|
|
I have a number of wall warts, all of which are inadequate to a
task that I have for them. One of them that I can spare is rated at
13 VDC and 650 mA output.
With only a digital VOM plugged into the connector, the voltage
reads 19.3 to 19.4 volts. When switched to current measurement and
10 amp scale, a bit over 4 amps is indicated on the display. Yet
when I actually attempt to power something with this adaptor, with
the VOM in series to measure the current, only its rated amount (or
even less) gets through.
On opening the case, I found a transformer and what appears to
be a simple bridge rectifier with a 25 volt 2200 uF capacitor across
the DC output (presumably to smooth out the ripples). There doesn't
seem to be any provision for limiting current or voltage.
What would cause the limitation to available power in this
circuit? If I replaced this circuit with my own diodes, selected
for adequate current and voltage ratings, could I get better
performance? (I only need it for running a few tests. If they pan
out well, I can spring for a proper AC adaptor.)
(Please link where appropriate.)
27 responses total.
The resistances of the diodes and transformer limit the current. When you measured it shorted, of course the output voltage was essentially zero. The current you get when you power something with it depends on that something too (what was it?). You probably stressed those diodes a bit when you measured the shorted current, but maybe they survived... Higher current diodes would have lower resistance but mainly they would dissipate the heat better. How much current do do you need?
A couple of amps at around 15 volts.
You have a few options, depending on how 'clean' you need the power to be, and how critical that voltage is, and how handy you are. You can buy a ready-made supply at Radio Shack. Supplies made to power things like CB radios and such generally put out 13-14 volts. You can build your own supply. I believe the LM317 three-terminal regulator will supply 2 amps if heatsinked. Radio Shack carries this chip, heat sinks, bridge rectifiers, transformers, diodes, and resistors; this is really all you need to make a supply at any voltage from 1.5 to 25 volts. I think the data sheet for the LM317 has a sample circuit. You could also use a 7812 and lift the ground pin a few volts above ground, to "fool" it into putting out 15 volts instead of 12. An LED or two would probably provide a voltage drop very close to what you'd need. I did something similar to this with a 7805 to make a 7.5 volt supply. You can recycle a computer power supply. 12 volts at a few amps is available from the disk drive connector. This might be close enough to what you need.
Since your WW is rated 13 V @ 0.65 A, it will fall below 13 V @ 2 A (more or less - those ratings are pretty approximate). Put a 1 amp load on it, and measure the voltage across the transformer secondary and the output voltage. That will indicate where the main voltage loss is (from transformer impedance or rectifier resistance). The *maximum* DC you can get out of the bridge rectifier is, of course, 1.4x the input voltage. You might also measure the open transformer secondary voltage (no load) to check this. If the main voltage loss is across the diode, you have the possibility of replacing the bridge with diodes with a larger current rating. The transformer will get hotter at 2 A, of course, but leave off the case (since this seems to be a temporary application).
r u crazed? 13volts and 650milliamps rated and you want to get 'a couple amps at 15 volts'? Now long? Like a couple minutes until it melts down into a slag setting your whole house on fire? R U nuts?
U must be a 'renter'.
I doubt it would set his house on fire, but I dont' think there's any way he's going to get the current he wants from the wall wart. I think he'd be better off buying a real supply from some surplus house. I doubt it would cost more then ten bucks.
Not so fast. He wants 2 A at 15 V. The unit gives 19.3 V at 0 A, so where are the 6.3 volts going at the nominal 13 V at 0.65 A? If they are mostly lost across the bridge, then there is some hope. If they are mostly lost in the secondary winding, there is no hope. He *can* draw 2 A (since he can draw 4): maybe he should just let it draw 2 A and only replace whatever smokes first... 8^}.
I think I see the problem, after converting said wall wart to an AC output device by removing the board, and trying other AC only devices. (I have a single-component bridge rectifier rated at 25 volts and 4 amps.) DC resistance across the primaries generally measure on the order of 50 to 100 ohms, allowing 1 to 2 amps, or 100 to 250 watts - plenty of capacity. Resistance across secondaries are around 2.5 ohms, causing a significant voltage drop. Looks like a similar device rated at 20 VAC is indicated. The one transformer I found in the scrap heap had a 125V output and a 6.5 volt output, according to the label. I thought I had another, but must have tossed it out last spring. I'll see what else I can dig up...
A cheap power supply usually has: transformer | rectifier | big capacitor | resister | current regulator | electronic logic This style of power supply is not very efficient - the voltage drop & current through the resister is essentially constant, and the regulator has to be capable of absorbing under "no load" the maximum power the unit would produce at "full load". The current regulator should be "close" to the logic. If it's not close, and the wires are too thin, there will be a voltage drop between the regulator and the device, which means any change in current draw will change the voltage. More expensive power supplies avoid the big resistor loss with smarter logic. An extreme in this is the "switcher" power supply, which replaces the big transformer with a much smaller transformer running at a much higher frequency. Most computers today use switching supplies. A really cheap wall "wart" consists of just the transformer. This style of device can often be recognized by the "hot spot" in the logic where the onboard power supply dissipates its excess heat. A more expensive style of power supply will produce rough DC at a higher voltage (say, +15), then step it down to +12 for the actual onboard use. The power supply will run hotter, and the logic cooler. An even more expensive style of power supply has a "sense" line running back from the logic. This allows the power supply to automatically compensate for any loss between it & the logic, but requires a more expensive supply and a more expensive connector and wire as well. S-100 machines used to use +15V/+12V 2 step regulation. IBM think-pads used the external sense line approach.
The plate on the wart said 12v @ 650ma. Draw less current and the voltage goes up. Draw more current and the voltage goes down. Rectifiers are not resistors. They drop .07 v unless they short or open. i.e. the losses you are seeing are transformer losses. Not only in the secondary but also in the primary. The only way your going to get 15 volts @ 2 amps out of that wart is if you boost the input voltage. Expect it to get quite warm, or should I say hot? If you want a 12 volt, 2 amp supply buy of build one.
I meant to say that it sounded like the "wall wart" might be using the resistance of the transformer as part of the regulator - ie, replacing it with a larger transformer might just blow the regulator in the device. Uh, what is this thing powering anyways?
Diodes do have resistance. Measure the curve sometime. There is a
small voltage drop at low current, but the voltage drop increases
as the current increases - not linearly, but very noticeably. Here
are some values I measured for rated 3 A 100 V diode (ER301):
Current (ma) Voltage drop
9 0.26
13 0.30
460 0.69
580 0.79
1000 1.04
A lot of WWs have no regulator - which seems to be the current
case.
Alright. Rane is correct. Diodes are one way resistors. As a matter of fact, all electrical devices have resistance, including wires and superconductors. How about the magnetic portion of the transformer? The iron in the transformer is responsible for most, but not all, or the coupling between the primary and secondary windings. Can it handle the increased magnetic field required for higher power transfer without going into saturation? The Radio Amateurs Handbook has a section with a table to help you determine the power handling capability of an iron core transformer by looking at the cross sectional area of the iron passing through the center.
Another mistake: Diodes have resistance in both directions. One way is just less than the other.
Since iron costs money, and the goal of wall warts is to be as cheap as possible, I'd be surprised if they could put out much more than rated current without going into core saturation.
More to the point is whether the wall-wart could put out 30 watts. I suspect not. The core of the transformer can only transmit a certain amount of energy per cycle (this is why high-frequency transformers can be so much smaller than low-frequency transformers). A transformer core which is near its limits at 650 mA is not going to be able to handle 2 A under similar conditions. You are going to need a bigger transformer, or several wall-warts in parallel. An alternative to parallel wall-warts is to borrow a power supply from a defunct PC chassis. It shouldn't be terribly hard to adjust the 12 V output up to 15 V. The big issue might be getting the proper load on all the outputs so it will run. This is a more elegant solution than multiple wall-warts, but it isn't as easy. Speaking of the term "wall-wart", I just coined a term for a transformer in the middle of a power cable: cord gall.
Winter Agora 56 <-> Science 69.
While technically you should put a load on the outputs of a computer power supply, in reality most will run just fine with only one output loaded, or no load at all -- the fan on most supplies runs off the 12V output, and you'll notice the fan usually spins up then you turn on a supply with mothing connected to it. Getting it to output voltages other than the +12, +5, -5, and -12V it's intended to output would probably be tricky, though.
How exactly would the output voltage be "adjusted"? Is there a setscrew or variable resistor that can be turned?
Another term for a power adapter in a power cable might be a "cordoma", after "neuroma", which is a growth along a nerve (typically in the nerves going to the toes).
Re: #17, 21 No, no, no. Those bulges in cords are referred to as mice or rats (depending on the size). In some circumstances they are referred to as aneurysms.
No, no, no. A rat is a computer input device that you roll around on the floor with your feet instead of your hand.
I've seen wall warts with switching power supplies in them capable of 30 watts. Not too common though. I've also seen humungo linear wall warts capable of that kind of power. A little more common.
Re #24: Old discussion, but I've noticed a glut of high-output wall warts and cord warts in surplus catalogs lately. Many of these were meant to be laptop power supplues and are switching supplies. Some are amazingly omnivorous...I have one that's rated at 100-240V, 47-63 Hz input. That should work pretty much anywhere in the world.
interesting input .. what is the rated (and/or) measured output? all 'sources' have a 'source resistance' which, when equaled with a 'load resistance' equals the maximum power (watts) output/transfer. due to typical and resonable inefficiencies, power in is greater than power out - i.e., power sucked is greater than power avaialable. way too often (!!) maximum power-transfer is beyond the capacity of the wall-wart. be aware, be very aware.
19V, 2.6A. The nameplate also notes max total output power is 50 watts. (19 * 2.6 = 49.4, so that makes sense.) It's a cord wart, about the size of a brick.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss