Grex Sexuality Conference

View Responses

Grex Sexuality Item 29: Man on Man anyone?
Entered by mynxcat on Fri Apr 26 19:54:39 UTC 2002:

This item text has been erased.

51 responses total.

#1 of 51 by mynxcat on Fri Apr 26 19:57:43 2002:

This response has been erased.

#2 of 51 by jazz on Sat Apr 27 00:34:08 2002:

        Hrm.  Well, I can say that I wouldn't want to see two butch women going
at it.  It wouldn't be painful or anything, just uninteresting.

#3 of 51 by i on Sat Apr 27 11:42:32 2002:

Aren't women the market that slash fiction is written for?  Is our
resident Star Trek expert around to comment?

#4 of 51 by phenix on Sat Apr 27 16:59:34 2002:

slash fiction? bodice rippers?

#5 of 51 by jazz on Sun Apr 28 05:27:18 2002:

        I kinda wondered about that comment myself ...

#6 of 51 by i on Sun Apr 28 11:59:41 2002:

From the memory of a definite NON-expert:

slash fiction - sub-sub-genre of Star Trek fan fiction; stories are built
very tightly around a (homosexual) relationship between Kirk and Spock;
the market for slash fiction is almost entirely middle-aged women; the 
term comes from the notation "Kirk/Spock".

I'm unaware of any expert on grex besides chanur.  Last i recall she was
working on a Ph.D. in Star Trek literature.

#7 of 51 by jmsaul on Sun Apr 28 15:06:35 2002:

I don't think it's just Star Trek, though it probably originated there.  I've
heard of people doing Starsky and Hutch slash fiction.

(No, I'm not an expert either.  In fact, I've never read any.  In further
 fact, I think I've been permanently damaged psychologically by even having
 heard the phrase "Starsky and Hutch slash fiction.")

#8 of 51 by morwen on Sun Apr 28 18:01:35 2002:

there used to be a site where there was Highlander slash fiction based 
off the series with Adrian Paul.

#9 of 51 by pthomas on Sun Apr 28 19:28:23 2002:

There's West Wing slash fiction.

#10 of 51 by brighn on Sun Apr 28 20:08:35 2002:

Wesley Crusher slash fiction is also popular.
If I were going to write ST slash fiction, it would probably involve an
alternate script to Charlie X where Charlie manages to get it on with Yeoman
Rand, who manages to get it on with Kirk, who manages to get it on with Uhura,
who manages to get it on with Spock.

#11 of 51 by lelande on Sun Apr 28 23:22:05 2002:

wild.

to coax me into fondling some other guy's genitals, you'd have to be wealthy,
successful and decadent, willing to offer me a place to stay and meals to eat,
and be a very beautiful, drug-addicted woman.

#12 of 51 by mynxcat on Mon Apr 29 01:14:32 2002:

This response has been erased.

#13 of 51 by jaklumen on Tue Apr 30 10:43:19 2002:

where you from originally, mynx?

resp:0  I know someone has commented elsewhere, since I believed I 
asked.

#14 of 51 by mynxcat on Tue Apr 30 16:13:23 2002:

This response has been erased.

#15 of 51 by oval on Tue Apr 30 20:13:33 2002:

hahahahaha! only here could this topic drift into star trek freakiness..

2 cute people of any gender gettin it on is a turn on to me ...

#16 of 51 by mynxcat on Tue Apr 30 20:59:03 2002:

This response has been erased.

#17 of 51 by jazz on Tue Apr 30 21:33:40 2002:

        Yeah.  Let's hear it for hotties.

        No, that doesn't mean that I want to see attractive men getting it on
- send those tapes over to oval and mynxcat - but at least if they're getting
it on with each other, they're not occupying the same niche.

#18 of 51 by mynxcat on Wed May 1 00:01:40 2002:

This response has been erased.

#19 of 51 by oval on Wed May 1 00:53:13 2002:

jazz stop telling people to send it! NOW i know why i'm getting all this sex
spam!

actually, i would prefer seeing this in person. up close. nekkid.

#20 of 51 by mynxcat on Wed May 1 02:08:10 2002:

This response has been erased.

#21 of 51 by michaela on Wed May 1 19:36:29 2002:

I agree.  :)

#22 of 51 by jaklumen on Thu May 2 08:20:42 2002:

pardon me, but I was just waiting for that =)

#23 of 51 by mynxcat on Thu May 2 14:59:53 2002:

This response has been erased.

#24 of 51 by vidar on Sat May 4 15:46:40 2002:

People who obsess about romantic relationships (real or potential) in 
TV series really need to get a life.

#25 of 51 by jaklumen on Sun May 5 09:36:35 2002:

resp:23 no, for resp:21, actually.

#26 of 51 by jmsaul on Sun May 5 16:00:04 2002:

Re #24:  This is going to sound nastier than I mean it, but I'm not sure
         adults who wear diapers should be taking shots at other people's
         sexual fetishes.

#27 of 51 by oval on Sun May 5 21:29:04 2002:

..and how hypocritical given how romaannnnnntic diapers are!

#28 of 51 by vidar on Mon May 6 01:25:11 2002:

resp 26: Actually, it's mostly a gripe I had from being a fan of 
Farscape (and sometimes looking at Sci Fi's Farscape Message Board).  I 
had difficulty continuing to watch the show after the body switching 
episode and another with Jothee and Chianna.  Waaayy too many people 
there were obsessed with a relationship of 2 of the main characters - 
reading their posts made me physically sick.  Besides, I knew someone 
would respond to my post here in a semi-negative way. :-p

#29 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 03:48:46 2002:

Hey, I'm not into slash fiction either, or diapers, for that matter.  (Forced
to make a choice, I'd go for slash, but that's just me.)

#30 of 51 by jazz on Mon May 6 04:08:48 2002:

        It's not as bad if someone takes a picture of you reading poorly
written erotic fan fiction.

        I just don't understand fan fiction.  It doesn't bother me.  It's just
wish fulfilment fantasy set in someone else's fantasy world, and no more
derivative than Arthurian fantasy, if less snooty.  If it was well-written,
I guess I'd read it;  I just haven't found any that is.

#31 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 04:40:54 2002:

I don't think I'd be interested in well-written Starsky and Hutch slash
fiction, even.

#32 of 51 by jaklumen on Mon May 6 05:38:11 2002:

What's wrong with Starsky and Hutch gettin' it on?

#33 of 51 by phenix on Mon May 6 13:23:27 2002:

ugh
that's as bad as vadar and the light saber

#34 of 51 by jmsaul on Mon May 6 13:36:54 2002:

Re #32:  Nothing, as long as they're both consenting.  I'm just not into
         reading about it.

#35 of 51 by mynxcat on Mon May 6 16:25:11 2002:

This response has been erased.

#36 of 51 by vidar on Mon May 6 16:32:37 2002:

resp 27: lol.

#37 of 51 by phenix on Mon May 6 17:19:48 2002:

re 35: bad 70's psudocop drazma

#38 of 51 by mynxcat on Mon May 6 18:07:48 2002:

This response has been erased.

#39 of 51 by lelande on Mon May 6 19:36:10 2002:

not that i possess the collector-mentality, but now one thing i'm dying to
get my hands on is a picture of joe saul reading slash porn in a diaper.