1 new of 264 responses total.
And another point. Shouldn't California's recall laws stipulate that a runoff be held if no candidate in a recall election gets 50%? How can anyone who gets elected with ten percent or less of the vote possibly claim to have a mandate? It seems to be that this sets up whoever gets elected to be ineffective from the start. If noone on the recall vote gets fifty percent, and its highly unlikely anyone will, they should have a runoff between the top two vote getters. And if the second place person got only 4%, and there were 48% of voters voting against recalling the Governor, it could be argued that the Governor is in essence the first or second place vote getter and he should be in the runoff against whoever won the recall ballot.
You have several choices: