|
|
I store for you somewhere a knot in me Its filled with all I know that's shining light. Its hard to avoid but harder to see For there is naught in me for you to fight. Indeed within my soul for you to catch There Lies a gift of love you've not untied. When the world may decide to be a wrtech and hits you hardest in structures untried, I reveal this knot to you but know, dear, I pray you not to steal away this love Because I hold inme a touch of fear That in your soul a lie may dwell to shove Away this gift which I have shown to free For it perceives in me an enemy.
15 responses total.
I dunno...this sounds a little forced to me, and the rhythm's off in a whole bunch of lines. The tying/untying/knots images for love are cool, though.
it is my first attempt at a sonnet :P hopefully i will get better as i go :)
really? I thought I'd seen sonnets of yrs posted in this conf. a while ago. I guess I'm just confused. My suggestion would be to try to change the word order to it's more natural, i.e. "I store a knot for you somewhere in me" rather than "I store for you somewhere a knot in me". I know it's tempting for me when writing sonnets to try and mimic Shakespeare's reversed word order, but in fact even Shakespeare keeps his sentences in normal word order whenever he can.
hmmm i guess i didn't try all permutations... i don't remember writing thatat all wehn i was doodling ;P
well, just getting it out is good..
Good work for a first. I'm given (mostly by experience) to know that it is mostly by practice that poetry becomes better. It is by sharing that it becomes good.
personally I like it, but I think orinoco's resp:1 is right, a bit forced (linked to new poetry conf)
What I like best about it is the way the poet varies the scansion of the pentameter lines. Some of the variation might be the by-product of a new sonnet-maker striving simply to write lines with ten syllables in them, but (I'm giving away a secret here) that's how it's done much of the time. The result in this case is quite musical. As to its being "forced," that's the #1 criticism people direct at a poem written in a traditional verse form. But this sonnet isn't any more "forced" than most of the free verse I read here. In my mind, the free verse I read here is the verbal equivalent of graphics; this sonnet is a painting. Each has its place, but you can't criticise one with the same tools you'd use to criticize the other. *Very* nice start.
<nods> I'll admit I tend to be more critical of traditional-form poetry. In particular, once my brain realizes a poem is in pentameter, it tries to force the whole thing into baDA-baDA-baDA-baDA-baDA....so the variations in the rhythm tend to annoy me, rather than making the poem more interesting to me.
Much of the music of formal verse come from the little tensions between the baDA-baDA-baDA-baDA-baDA in your head, and such lines as: Shall I compare thee to a summer's day? A little learning is a dangerous thing Oh, there is blessing in this gentle breeze Pale pink convolvulus in tendrils creep He will not go behind his father's saying Who cares if some one-eyed son of a bitch Not to mention Lear's famous Never, never, never, never, never.
trust conversation of traditional styles to bring the old-school poetry cf'ers outta the woodwork.. (; the whole "knot" thing reminds me of a poem from ye ol' poetry conference (poetry1, #443).... I've never tried to write a sonnet; I think I'd like to try now.
I hope you do try, Arianna. If you want any encouragement or suggestions along the way, the mailbox I read is mdelizia@aol.com.
why t;ank you, you may be hearing from me soon. (;
The line "and hits you hardest in structures untried" seems awkward to me. Staring at it, the substitution "and hits you hardest, scrapes the wounds you hide" occurred to me. Also, some punctuation before "but know, dear" might help make that sentence clearer, as well as providing a rhythmic pause to accentuate the change in tone.
Oh, and it's quite good overall. This is a keeper. :)
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss