Lovin' GNU, well it's the right thing to do, But how can i, ever switch to Linux for real, If I could, baby i'd give you my disk, But how can I, when Windows takes so much space? I can install Windows, install Windows, Run all that nifty software I can install Windows, install Windows. Tell me why, Windows runs aground Back it up, back it up or get dumped in poo, If I could, to Linux I'd give all my disk, Open Source, makes no sense to You-Know-Who. I can install Windows, install Windows, Run all that nifty software, I can install WIndows, install Windows! (x2) (Disk drive solo and drums till fade out)15 responses total.
Ok this is prolly a bit more obscure than the other songs. It's sung to the tune of "Go Your Own Way", by Fleetwood Mac.
The fact that you are now a confessed cocksucker destroys anyone's enjoyment
Looks like you need to work on your scansion a bit; the second
line doesn't fit at all with the original. ("Convert" would
work, though the stress isn't quite right for the rhythm.)
All these new items don't really fit with Agora, which is
for discussion. Perhaps you should devote one item to
lyrics, and let people forget it if they don't care for it.
Oh go blow yourself. Agora has always been the general conference. I've seen worse items posted than that. Hell if twenex just wanted to post a series of items with the individual letters of the alphabet, I'd say go for it.
This response has been erased.
;) Maybe it should be linked to Jellyware instead of music, this time
Thanks sapna ;-)
From response 4: >Oh go blow yourself. Agora has always been the general conference. While back in item 8.... >#267 by Joe (gelinas) on Thu, Jul 24, 2003 (10:22): > IABB the song-parody items are proliferating. I'd prefer one item I don't > have time to read to a half-dozen (and growing). :( No further comment necessary.
But he didn't demand that they be moved. You cld have posted a bummed item, but by actually demanding that someone not use agora to post these items is stepping over the line. Especially "agora is for discussion". Hah! Have you seen half the items on here lately.
I haven't read item 8, recently; however, i can assure joe and anyone else that they're not growing, anymore. In fact i plan to collate them in one item, then delete the originals. However, i would like to know why joe (or anyone else) thinks that 1 long item is better than several short items? Thanks.
Re #10: One long item is much easier for the uninterested to forget than several short items. It also has more of a "critical mass" of things for the interested to keep discussion going, as opposed to several short items which can easily become idle or fall victim to cross-drift (as opposed to regular drift, such as this response et prequelae).
Fair enough. Thanks
unluckty
inteed.
Because picospan reports the number of new items and items with new responses. Until I get caught up, I have to either use "postpone" a dozen or so times or put the numbers of the items I want to read after a "read" command. Both are inconvenient.
You have several choices: