No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Scifi Item 38: THE X FILES (they are among us) [linked]
Entered by willi on Sun Mar 13 02:08:58 UTC 1994:

 Don't know if anyone has caught The X-Files on the Fox network.
For those listeners who enjoy conspiracies, secret Government
experiments, UFO searches, and FBI agents that dig into all that
juicy stuff, this is the show for you...

119 responses total.



#1 of 119 by willi on Sun Mar 13 02:10:26 1994:

The Litchfield experiments! (3/11) How about those crazy clones...


#2 of 119 by robh on Sun Mar 13 03:08:26 1994:

This item is now linked as Scifi item 38.


#3 of 119 by dam on Sun Mar 13 05:06:09 1994:

gee, when is the lake michigan UFO going to make the show?


#4 of 119 by other on Sun Mar 13 05:42:04 1994:

I just got the April _Omni_. 
        "Special: 50 years of close encounters"
        "The UFO Conspiracy"
        "Russian secret saucer research"
        "An abductee speaks"
        "Inside the military/UFO underground: breaking the silent barrier"

        I'm beginning to wonder why I got this subscription...there's 
actually some intelligent reporting, but it's buried underneath all this
sensationalist garbage!



#5 of 119 by kami on Sun Mar 13 06:14:32 1994:

they USED to have a fair amount of good fiction.


#6 of 119 by other on Sun Mar 13 07:33:49 1994:

There *is* that, but it wasn't what I was looking for when I got it...
Actually it was the "Science and the Mind" issue which attracted me (Oct. 1993)


#7 of 119 by kami on Mon Mar 14 05:32:38 1994:

sort of getting Playboy for the interviews- it CAN be done, but no one 
believes you...


#8 of 119 by other on Mon Mar 14 05:36:46 1994:

If I had been better informed before buying (my eternal downfall), I should
have chosen an alternate product...


#9 of 119 by kami on Mon Mar 14 05:42:18 1994:

analog?


#10 of 119 by danr on Mon Mar 14 12:13:48 1994:

re #8: Write Omni and thell them you want to cancel your subscription.
I've don this a couple of times and both times I've received a refund
for the unused portion of my subscription.


#11 of 119 by willi on Mon Mar 14 22:59:57 1994:

 In case anyone had missed it, Pop. Science had an interesting
article in the March issue about "Area-51", the secret airforce
base in Nevada that is presumed to house/test the Aurora hypersonic
spy plane that replaced the SR-71. It is also conjectured that
the alien spacecraft supposedly seized by the Gov't in the 50's
was reverse engineered and tested at this complex. Note that the
Airbase doesn't show up on any Gov't or aviation maps, 'ala the
Soviets. The only boo-boo is that Uncle Sam forgot to grab the 
high ground outside the air base that many keen observers have
been watching events from a clear vantage point for years, a
situation they are now trying to rectify.



#12 of 119 by ziggy on Mon Mar 14 23:54:10 1994:

sounds interesting.


#13 of 119 by other on Tue Mar 15 00:46:08 1994:

Speaking of Omni, they report in the current issue that "On September 30 of 
last year, [the U.S. Air Force] initiated procedures to seize another 3,900
acres adjoining Groom Lake, [the aforementioned 'Area 51']  effectively
sealing off two public viewing sites of a base it refuses to admit exists."
        I wonder from whom they are seizing this land, and under what legal
        grounds...imminent domain?


#14 of 119 by davel on Tue Mar 15 03:20:30 1994:

Well, before the last presidential elections, one of the supermarket tabloids
revealed that Ross Perot had had a conference with some aliens ("space aliens"
that is).  They had a clear photo on the front page.

IMO, if the US seized & reverse-engineered alien spacecraft we'd have
learned *something*, & there's no evidence that we did.


#15 of 119 by steve on Tue Mar 15 03:23:01 1994:

   Yup.  Of course, had we ever gotten ahold of an actual spacecraft
from another civilization, it would have been leaked.  If we can't
keep leaks from getting out of the government, and spies from crawling
in, I hardly think that such a story would go unpublished.


#16 of 119 by gregc on Tue Mar 15 05:01:03 1994:

Oh, but Steve, those stories are published *all* the time! :-).


#17 of 119 by steve on Tue Mar 15 05:11:23 1994:

   Yeah--right between the National Inquirer and nail files.


#18 of 119 by kaplan on Tue Mar 15 05:19:33 1994:

I enjoy the X-files a lot more than similar stories that claim to be true. 
Government conspiracies, ghosts, and other (probably) impossible things in
a fictitious world are fun to think about, but when a real guy says that
the space aliens really abducted him my skepticism gets in the way of
enjoying the story. 

Before yesterday, I never wanted to risk getting hooked on IRC.  But now
that I've read that X-Filers (or whatever the fans have decided to call
themselves) get on IRC after the episode airs, I may have to find a way to
check it out.


#19 of 119 by other on Tue Mar 15 17:40:31 1994:

It seems entirely likely that *if* such contacts as mentioned have occurred,
and *if* reverse engineering has occurred, any leaks which would have resulted
would be very easily discredited simply by nature of the popular fascination
with the idea and it's rejection by the establishment.  It puts anyone claiming
anything in the light of ridicule automatically.
        Therefore, it is faulty logic to assume that 1) there have been no
occurrences because there would have to have been leaks or, 2) there have bee
no leaks because we would have heard them.   The fact is, we wouldn't be able
to distinguish a legitimate claim from a bogus one dreamed up by an individual
with a large store of technical knowledge.  We just don't seem to have access
to physical materials which can support any claims.  The military *certainly*
would not allow public access to any technology which they feel might give
them any advantage on the world stage if they could keep it secret, especially
if it is so advanced as to be unrecognizeable by 'enemy' inteligence.


#20 of 119 by shf on Tue Mar 15 19:32:56 1994:

It has been asserted that "stealth" technology is reverse engineered
alien technology:)


#21 of 119 by other on Tue Mar 15 20:28:44 1994:

        It is equally assertable that "stealth" technology is the logical
result of research into radar invisibility.  Or rather, research which is not
complete, as apparently "Stealth" fighters and bombers are not nearly at the
point of undetectability, or even beyond the point of identifiability...


#22 of 119 by bap on Tue Mar 15 20:53:35 1994:

And where do you think GE got the knowledge to manufacture microchips instead
of vacuum tubes?  From those captured alien aircraft.  

I love the X-Files.  


#23 of 119 by davel on Tue Mar 15 21:08:42 1994:

(Hey, Buddy, have I got a bridge for you.  Cheap!)


#24 of 119 by shf on Wed Mar 16 05:35:58 1994:

ayup


#25 of 119 by tnt on Wed Mar 16 05:39:21 1994:

 Sohunds like _FOOL DISCLOSURE_ should advertise during the X-Files show...


#26 of 119 by tsty on Thu Mar 17 03:58:20 1994:

You thinking of going public now, tnt?


#27 of 119 by polygon on Fri Mar 18 01:04:27 1994:

Um, the Weekly World News (supermarket tabloid) showed the Alien shaking
hands with and endorsing Clinton during the campaign.  Later, there was
a front page picture of Hilary Clinton, adopting the Alien's baby.  It
wasn't Ross Perot, at least, not in the Weekly World News, which stands
at the absolute bottom of the whole genre.


#28 of 119 by robh on Fri Mar 18 02:51:25 1994:

Sorry, polygon, but I did see a WWN with an alien shaking hands
with Perot.  What, you expect logical consistency from the
Weekly World News?


#29 of 119 by davel on Fri Mar 18 05:11:10 1994:

(The alien *I* saw, I think on WWN, was walking behind Perot with a hand
on his shoulder.)


#30 of 119 by tnt on Fri Mar 18 09:00:09 1994:

 Hitlary adopted the alien's baby because Bill Clinton is the biological
father!


#31 of 119 by geg on Sat Mar 19 20:53:24 1994:

Oh no, a sibling for Chelsea!   
I've been enjoying the X files, mainly because most of them leave things to be
considered.  generally the shows don't have enough 'proof' for the avowed
skeptic agent to accepOD    be considered.  The skeptic agent never has enough
proof to convince her and hence the audience.


#32 of 119 by robh on Sat Mar 19 21:50:35 1994:

Here's a little something I found on the Usenet.


From swalton@whale.st.usm.edu Sat Mar 19 16:48:22 EST 1994
Subject: XPHILES SURVEY: 1 MO'TIME

X-PHILES SURVEY -- RE:POST -- ONLY FOR THOSE WHO MISSED THE OTHER POSTINGS

***Do not post answers to the NET or reply to me
****Email all responses to x-files@info.rutgers.edu

All  fans of  the  X Files please answer  the survey  questions below.
Some of the questions may seem  redundant, but serve a  purpose.  Once
it's  compiled,  this  information will  be  posted  to the  group and
results will be  forwarded to the people at FOX, who are aware that we
are doing the survey and have had input on the questionnaire.  Please
do not edit out or combine any lines of the questionaire.  Thanks!!

Please make copies and  collect (and email) answers from  X-philes who
are not NET users.   Names  are  optional, but please send in only ONE
response  per  person. DEADLINE MARCH 22   


Name:

Netter (Y/N):

Indicate your age category, choosing from
1 = 12-17
2 = 18-24
3 = 25-34
4 = 35-49
5 = 50+

Age:

Sex (M/F):

Indicate your highest educational level, choosing from
1 = high school student/completed high school; 
2 = college undergraduate; 
3 =completed bachelor's degree; 
4 = graduate student;
5 = completed graduate/terminal degree

Education:

City:

State/Province:

Country:

For U.S. residents, please approximate your region; 
1 = Northeast; 
2 = Southeast (below Virginia); 
3 = Central (Mississippi River to the Rockies); 
4 = Northwest;
5 = Southwest (below Oregon)

Region:


Please judge how much television you watch and rank what type of viewer
you are (1 = light viewer; 2 = medium; 3 = heavy viewer)

Viewer:


Please list your three other favorite TV shows:

1:

2:

3:

THANKS!!!




#33 of 119 by vidar on Mon Mar 21 20:43:16 1994:

...


#34 of 119 by facelift on Sun Apr 3 13:08:01 1994:

Real insightful, Vidar...


#35 of 119 by wccolley on Mon Aug 22 20:04:57 1994:

Query, is Deepthroat really dead?


#36 of 119 by terrysl on Mon Jan 9 02:42:27 1995:

I don't know if you have already discussed this or not but if not do you think
Scully deliver an alien baby? 


#37 of 119 by tyche on Mon Jan 30 15:59:56 1995:

Here's an eerie thought. What if there was a Twin Peaks/X-Files crossover? 
just a thought *grin*.


#38 of 119 by val on Mon Jan 30 17:06:15 1995:

i would love that!! :)



#39 of 119 by aruba on Tue Jan 31 06:02:02 1995:

Yes!  That would be great!


Next 40 Responses.
Last 40 Responses and Response Form.
No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss