Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Pseudo Item 2: Descriptions
Entered by tocohl on Mon Oct 7 22:53:48 UTC 1991:

Okay, all you pseudos, tell us about yourselves.  (Yes, this item has
been purposely left vague.)

57 responses total.



#1 of 57 by tocohl on Mon Oct 7 23:04:24 1991:

I came into existence sometime back in July of this year, on M-Net.  When
Grex opened, I came over here, too.  I left mostly short, subtle messages
that escaped most people's notice at first, but a few people began sending
me "thank you" mail when I started giving people gribblies, and this
caused a small handful of people (one in particular) to begin investigating
who the person might be behind Tocohl Susumo.

Then when the demise of M-Net was to come within a matter of hours, I
revealed my true identity on Labor Day of this year.  Therefore, I am now
only a semi-pseudo.  My account was then left alone for months, only to
be resurrected in order that there might be a fairwitness of the pseudo
conference.


#2 of 57 by krug on Tue Oct 8 02:32:22 1991:

I am an academic from a foreign country, in hiding under a
false identity in the United States.  My young son and I
fled our homeland to escape persecution by the totalitarian
regime that oppresses our people.  I cannot tell you my
true name, or even the nation that I call home, for fear
that the agents of the oppressors--whom I know are at large
in this country--will find us.

I thank God that the government of the United States has
granted asylum to me and mine, and pray that one day we
can return home in peace, safety, and freedom.


#3 of 57 by crimson on Wed Oct 9 23:00:29 1991:

crimson:  The name of a colour; a deep red somewhat inclining towards purple.
Marcella:  From the Latin, meaning "warlike".  A feminine form of Mark.
conundrum:  1. Any puzzling question or problem; an enigmatical statement.
            2. A thing that one is puzzled to name, a "what-d'ye-call-it".

"The historian makes a construction of the past in a creative mental effort
based on the available evidence.  It is comparable, but not necessarily very
similar, to the creation of a symphony or a scientific theory."

"Londoners live *within* history, not outside it, as though looking through
plate glass at a museum exhibit."

"The old virtues of Londoners, as they saw themselves, comprised humour,
craftsmanship, trustworthiness, a civic consciousness, and a love of sport
and ceremonial."

"Oneparent families are looked upon as the 'lowest of the low' by many and
as the forces of social change by others."


#4 of 57 by reach on Sun Oct 13 07:04:35 1991:

I am told I am an "annoying pseudo". I contest both charges.


#5 of 57 by polygon on Sun Oct 13 21:36:54 1991:

Ruth, you are NOT annoying.

As to whether or not you're a pseudo, well, only YOU know that for sure.


#6 of 57 by griz on Sun Oct 13 21:52:31 1991:

*I* don't find you annoying.


#7 of 57 by reach on Tue Oct 15 17:09:18 1991:

Um, I think it's only my hairdresser that knows for sure.
Or something like that.
Can I be a "hair pseudo"?
Or "heir pseudo"?
Oh my.


#8 of 57 by polygon on Tue Oct 15 17:54:12 1991:

The question has been raised as to the definition of "pseudo."  Clearly it
applies to the secret alter ego of an established user, with a distinct
voice and persona.

But what about users like lmaster and kali on M-Net, and possibly others,
who are not known to the conferencing community under their real names,
and though they write under a pseudonym, they write in their own genuine
persona?


#9 of 57 by reach on Wed Oct 16 20:56:32 1991:

Maybe I should call myself "kali'?


#10 of 57 by crimson on Wed Oct 16 21:20:53 1991:

Ms. reach, I believe that name may be already taken.


#11 of 57 by polygon on Wed Oct 16 22:45:35 1991:

Maybe reach on Grex and kali on M-Net are the same person!


#12 of 57 by bad on Thu Oct 17 01:30:20 1991:

You never knw, I guess...
Just don't call me "johnson".


#13 of 57 by reach on Thu Oct 17 04:43:53 1991:

Thank you, you may keep your "johnson" to yourself.
I think I will stick to reach.


#14 of 57 by popcorn on Sat Oct 19 18:54:10 1991:

This response has been erased.



#15 of 57 by bad on Sat Oct 19 20:19:15 1991:

Maybe her parents helped (with the "Ruth")?


#16 of 57 by reach on Sun Oct 20 02:38:36 1991:

My parents were no help at all.
I'm sorry to admit I didn't really put too much thought into it.

Reach...to strive...to reach one's limits?


#17 of 57 by danr on Sun Oct 20 11:55:31 1991:

or maybe:  out of (reach)?


#18 of 57 by razberry on Sun Oct 20 22:56:09 1991:

Re 16.  A pseudo's reach should exceed its grasp?


#19 of 57 by ecl on Mon Oct 21 03:37:42 1991:

Better named Ruth than light.



#20 of 57 by reach on Mon Oct 21 03:50:12 1991:

You deserve a slash for that one, my boy.
Or, should I call you "Zeenorf"?


#21 of 57 by ecl on Mon Oct 21 17:30:11 1991:

My grandmother (may she rest in peace) was named Ruth.



#22 of 57 by bad on Tue Oct 22 17:34:05 1991:

My grandmother was named Zeenorf. Small world.


#23 of 57 by reach on Wed Oct 23 04:09:45 1991:

Hmph. That was to be *my* line.


#24 of 57 by ecl on Wed Oct 23 18:40:07 1991:

O.K. I'll admit that my real name is not zeenorf



#25 of 57 by reach on Thu Oct 24 04:16:21 1991:

It is brave of you to admit that, Zeenorf.


#26 of 57 by ecl on Thu Oct 24 05:37:12 1991:

Now if I could only spell immediately correctly I would be all set.



#27 of 57 by bad on Thu Oct 24 06:44:52 1991:

Om.


#28 of 57 by pipeweed on Sat Oct 26 17:10:01 1991:

I am under federal protection in the witness relocation program, I
can't reveal my real name, for fear it would cost my life.  I designed
an accounting software program for a couple of very nice men who paid
me in cash.  It wasn't until later that I realized they were using my
program to keep track of laundered money.  I wondered why every time
their system crashed there was suds coming out of the terminal.

Nice to meet you other folks, anyone else in this predicament?


#29 of 57 by bad on Sun Oct 27 04:53:17 1991:

Well, if they were, they'd likely not be stupid enough to sat so, 
and would just log in in their newly assumed names. :)


#30 of 57 by keats on Wed Dec 18 16:11:47 1991:

ruth saber is a pseudo? oh, my.


#31 of 57 by polygon on Wed Dec 18 17:22:58 1991:

Heh.


#32 of 57 by bad on Thu Dec 19 06:33:36 1991:

Sheesh.


#33 of 57 by keats on Thu Dec 19 13:42:37 1991:

<whoosh>


#34 of 57 by bad on Thu Dec 19 20:22:13 1991:

It's Super-Keats!
?
(or was that just you blowing hot air?) :p


#35 of 57 by keats on Fri Dec 20 01:26:20 1991:

(it's not like you have to choose between those two possibilities...)


#36 of 57 by bad on Fri Dec 20 16:47:47 1991:

Okay.


#37 of 57 by keats on Sat Dec 21 07:41:09 1991:

<whoosh>


#38 of 57 by reach on Mon Dec 23 05:30:54 1991:

I will put my vote toward "hot air".
Or would, were I afforded one.


#39 of 57 by spite on Wed Jan 22 02:25:35 1992:

Can I be keats's pseudo, too? Maybe *that's* how I can diversify!


Last 18 Responses and Response Form.
Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss