No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Test Item 7: A zero-line item
Entered by mdw on Fri Sep 28 10:34:27 UTC 1984:

44 responses total.



#1 of 44 by mdw on Fri Sep 28 10:34:38 1984:

and some responses to force nsep


#2 of 44 by mdw on Mon Oct 29 14:16:04 1984:

And a 3red unfortunatley NOT NEW RESPONSE.


#3 of 44 by mdw on Mon Oct 29 14:16:18 1984:

and a NEW response.!


#4 of 44 by tnt on Fri Jul 19 05:20:30 1991:

Hurray!


#5 of 44 by lee on Sun Apr 20 22:53:35 1997:

and another new response!


#6 of 44 by remmers on Mon Apr 21 15:42:24 1997:

A response gap of almost 6 years between #4 and #5! Is this a
record? It's almost as large a gap as it's possible to have on
Grex at this time.


#7 of 44 by lee on Mon Apr 21 23:11:19 1997:

Aww, man, if I'd seen the date, I'd have waited until it was exactly
six years to respond!  Oh well.  Close enough.

What is the largest possible gap to have on grex?  And I thought
the 1984 dates looked odd... didn't someone once say it was a time
warp or something?


#8 of 44 by remmers on Tue Apr 22 03:53:29 1997:

Well hmm, when did Grex first go on line for staff testing and
configuration? It was a few weeks before it opened to the
public. Sometime in June 1991 I think.


#9 of 44 by valerie on Tue Apr 22 13:32:39 1997:

This response has been erased.



#10 of 44 by valerie on Tue Apr 22 13:34:07 1997:

This response has been erased.



#11 of 44 by valerie on Tue Apr 22 13:35:26 1997:

This response has been erased.



#12 of 44 by remmers on Tue Apr 22 16:40:36 1997:

No discussions here are regularly scheduled. They are all
irregular.


#13 of 44 by orinoco on Tue Apr 22 22:30:18 1997:

I thought the '84 dates were a glitch...
,what's wrong with stray commas?
,why shouldn't they work?


#14 of 44 by valerie on Wed Apr 23 04:10:37 1997:

This response has been erased.



#15 of 44 by remmers on Wed Apr 23 11:15:17 1997:

Aha.


#16 of 44 by lee on Wed Apr 23 22:46:12 1997:

Backtalk is your friend :)
I'm actually on today from regular telnet (gasp, I got on)
What was this item about again?
Who wants to explain the 1984 dates?  I think I read something on them before
but I've forgotten since...


#17 of 44 by remmers on Thu Apr 24 12:42:51 1997:

If you do an 'only 0' to look at the item text, you will see
that this item is about nothing at all. The honesty is
refreshing. Most items that are about nothing at all pretend to
be about something.


#18 of 44 by lee on Thu Apr 24 23:41:35 1997:

Okay, well let's pretend this item is about something then.  Any ideas
about what we should pretend this item is about?


#19 of 44 by valerie on Fri Apr 25 13:40:37 1997:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 44 by remmers on Fri Apr 25 14:07:51 1997:

Only your allergenist knows for sure.


#21 of 44 by orinoco on Sat Apr 26 16:32:45 1997:

I think it has something to do with computers reseting to '84 when their
internal clock goes screwy, lee.  md explained it once, but I don't remember
the exact way it works.


#22 of 44 by lee on Sat Apr 26 22:47:45 1997:

Resetting to 1984 seems strange... I could see if something reset
to 1900 or 2000 or even 1950... but 1984 is such a specific year...
UNLESS someone did it on purpose (isn't there a book called 1984?

<lee, who really needs to go read more literature stuffs after
doing too many economics problem sets>

With respect to the allergy, what is it about yellow boums that you
are allergic to... are you allergic to boums of other colours or
the color yellow (as opposed to the color purple) in general?

Disclaimer: I don't know what a boum is.


#23 of 44 by orinoco on Sun Apr 27 02:26:03 1997:

The noise an allergenic flower makes when it explodes.


#24 of 44 by lee on Mon Apr 28 01:13:51 1997:

noises have colours?


#25 of 44 by remmers on Tue Apr 29 11:43:31 1997:

^[[35mYou bet.^[[0m


#26 of 44 by orinoco on Tue Apr 29 23:01:47 1997:

depends on what you're smoking.


#27 of 44 by lee on Wed Apr 30 02:43:59 1997:

candy cigarettes?


#28 of 44 by orinoco on Thu May 1 20:38:27 1997:

Probably not.


#29 of 44 by mdw on Fri Jul 11 04:04:46 1997:

There was nothing screwey about the clock when the responses in 1984
were entered.  They were, in fact, created in September of 1984.
Besides, the "magic" date in Unix is December 31, 1969 (19:00).


#30 of 44 by orinoco on Fri Jul 11 16:04:43 1997:

Hmm...didn't know that.
So what accounts for the gap between the computer being started up in 84 and
grex opening to the public in, what, 91?


#31 of 44 by remmers on Sat Jul 12 11:15:04 1997:

The computer used in 1984 is from another galaxy, long ago and
far away.


#32 of 44 by lee on Sat Jul 12 21:24:28 1997:

"Magic date" for unix?
<now has Summer of '69 stuck in her head>


#33 of 44 by remmers on Sat Jul 12 23:58:26 1997:

Ah the summer of '69: Woodstock! Magic indeed.

No, 1984 is not magic as far as Unix is concerned. I assume that
these 1984 items were entered on M-Net back then, and simply
copied over here.


#34 of 44 by jared on Sun Jul 13 10:38:08 1997:

My guess would be more that they were before that, but I may be wrong.


#35 of 44 by remmers on Sun Jul 13 13:12:49 1997:

That would violate the principle of Occam's Razor.


#36 of 44 by mdw on Mon Jul 14 23:35:40 1997:

The item & responses were not entered on m-net.


#37 of 44 by jared on Tue Jul 15 05:22:26 1997:

That's what I was thinking.


#38 of 44 by orinoco on Tue Jul 15 16:01:04 1997:

So when and where were they entered.  Enlighten us.


#39 of 44 by orinoco on Tue Jul 15 16:02:03 1997:

So when and where were they entered?, rather.


Last 5 Responses and Response Form.
No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss