|
|
Not long ago, I though that racism was close to its demise,
that our soceity was finally unbiased as a majority. I even began
to think that Affirmative Action was no longer necessary.
I was utterly wrong.
Try to remember back when that 'mother' in South Carolina lied
about what happened to her children. Remember when she said that
a "black man stole my car. He wouldn't let me take my kids out."
Remember how the police made a sketch with her? Remember how bad we
all felt? Remember how we believed her? And how she actually killed
own kids? If the man was white, whould it have made national T.V?
And how about right after the Oklahoma City bombing? Who where
the very suspects people said they saw standing in front of the
A.P. Murray building? This is who ---> two 'Middle Eastern' men!
I am not black, and I'm not Middle Eastern, but what I am is
really damn sorry this is still happening in the 'greatest country
in the world.'
I just don't know what to make of it without the opinion of
other people.
5 responses total.
Then there was the guy in New York who shot his wife and then shot himself in the abdomen, claiming he was shot by a black attacker. His motive was to murder his wife, give himself a recoverable would and live happily ever after. Maybe there was insurance$$ too.
Actually, my initial reaction to Susan Smith was, "Nice crocodile tears." My initial reaction to the suggestion that the Oklahoma bombing was so-called Arab terrorists, and the frequent commentary that this was something only "they" would do was (sarcastically), "Actually, I think it was the IRA." In any event, it is hard to imagine that either of those events impacted anyone's employment prospects, save for those of the responsible (white) offenders. While an argument can be made for retaining "affirmative action," I don't think this is it.
The problem is that much of the time in legitimate cases, blacks ARE the ones doing the car-jacking, & "Middle-Eastern" types ARE the ones doing the terrorism in the U.S. As for the guy in *Boston* that shot his wife, injured himself & then called the police & said some dude (who happened to be black) tried to mug/car-jack them, what would you have done? In those circumstances, do you disregard the injured man's story & assume that he killed his wife & shot himself, & thus not pay any attention to any story he gives indicating that someone else committed the crime? Keep in mind that in ALL the cases that you mentioned, the police used their resources & despite the false evidence given (in the OKC case, it wasn't really evidence, just a potential clue/lead), captured the (white offenders). By the way, one of the biggest clues in the Susan Smith case is that the black dude didn't kick the kids out of the car (either at the time or shortly later) that he supposedly kicked out Ms. Smith in her story. Black men have a difficult enough time staying with their own kids, let alone two white kids who assumably would have been screaming. Does that annoy you? Probably, but thems the facts! Ever wonder why in the crime blotter sections of newspapers, they'll give pretty descriptive reports of suspects, including height/weight, gender, clothing description, etc. but leave out the race of the suspect?
Quite true! Someday people will be people regardless of sex or race, you know, "Humans" but lets not fool ourselves into thinking that this has been achieved yet. Lets just realize when we are doing it and think about it!
that is really racist!
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss