|
|
We have been silent on this MUCH too long.... Whitewater. Is this a scandal, or is it something that is being used to keep President Clinton from passing healthcare and other vitareforms for this country. Let us discuss Whitewater.
6 responses total.
#0 assumes that the govt. works on one issue, one-at-a-time. Even through all the brouhaha, Congress is still lurching along on Welfare and Health reform.
If Bush and Regan could get away with diverting funds to the Contras, how can we possibly hold Clinton responsible for a little corruption in Arkansas? Clinton is a politician. Politicians are required to be slimy. If you don't want slimy politicians, start by outlawing campaign contributions over $6 per month or $60 per year....
in 0, I was infering that the Republicans (Dole/Gingrich/D'Amato) want the Clinton healthcare plan to be killed, and if they keep regurgitating whitewater, sooner or later it will be killed. I have read and seen all the so-called explanations of the supposed deal that transpired and from what I see, it is Much Ado about Nothing (apologies to the Bard). But no, in this age of questioning the questioners I suspect that this media feeding frenzy will continue until Mr. Clinton resigns.
The *Clinton* healthcare plan *is*, for all intents and purposes, dead. However there are enough variations of that theme floating around that something similar *will* pass. To me, Whitewater boils down to one thing: The perception of Bill Clinton as being "above the greed of the '80s" and "the most ethical administration ever". All Whitewater has shown is that he is like every other politician. And there is no way on Earth that he will resign. Somebody would have to prove he pulled the triger that killed Vince Foster for that to happen...
The whole thing is designed to be a distraction from Health care reform and other issues, and to hurt Clinton's chances in '96. I'm sorry to say that it looks like it's working.
The significance of Whitewater (and the 'why and how' of Hillary's big commodities profits) is the window it might give into the motivations, character and reliability of the two most influential people in the U.S. If the incometax disparities are not honest mistakes but instead are intent to cheat, that tells the voters something about the basis on these folks make their decisions. That will help me evaluate whether or not to give them more time at the top.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss