No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Sexuality Item 3: what type do you like
Entered by phenix on Thu Sep 6 16:46:04 UTC 2001:

ok, what features (physical or otherwise) turn you on or catch your eye?
i mean specific one's people..

158 responses total.



#1 of 158 by kewy on Mon Oct 1 04:18:57 2001:

generally dark hair, curly, glasses.  Those are 3 main ones.


#2 of 158 by moller on Tue Jan 1 12:29:37 2002:

a Wild woman do turn on.


#3 of 158 by vidar on Tue Jan 1 13:40:22 2002:

I have a preference for albinos, specifically those with the most 
severe version of it: bone white skin, white hair, and red eyes.

Also, I tend to like women who are shorter than myself.


#4 of 158 by michaela on Wed Jan 2 08:37:56 2002:

Long dark hair, sturdy build, nice smirk


#5 of 158 by jaklumen on Wed Jan 2 08:52:27 2002:

I love women with red hair, but generally, that with varying degrees 
of brunette highlights.  Curls are nice, too.  Of course, that would 
include green or blue-green eyes, and ruddy skin, which is fairly 
common.

Good proportion is usually a must for me, although I don't go for 
twiggy girls.  Top-heavy and bottom-heavy aren't really my thing, i.e. 
Dolly Parton and Jennifer Lopez type physiques.  Fitness and trimness 
are nice, and I think the shift towards slightly muscular women has 
been a good thing, granted, when it's natural-- I don't believe in 
freaky bodybuilding men or women.. too much muscle is just gross.

But the physical aesthetic only goes so far.  It's good for me to be 
able to share intellectual conversation that is engaging and mentally 
stimulating.  While mutual interests are nice, as common ground is 
somewhere to start, I do enjoy talking to others who pursue other 
interests, especially if they are able to explain them in ways that I 
can comprehend and appreciate.

What drew me to Julie was our common interests in humor (Bill Cosby 
for example) and the comic book/gaming world.  I felt safe in that I 
could do 'guy' things with her and that she wouldn't be 
uncomfortable.  But conversely, I also felt safe pursuing 'gal' things 
without feeling demasculinized.  It's hard to explain, but I found we 
were complimentary.



#6 of 158 by orinoco on Fri Jan 4 17:41:21 2002:

(I've never heard "nice smirk" as an important physical quality before. 
Neat.)


#7 of 158 by aluser on Sat Jan 5 02:18:09 2002:

Like Jack said, the willingness to do "guy-things" is important.  Then again,
does anyone actually *not* enjoy some gender-atypical activity?  Might
affection somehow cause us to be more likely to notice how the person doesn't
conform to stereotypical gender roles?
-Alex


#8 of 158 by vidar on Sat Jan 5 21:41:22 2002:

As an infantilist, I also try and see if I can notice if anybody I'm 
interested in also wears diapers.


#9 of 158 by phenix on Sat Jan 5 21:56:12 2002:

yha, fetish play can be hard to find. and that's a shame
hell, just about any non-main stream sexuality is frowned upon adn hard to fnid
in most of the less liberal places.


#10 of 158 by lelande on Sat Jan 5 21:58:48 2002:

like walmart?


#11 of 158 by vidar on Sat Jan 5 23:07:21 2002:

Yeah, but if someone really loves you, they'll accept your fetishes 
whatever they may be.


#12 of 158 by lelande on Sat Jan 5 23:19:41 2002:

yeah, if they don't have any self-esteem. does it make sense to say "i didn't
love him/her because i couldn't bring myself to blow up balloons inserted in
his/her ass." is that how love works? this sounds more from the heart: "baby,
i love you, but this balloon business has got to go."
to be less comical, what if someone has a fetish for infidelity? for watching
watching his or her significant other be fucked by strangers? "baby, if you
REALLY loved me, you'd let the dog lick your pussy when i asked you to." no.


#13 of 158 by vidar on Sun Jan 6 00:19:54 2002:

Okay, so maybe not *whatever* they may be.


#14 of 158 by vidar on Sun Jan 6 00:25:23 2002:

Also, though you didn't mention it, I think that excessive fetish play 
is a good reason to break up.


#15 of 158 by phenix on Sun Jan 6 18:35:46 2002:

or incompatible fetishes. 


#16 of 158 by vidar on Sun Jan 6 23:04:08 2002:

Well, I know at least one place to find people who share that 
particular fetish.


#17 of 158 by michaela on Mon Jan 7 16:03:25 2002:

Orinoco - a nice smirk indicates many things...plus, it's sexy.  :)

Similar fetishes are a Very Good Thing, and understanding your partner's
fetish (and maybe getting a taste for it) can be cool too.


#18 of 158 by lelande on Tue Jan 8 22:57:35 2002:

14
actually, i think i made the mistake of mixing up 'acceptance', as you said,
with 'compliance'. but, what the hell, blurry lines everywhere.


#19 of 158 by vidar on Wed Jan 9 00:53:18 2002:

OK


#20 of 158 by jazz on Wed Jan 9 18:49:28 2002:

        If your partner's into inserting balloons up your ass, then you've got
room for negotiation.  If it's an actual fetish, and the only possible way
that they can get off is to insert balloons up your ass, and it doesn't happen
to tweak your nipples for you, then you've got a problem ... you're completely
and utterly sexually incompatible.



#21 of 158 by brighn on Wed Jan 9 19:22:14 2002:

Few people use "fetish" that strongly anymore. Most people use it to mean
"something kink that I really dig."


#22 of 158 by jazz on Wed Jan 9 19:46:55 2002:

        Very true.  It's still pretty mystifying to me, even if it's not a
complete short-circuiting of the sexual drive, some of the things that people
do.  


#23 of 158 by phenix on Wed Jan 9 19:52:41 2002:

btw, welcome back


#24 of 158 by vidar on Tue Feb 5 14:55:39 2002:

Last night I met a woman who shares my particular fetish.  I think the 
meeting would have gone better had it been less spontaneous and if we 
had not both been horrendously tired.


#25 of 158 by phenix on Tue Feb 5 21:36:43 2002:

so setup another one


#26 of 158 by vidar on Thu Feb 7 13:19:42 2002:

Maybe I will.  At least the meeting I had identified a key problem area 
for me: flirtation skills.


#27 of 158 by phenix on Thu Feb 7 16:38:01 2002:

those are rough
too much and you're in trouble or a goof
to little and they may not detect the interest


#28 of 158 by jazz on Thu Feb 7 18:03:15 2002:

        If you're worried about that, just ask for someone's number.  It's
pretty unambiguous, though people may later decide to play the ignorance
card.


#29 of 158 by morwen on Thu Feb 7 19:11:18 2002:

For me, personality is most of everything.  I've met people with great 
bodies who turned out to be absolute freaks.  Physical turn ons are 
some of the usual, muscles (without being so muscular that you look 
like your head will pop off or that you have problems walking) and good 
grooming.  I like men with dimples.  

For a long term relationship, though, since I can look at beautiful men 
all day long and not get hurt, I needed someone who was sensitive 
without being boring.  Someone interesting and funny without making me 
feel put off or that he was trying too hard.  Jon fits this almost to a 
tee.  As he said, we compliment eachother.


#30 of 158 by vidar on Fri Feb 8 01:07:55 2002:

With the woman I met, so far the only shared interest is diapers.


#31 of 158 by morwen on Fri Feb 8 01:41:17 2002:

Pardon my curiosity.  Diapers?


#32 of 158 by kewy on Fri Feb 8 03:15:54 2002:

You cannot build a relationship on diapers alone!


#33 of 158 by vidar on Fri Feb 8 05:25:59 2002:

Re #31: read some of the previous responses.

Re #32: true.  relationships need to be built on multiple mutual 
interests as well as the differing interests.


#34 of 158 by oval on Fri Feb 8 20:34:08 2002:

#31


#35 of 158 by jazz on Sat Feb 9 19:38:43 2002:

        When you stare deep into a diaper pail, the diaper pail also stares
into you.

        Ugh.


#36 of 158 by kewy on Sat Feb 9 21:34:00 2002:

eh?


#37 of 158 by vidar on Sun Feb 10 01:51:14 2002:

A few responses back there was a question about my interest in diapers, 
which I had already answered earlier in this same item.  Jazz is just 
having some fun.


#38 of 158 by phenix on Sun Feb 10 02:25:13 2002:

neitzie


#39 of 158 by morwen on Sun Feb 10 18:59:50 2002:

Yeah, Jon said as much <blush>  Guess I wasn't paying attention.


Next 40 Responses.
Last 40 Responses and Response Form.
No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss