|
|
Can anyone provide the etymology to show the difference between "forensics" as in "debating" and "forensic" (medicine) as in "pathology" ?
5 responses total.
This isn't etymolgy as such: my dictionary assumes that there's no difference. I'll quote: > 1. Pertaining to or employed in legal proceedings or argumentation: > _forensic medicine_. 2. Of, pertaining to, or employed in debate or > argument; rhetorical. The etymology it gives is Latin _forensis_, from _forum_, & refers you to the Appendix on *dhwer-*, which I'll forego following up. Is there a problem with this? Debate, in court or out, is the common element, I think.
Curious that my understanding of "forensic medicine" - pathology, i.e. determining cause of death - would have adopted this "debate" component for its terminology. Maybe they thought it was an inexact science, open for debate by attorneys? "How can you be sure that arrow thru the heart really killed him?" :-)
I suspect that the reason "forensic" got applied to pathology is that it was seriously pursued as an aid to legal procedings - determination of cause of death being needed for determination of whether a crime has been committed, etc.
Yes, I don't believe forensic medicine is a direct reference to pathology at all. Rather it is a reference to medicine used in court. Admittedly, this is very often pathology.
The Russian for forensic medicine is literally 'court medicine'. There is another phrase that translates 'forensic chemistry'.
Response not possible - You must register and login before posting.
|
|
- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss