|
|
I received a C. Crane catalogue today. They have the Sangean ATS-505P, which covers 1.7 to 30 MHz and includes SSB. No mention is made of CW though. Is that just a question of adding an external tight, tuneable audio filter?
10 responses total.
I did a bit of searching, and found the manual on Grove's website. http://www.grove-ent.com/ATS-505_e.pdf According to the manual, the "Clarify" control can be used to a 1.5kHz resolution. While not great, I would say that's not too bad for most uses. What about feeding the audio to a computer, and using some sort of DSP to narrow it further, if needed? (I'd be surprised if someone hasn't written something to do this type of thing.)
Make sure you use an attenuator cable for the headphone feed to the aux in on your computer and you should be fine.
Modern headphones require only milliwatts of power, so if it's a headphone jack (as opposed to a speaker jack), it may already have an attenuator built in. I've often run headphone outputs of things like iPods and portable CD players into the line inputs of amps and sound cards, and I've never had a problem. If the signal is too strong, the distortion will let you know.
Re #1: I read something today that suggested the Sony ICF- SW7600GR was better than the ATS-505, that it includes CW and it doesn't seem to cost much more. Thanks for the link to the manual though, I'll have a look at that. Re #2 & #3: It's a shame that more devices don't include a line-level output.
re 4 Most people have no use for a line-level interface, the hobbiest is the oddity in that regard. But as was pointed out, the headphone/earphone jack output is typically sufficient, and works well. Since a line-level input is a high impedence, and the headphone output is low impedence, it works just fine as a "voltage transfer" vice a usual signal transfer.
Re #5: I'm an oddity in many regards. I wish that all (or at least most) audio devices had line in and out as appropriate. I wish that most things with a microprocessor had an optional RS422 or RS232 serial port and a documented command set. In unix I can connect together individual commands and use them in ways that the original authors might never have imagined. I appreciate the ability to do the same thing with hardware, and miss that when it's not there. I can understand manufacturers skimping on hardware to save money, but sometimes the ports are there and it's just down to unimaginitive firm- ware writers.
Or sometimes the ports and the firmware are there, but it's down to companies trying to protect their proprietary peripheral market.
That too, which is an equally crappy reason.
I run into this a lot in my current job. There are several manufacturers of surveillance camera equipment. While NTSC video is, of course, standard, everyone has their own proprietary protocol for controlling things like pan/tilt/zoom mechanisms, effectively locking you into their product line.
I like my ats-505.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss