No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Writing Item 182: Obituarary [linked]
Entered by octavius on Fri Feb 9 02:28:15 UTC 1996:

                The person who writes about dead guys passed away today
                There is little else that we can say
                He started every sentence with Mister-
                So we brought in someone fired by Twisted Sister.

                She says the guy who rudely called in-
                Complaining about the grammar school to which he'd been
                Is surely going to rot well in (Ex. Del.)
                
                She's examined the column overly,
                And cannot a person whose compalint worthy,
                Laws of grammar go ignored
                Much like this poem, but  not quite a bore.

                Nor does she see that they can write,
                Surly they see the letter writer's plight
                To have their opinions surplanted,
                By people saying "MY idea is..." (not even planted.)

                What right do they have complain-
                While the true letter writers go insane
                Seeing dingbats express public thought
                When they actually a stamp had bought.
        
                For evolution's sake this call in people should 
                give up breathing
                (A sentence which bears repeating.)
                Instead of taking up the phone to talk,
                They should probably go out for  a walk.

                Leaving the real commentary to those they fell know how-
                If you've signed your name to such letter take a bow.
                For they do not write in anonymity,
                Perhaps this is a reason for the brave ones' hostility.

        This was "inspired", if indeed, that is the proper word for this, by 
someone calling in to a stupid column in our local paper complaining about
the obituarary writer's starting every paragraph with Mister or Mrs., and
suggesting they be more creative.
        Judging by the general grammar rules that are followed (more are
        ignoredthan even I could do delibrately), most of these people have no
        right to
complain.

21 responses total.



#1 of 21 by shade on Fri Feb 9 06:50:35 1996:

(why not post it in poetry?)


#2 of 21 by octavius on Fri Feb 9 17:54:59 1996:

        I do not feel like joning a new conference.


#3 of 21 by rcurl on Fri Feb 9 21:06:17 1996:

The usual thing to do is have it linked to another appropriate cf.


#4 of 21 by shade on Fri Feb 9 23:52:35 1996:

(gee gosh golly, I cold link it to poetry...being the fairwitness and all
but i'm lazy you know)


#5 of 21 by shade on Fri Feb 9 23:55:59 1996:

(tis done)


#6 of 21 by rlawson on Sat Feb 10 00:03:27 1996:

She how moody she is... one minute she's lazy, the next she can be something
totally different. <robert kisses jenna sweetly> :)


#7 of 21 by arianna on Sat Feb 10 00:58:20 1996:

Right on, this is neat.  (=


#8 of 21 by shade on Sat Feb 10 19:40:33 1996:

(actually I just trial and errored until I figured out how to link
items)


#9 of 21 by octavius on Sun Feb 11 02:22:28 1996:

        Well, she can feel free to pick on my laziness since she's probably
still upset about the spelling thing, but I do not consider myself a
great poet (look at the rhythym and meter, they are not at all consistent)
and prefer to stick to prose, unfortunately, there is nothing to post here
for me right now.


#10 of 21 by shade on Sun Feb 11 05:11:11 1996:

(I didn't care about the spelling thing, except that you said nohing
else about the piece)


#11 of 21 by octavius on Sun Feb 11 17:02:59 1996:

        Was it the vampire thing?  I do not care much for Vampires, and become
sickened when I hear people raving about Anne Rice..., I'd much rather read
the good works by other authors in the section her books are misapropriately
placed in.  (Such as Clarke.)


#12 of 21 by octavius on Sun Feb 11 17:05:08 1996:

        Kindly disregard the last entry.


#13 of 21 by shade on Sun Feb 11 20:47:54 1996:

Why? I don't like Anne Rice either. Wordy. Much better movie. no
long descriptive passages. I don't remember if it was vampyres
or soemthing else, sci fi, realistic fiction, jsut plain
strange. Don't recall.


#14 of 21 by cornflk on Mon Feb 12 01:02:04 1996:

The only Anne Rice book I liked was "The Mummy or Rames the Damned" it sort
of departs from her usual style.  I don't know... I read it a few years ago.


#15 of 21 by octavius on Tue Feb 13 22:50:54 1996:

        I'll take Science Fiction any day, personally.


#16 of 21 by shade on Wed Feb 14 00:58:15 1996:

OOps...I didn't mean to respond, but so will I, for that matter


#17 of 21 by cornflk on Sat Feb 17 18:21:19 1996:

Amen to that, but (and prehaps I should be a bit more discriminating in my
reading tastes) I generally read anything with print that I can understand,
but I do much perfer Sci Fi.


#18 of 21 by octavius on Sun Feb 18 22:58:37 1996:

        Perhaps I should enter some more of my stuff here.  I have been bereft
        of ideas for short stories lately, though.


#19 of 21 by octavius on Sun Feb 18 23:00:33 1996:

        I keep forgetting this item  is in the poetry conference also.  So much
        for the image of the mighty Roman Emperor I stole my login name from.


#20 of 21 by shade on Mon Feb 19 00:36:30 1996:

 ;} it's okay


#21 of 21 by octavius on Mon Feb 19 14:38:45 1996:

        Just a sid e not I should not have ended that one sentence with "also",
and I should have completed the thought in the second...

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss