|
|
This was written after reading Erinn's "Time Honored Tradition", item:61. Thanks for the inspiration! The Creator 6/3/99 As I hold this half-formed wooden figure, I feel that much closer to my maker. I know what it must have felt like Just before the breath of life was Granted Man; I feel a shadow of God's joy As I, too, little god of little wooden Men, shape little worlds. My people speak to me, Silently they call on me to free Their crudely moulded bodies from the Grain of cedar, oak, mahogany. Simple folk, stiff and silent always, I feel so much love for these, my children. Fashioned in the likeness of their maker, Crudely, clumsily, they love me too.
6 responses total.
This is a wonderful idea - especially the last line. The image of the artist as God is pretty common, but the idea of the artists creations loving him as he loves God is a twist I haven't seen before, and I like it. The only complaint I have is that some of the line breaks are in awkward places. Splitting "wooden men" across a line break is especially clunky. Is there some sort of meter scheme here that I'm not seeing that forces you to break the line there? Other than that, as I said before, I like this a lot.
WOW! *I* imspired this? I'm floored. Absolutely knocked asunder. Thank you for the honor!
(10 bonus points for using "asunder" in a spontaneous exclamation)
re resp:1 - The meter was simply me trying to avoid iambic, since the first few lines, which were the ones that suddenly came to me, and of which the rest of the poem is just an elaboration, were not iambic. Rather than attempt to change them, I tried to stick with the opposite of iambic (whose name I can't recall off the top of my head; dactylic perhaps? hmm...), which resulted in odd line breaks sometimes. But more natural line breaks would have made me slip into iambic. When that happens, it's hard for me to get back out. :)
Ahh.... I get it. Hmm... Well, I'd still consider moving the line breaks around now that you've got it written not-in-iambic-meter, but that's just me.
I don't know. I mean, lots of the "classic" poetry I read has line
breaks in places that appear funny to me if I've been reading free verse
recently, but it manages to make sense anyway. I think that when
reading poetry, the ability to, when necessary, *ignore* line breaks is
important. A lot of the singsongy effect that inexperienced poets get
(not that I claim to be experienced or anything) when they try to write
metered poetry, especially with lines of fixed length and/or rhyme, is
due to a tendency to try to make line breaks coincide with rhythmic
pauses. Conversely, I picked a random Shakespeare sonnet just now and
found this couplet:
Thou art thy mother's glass, and she in thee
Calls back the lovely April of her prime.
When I read that, I pause at the comma, run straight through the line
break as if it weren't there, and put a very slight pause between "back"
and "the" in the second line.
Now, I grant that in the Shakespeare example the line break doesn't
separate a phrase like I did with "wooden / Men", but then I never
claimed to be on the order of Shakespeare yet. :)
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss