Grex Language Conference

Item 127: New fair witness of the language conference!

Entered by naftee on Sun Nov 30 01:14:31 2003:

25 new of 78 responses total.

#54 of 78 by davel on Thu Dec 4 14:14:21 2003:

Some active users need encouragement.  Some are just a plague.

#55 of 78 by naftee on Fri Dec 5 04:14:00 2003:

re 50 I've given you almost a dozen reasons for why I should be a fairwitness
of the language conference.  Care to give me any reasons why I should not be
one?

#56 of 78 by gelinas on Fri Dec 5 04:53:20 2003:

Yes:  #46 and #48.

#57 of 78 by willcome on Fri Dec 5 05:02:49 2003:

He was just being silly, gelinas.  Couldn't you tell by his language?

#58 of 78 by gelinas on Fri Dec 5 05:34:25 2003:

And how is that different from everything else he (or is it you, under a
different login-id?  I've never yet figured that out) has entered here?

#59 of 78 by willcome on Fri Dec 5 05:38:40 2003:

What's wrong with entering silly stuff?

#60 of 78 by gelinas on Fri Dec 5 05:43:30 2003:

Nothing, as an occasional change of pace.  But when it is all (or even almost
all) someone enters, the resulting impression is . . . silliness, unrelieved
silliness.

#61 of 78 by willcome on Fri Dec 5 06:52:13 2003:

Your age is showing, gelinas.

#62 of 78 by gelinas on Fri Dec 5 07:18:42 2003:

As is yours.

#63 of 78 by davel on Fri Dec 5 13:21:47 2003:

In any case, it's not a strong qualification for FWing.

#64 of 78 by naftee on Fri Dec 5 16:38:56 2003:

It's almost funny how gelinas is using willcome's opinions of my actions as
the truth.

#65 of 78 by jep on Fri Dec 5 18:25:07 2003:

re resp:64: Yeah, it's strange how people view things when two loginids 
always agree with one another; when one of them usually comes along and 
says "Me, too" when the other one says anything at all; and when they 
cite one another as possessing positive characteristics that no one 
else seems to have perceived.  It's really weird how, when two loginids 
seem identical, others may come to think they have something in 
common.  Fortunately, willcome, by jumping on such assumptions and 
disputing them, you can always correct people's impressions and make 
sure they treat you as two separate people.  Keep trying, some of us 
are pretty slow and have to be told as many as dozens of times before 
we'll properly understand what you're saying on a subject such as this 
one.

#66 of 78 by mynxcat on Fri Dec 5 18:46:00 2003:

This response has been erased.


#67 of 78 by jp2 on Fri Dec 5 18:54:51 2003:

This response has been erased.


#68 of 78 by mynxcat on Fri Dec 5 19:10:05 2003:

willcome's polytarp. As is dah, and plongeur. 

naftee's asd.

#69 of 78 by naftee on Fri Dec 5 19:20:07 2003:

re 65

> when two loginids always agree with one another;

Patently false.

>when one of them usually comes along and
> says "Me, too" when the other one says anything at all;

Mmhuh?

> when they
> cite one another as possessing positive characteristics that no one
> else seems to have perceived.

Some people percieve them, others don't.

>when two loginids seem identical, 

Seem identical to whom?  Since you're responding for gelinas, we 
may as well say that jep and gelinas are the same person.
You seem identical enough.

> others may come to think they have something in common. 

Maybe two people have some things in common, but clearly they are not the same
persons.  Your post has done more to show the differences between myself and
willcome than to show how we are the same.  Or perhaps its purpose was to show
how old persons' faculties slow down over time.

#70 of 78 by albaugh on Fri Dec 5 20:07:39 2003:

If naftee really wants what is best for the lang conference, he can do what
other people have already said re: give his ideas to the existing FW to try
out.  If naftee absolutely must *be* a FW before knowing what those ideas are,
I agree with what rcurl said in #45 - go learn as the FW of a conference no
one cares if it gets "broken".

#71 of 78 by jep on Fri Dec 5 20:47:15 2003:

Heh.  You're not going to offend me by confusing me with gelinas, but 
Joe might take it badly.

#72 of 78 by gelinas on Fri Dec 5 23:12:13 2003:

I don't participate on M-Net.  It is entirely possible that the polytarp
and naftee personas are differentiated on that system.  They have not
been well-differentiated here.  #69 is the first response I've noticed
that offers some evidence of different people.  Saying "I'm not polytarp"
is NOT evidence, by the way; it is merely an claim.

#73 of 78 by naftee on Sat Dec 6 00:05:27 2003:

re 71 No, I'm actually quite capable of differentiating between two seperate
users, unlike some other users around here.  Funny, it seems like some of
those "other users" are staff members.  You'd think a staff member would know
how to tell if indeed there is only one user using two loginids.

re 70 What happens when you attempt to give your ideas to a FW of a conference
who a) has let it become inactive and therefore doesn't give a shit about it
and b) is prejudiced towards the giver of ideas?  No, that FW must certainly
be replaced.

#74 of 78 by albaugh on Mon Dec 8 21:11:22 2003:

No, you are certainly wrong.

#75 of 78 by naftee on Tue Dec 9 02:29:09 2003:

Believe it, it's true.

#76 of 78 by jaklumen on Thu Dec 11 02:14:55 2003:

"I know you are, but what am I?"

#77 of 78 by jesuit on Wed May 17 02:14:25 2006:

TROGG IS DAVID BLAINE

#78 of 78 by naftee on Mon Oct 9 03:58:28 2006:

hey guys; i still wouldn't mind doing this.

There are no more items selected.

You have several choices: