Grex Agora46 Conference

Item 162: The Great North American Blackout of 2003

Entered by scott on Sat Aug 16 01:45:12 2003:

So what did you do during the Great Blackout, and how long did you have to
do it?
99 responses total.

#1 of 99 by scott on Sat Aug 16 01:48:23 2003:

Luckily (well, I forget how much is luck vs. plan) my storage locker place
doesn't allow volatiles, so my camping stove was stored here instead.  That
got me coffee in the morning.  Then I'd just bought a new cylinder of propane
for my tiny grill, which served to cook up the meat that would have gone bad.
Got online a few times with my laptop.

Oh, and I turned on my police scanner and sharpened a bunch of knives.  Well,
I had the police scanner on for early news, then in the process of looking
for something else I finally found the whetstone I'd been looking for.  

Then today in a burst of bored energy I nearly completed my 3rd chainmail
shirt - probably an hour left to finish the armpit seams.


#2 of 99 by janc on Sat Aug 16 03:48:01 2003:

Dozed off in front of the radio, woke to hear that George Bush had sent troops
to invade Canada in reprisal for their unprovoked attack on America's power
grid.  No wait, that was a dream.


#3 of 99 by jlamb on Sat Aug 16 04:20:19 2003:

Looks like people are having problems getting on grex.
DNS seeems to be down.


#4 of 99 by drew on Sat Aug 16 06:29:57 2003:

Made a trip to 'Arbor - unaware that it was anything but some local power
company screw-up, until I turned on the radio mid-trip. SemiSlug was canceled,
though two or three people did show up.

Came home, stopped at the local Meijer to pick up a fresh deep cycle battery
to replace one with a surface charge of 8 volts. Managed to get a light and
a fan, plus the computer equipment, powered some of the time.

Today, took off looking for fuel. Listening to radio reports of where power
was coming on, I decided to get just before the wave front, as it were, and
after three tries found a station with not too long a line.

Took fubar battery to Meijers and collected the core charge.

Got power back at 2pm, while I was out, and water around 9PM.


#5 of 99 by carson on Sat Aug 16 09:40:27 2003:

(what blackout?  we haven't had a blackout in at least two years.)


#6 of 99 by gelinas on Sat Aug 16 13:16:04 2003:

(where are you now, carson?)

Lesseee.  Took my long-haired bunkie to work around 17:30, when the power had
been out for an hour.  No power at work, but they found things to do with
flashlights and little else.  While she was at work, the rug rats and I went
out to the sailing club, where I did some painting.  After sunset, drove back
to Ann Arbor, hung out in the parking lot until my LHB got off work.  Read
by flashlight until we fell asleep.  Friday, took folks to work. 
(Daughter-mine wasn't needed; my long-haired bunkie wasn't so lucky.)  Then
went back out to the sailing club to do some more painting, reading, etc.

Got home around 14:30 to be told that power came on at or about 14:00.  Ended
up going to Chelsea, since the stuff around the house was closed (got gas at
the Marathon at Packard and Stadium first; I'd hoped not to have to, but that
didn't work out.  The line wasn't bad at all.)  Went back out to the sailing
club, just because.  (Power came on out there at or about 18:30.)  Picked up
my LHB at 20:00, and drove over to the Pumpkin, where I proceeded to plug
stuff in and turn on switches, during which fun activity I was joined by i.

Dinner was at Fazoli's on Stadium at Liberty.

A fun time was had by (almost) all. :)


#7 of 99 by goose on Sat Aug 16 14:38:23 2003:

Did the club have power Joe?  We never lost it on the other side.


#8 of 99 by dcat on Sat Aug 16 15:34:01 2003:

Was at the UGLi, in the computer lab, when the lights did a crazy dance and
computers went off and came back on for a few seconds before finally dying.
Not knowing it was wide-spread, tried to call DPS (UM campus police) but
couldn't get through, so called AAPD (not the emergency number, no), which
was the first time we heard it was city-wide.

Somehow the Grad still had power; went up and checked news online & read
NYTimes's early report identifying the problem as a cascade failure of the
Niagara-Mohawk grid, then walked home.  Glen street was barely moving.

Somewhere around 6 my dad got home -- the Exhibit Museum never lost power,
either, so he didn't even know there was a problem until he left to come home.
Listened to radio and read by candle/flashlight until going to bed.

Friday, sat outside listening to radio & reading until about 1, when we
noticed the porchlight had come on.  Went inside and noticed the clocks had
been on for half an hour. . . .

My dad went out to stores to find food -- hadn't had much, but had no ice,
so lost what we did have -- and got stranded at the mall when the thunderstorm
rolled through mid-afternoon & made it impossible for him to drive.  Made it
back eventually, and we had hot dogs from the grill for the second night in
a row.

The Ugli continues closed today, but is to reopen Sunday.


#9 of 99 by polytarp on Sat Aug 16 15:44:26 2003:

Huh?  Mostly, I just listened to the radio!  The BBC even!  Wow!


And then my power was on at like 2AM or something thereabouts somewhere 'round
there.


#10 of 99 by ea on Sat Aug 16 16:06:24 2003:

I was in line at Price Chopper when the power went off.  After about 5 
minutes, the backup generators had kicked in, and the lights went on.  
Took them about 15-20 more minutes before they were able to get the cash 
registers up and running.

Got through the line, went back to my apartment, sat on the front porch 
with roommates for a while, then went out to dinner.  The restaurant had 
power (apparently they were running from the grid, not the backup 
generators, because all the tv's were fully operational).  Drove back, 
noticed street lights were on ... until about a mile away from home, 
where everything was off.  Got home, sat around on porch for about 45 
minutes, then power came back on. (about 2115 thursday, IIRC)


#11 of 99 by scott on Sat Aug 16 16:08:05 2003:

I first tried to call DTE, but it was busy, so I walked up to Stadium to see
if the traffic lights were out.  Then I went home and turned on the police
scanner, where I heard somebody mention that this was ahpening in other
states.  Then I dug out a regular radio and found somebody still broadcasting.
Some of the AM stations were eventually just broadcasting the audio from a
TV station.


#12 of 99 by twenex on Sat Aug 16 16:53:03 2003:

Got up on Friday morning, heard about power blackouts in the US, thought,
"hmm, that's interesting"*, went to work, got on with my life, went out, came
back and went to sleep, got up, tried to log on to GREX, failed, thought,
"hmm, that's annoying"**, got on with my life, bought a suit, came back,
logged on to GREX, thought "Thank Christ, what a relief"***.

* That's the polite version.
** That's also the polite version.
*** You think that's the polite version?


#13 of 99 by keesan on Sat Aug 16 17:15:16 2003:

I enjoyed the unusual quit - no airplanes, few cars - and the lack of
streetlight glaring through my window (20 feet away).  Listened to birds in
the morning.  Counted cricket calls - average 3, sometimes 2 or 4 or even 5.


#14 of 99 by jaklumen on Sat Aug 16 17:39:25 2003:

I did what I usually do, really... because the blackout didn't reach 
this far west.  I was wondering why Grex was down until I saw the 
20/20 report and then figured it had something to do with it.


#15 of 99 by eprom on Sat Aug 16 18:50:19 2003:

I was at home when my UPS started beeping and the lights flickered and 
dimmed for about 4-5 seconds. I thought it was because I was using too
much electricity, so I went around turning off my A/C, and lights.

Then went about my day as usual, a few hours later, I flipped on the TV
and heard the news about the big power outage. I live in Kzoo. It sure
looked like the NY'ers were have a good time. We should have more black
outs. I think I depend on electicity too much in my daily life. If it
wasn't cloudy, yesterday would have been a great night for watching the
persides meteor shower and Mars.





#16 of 99 by furs on Sat Aug 16 19:19:01 2003:

I happen to be in MI right now and was caught in the blackout 
in my office in Southfield.  The lights went out and I was on a conf 
call.  Because the phone switch is on a UPS, our phones worked for a 
couple hours.  I just kept going on the phone, then someone came in and 
let me know what was really going on, so we got off the call.

I stayed at work until 7pm cause I was low on gas and I knew it would 
be a waste of time to drive anywhere where I was going to sit and run 
out of gas in the deadlocked traffic. So we sat around and played 
Euchre for a while. Then I called all my relatives to 
see who had power, and my mom had it up in Flint, so I went up there 
and stayed.

I was on the phone until about midnight with my boss and others 
deciding what we were gonna do (which was nothing, but it took them 
until the next day to figure that out.)  Our DR team called from 
Atlanta to ask us what we were going to do, and when we would start 
flying people to Denver to get them up and running.  I just 
said "Listen, this is going to be probably one day without work, so 
basically we are going to wait it out."  Gee, I was right!  Our power 
at work came back on at 7pm yesterday and my infrastructure guys went 
in to bring everything up.  Corporate spend 6 hours trying to figure 
out what to do, then they finally decided that we would just wait it 
out.  It was just frigging ridiculous.  

My cell rang off the hook yesterday from 6am until 6pm.  People just 
need to take a chill pill.


#17 of 99 by richard on Sat Aug 16 19:22:44 2003:

Managed to walk all the way home to Brooklyn in pitch black darkness, 
pushing through throngs of people with only a poorly working flashlight 
guiding the way.  With no subways running, everyone was walking on the 
sidewalks to get anywhere, and with no parking lights or walk/don't 
walk signs working, you crossed streets VERY carefully.  They suspended 
side street parking rules and were telling people who were driving to 
pull over and park their cars, because with no street lights and 
everything pitch black, even car headlights don't help much.  Better to 
park your car, and hope you remember where you left it later, then to 
risk driving and hitting someone in the street because you couldn't see 
them.

After I finally got home, I popped open a beer and went up on the 
rooftop of my apartment building where it was much cooler than it was 
inside.  There I could see the entire manhattan skyline pitch dark, 
Jersey was dark.  It was quite a sight.  The only thing that appeared 
to stay lit that I could see, was off in the harbor-- the Statue of 
Liberty, which apparently has its own generator powering its torch.  
Well after all, it IS Lady Liberty's eternal flame, so they CAN'T allow 
that to go out right?

All in all, everyone here in NYC seems to have handled things well.  
There were people taking turns on my street running out to direct 
traffic at the intersection.  Some of the bars and stores stayed open, 
using candelight.  Quite an experience.


#18 of 99 by sno on Sat Aug 16 20:12:20 2003:

Thursday I got kicked off of Pierce Lake GC because it was a State owned
facility and they went into emergency mode.

Filled my truck with gas in Chelsea where the electricity was still
flowing.  Drove home and grabbed five five-gallon gas cans and drove
the side roads back to Chelsea where the pumps had since run dry.
Continued down I-94, checking the lines at gas stations along the way
until I found one with a short line at exit 145.  Filled up and ate
dinner.  Came home and set up my generator.

Last summer I hired an electrician to set up a breaker board for my
generator.  I hooked that all up and fired up my juice.  My house was
powered and we watched some TV (all blackout coverage) until bedtime.

Friday I reran my generator in the morning and then went to all the nearby
neighbors offering to roll my generator to them and pump up their
fridges, freezers, and sump pumps.  I serviced about six houses on a
rotating cycle.  One neighbor has water problems and was freeking about
the rain.  I was at his house running his sump when the TV came on about
4:15 PM.

I worked very hard and received a lot of appreciation.

Today, I'm resting dammit.



#19 of 99 by rcurl on Sat Aug 16 20:57:31 2003:

Our 30 hour Holiday in Phoenix AZ:

We got up at 4:30 a.m. PDT in San Francisco on Thursday morning to make a
9:00 a.m. flight to Detroit via Phoenix: on time in Phoenix and boarded
the flight to Detroit at noon MST. We rolled out, but plane had backup
hydraulics problem, so returned to ramp where we sweltered for an hour,
and finally deplaned. Plane was finally declared inoperable so another
plane was brought in to be prepped. At about that point a rumor of a power
outage in the East began to circulate and finally the flight to Detroit
was cancelled and we were rebooked for a 6 pm MST flight Friday, and given
a room for the night at the airport Holiday Inn plus dinner vouchers. 

Meanwhile, our daughter who had flown with us from SF had departed on a
flight to Columbus OH at about the same time we had been scheduled to fly
to Detroit. She got to Columbus OK to a emergency-powered airport and
picked up her car to drive to either her apartment in Springfield OH or to
our home in Ann Arbor. But Springfield was reported without power so she
opted for Ann Arbor. 

We got to our Motel, had dinner, and called daughter on cell phone, and
discovered her in her car disabled by the road outside Columbus after the
car's battery had exploded. She was waiting for a tow truck from a non-AAA
garage because AAA garages were overloaded. 

So back to the Phoneix airport in the AM to wait 'til 6 pm MST for our
flight.  While waiting we got a cell call from our daughter who had gotten
the car repaired and driven to Ann Arbor to find the power was out, but
but it had came on again by Friday morning. We left on time and arrived
ca. 1 a.m.  EDT Saturday in Detroit, to an emergency-powered airport. The
parking garage was unlit but the shuttle was operating. They were, of
course, collecting parking charges: the attendant was in his booth
illuminated by a candle. Home by shortly after 2 a.m. 



#20 of 99 by gelinas on Sat Aug 16 21:19:56 2003:

goose: no, the club did NOT have power Thursday evening nor most of
Friday.  We could see lights across the lake, in Livingston County,
but the Washtenaw side was dark (except for the folks who had their own
generators, of course.  ;)


#21 of 99 by tod on Sat Aug 16 21:43:11 2003:

This response has been erased.



#22 of 99 by russ on Sat Aug 16 22:00:25 2003:

After I got home (an interesting exercise in itself, as the fuel pump
of the car couldn't take the heat at its advanced age and decided to
croak about 3 miles out), I got out my camping lantern and patched my
backup power system together from the UPS and storage battery.  I had
never tried it before, but it worked the first time.

(Re item 161 response 1:
  Yes, it's a deep-cycle battery, labelled for trolling motors.  I'm
  running through an APC 600 UPS (the internal gel-cells had failed
  long ago, so I just patched onto the wires and went from there).
  It's a sealed battery, so it requires no venting.  I'm charging
  it from an external charger to avoid compatibility issues.)

After taking care of the basics, I pulled a still-cold Coke out of the
fridge and sat down with the newspaper and crossword, and then I powered
up the computer and wrote what became item 161 and played a game or two.
That didn't take the whole evening, so before bed I went to the
bookshelf for some things I hadn't read yet.  My little white-LED book
light from Meijer wasn't optimal, but it did the job.

Friday morning, power was still out so no work.  I drove over to
where the VW had died, and of course the fuel pump worked just fine
after cooling off overnight.  I drove it to the shop on the corner
and left it with them, farted around home for a while, dropped the
book I'd started the previous night in favor of Terry Pratchett,
and rather than trying to cook I decided to kill two birds with one
stone and get some hot food and a cold drink while recharging my
storage battery.  Using the lighter plug and cord from a defunct
tire-compressor, I patched the storage battery into the Taurus's
power system and went for a drive.  Found food, ordered, read book,
ate food, chatted with another customer about Linux, moseyed home
by back roads, found that battery had charged very nicely.  I pretty
much sat around and read until the power came back on.

My only regret is that I didn't have a big enough inverter to run
my refrigerator.  With another battery I could have run just about
everything but the fridge, including main lights and a fan or two
as well as the computer.  I'm considering this, as the start of a
solar electricity system.


#23 of 99 by scg on Sun Aug 17 00:40:27 2003:

So, can we Californians gloat about your unreliable electric power now?


#24 of 99 by gelinas on Sun Aug 17 03:01:14 2003:

Feel free, Steve. :)


#25 of 99 by jep on Sun Aug 17 03:40:24 2003:

I live in Tecumseh.  I got my power back around midnight on Thursday 
night.  Friday morning, I was just finishing breakfast when the power 
went out again.  There was nowhere to get gas; my Taurus was about 
out, so I drove my pickup to work.

There was no power at work, but a few of us went to Pinckney on Friday 
and worked for a while from my manager's house.  When I got home, 
around noon, the power had been back on for less than an hour.

I was able to fill up with gas without waiting in line around 4:00 
Friday.


#26 of 99 by scg on Sun Aug 17 06:40:06 2003:

Friday's San Francisco Chronicle had a headline saying "It could happen here,
expert warns: California vulnerable to blackouts."

Really?

Gray Davis was on TV tonight, claiming credit for this blackout not happening
in California.


#27 of 99 by beeswing on Sun Aug 17 06:48:48 2003:

Waaah. Memphis had its power out for over a week from the straight line
winds storm. 


#28 of 99 by scg on Sun Aug 17 06:59:21 2003:

One of the San Francisco TV stations last night showed some interviews with
people in Iraq, who were saying something along the lines of, "they've left
us without power for three months, but they think it's a problem when they
lose power for a day?"


#29 of 99 by pvn on Sun Aug 17 09:42:20 2003:

Damn straight, you ragheads!  And whats more, we don't have to have a
big fucking super-power with big phucking military to do the regime
change for you too stoopid or lazy.  We do it ourselves in the ballot
box with little or no casualties every couple years.


#30 of 99 by scott on Sun Aug 17 12:58:45 2003:

Re 27:  Well, we get ice storms every couple of years up here in the frozen
white wastelands, with accompanying power outages.  This is actually the first
real power outage I've ever had in the summer, but in the last 7-8 years
I've had a couple multi-day outages during freezing weather.


#31 of 99 by furs on Sun Aug 17 13:16:12 2003:

Which is WAY more convenient for keeping food cold!


#32 of 99 by beeswing on Sun Aug 17 15:53:44 2003:

Nyup. We can't handle things like ice storms here, but we know to
anticipate problems in the winter. The storm that hit here was totally
unpredicted.  


#33 of 99 by slynne on Sun Aug 17 20:33:53 2003:

Yeah but when there is a power outage in the winter, I have no heat :(. 
I dont even care about the no heat too much because I can always pack 
up all the animals and head up to my parent's house but if the heat 
goes, then the pipes might freeze. Luckily for me, the one time I lost 
power for any significant length of time in the winter, it was during 
an ice storm and the temp had risen to just above freezing. 

On Thursday, I was  at work trying to fix some problems related to a 
virus we got earlier in the week when the power went down. It didnt 
take us long to figure out that it was a big outage because some of our 
stores are required to call in if their power goes out. Our phone 
system has around 1/2 hour of battery backup. 

Around 4:30p, the company decided to close the building. So everyone 
left at once. That sucked. Even if the light at the one exit from this 
office park was working, there would be a traffic jam. However, it 
wasnt working so the traffic got *really* backed up. Some co-workers 
and I took some popsicles out of the freezer and sat in the shade 
eating them. We waited for about an hour. The roads had cleared 
somewhat by 5:30 but it still took me 45 minutes to drive to Ypsi. I 
was a little worried about the dogs because I knew they would be doing 
a pee pee dance by the time I got home. Luckily, I ended up getting 
home only about 1/2 hour later than I normally would get home and they 
seemed fine with that. 

I had about a 1/4 tank of gas so I had no trouble getting home. I 
thought about going up to my parent's house because they have a 
generator and also a lake which means it is cooler there. It was really 
muggy and hot on Thursday night. But then, I figured that people get 
crazy when the power is off and I didnt want to risk having someone 
break into my house so I got out all my millions of candles and lit up 
the joint! I read a book. I only had pasta for dinner but that is ok 
because I like pasta. 

On friday, a couple of gas stations in Ypsi opened up and the lines 
were LONG. I thought about going to get gasoline but decided it wasnt 
worth it to wait in line. When I went to go get gasoline on Saturday 
morning, those gas stations had sold out of gas! 

My power came back on at around 8:30a on friday. Nothing spoiled from 
my freezer. When I checked on things at 8:30a, everything was still 
frozen. I still had ice cubes. I didnt open the door until 
the power came back on so it held all the coldness inside. 



#34 of 99 by russ on Sun Aug 17 22:13:58 2003:

Winter is certainly more convenient for a lot of cooking-related
stuff.  Being able to just stick your freshly-boiled soup stock
outside the window and skim off the congealed fat a few hours
later beats most things Nature does for the cook in the summer.

On the other hand, when the power is out it's very nice not to
have to worry about draining your pipes before they freeze.


#35 of 99 by scott on Sun Aug 17 23:35:20 2003:

Of course now that I'm living in a house with a woodstove the power failure
is during hot, muggy weather.  I did hole up here for a 3-day failure a few
years back, though.  Brought the cats over and everything.


#36 of 99 by jep on Mon Aug 18 00:01:04 2003:

If there's a power outage in the winter lasting more than about 6 
hours, my pets are goners.  They're tropical fish.  They're in 50 and 
55 gallon fish tanks and so might last for a few hours.

Since I moved here, I've had one several hour long power outage in the 
winter, and that was before I got my fish.

My fish help keep the power running in Tecumseh, I think.


#37 of 99 by carson on Mon Aug 18 01:04:16 2003:

re #5:#6:  (Chicago.  beady probably has a more accurate recollection of
      this:  a couple of years back, during some pretty hot summer days,
      there were a number of blackouts, including at least one that affected
      the downtown area.  the situation left Mayor Daley Jr. none too 
      pleased and he made a number of public statements to the effect of
      "this isn't going to happen again."  so far, his word has held up.)


#38 of 99 by scg on Mon Aug 18 01:49:44 2003:

re 36:
        Have you thought about putting your fish on a UPS, John?


#39 of 99 by glenda on Mon Aug 18 03:17:54 2003:

Staci went off to a sleep over birthday party.  I can only imagine a sleep
over party with 8-10 teens with no power.  Damon and I sat on the porch,
reading, stitching and talking.  We grilled sausages and eggs for dinner.
STeve was at work at MSU which is self contained and had power even though
the rest of the Lansing area didn't.  After it got too dark to read outside
I lit candles and continued reading (homework, with a final on Wednesday)
until STeve got home around midnight.  I listened to STeve struggle to breath
while I scratched at mosquito bites.  We are going to be setting up a battery
backup for his CPAP very, very soon, he did call about checking into the
hospital for the night, but decided that he would try sleeping at home since
they had people that needed the machine more than he did.  Spent Friday
reading and stitching on the porch until power came on at 14:00.  

We lost milk and cream type stuff from the refrigerator and one fudgecicle
from the freezer. Everything else was ok.


#40 of 99 by tod on Mon Aug 18 20:43:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#41 of 99 by jep on Mon Aug 18 20:59:15 2003:

re resp:38: That's a very good idea!  No, I never thought of it.


#42 of 99 by jaklumen on Tue Aug 19 01:48:43 2003:

A weird but fanciful thought: if this were to continue enough, would 
more people consider technologies that would allow them to get off-
grid?


#43 of 99 by janc on Tue Aug 19 03:21:54 2003:

Maybe.  Maybe not.  You can put solar panels on the roof.  Mostly how they
work is they feed power into the grid and you draw power off the grid.  So
maybe you sell power to the utility during the day, and buy it back at night.
What does this buy you when the grid is down?  Not too much.  If you actually
want this to provide power for you when the grid is down, then you'll need
to have your own energy storage - batteries maybe.  The system just got a lot
more expensive.  And you need capacity to satisfy your peak need, so the solar
panel just got a lot bigger.  Really getting off grid costs a lot of money.

I was interested in the behavior of the two phone networks during the
blackout - landlines stayed up and worked without a hitch, while the cell
phone network disintegrated.  The cell phone network problems weren't because
they lost power - it was because of excess demand.  There isn't anything
intrinsic to the technologies that says the land network should be more
robust.  I think it has to do with history - the land network was built by
a regulated monopoly, the cell phone network was built by a free market.

In a competitive marketplace, it doesn't make sense to design a communications
network with a lot of excess capacity.  It costs money and earns you no
reliablity.  If you over build like that, other companies will undercut your
price and put you out of business.  A free market cannot build a phone network
as reliable as the old Bell Network.

I think this is the issue with deregulation of the energy companies as well.
You cannot simultaneously maximize reliability and and profit in a competitive
market, so deregulation will get us flakier power grids.


#44 of 99 by sj2 on Tue Aug 19 05:26:55 2003:

Nationalise them ;-)


#45 of 99 by rcurl on Tue Aug 19 06:12:44 2003:

Our AT&T phone cards could not be used last Thursday and Friday (at
least):  busy signals on the 1-800 numbers. Even landlines don't work if
an intermediate facility is down or jammed. 



#46 of 99 by mary on Tue Aug 19 10:25:29 2003:

Our Sprint cell phones worked great.



#47 of 99 by jmsaul on Tue Aug 19 12:03:25 2003:

Our landlines were out, but we're in Verizon (formerly GTE) territory.  I had
some problems with system overload on the cell phones (AT&T), but as the
outage progressed it became harder and harder to get a signal at all.  I'm
wondering if towers were dropping off as their battery backups ran out or
something.


#48 of 99 by gelinas on Tue Aug 19 12:20:26 2003:

That was the report I heard on NPR, jmsaul.  The problem was particularly
acute in places like NYC, where it was assumed the towers, often built
on the roofs of buildings, would always have power so no backup system
was included at all.


#49 of 99 by cmcgee on Tue Aug 19 13:03:34 2003:

My AAT phone card worked like a breeze Thursday afternoon/evening, and all
day Friday.  Got almost all my "big-picture" information by calling a cousin
and having him give me the latest update.  Never got a busy signal.


#50 of 99 by gull on Tue Aug 19 14:55:00 2003:

Re #47: That was my experience, too.  My T-Mobile phone worked from the
time the power went out until about 7 pm (though with lots of fast-busy
signals and cancelled calls due to the circuits all being busy) but
after that I couldn't get a signal until about 8:20 am, when power came
back on in the area of the local tower.

At work we have no battery backup for our PBX, so when the cell network
clogged we effectively had no means of communications.  I'm not even
sure a backup for the PBX would have bought us much, because both our
voice and data T1 lines appeared to fail as soon as power went out.


#51 of 99 by slynne on Tue Aug 19 15:00:43 2003:

My land lines were fine but my parents' land line was down until 
Saturday. I dont know if my cell phone worked because I had forgotten 
to charge it and it had no power. I was wishing I had spent the extra 
money on a car charger. :) doh!


#52 of 99 by gull on Tue Aug 19 15:06:49 2003:

Just heard on the radio that SBC has said they won't pay people for days
they were out of work due to the power outage.  They'll have to either
use a vacation day or have their paycheck docked.


#53 of 99 by klg on Tue Aug 19 16:21:22 2003:

If those SBC employees belong to a bargaining unit, then any payment 
would be governed by the labor agreement and not be at the unilateral 
discretion of management.


#54 of 99 by dcat on Tue Aug 19 16:28:10 2003:

Was able to call to land phones fine from my Verizon cell phone, but had
difficulties reaching other cell phones, ranging from flat-out no response
at all to busy signals.


#55 of 99 by slynne on Tue Aug 19 17:32:26 2003:

All the people here in my department were told the same thing. We could 
either use vacation time or have our paychecks docked. Luckily for me, 
I always have Fridays off so I'll only lose the 45 minutes I left early 
on Thursday. 


#56 of 99 by anderyn on Tue Aug 19 19:55:42 2003:

Wow. We were told to count it as a paid working day, even if we didn't work.
Just like a snow day. One good thing, anyhow.


#57 of 99 by russ on Tue Aug 19 23:27:02 2003:

Going off-grid in town isn't much of an option.  A real off-grid
system has a lot of energy storage, whereas most on-grid RE systems
have no batteries and use grid-interactive inverters and net metering.
Without storage or an active grid connection, you're limited to the
power you can make at that very moment; if starting your refrigerator's
compressor requires more power than your system is putting out, you
can't do it (and everything else might shut down when it tries).

Batteries change the entire picture.  If you had an inverter running
from the battery of a hybrid car (the Toyota Prius has a 144 volt,
6 AH battery for about 850 WH of storage), you could run most
everything in your house save air conditioning and electric heaters.
Then your problem would be maintaining your energy balance between
production and consumption, which is much easier to do - and if you
already have the battery as part of the car, it's a lot cheaper.


#58 of 99 by jep on Wed Aug 20 02:05:14 2003:

I work for an SBC subsidiary, and will be paid in full for last 
Thursday and Friday.


#59 of 99 by scott on Wed Aug 20 02:10:31 2003:

Guess it depends on whether Catbert is running your HR department or not,
then.


#60 of 99 by scg on Wed Aug 20 03:17:29 2003:

I have no particular knowledge of the SBC situation, but at another large
telco, that was the sort of thing that started happening after management
announced that "our goal is to shrink through attrition."


#61 of 99 by goose on Wed Aug 20 14:48:51 2003:

We're getting paid for Thurs and Fri...like Twila they are treating it as a
'snow day' or whatever.  I came in part of the day anyway, and worked from
home for a bit.  


#62 of 99 by gelinas on Sun Aug 24 23:22:09 2003:

Checkout today's (Sunday, August 24, 2003) User Friendly at 

        http://www.userfriendly.org/static/


#63 of 99 by dcat on Mon Aug 25 23:36:02 2003:

Monday's (http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20030825) is also good.
But then, I gather they pretty nearly always are.


#64 of 99 by gelinas on Tue Aug 26 00:50:36 2003:

True, but yesterday's was about the blackout.


#65 of 99 by russ on Wed Aug 27 03:05:26 2003:

Speaking of the blackout, I finally got a chance to read Saturday's
NYT article about it.  The details of the timeline are awe-inspiring
in the way massive forces marshalled themselves with such speed, but I
digress....

As it happens the problems began with First Energy in Ohio, but the
vulnerabilities are probably built into the system.  We depend too much
on long-distance transmission of power (which is not terribly efficient
in any case, and should be discouraged by policy) and the communications
system for handling imbalances is people yakking over telephones.  This
is good for problems coming up over the next hour, but totally inadequate
to handle lightning-fast changes over the next ten seconds.  If we are
going to continue as we are, we need to find ways to manage power much
better.  For instance, if First Energy had been able to cut every
air conditioner in Cleveland back to half power in response to the
power lines failing, the problem might never have happened.  If Michigan
had 2 GW of surge power on tap, the local grid would have stayed up
long enough to cut Ohio loose.  Etc, etc.  There are a lot of things
we need to address.


#66 of 99 by rcurl on Wed Aug 27 03:32:31 2003:

I found that the articles in the newspapers I read quote officials giving
oversimplified analyses of what they think happened, talking as though
electricity was like water being pumped around the system. One event that
was describe was an "unexplained" surge of 4000 megawatts into the
Michigan network. Well, electricity isn't stored in the network, so a
"surge" of power into the network would require that it be consumed
somewhere, but unless it melted a lot of copper, where would it go? Of
course, trey didn't say how long that "surge" lasted, and there could be
such a pulse into reactance in the system if the source phase slipped from
the load phase. That's the kind of detail I would like to read about.  I
suppose it will be available eventually. 

One commentator on NPR tried to explain how fast problems can move in the
system by saying that the "electrons move at the speed of light".
Well..not quite. Direct current electrons move at most at only centimeters
per hour, depending on the current and the wire cross section (there is a
calculator for this at
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/miccur.html#c3). 
Disturbance, of course, move much faster as waves through the population
of electrons. If he had said, "disturbances move at the speed of light (in
the conductor)" he would have been OK. 



#67 of 99 by pvn on Wed Aug 27 04:50:57 2003:

Alright, so what moves and what direction does it move?  (Lightning
actually moves from the ground up to the sky, not the opposite which is
what we perceive as we are used to gravity - ie things don't fall into
the sky.)  

Muna is actually what was flowing, electrons are merely like ball
bearings that ease the way and some substances have more electrons
that are greased to ease the passage of muna.  It is entirely possible
that something in Ohio caused muna to rapidly leak out over the ground
and thus the direction of muna flow reversed course.  It is also
possible that somethings in Canada suddenly stopped wanting muna, and
since muna likes to keep moving once it is finally convinced to do so it
headed back home where it came from so the buckeyes may have been the
victims not the cause.  The other problem with muna is that it is hard
to coordinate things.  Some early practioners in the art of muna
movement decided to wiggle the muna to try to coordinate events and that
has worked pretty well so far but the modern problem is that folks are
trying to move muna really long distances and so its sometimes hard to
figure out what has happened after an event as folk don't always know
what time it is as wiggling muna confuses things.


#68 of 99 by rcurl on Wed Aug 27 06:23:26 2003:

Is muna a form of phlogiston? 


#69 of 99 by gull on Wed Aug 27 12:59:13 2003:

Re #66: Then you would have quibbled by saying "it's actually more like
70% the speed of light." ;>


#70 of 99 by rcurl on Wed Aug 27 17:13:26 2003:

I said "at the speed of light (in the conductor)" to include the reduced
speed of the disturbance in a conductor compared to that in free space.
Therefore I had already quibbled......


#71 of 99 by i on Thu Aug 28 02:47:28 2003:

What's to stop any given utility from rigging a computerized "fire
curtain" into their central control system, so that (when the larger
grid's getting out of control) they can both cut themselves off from
the larger grid and cut enough of their own load (via blackouts) to
achieve independent, local stability?


#72 of 99 by russ on Thu Aug 28 03:16:29 2003:

Re #66:  I expect that the (scientifically illiterate, if at all
typical) reporter was trying to get his mind around something
like the surge of power from Ontario and Indiana through the
Detroit area toward Cleveland, where powerplants were tripping
off-line as the failed powerlines overloaded them.

I expect that the solution is going to have to be systems which
automatically shed load (create local blackouts) if major power
sources are lost for any reason.  This is anathema to system
managers, but if there is no effort to reconcile demand with
supply the alternative is the risk of more huge blackouts.


#73 of 99 by rcurl on Thu Aug 28 06:09:30 2003:

Do you know why load shedding is disliked (if not anathema)? Load shedding
should go along almost automatically with generation dropouts. 

There is an ultimate technical problem with even using AC, which is phase
matching, which makes grid regulation tricky. Think of having two home AC
generators and trying to put them in parallel (it is even a problem for
load leveling, but phase matching makes it much harder). It would be
easier with DC (also with fewer losses), with the use of modern converters
for voltage shifting.



#74 of 99 by scott on Thu Aug 28 10:30:40 2003:

It is a bit amusing to think about technically-deficient explanations, though.

"My God, that power surge must still be trapped on the transmission lines!"
"Get me Jed Collick!!!"


#75 of 99 by gull on Thu Aug 28 13:28:35 2003:

Re #71: That's sometimes done; it's called "islanding".  There are two
problems, though, as I understand it.  One is that the local utility may
simply not have the generating capacity to carry the load once they're
isolated from the grid.  Another is that it becomes difficult to get the
islands back in phase to reconnect them later, without shutting
everything down.

Re #72: Automatic under-frequency load shedding was supposed to have
been implemented after the major blackout in the 70's, but obviously the
systems aren't as effective as people had hoped.  The major blackouts on
the west coast in the 90s (some of which actually did end with the west
coast seperating into three "islands") showed that sequencing automatic
controls so that they trip in a way that limits damage, instead of
causing it to cascade through the system, is difficult.  We don't seem
to be able to model the behavior of these complicated power grid systems
very well.


#76 of 99 by rcurl on Thu Aug 28 16:28:44 2003:

I just looked at the undergraduate curriculum in electrical engineering at
the UM, and there are no courses in power generation and transmission.
This type of neglect in universities for "established technologies" is
pretty common. The real knowledge and expertise moves into the industry
itself and students can only become expert in the technology by
apprenticing themselves.  This isn't unexpected as industry develops
systems and processes that they want to keep proprietary, so universities
can't even learn about them. On the other hand, it creates some barriers
between really advanced theoretical developments in universities and
applications in industry.

I saw this happen in chemical engineering at UM when a large chemical
company sought to learn about the expertise available in the chemical
engineering department. Their staff met with faculty members and discussed
what the faculty were doing in research and teaching. However we could
learn nothing about what the company was doing, even to obtain ideas for
more modern and realistic problems to use in some courses. Some individual
liaisons were created but so much was proprietary that it didn't really
help the overall educational mission of the department. 

So maybe our inability to model these power generation and distribution
systems is limited in part by this university-industrial gap in two-way
information sharing. 


#77 of 99 by tod on Thu Aug 28 16:50:55 2003:

This response has been erased.



#78 of 99 by rcurl on Thu Aug 28 17:19:47 2003:

Doesn't sound like they'd let you try to balance loads and phase in a grid
after that course.... Did the Purdue or USMC courses teach that? This is
really pretty complicated stuff as transmission lines really are 
Transmission Lines, with their characteristic impedance, requiring matched
terminations, etc. Then, how do you get all the generators humming the same
note...without destructive beats? 

I have no idea how developed the science of this is, but I would think
that industry would not have many scientists that devote their time to
thinking this through. The industry probably does underwrite a research
consortium that doles out grants to universities for some related work.


#79 of 99 by albaugh on Thu Aug 28 19:12:20 2003:

From: <BreakingNews@MAIL.CNN.COM>
Subject:      CNN Breaking News

Major power outage hits south London, cutting subway service 
during evening rush hour.


#80 of 99 by klg on Thu Aug 28 19:34:46 2003:

A tree fell in Cleveland again?


#81 of 99 by tod on Thu Aug 28 19:49:22 2003:

This response has been erased.



#82 of 99 by rcurl on Thu Aug 28 23:11:49 2003:

My point was that UM doesn't offer anything concerning power grid operation.

The USMC would do that, for their purposes. That was also my point - the
training in power technology has moved to industry (and of course, the
military - those that *use* the technology).

Did your training include synchronizing two generators feeding the
power system simultaneously?


#83 of 99 by tod on Thu Aug 28 23:29:18 2003:

This response has been erased.



#84 of 99 by gull on Fri Aug 29 00:00:17 2003:

Re #76: I had "power systems" courses that covered generation and
transmission, as well as stuff like AC motors and industrial controls,
as an undergrad at Michigan Tech.  I was in the School of Technology,
but I assume the School of Engineering has similar but more in-depth
(and probably less hands-on) courses.  Generally at MTU the School of
Technology's courses involve a lot of lab work, and the School of
Engineering's courses involve a lot more theory and computer simulation.


#85 of 99 by i on Fri Aug 29 01:54:47 2003:

Re: #75
The local utility doesn't need to have enough generating capacity active
"on the island" when they cut it loose from the grid...IF they have the
ability to both measure usage in and blackout a fair number of smaller 
parts of the island.  X times per second, a computer in their central 
switching HQ solves the problem "if we cut to being an island right now,
which pieces of load and/or supply would have to immediately cut to have
our island's grid viably balanced?".  If the larger grid gets too bad to
hand onto, then the computers simultaneously cut off from it and off from
the load and/or supply that the island can't keep up right now. 

Where do the power plants get their 60Hz reference from now?  Or is it
just a brute-force "democratic vote" of the local references on a variety
of pieces of equipment?  Sounds like syncing islands to rejoin is a "we
never bothered to make control systems for that" problem.  


#86 of 99 by polytarp on Fri Aug 29 02:00:51 2003:

Sounds like it.


#87 of 99 by rcurl on Fri Aug 29 05:32:19 2003:

I don't know where they get their reference, but I do know that the
frequency wanders during the day, such that clocks that use synchronouos
motors vary daily by several minutes (mostly partly corrected overnight -
see http://web.ukonline.co.uk/freshwater/clocks/synch.htm).



#88 of 99 by albaugh on Fri Aug 29 14:23:41 2003:

DTE wants to pass on the cost of the 2003 blackout to its consumers (after
initially they said on the radio they wouldn't be).  The freep says this would
be 25 cents per month added to each consumer's bill, for 3 years, starting
in 2006.


#89 of 99 by tod on Fri Aug 29 17:29:30 2003:

This response has been erased.



#90 of 99 by rcurl on Fri Aug 29 17:45:50 2003:

Re #83: how are two generators feeding the same system synchronized in phase
and balanced to carry equal shares of the load?


#91 of 99 by tod on Fri Aug 29 18:02:58 2003:

This response has been erased.



#92 of 99 by happyboy on Fri Aug 29 18:06:28 2003:

LOL!

burnt weenie sandwich.


#93 of 99 by tod on Fri Aug 29 18:16:03 2003:

This response has been erased.



#94 of 99 by happyboy on Fri Aug 29 18:21:34 2003:

/cues: "I'm Proud To BE An American"



#95 of 99 by tod on Fri Aug 29 18:24:26 2003:

This response has been erased.



#96 of 99 by happyboy on Fri Aug 29 18:31:24 2003:

/shouts "Americans!" with a dubya speech impediment
soze it sounds like "Merkenz!"


#97 of 99 by tod on Fri Aug 29 18:36:26 2003:

This response has been erased.



#98 of 99 by happyboy on Fri Aug 29 18:45:45 2003:

OMG!


#99 of 99 by russ on Sat Aug 30 13:30:50 2003:

Re #73:  Keeping service running appears to be the mantra, and the
grid operators do not like systems which can malfunction and bring
things down.  Blackouts make customers very unhappy and trigger
penalty clauses.
                                                                               
                                       
I largely disagree with the assertions of the governor of New Mexico and others
who claim that we have a third-world electrical grid.  Far from it!  Ours is as
good as anywhere in the world.  What we have, unfortunately, is a *dumb*
electrical grid, with dumb appliances connected to it.  The only way to remedy
a sudden loss of generation is to cut customers off.  There is no segregation
of loads into critical (like computers, medical equipment and traffic lights)
and non-critical (like air conditioners, washing machines and outdoor sign
lamps).  Some office buildings have such distinctions in their wiring (certain
circuits on a generator feed), but that only makes a difference once the grid
power has gone off.

If Cleveland could have dumped half their air-conditioners at the
first sign of trouble and modulated demand to keep their plants and
wires running within limits, there would have been no problem; most
people probably wouldn't ever have noticed.  A given wire carries
power from zero to max to zero in 8.33 milliseconds, but the system's
intelligence takes a goodly fraction of a minute to do anything on a
really good day.  If we are going to keep cutting margins in the
name of market efficiency, that has to change.
                                                                               
                                       
Syncing an alternerator is about as easy as Tod represents.  All you need to do
is connect it to the line through a resistor, and it will be automatically
pulled into phase.  (This is assuming you aren't using something like a
grid-synchronous inverter, which you can buy off the shelf in ratings of a
couple hundred watts on up.)  So long as you aren't applying more power than
the line impedance can carry without losing sync, you're fine.  Once the
alternator is in phase you can cut the resistance to zero and start making
serious power.

Some generators, such as induction generators, take their sync from
the line and require no attention in that regard.  However, they can't
run stand-alone without some fairly sophisticated measures.
                                                                               
                                       
Re #85:  If I do not misunderstand, California was reduced to a set of islands
by various failures last decade.  It seems likely that the eastern seaboard was
also islanded by the failure of 8/14.  Those islands certainly were
synchronized, quickly and professionally.


There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: