Grex Test Conference

View Responses

Grex Test Item 3: test item.
Entered by mdw on Fri Sep 28 08:50:41 UTC 1984:

this is a test item.

55 responses total.

#1 of 55 by mdw on Fri Sep 28 08:50:57 1984:

This is a test response.
more of test response.
Still more of test response.
End of test response.

#2 of 55 by mdw on Mon Oct 29 14:07:15 1984:

this is a test response.

#3 of 55 by mdw on Mon Oct 29 14:15:52 1984:

this is another NEW response!

#4 of 55 by chelsea on Mon Jun 3 12:51:50 1991:

Ok, so who's the smarty who grabbed Marcus' login id.
These short responses...  It's simply can't be the Marcus
of which I'm so fond.

#5 of 55 by bad on Tue Jun 4 04:20:31 1991:

^G^G

#6 of 55 by igor on Thu Jul 18 23:27:30 1991:

oh crap! i forgot my scantron!

#7 of 55 by lnf on Sun Jul 12 00:20:18 1992:

at least you didn' forget your scrotem

#8 of 55 by npeart on Tue Aug 30 19:36:05 1994:

this is a test response

#9 of 55 by npeart on Tue Aug 30 19:37:06 1994:

This is another test response

#10 of 55 by npeart on Tue Aug 30 19:41:36 1994:

HERE is the REAL test response...

#11 of 55 by remmers on Tue Aug 30 22:41:51 1994:

By contrast, this is a WELL TESTED response.

#12 of 55 by mwarner on Tue Aug 30 23:27:48 1994:

Testi flies,  Testostyrene (synthetic hormones),  Test D'Ubervilles,
L.A.test (what Los Angeles claims to be), Testcycles (Bikes with ball
bearings instead of gears), Test Seaquench (an orderly beverage),  
Infant Test Mall,  Con Test, Grow Testq, GRATE TEST    (.)

^T
.....checking spelling

Find replacement for:  Testi

^D ^D ^C
^X  (oops)
y indeed?

#13 of 55 by mwarner on Tue Aug 30 23:35:14 1994:

Hey! That's not *my* pseudonym.  How's that worked?

#14 of 55 by popcorn on Wed Aug 31 12:48:55 1994:

This response has been erased.

#15 of 55 by mwarner on Wed Aug 31 19:19:19 1994:

I must have "setname" in place of pseudoing way back when.  It comes back
to me now.  What a surprise it is to see a different name on your own id.
It's like seeing a different face in the mirror.  At least it wasn't "Bob,
from Twin Peaks".  Definite end of test.

#16 of 55 by remmers on Thu Sep 1 02:50:49 1994:

blah blah blah etc. etc...
^HYou have less mail.

#17 of 55 by popcorn on Sun Sep 4 14:33:17 1994:

This response has been erased.

#18 of 55 by remmers on Tue Sep 6 09:50:09 1994:

Yeah, something to beware of if you go from, say, "enigma" to a newly
restarted "agora".

#19 of 55 by scg on Sat Sep 28 03:53:16 1996:

This response has been erased.

#20 of 55 by sumantps on Sat Mar 8 05:13:47 1997:

hi all
bye

#21 of 55 by remmers on Sat Mar 8 12:18:13 1997:

Leaving so soon?

#22 of 55 by valerie on Sat Mar 8 13:23:50 1997:

This response has been erased.

#23 of 55 by lee on Sun Mar 9 02:03:46 1997:

This is a test response.

#24 of 55 by remmers on Sun Mar 9 03:31:17 1997:

Can you prove that?

#25 of 55 by lee on Sun Mar 9 23:38:57 1997:

Given: A response has been entered in the test conference.
Prove: It is a test response.

Proof by contradiction.
Suppose it was not a test response.
Then the response should have said something remotely meaningful, in reference
to something that somebody had said in a previous response.
However this response stands alone and does not refer to anything that anybody
has said so far in this item.
Therefore it contradicts the notiong that it was not a test response.

.`. It (#23) is a test response.

#26 of 55 by remmers on Mon Mar 10 12:00:13 1997:

Nice try, but the properties you mentioned in your proof are
also possessed by twit responses. So you have not ruled out the
possibility that the response was a twit response. Try again.

#27 of 55 by orinoco on Mon Mar 10 17:08:15 1997:

Of course it was a twit response.  All we have here are twit responses.  This
is a twit conference.
Not that there's anything *worng* with that.

#28 of 55 by lee on Mon Mar 10 20:50:20 1997:

I thought this was a *test* conference.
Could you please define twit responses so I can rule them out?
Define test response while you're at it too.

#29 of 55 by remmers on Tue Mar 11 10:49:13 1997:

If I were to define my terms it could scotch this whole
discussion. You get the liveliest discussions when people are
arguing about terms that nobody has bothered to define.

#30 of 55 by orinoco on Wed Mar 12 21:21:50 1997:

Ideally, you aren't all arguing about the same terms.
It really heats things up if a couple people are speaking a different language
as well.

#31 of 55 by lee on Sun Mar 16 04:15:19 1997:

Je ne comprends pas du tout cette conference...

#32 of 55 by remmers on Sun Mar 16 13:20:59 1997:

Lapin!

#33 of 55 by lee on Mon Mar 17 01:52:28 1997:

Ou?

#34 of 55 by valerie on Mon Mar 17 18:02:54 1997:

This response has been erased.

#35 of 55 by orinoco on Wed Mar 19 00:20:03 1997:

Eesay?  Isthay akesmay itway osay uchmay oremay interestingway.

#36 of 55 by lee on Sat Mar 22 03:18:15 1997:

Pourquoi est-ce que le lapin est sur le pont d'Avignon?
Comment est-ce qu'il a arrive la-bas?

#37 of 55 by valerie on Sat Mar 22 22:27:45 1997:

This response has been erased.

#38 of 55 by lee on Mon Mar 24 00:51:01 1997:

<lee just looks confused>

#39 of 55 by valerie on Mon Mar 24 16:22:16 1997:

This response has been erased.