|
|
i thought it would never come dusting the land in a white blanket it is beautiful but i overlook it thinking i would fain be glad that it would cover my guilt and shame wishing that i could forget other melancholy memories of thought, pondered while wandering through those blinding fields i wish i wasn't here so often with a heavy weight in my chest with pen in hand, its nub broken blunt when words wouldn't come save i slid that dull blade to the wrist to let it flow by blood to the page i would that my scarlet sins were as white as snow so white as snow
19 responses total.
Very expressive, my husband.
That middle stanza ("I wish I wasn't here so often") is reeeeal nice. The
ending is a little cliched, but still, yes, very expressive.
(What does "I would fain be glad" mean?)
'fain' is a rather archaic word, I suppose. I used it a bit redundantly since it means 'I would very much like to, except.." damnit, I'll have to look it up to be sure.
I'm wondering if it isn't spelled "feign", which means "to pretend" ??
I've seen that spelling before, it's just that I was never sure what it meant.
From http://www.dictionary.com (reformatted somewhat):
fain (fayn) [orig. f, a-with-horiz-line-over-it, n]
adv.
1.Happily; gladly:
"I would fain improve every opportunity
to wonder and worship, as a sunflower
welcomes the light"
(Henry David Thoreau).
2.Archaic. Preferably; rather.
adj. Archaic
1.Ready; willing.
2.Pleased; happy.
3.Obliged or required.
[Middle English from Old English faegen, joyful, glad.]
Which is about what I expected.
Sounds about right to me.
All the same, best to stick to words still in common usage in the century you're writing in. Avoids confusion and accusations of elitist affectation.
Mm. People keep saying stuff like that, and every time I hear it, something in me rebels just a bit. Archaic language can be extremely effective, and so long as you know how to use it. I've never been comfortable with the idea of simplifying one's writing so that it can be more easily understood. With the exception of technical writing, where the idea is to get the point across, writing is as much about the beauty of language, ambiguity, subtlety, etc. as it is about content. If *nobody* understands your writing, you may want to think about why, but if a few people don't understand the words you use because they're not in common usage... And as for accusations of elitist affectation... "You can't be a REAL poet until you give up your elitist affectations." Does anyone else see the irony here? :)
Okay, so maybe avoiding the phrase "elitist affectation" would be another good way to avoid accusations of elitist affectation. :) Archaic words are useful effects, but they're even more annoying than the lowercase i thing when you use them just for the sake of using them, IMO.
Archaisms should be used as a tool of effective wordsmithery; when an archaism is chosen because it matches the meter, or the rhyme, or some similar reason, it's laziness, not emotional impact, that motivates the choice. And where did I make any statments about what "REAL poets" do? I made a suggestion about avoiding archaisms. I'd thank the collected not to put words into my mouth.
Sorry, I wasn't attempting to put words in your mouth; I was putting words in the mouths of those who would accuse others of elitist affectation. Which I didn't intend to include you. Sorry if I was unclear.
'sok. I was in a mood anyway.
I chose "fain" because it felt right. That good enough for you?
no, actually, but I'll stop pickin' on ya ;}
Guys. guys. Lets not argue, Okay?
Look at who you're asking not to argue, and say that again with a straight face. :)
Yeah. yeah. I just don't like to listen to... or read an argument. We can use one of the other conferences for that can't we?
Ahem #15> I'll stop pickin' That's called "dropping it." Don't encourage me to say what's on my mind at this moment. Rather, leave it dropped.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss