No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help
View Responses


Grex Mnet Item 70: With mnet down, where are we gonna put this stuff?
Entered by md on Fri Jun 7 23:49:46 UTC 2002:

Aguilera's Breasts Back under the Spotlight 
World Entertainment News Network 

Singer CHRISTINA AGUILERA's breasts have come under the spotlight 
again - with further speculation about whether Mother Nature has been 
given a helping hand. 

The GENIE IN A BOTTLE singer has been at the centre of whispers before 
about whether or not she's had her chest surgically enhanced, and the 
latest uprising of the subject came in America's US WEEKLY on Wednesday
(05JUN02), when a reader wrote in to ask about their authenticity. 

Although the magazine was unable to get a response from Aguilera's 
representatives, New York-based plastic surgeon DR DAVID ABRAMSON, who 
compared old and new photographs of the star, says, "Either she has 
gotten implants or grew about 300 cc's." 

39 responses total.



#1 of 39 by md on Sat Jun 8 00:06:20 2002:

(For the metrically impaired, I've calculated that 300 cc's is about 10 
fluid ounces, or a cup-and-a-quarter.  If Dr. Abramson meant 300 cc's 
per tit, that would be noticable.  Imagine pouring a cup-and-a-quarter 
of saline into the average hooter.  On the other hand, only 150 cc's 
per boob seems barely noticeable.)


#2 of 39 by cyklone on Sat Jun 8 03:30:37 2002:

You sound like an expert on the subject!


#3 of 39 by styles on Sat Jun 8 15:56:52 2002:

my tits need to be in the spotlight.


#4 of 39 by cyklone on Sat Jun 8 21:07:13 2002:

First you have to pass md's audition . . . .


#5 of 39 by lelande on Sun Jun 9 05:10:56 2002:

i know it's on when i meet a girl with a stomach volume equivalent to the
volume of one of her boobs.

boom boom.



oh.
wait.


#6 of 39 by dsa on Sun Jun 9 23:20:47 2002:

Umm... Is asd around?


#7 of 39 by oval on Mon Jun 10 07:23:44 2002:

can grex start an "md's breast implant fund" so he can fondle himself and get
it out of his system already?

make that "md's perky impant fund"



#8 of 39 by md on Mon Jun 10 11:44:45 2002:

Ick.  But thanks for the thought.  

Apropos, Leelee Sobieski turns twenty today.


#9 of 39 by tonster on Mon Jun 10 13:59:04 2002:

Wow.  I saw her playing Joan of Arc last night.


#10 of 39 by hash on Mon Jun 10 19:33:12 2002:

are you sure that wasn't milli jovovitch?

oval is an asshole.  why isn't he on m-net?


#11 of 39 by jp2 on Mon Jun 10 19:46:37 2002:

This response has been erased.



#12 of 39 by twinkie on Mon Jun 10 20:12:49 2002:

re: 10 
We're all stocked up on "Bad Boy" Grexers over on M-Net. 

Between md, polytard, jp2, naftee, and chamberl, we're pretty well covered.



#13 of 39 by jp2 on Mon Jun 10 20:20:53 2002:

This response has been erased.



#14 of 39 by tonster on Mon Jun 10 20:57:04 2002:

#10: According to IMDB, it was indeed Leelee Sobieski
Leelee Sobieski ....  Joan D'Arc  



#15 of 39 by twinkie on Mon Jun 10 21:26:48 2002:

re: 13
What are you going to do about it? Bore me until I fall asleep, and you
declare yourself winner?



#16 of 39 by jmsaul on Mon Jun 10 21:28:12 2002:

Re #10:  Milla Jovovich was Joan of Arc in a different movie.


#17 of 39 by jp2 on Mon Jun 10 21:40:11 2002:

This response has been erased.



#18 of 39 by polytarp on Mon Jun 10 22:02:36 2002:

RE 12:  When talking about more than two things, isn't it correct to use
'among' rather than 'between'?  Is this a special case?


#19 of 39 by tod on Mon Jun 10 22:49:59 2002:

This response has been erased.



#20 of 39 by oval on Mon Jun 10 23:08:28 2002:

sometimes i wander over to m-net but i'm a goiyle. and i don't talk much cuz
i'm afraid someone will make me cry.



#21 of 39 by tod on Mon Jun 10 23:15:44 2002:

This response has been erased.



#22 of 39 by oval on Tue Jun 11 00:00:02 2002:

hewrow.



#23 of 39 by cyklone on Tue Jun 11 01:17:51 2002:

All you need to know about M-net is that just because someone tells you to
Eat a Bag of Shitdicks (TM), it doesn't mean you have to . . . .


#24 of 39 by caspre on Tue Jun 11 01:22:42 2002:

stop exposing our weaknesses


#25 of 39 by jmsaul on Tue Jun 11 01:25:40 2002:

Damn it!  He's wrecked the Shitdick Deterrent Initiative!


#26 of 39 by jp2 on Tue Jun 11 01:47:27 2002:

This response has been erased.



#27 of 39 by twinkie on Tue Jun 11 02:24:58 2002:

*ahem*

Eat a bag of shitdicks.



#28 of 39 by iggy on Tue Jun 11 13:45:34 2002:

wouldnt the shitdicks somehow have to be detached from the
men to fit into a bag?


#29 of 39 by twinkie on Tue Jun 11 14:07:52 2002:

You know too much already...



#30 of 39 by void on Tue Jun 11 15:32:01 2002:

Dang.  I thought tonster was talking about Maria Falconetti.


#31 of 39 by tod on Tue Jun 11 17:30:25 2002:

This response has been erased.



#32 of 39 by cyklone on Fri Jun 28 12:51:30 2002:

Is M-net hosed again? After dialing in and getting long waits for a prompt
(a WWNET problem?) I got to log in but got stalled shortly after entering my
login and pw. Once I got passed that and received the following:

    M-Net Menu 3.1
                               Copyright 1994
                                 Dave Parks
/usr/local/lib/menus/menu.107: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
/usr/local/lib/menus/menu.107: Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
%exit
logout

Connection closed.

NO CARRIER                             


#33 of 39 by jp2 on Fri Jun 28 13:01:43 2002:

This response has been erased.



#34 of 39 by jor on Fri Jun 28 13:20:11 2002:


        now getting 'no more processes:

Now leaving June General... 
Error, pipe not open
Tried to close unopened file
M-Net: /home/member/jor
M-Net: /home/member/jor
M-Net: /home/member/jor
M-Net: /home/member/jor
M-Net: /home/member/jor bbs
No more processes.
M-Net: /home/member/jor top

        top showed me at the top and everyone
        else had zero cpu



#35 of 39 by iggy on Fri Jun 28 13:20:34 2002:

yeah, i got something about it being temporarily unavailable when i tried to
log in this morning.


#36 of 39 by jep on Fri Jun 28 13:51:58 2002:

M-Net seems to be working again right now.


#37 of 39 by void on Fri Jun 28 19:45:23 2002:

   I am currentrly unable to telnet to m-net from home, but I could
telnet there from work earlier today.


#38 of 39 by mdw on Sat Jun 29 07:07:04 2002:

Another fork bomb?


#39 of 39 by iggy on Fri Aug 9 19:17:29 2002:

boom?

Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.

No Next Item No Next Conference Can't Favor Can't Forget Item List Conference Home Entrance    Help

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss