|
|
adynata/ impossibilia/ oxymorons are sentences having inherent contradictions
or factual impossibilities. the following ones have been plagiarised from
Umberto Eco's /Foucault's Pendulum/. have a look:
Urban Planning for the Gypsies
History of Antarctic Agriculture
Contemporary Sumerian Literature
Assyrio-Babylonian Philately
Technology of the Wheel in Pre-Cambrian Civilisations
Phonetics of the Silent Film
Crowd Psychology in the Sahara
can of think of more on similar lines?
however, beware, as eco says, of the fact that adynata and oxymorons are not
exactly the same. adynata is a factual impossibility, whereas oxymorons have
contradiction in terms. for example, 'Urban Planning for the Gypsies' is
adynata whereas the corresponding oxymoron would be 'Nomadic Urban Planning'.
add more if you like, and try to classify them as adynata or oxymoron.
5 responses total.
some standard ones:
Future History <-- oxymoron
Back to the Future <-- oxymoron
some modern ones ;-)
101 Ways to an Honest Relationship /by/ Bill Clinton <-- adynata
What's wrong with "Future History"? It is no more an oxymoron than future presidents. There *will* be history at every time in the future.
syntactically it's still an oxymoron, although the intended meaning might be different.
"History of the Future" might better qualify, except that depends upon the meaning of "Future". The future is much discussed in the present, so a history of that discussion would come under the expression.
i agree.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss