that, as long as he does it when he's home, it's fine with me. Better he does it at home with me around, than somewhere else. We talk about drinking and driving occasionally now, and will discuss it more when he gets close to driving age, so he'll know that I am very strongly against him doing that. I've got to get another copy of Mike Fedel's "I Miss Your Smile", which is about Mike's daughter who was killed by a drunk driver.
This response has been erased.
This response has been erased.
re11 /passes tod an ice cold can of BAPst
I hope that responsibility and clear-headedness is implied: there are cases of teenage binge drinking where the parents bought the alcohol. I think most here are suggesting that moderation be taught by example, but I wasn't perfectly sure because it wasn't said so explicitly. Of course, consistency would be a stabilizing influence, as I'm sure many kids get mixed messages from many sources in their lives.
Over here, (that is, in the UK), the legal drinking age is 18, but the legal
age for smoking cigarettes is 16. The legal age for voting is 18, but the
legal age for being an MP is 21 (afaik, the legal age for being a Member of
the House of Lords is 18, but you also must be one of the few Lords that still
are entitled to sit in the House, or appointed by a government commission).
The legal age for driving is 17, or 18 for a truck ("medium-sized goods
vehicle"). So you can smoke and drink before you can drive.
Also, the legal age at which you are deemed to be a "consenting adult" for
the purposes of sexual intercourse is 16, but 18 (recently reduced from 21)
for gays. Go figure.
Erratum - you can smoke before you can drive, but you have to wait a year to drink legally. In private houses, "with adult supervision", the legal drinking age is 5. This hasn't stopped the kind of binge drinking British football (soccer) hooligans and holiday makers get up to - to the point that in Peninsular Castilian (or Spanish as spoken in Spain), the word for "British football fan" is now "hooligan".
The legal age for smoking tobacco should be raised. It's 18 all over America (I think). I wouldn't mind if it were 25. Maybe 35 would be better.
This response has been erased.
The only excuse for a 'legal smoking age' is that we don't teach our children to be responsible for themselves. Come to think of it, that's the only excuse for a legal drinking age, too.
Parents leading by example. Hey, that would work great as long as pickup-driving, beer-swilling, "good ol' boys" weren't allowed to be parents. Hmmm.....
Where is there established a legal age for smoking tobacco? (We know of a legal age for the purchase of tobacco products.)
resp:18 yes, not all parents are willing to lead by example, unfortunately...
RE #21 In Michigan we're covered by Public Act 31 of 1915, the Youth Tobacco Act. 722.642 Possessing or using tobacco products in public by person under 18; violation as misdemeanor; penalty; participation in health promotion and risk reduction assessment program; costs; community service. So it looks like a minor can smoke in the privacy of their home.
This response has been erased.
They had "community service" and "health awareness" concerning tobacco in 1915?
722.642 is from 1972...ammendments
The thing to do is pick one age and make it the age of majority. If I can smoke at age x, I should also be able to drink, drive, vote, have sex, and get any license. That age should be 21, with the exception of those in the military. If you are in the military, you should have access to all those vices.
Where did people get the ages of 16, 18 and 21 anyways?
Compromise....
Presumably from some combination of objective determination of "maturity" and social status at those various ages, over the years. That would be my guess. In other words, what Rane said.
Most smokers start a few years before the legal age, unfortunately. Lowering the legal age for buying tobacco would make it easier for more stupid kids to start earlier. Probably the same for drinking. You can ask older kids to buy for you but this is more complicated and probably reduces the frequency of use or the number of users.
This response has been erased.
To the extent that it will be a greater burden on society if we don't coddle them. The costs of human stupidity is also enormous - we don't need to make it larger intentionally.
"Stupidity is a capital crime, with the sentence executed by Nature."
This response has been erased.
They are positively correlated.
This response has been erased.
I think people should be required to buckle up their kids, but once they reach adulthood if they want to be stupid they can go unbelted.
I support the seatbelt law. It is hardly a real infringement of any civil liberty and, in fact, is more like a part of the machinery of operating a safe car. My reasons are not just to protect other drivers, but to keep bodies out of the path of my car if I am among crashing vehicles. They make a real mess.
Seatbelts also help to keep drivers behind the wheel, where they have a better chance of maintaining control. This can be really useful in the last few minutes, or seconds, before a crash.
This response has been erased.
They aren't called "brain buckets" for nothing.
You have several choices: