This item text has been erased.

11 responses total.

 Being one of those that never swims with current, I'd say what I thought.

I'd probably say the opposite and admit to it later.  8*)

I'd say the opposite.  But then, I might be saying the opposite right now, so
then I'd never say the opposite, making the above statement paradoxical.  I
loeu paradoxes.  don't you?

Join the Paradox conference, amoco.  We have some wonderful discussions
of paradoxes there.  

I don't say what I don't think, except by one of my frequent mistakes.
But I would probably make suggestions in the form "I had this idea, but
it has these drawbacks ..."

Lying's just not my way.  I might consider jumping ship if these people
were so intractable in their passive-aggressive tendencies.

I'd start looking for a new job cause this company ain't gonna
be around very long.  Sounds more like sit-com fodder than real
life.

I find Gracel's way works great with gov't bureacrats who hate change.
They tend to rise to the challenge of overcoming the "drawbacks."

Yes

The path towards a goal should not be the goal in itself, it is just the means
to wards the goal. If that is the only way i can get things done, i will do
it.

I'd mix my responses up, and manipulate them like the sheep they are.

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss